ImageImageImageImage

Who do you want us to take at #1?

Moderators: Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird

Who would you take at #1?

Jabari smith
111
51%
Chet Holmgren
63
29%
Paolo Banchero
27
13%
Jaden Ivey
1
0%
Keegan Murray
1
0%
Shaedon Sharpe
8
4%
Other
5
2%
 
Total votes: 216

User avatar
PrimeThyme
RealGM
Posts: 10,621
And1: 14,562
Joined: May 25, 2016
Location: Doak Campbell
 

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1321 » by PrimeThyme » Wed Jun 15, 2022 2:42 am

Magic4champ wrote:Great summary and scouting report of all the prospects
Spoiler:
Read on Twitter
?s=20&t=J5-Rq6MD9nCsSwP4v1i3aQ

Awesome doc.

Chet and Ivey are the two who really stick out to me. I think Ivey is going to be awesome. Especially when you look at that FTR. I see his game translating pretty effortlessly. The shooting may take a year or two.
Image
Magic4champ
Junior
Posts: 497
And1: 237
Joined: Jul 14, 2014
 

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1322 » by Magic4champ » Wed Jun 15, 2022 3:34 am

PrimeThyme wrote:
Magic4champ wrote:Great summary and scouting report of all the prospects
Spoiler:
Read on Twitter
?s=20&t=J5-Rq6MD9nCsSwP4v1i3aQ

Awesome doc.

Chet and Ivey are the two who really stick out to me. I think Ivey is going to be awesome. Especially when you look at that FTR. I see his game translating pretty effortlessly. The shooting may take a year or two.

Ivey and Banchero are awesome offensive weapons, surefire to translate 3 level scorers. Chet is not the same stat stuffer offensively but he'll be a longer version of Franz playing off the ball. Chet impacts the game by his on court smarts and defensive IQ and reads. These 3 guys Banchero, Ivey and Chet are the can't miss prospects.
User avatar
ibraheim718
RealGM
Posts: 41,798
And1: 15,303
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1323 » by ibraheim718 » Wed Jun 15, 2022 5:44 am

Comparing Bol Bol to Chet is hilarious. Hilariously bad. Bol Bol has absolutely no clue on the defensive end.. like none at all. He gets completely lost on that side of the ball whereas Chet is a savant.
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,533
And1: 14,987
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1324 » by basketballRob » Wed Jun 15, 2022 6:13 am

ibraheim718 wrote:Comparing Bol Bol to Chet is hilarious. Hilariously bad. Bol Bol has absolutely no clue on the defensive end.. like none at all. He gets completely lost on that side of the ball whereas Chet is a savant.
Let's see how Chet plays against guys as big as him.
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,380
And1: 19,480
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1325 » by pepe1991 » Wed Jun 15, 2022 6:37 am

If you can't see difference between Chet and Bamba you probably shouldn't watch basketball any more.

Bamba is player who has no basketball awarness. He just has long hands that allowed him at college to recover from mistakes. In nba it's not enough.

Bamba also had one of the worst assist to turnover rates in college history, among players projected to be drafted in first rounds.
His college assist career high was- two.

To this date he is black hole on offense and once he gets ball it's either turnover or jumpshot.


Chet is definition of "anti Bamba". Player who processes game better than majority of guards. Who projects plays and inserts himself in right positions, who can pass the ball ( and that's skill that will translate much better in nba than it was at college ) and who will be very strong help defender execlly because he understands and reads game so well.

Fact that he stands at 195 pounds and people still can't bully him tells you everything about his elite positioning.


"but he got scored 30 points by Victor Wembanyama " ...whoo.
For start, Victor is best prospect since Zion and Doncic, 7'3 phenom who will dominate nba for years.
Second, Victor didn't even play all that well. Shot 6-14 FG, 1-5 for 3, but had 9-9 FTs , however, he fouled out of a game.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,533
And1: 14,987
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1326 » by basketballRob » Wed Jun 15, 2022 6:40 am

pepe1991 wrote:If you can't see difference between Chet and Bamba you probably shouldn't watch basketball any more.
They were the same as far as blocking shots and steals in college. Based on that they could be the same in the NBA in BPG and SPG. I just push back when people think Chet's going to come in and be Rudy Gobert on defense and Durant on offense.

