Sixerscan wrote:Yeah I mean the fact that Simmons coming off an all star appearance signed a full 5 year deal while Porzingis coming off a lost season got 4 years and a player option is a pretty clear example of the advantages of locking certain guys up early.
As far as Fultz goes... if they wanted to pick up his option I can see the argument there really wasn't any point in waiting. Even if he shows progress in training camp he can always regress like he did last year. At a certain point you just have to decide whether you're committing to him or not.
I’m not sure I get your point. Porzingis coming off an ACL was much more likely to push for a long-term deal. Simmons potentially coming off a healthy, second consecutive all star season would be more likely to be empowered to take a one year max with the intention of moving on if he was pissed that the Sixers made him wait. We’re living in the player empowerment era. I don’t think that kind of thing is beyond reasonable anymore. I promise you Rich would have said as much (whether true or not) if Sixers hadn’t stepped up.
I stand by my point with Fultz. Maybe you’re going to do it regardless but there’s value in actually making him earn it. He hasn’t had to earn anything in the NBA to this point. There are questions about his work ethic and mental state, media driven or not. Why not put him under a little pressure and see how he responds? If he can’t handle that then what are actual NBA games going to do to him??




















