Image ImageImage Image

Potential Zach Trade Partners? 24/25 Edition

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 60,778
And1: 38,150
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1021 » by coldfish » Tue Jul 9, 2024 2:07 pm

DASMACKDOWN wrote:
coldfish wrote:I'm not sure the real Bulls feel this way but IMO, the downside risks of keeping him are zero. Worst case is that he refuses to play or throws a fit and makes the team worse . . . helping the tank. If he comes in and plays well, his contract will get shorter as time goes on and his value will go up.

Play him, let him be the alpha when the game is on the line, etc. Its fine.

One of the scenarios I can see happening is for the offense to be fine, lots of players to get numbers and still have the team lose night in and night out due to atrocious defense. That's not the end of the world.


You are probably right on how most of us feel.

What is our tax position if Zach has to play the whole season with us and then start the 25-26 season? We have Josh Giddey pending contract and that could be worth 175-200 mil.

Would we trade Zach for Ben Simmons just to get off the contract?


Lonzo’s expiring deal probably keeps the Bulls safe on the LT barrier.
User avatar
FriedRise
RealGM
Posts: 14,499
And1: 13,606
Joined: Jan 13, 2015
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1022 » by FriedRise » Tue Jul 9, 2024 3:30 pm

Red8911 wrote:Would be super awkward if Zach stayed once again after the bulls shopped him to the whole league.

There’s plenty of time before the season starts to find a deal, I still think they’ll trade him.

Both sides are just done with each other. I don’t see how they can go back to normal like nothing happened. How would Zach even be motivated to play for the bulls anymore ?


I thought KC reported that Zach didn't actually ask for a trade?

Zach knew that the Bulls have been shopping him (this is nothing new)
Bulls stood pat for the 3rd year in a row and began the season with a miserable 5-19 start
Zach told Bulls, "hey, since this is clearly not working and y'all are shopping me anyway, why don't we work together to find me a new team?" Bulls agreed.
Zach got injured, Bulls played better, no trade options can materialize because he's injured
Zach got cleared and tried to play a handful of games, but ultimately got injured again that led to surgery
Bulls continued to try to move him, but obviously no takers because he's still injured

To me, this is two sides trying to amicably work together to find a solution. Zach is not some locker room cancer that gives a "trade me or else" ultimatum like some of these other stars did. If he's not moved by the start of training camp, I think he's gonna remain professional like he always has.
MGB8
RealGM
Posts: 19,015
And1: 3,631
Joined: Jul 20, 2001
Location: Philly

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1023 » by MGB8 » Tue Jul 9, 2024 3:45 pm

Yeah… still think that there is zero interest in Zach and won’t be at least until he proves he is healthy… but that with the new CBA rules, it is likely that the Bulls and Zach are stuck together for the remainder of his contract.

There just isn’t room for bad max contracts anymore, and even when healthy, Zach is not a Max value player - he does not create offense for others like a Lebron, Jokic, Embiid, Luka, SGA, Curry, etc. He is an elite 3 level scorer but that isn’t enough anymore, would at minimum need to also be good in clutch, etc., and really needs to be a guy who you build an offense around, OR if still only a “finishing” scorer - would need to be a very high level defender on top.

Given the size of his deal - yeah, maybe you get two smaller but worse deals (Poole, etc.,)… but even Ben Simmons’ expiring deal likely “worth” more RN. Only for a team where he would be a healthy “finishing piece” (who don’t mind going to and staying above 2nd apron)… and there isn’t one out there right now.
boundbymusic
Senior
Posts: 591
And1: 337
Joined: Jun 07, 2012
Location: Austin, TX
       

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1024 » by boundbymusic » Tue Jul 9, 2024 3:50 pm

If he proves he's healthy and back to normal there will be partners. The cap is increasing every year. Look at some of these other deals being signed and Zach's money doesn't look AS bad as long as he's pre-injury Zach (and he waives his trade kicker).
jnrjr79
Head Coach
Posts: 6,810
And1: 4,060
Joined: May 27, 2003
Location: Chicago

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1025 » by jnrjr79 » Tue Jul 9, 2024 3:56 pm

boundbymusic wrote:If he proves he's healthy and back to normal there will be partners. The cap is increasing every year. Look at some of these other deals being signed and Zach's money doesn't look AS bad as long as he's pre-injury Zach (and he waives his trade kicker).


He doesn't need to waive his trade kicker. It will have nominal to no effect whatsoever, because it can only gap-fill any difference between how much the cap has gone up vs. whether his 8% raises have kept up, which they basically have.
kodo
RealGM
Posts: 21,231
And1: 15,603
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: Northshore Burbs
 

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1026 » by kodo » Tue Jul 9, 2024 4:02 pm

DASMACKDOWN wrote:You are probably right on how most of us feel.

What is our tax position if Zach has to play the whole season with us and then start the 25-26 season? We have Josh Giddey pending contract and that could be worth 175-200 mil.

Would we trade Zach for Ben Simmons just to get off the contract?


For 2025 start keeping Lavine and making some assumed moves (keeping Terry, keeping Smith, etc.) we're at $129M + Giddey + roster spots (could be as low as min). Less if we salary dump Jevon. Lux tax line should be around $187M.

That being said, I don't think the lux tax is a magical line anymore. If the Bulls are going to be rebuilding I don't think ownership wants to be even close to lux tax. They would want the team to be cheap as possible, which is 90% of salary cap so around $138M. Even if we're well below lux tax, every dollar saved maximizes the net business.