I'm surprised you like Chet. You complained for years that Bamba's body would break if he played significant NBA minutes and Chet is thinner than him.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
OrlandoNed
Head Coach
Posts: 6,740
And1: 4,878
Joined: Jul 31, 2013
 

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1327 » by OrlandoNed » Wed Jun 15, 2022 6:51 am

basketballRob wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:If you can't see difference between Chet and Bamba you probably shouldn't watch basketball any more.
They were the same as far as blocking shots and steals in college. Based on that they could be the same in the NBA in BPG and SPG. I just push back when people think Chet's going to come in and be Rudy Gobert on defense and Durant on offense.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app

I agree. He can dribble and shoot better than the average center but that does not mean the comparison carries over to everybody else in the league. Those skills aren't that impressive when compared to the average PG, SG, SF and PF.
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,380
And1: 19,480
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1328 » by pepe1991 » Wed Jun 15, 2022 7:01 am

I can't even.

In sport where you get assist despite player making 5 dribbles after reciving pass and making jumper, Mo Bamba had 0 assists in 16 out of 30 college games.

And you compare them because steals and blocks?

Anthony Davis had 1,4 steals, 4,7 blocks, Walker Kessler has 1,1 steals, 4,6 blocks so i guess Walker is new Davis right?

My God, i'm out, my brain can just take so much
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
User avatar
Blue_and_Whte
RealGM
Posts: 24,679
And1: 9,568
Joined: Jun 26, 2009
Location: Orlando, FL.
     

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1329 » by Blue_and_Whte » Wed Jun 15, 2022 7:20 am

pepe1991 wrote:I can't even.

In sport where you get assist despite player making 5 dribbles after reciving pass and making jumper, Mo Bamba had 0 assists in 16 out of 30 college games.

And you compare them because steals and blocks?

Anthony Davis had 1,4 steals, 4,7 blocks, Walker Kessler has 1,1 steals, 4,6 blocks so i guess Walker is new Davis right?

My God, i'm out, my brain can just take so much

Yeah it’s pretty bad.
Faith, Family, & Orlando Magic
#2A
#Adopt
#MAGA
User avatar
SOUL
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,261
And1: 41,025
Joined: Dec 11, 2006
Location: Orl★ndo
     

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1330 » by SOUL » Wed Jun 15, 2022 8:36 am

pepe1991 wrote:I can't even.

In sport where you get assist despite player making 5 dribbles after reciving pass and making jumper, Mo Bamba had 0 assists in 16 out of 30 college games.

And you compare them because steals and blocks?

Anthony Davis had 1,4 steals, 4,7 blocks, Walker Kessler has 1,1 steals, 4,6 blocks so i guess Walker is new Davis right?

My God, i'm out, my brain can just take so much


To be fair, Rob can be just as right saying that as you saying Jabari won't be a star and will just be a good role player. In the end, we don't know. Not necessarily saying that Chet will be Bamba is a good take, just that saying he could be more ineffective than people think while Jabari is the right pick could be right. It's possible. So is Chet being way better because of all the advanced metrics in college and Jabari being mediocre because of his inside game and dribble.

Personally, I think you both write a lot with some hyperbole and assumptions. It's part of your charm but also annoying to argue with :lol:
www.rareslums.com // please support my writing!
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,380
And1: 19,480
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1331 » by pepe1991 » Wed Jun 15, 2022 9:20 am

SOUL wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:I can't even.

In sport where you get assist despite player making 5 dribbles after reciving pass and making jumper, Mo Bamba had 0 assists in 16 out of 30 college games.

And you compare them because steals and blocks?

Anthony Davis had 1,4 steals, 4,7 blocks, Walker Kessler has 1,1 steals, 4,6 blocks so i guess Walker is new Davis right?

My God, i'm out, my brain can just take so much


To be fair, Rob can be just as right saying that as you saying Jabari won't be a star and will just be a good role player. In the end, we don't know. Not necessarily saying that Chet will be Bamba is a good take, just that saying he could be more ineffective than people think while Jabari is the right pick could be right. It's possible. So is Chet being way better because of all the advanced metrics in college and Jabari being mediocre because of his inside game and dribble.

Personally, I think you both write a lot with some hyperbole and assumptions. It's part of your charm but also annoying to argue with :lol:


I never said Jabari can't be star. I said he can't be best offensive player on elite team. That's pretty evident and not hard to "predict" because when you look skillset of best players and compare it to Jabari's skillset, they are different. Ballhandling, passing and ability to attack rim are not complimentary basketball skills, they are pivotal for best nba players.

Chet's comparison to Bamba is just laughable. Chet has floor vision. Bamba is blind.
Chet has BBIQ that allows him to play at elite level despite being toothpick. Bamba is dummy.
Chet understands basketball positioning. Bamba is out of position most of the time.
Chet can actually create space around rim. Bamba can't post up 6'2 guards in nba.
Chet can run transition and deliver ball in right spot. Bamba has zero desire to run in general.

