captaincrunk wrote:Stun704 wrote:I would say biz at 18 is more athletic then dwight at 18.
This is just patently false. Unless you're operating on some strange definiton of athletic, in no way is Bismack more athletic than an 18 year old Dwight. The 18 year old Dwight could run faster, jump higher, lift more weight, all while being slightly bigger.
Wheres the proof of this??

are you just pulling crap outta your ass? Where is Bismacks physical stats such as 185lbs bench press, sprints and vert test at? or are you just assuming Dwights are higher? since Bismacks aren't listed I'm using the eye test to judge who is more athletic at 18. and in my opinion Bismack is more athletic.
heres the facts:
At 24 Dwight may be SLIGHTLY taller 6'10.25 but hes done growing. compared to a 18 year old bismack who is 6.95 can still grow an inch or two. in the pre-draft thread in the draft section it was said that he grew .75 of an inch from april to june. Now lets compare what really counts wingspan, and standing reach.
Dwights wingspan:7' 4.5"
Bismacks wingspan:
7' 6.16"Dwights standing reach:9' 3.5"
Bismacks standing reach: 9' 3.42"
@ Slam& Crunk.. Dwights combine stats weren't impressive at all. thats why i'm saying at 18 Bismack is easily the more impressive athelete
Dwight @ 18:
Bench Press: 7 ---- [Compared to Emekas: 22]
Max Vert: 35.5
Like I said, dwights stats at 18 aren't that impressive, though Bismacks combine athletic stats aren't measured, looking from the nike hoop summit & other footage he seems to be much stronger then dwight was at 18.
It seems like you've become battery's polar opposite. instead of bashing DJ, you bash in Biz and Kemba.
At-least Battery is rational with his bashing.