Chet is contender to go first overall because of it. Bamba was drafted 6th ( and overdrafted based on nothing but measurments ).

I don't mind different opinions as long as they follow any logic, even if that logic is illogical.
But slapping BPG & SPG to figure Chet is Bamba vol 2 is as apsurd as that Kesller- Anthony Davis comparison ( and it's hilarious how similar their BPG & SPGs are). For sake of similar opinion, Doug Mcdermott 3rd college year was probably more impressive in terms of PPG, RPG than M.Jordan's :lol: :lol:

As for Jabari Smith, and i repeated this multiple times, imo he is good prospect but guy i would prefer to pair with post dominant center.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
User avatar
j_n
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,834
And1: 1,693
Joined: Mar 19, 2010
 

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1332 » by j_n » Wed Jun 15, 2022 10:48 am

Magic4champ wrote:
PrimeThyme wrote:
Magic4champ wrote:Great summary and scouting report of all the prospects
Spoiler:
Read on Twitter
?s=20&t=J5-Rq6MD9nCsSwP4v1i3aQ

Awesome doc.

Chet and Ivey are the two who really stick out to me. I think Ivey is going to be awesome. Especially when you look at that FTR. I see his game translating pretty effortlessly. The shooting may take a year or two.

Ivey and Banchero are awesome offensive weapons, surefire to translate 3 level scorers. Chet is not the same stat stuffer offensively but he'll be a longer version of Franz playing off the ball. Chet impacts the game by his on court smarts and defensive IQ and reads. These 3 guys Banchero, Ivey and Chet are the can't miss prospects.

Can't miss?
Chet may never be able to add weight without losing his mobility and is more likely to suffer injuries.

Banchero is a below average outside shooter and defender, and Ivey has questionable decision making and outside shot, each of them could become one of the the worst #1 in history.
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,533
And1: 14,987
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1333 » by basketballRob » Wed Jun 15, 2022 11:23 am

pepe1991 wrote:
SOUL wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:I can't even.

In sport where you get assist despite player making 5 dribbles after reciving pass and making jumper, Mo Bamba had 0 assists in 16 out of 30 college games.

And you compare them because steals and blocks?

Anthony Davis had 1,4 steals, 4,7 blocks, Walker Kessler has 1,1 steals, 4,6 blocks so i guess Walker is new Davis right?

My God, i'm out, my brain can just take so much


To be fair, Rob can be just as right saying that as you saying Jabari won't be a star and will just be a good role player. In the end, we don't know. Not necessarily saying that Chet will be Bamba is a good take, just that saying he could be more ineffective than people think while Jabari is the right pick could be right. It's possible. So is Chet being way better because of all the advanced metrics in college and Jabari being mediocre because of his inside game and dribble.

Personally, I think you both write a lot with some hyperbole and assumptions. It's part of your charm but also annoying to argue with


I never said Jabari can't be star. I said he can't be best offensive player on elite team. That's pretty evident and not hard to "predict" because when you look skillset of best players and compare it to Jabari's skillset, they are different. Ballhandling, passing and ability to attack rim are not complimentary basketball skills, they are pivotal for best nba players.

Chet's comparison to Bamba is just laughable. Chet has floor vision. Bamba is blind.
Chet has BBIQ that allows him to play at elite level despite being toothpick. Bamba is dummy.
Chet understands basketball positioning. Bamba is out of position most of the time.
Chet can actually create space around rim. Bamba can't post up 6'2 guards in nba.
Chet can run transition and deliver ball in right spot. Bamba has zero desire to run in general.

Chet is contender to go first overall because of it. Bamba was drafted 6th ( and overdrafted based on nothing but measurments ).

I don't mind different opinions as long as they follow any logic, even if that logic is illogical.
But slapping BPG & SPG to figure Chet is Bamba vol 2 is as apsurd as that Kesller- Anthony Davis comparison ( and it's hilarious how similar their BPG & SPGs are). For sake of similar opinion, Doug Mcdermott 3rd college year was probably more impressive in terms of PPG, RPG than M.Jordan's

As for Jabari Smith, and i repeated this multiple times, imo he is good prospect but guy i would prefer to pair with post dominant center.
You say Chet has floor vision but last week I listened to one of the Gonzaga people on Lock on Magic and he said Chet wasn't a good passer. The stats back up that assessment.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
tiderulz
RealGM
Posts: 36,944
And1: 14,872
Joined: Jun 16, 2010
Location: Atlanta
 

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1334 » by tiderulz » Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:39 pm

j_n wrote:
Magic4champ wrote:
PrimeThyme wrote:Awesome doc.

Chet and Ivey are the two who really stick out to me. I think Ivey is going to be awesome. Especially when you look at that FTR. I see his game translating pretty effortlessly. The shooting may take a year or two.

Ivey and Banchero are awesome offensive weapons, surefire to translate 3 level scorers. Chet is not the same stat stuffer offensively but he'll be a longer version of Franz playing off the ball. Chet impacts the game by his on court smarts and defensive IQ and reads. These 3 guys Banchero, Ivey and Chet are the can't miss prospects.

Can't miss?
Chet may never be able to add weight without losing his mobility and is more likely to suffer injuries.

Banchero is a below average outside shooter and defender, and Ivey has questionable decision making and outside shot, each of them could become one of the the worst #1 in history.

Paolo can and likely will improve his defense. Much easier to improve than learning handle or learning to shoot from the outside
User avatar
Def Swami
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 26,009
And1: 15,407
Joined: Aug 04, 2008
Location: Huevos Bancheros Brunch
Contact:
   

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1335 » by Def Swami » Wed Jun 15, 2022 2:27 pm

The Magic brought Smith in for a light workout and interview this week but continue to cast a wide net, scheduling additional visits with the likes of Paolo Banchero, Keegan Murray, Shaedon Sharpe and others. NBA executives overwhelmingly expect the Magic to select Smith, but they'll perform their due diligence to ensure they make the right choice.

https://www.espn.com/nba/insider/insider/story/_/id/34089687/2022-nba-mock-draft-first-round-changes-include-lottery-movement
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,533
And1: 14,987
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1336 » by basketballRob » Wed Jun 15, 2022 3:31 pm

Inside info on Jabari's Orlando Magic workout?

Read on Twitter
?t=XqTOB7wt_kFKIZTI8TehIw&s=19

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
tiderulz
RealGM
Posts: 36,944
And1: 14,872
Joined: Jun 16, 2010
Location: Atlanta
 

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1337 » by tiderulz » Wed Jun 15, 2022 3:47 pm

Def Swami wrote:
The Magic brought Smith in for a light workout and interview this week but continue to cast a wide net, scheduling additional visits with the likes of Paolo Banchero, Keegan Murray, Shaedon Sharpe and others. NBA executives overwhelmingly expect the Magic to select Smith, but they'll perform their due diligence to ensure they make the right choice.

https://www.espn.com/nba/insider/insider/story/_/id/34089687/2022-nba-mock-draft-first-round-changes-include-lottery-movement

I’ve said before I like Keegan. Not saying we take him at 1, but I do see him going in or near top 5. If they don’t absolutely love the top 3, move back and pick up another player/pick.
89Magicfan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,522
And1: 768
Joined: Feb 25, 2021
       

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1338 » by 89Magicfan » Wed Jun 15, 2022 3:52 pm

basketballRob wrote:Inside info on Jabari's Orlando Magic workout?

Read on Twitter
?t=XqTOB7wt_kFKIZTI8TehIw&s=19

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


Good listening.

There are things I do like about Jabari and this is one of them.
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,533
And1: 14,987
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1339 » by basketballRob » Wed Jun 15, 2022 3:56 pm

Delete
dsg2021
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,806
And1: 1,225
Joined: Jul 07, 2009
   

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1340 » by dsg2021 » Wed Jun 15, 2022 4:04 pm

I’m getting to the point that I’d be disappointed if it wasn’t Jabari. You have to read past what the numbers say here, because if Jabari’s unguardable 3 carries over even somewhat, well, I already know he’s going to improve everything else too.

Locking in, what is it, 54 mil a year on Chet Holmgren someday and he doesn’t become the top scorer and ball handler is not my cup of tea. I trust the tag team of WCJ and Mo. And if JI’s career was filled with injuries early like Steph Curry and then not so much afterwards, then we got a Gobert, Chet of our own defensively (and even better offensively).

I’m also not interested in 54 mil a year someday on Paolo when everything about him screams perennial B tier All Star when you needed an A tier one or All-NBA one.

The future is going to be Jabari, Isaac, and Franz. With hopes and prayers on Suggs and Fultz, or FA signings of Damian Lillard and Jordan Poole instead, plus a trade for Steven Adams xD

Return to Orlando Magic