So yes I think we'll trade Zach for an expiring even if we're not anywhere close to lux tax.
Red8911
RealGM
Posts: 14,877
And1: 4,737
Joined: Jul 13, 2010
Location: BROOKLYN

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1027 » by Red8911 » Tue Jul 9, 2024 4:21 pm

FriedRise wrote:
Red8911 wrote:Would be super awkward if Zach stayed once again after the bulls shopped him to the whole league.

There’s plenty of time before the season starts to find a deal, I still think they’ll trade him.

Both sides are just done with each other. I don’t see how they can go back to normal like nothing happened. How would Zach even be motivated to play for the bulls anymore ?


I thought KC reported that Zach didn't actually ask for a trade?

Zach knew that the Bulls have been shopping him (this is nothing new)
Bulls stood pat for the 3rd year in a row and began the season with a miserable 5-19 start
Zach told Bulls, "hey, since this is clearly not working and y'all are shopping me anyway, why don't we work together to find me a new team?" Bulls agreed.
Zach got injured, Bulls played better, no trade options can materialize because he's injured
Zach got cleared and tried to play a handful of games, but ultimately got injured again that led to surgery
Bulls continued to try to move him, but obviously no takers because he's still injured

To me, this is two sides trying to amicably work together to find a solution. Zach is not some locker room cancer that gives a "trade me or else" ultimatum like some of these other stars did. If he's not moved by the start of training camp, I think he's gonna remain professional like he always has.

Yeah originally I guess he didn’t officially ask for a trade but he clearly wants out. Even last season his body language during games showed us that he doesn’t care anymore.

KC also reported yesterday that both sides are motivated to get him traded. They are basically working together at this point to get it done.
League Circles
RealGM
Posts: 35,661
And1: 10,107
Joined: Dec 04, 2001
       

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1028 » by League Circles » Tue Jul 9, 2024 4:24 pm

I have a feeling that AK is going to ruin the good moves so far this summer by trading Zach for bad contracts for reasons of locker room chemistry and "helping" us try to keep our pick next summer.

I think I'm going to be very disappointed when we trade a high level SG in his prime for trash.
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
MGB8
RealGM
Posts: 19,015
And1: 3,631
Joined: Jul 20, 2001
Location: Philly

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1029 » by MGB8 » Tue Jul 9, 2024 4:28 pm

Red8911 wrote:
FriedRise wrote:
Red8911 wrote:Would be super awkward if Zach stayed once again after the bulls shopped him to the whole league.

There’s plenty of time before the season starts to find a deal, I still think they’ll trade him.

Both sides are just done with each other. I don’t see how they can go back to normal like nothing happened. How would Zach even be motivated to play for the bulls anymore ?


I thought KC reported that Zach didn't actually ask for a trade?

Zach knew that the Bulls have been shopping him (this is nothing new)
Bulls stood pat for the 3rd year in a row and began the season with a miserable 5-19 start
Zach told Bulls, "hey, since this is clearly not working and y'all are shopping me anyway, why don't we work together to find me a new team?" Bulls agreed.
Zach got injured, Bulls played better, no trade options can materialize because he's injured
Zach got cleared and tried to play a handful of games, but ultimately got injured again that led to surgery
Bulls continued to try to move him, but obviously no takers because he's still injured

To me, this is two sides trying to amicably work together to find a solution. Zach is not some locker room cancer that gives a "trade me or else" ultimatum like some of these other stars did. If he's not moved by the start of training camp, I think he's gonna remain professional like he always has.

Yeah originally I guess he didn’t officially ask for a trade but he clearly wants out. Even last season his body language during games showed us that he doesn’t care anymore.

KC also reported yesterday that both sides are motivated to get him traded. They are basically working together at this point to get it done.


They should focus more on Zach reintegrating into the new look Bulls. Then the rest will take care of itself. The Bulls are still to asset poor to be sending out assets just to move off of Zach’s contact.

Does that move help the team at all?

Nope. Bulls won’t be truly competitive for at least 2-3 years, and by that time, LaVine’s contract is either expiring or up. In the interim, losing Zach won’t provide for room for some quality FA or even a move where the Bulls would take on bad salary for an asset (because the Bulls have t shown any interest in doing that, ever).

Moving Zach for assets is one thing - that would help the team. But moving him even for a pure salary dump is unlikely to really have any benefit except to ownership’s wallets a little bit. Maybe an extra couple of losses towards a tank.

This is starting to feel petty and personal, like how things got with Thibs at the end. Not a good look for an org that already has a pretty bad reputation.
Red8911
RealGM
Posts: 14,877
And1: 4,737
Joined: Jul 13, 2010
Location: BROOKLYN

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1030 » by Red8911 » Tue Jul 9, 2024 4:35 pm

boundbymusic wrote:If he proves he's healthy and back to normal there will be partners. The cap is increasing every year. Look at some of these other deals being signed and Zach's money doesn't look AS bad as long as he's pre-injury Zach (and he waives his trade kicker).

He’s fully healthy right now but doesn’t mean he won’t get hurt again in the future. Proving you’re healthy for a short amount of time doesn’t matter.

Zach’s an injury prone player, whoever (if anyone) decides to trade for him knows this and would have to take a risk.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,234
And1: 11,895
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1031 » by WindyCityBorn » Tue Jul 9, 2024 4:39 pm

Red8911 wrote:
boundbymusic wrote:If he proves he's healthy and back to normal there will be partners. The cap is increasing every year. Look at some of these other deals being signed and Zach's money doesn't look AS bad as long as he's pre-injury Zach (and he waives his trade kicker).

He’s fully healthy right now but doesn’t mean he won’t get hurt again in the future. Proving you’re healthy for a short amount of time doesn’t matter.

Zach’s an injury prone player, whoever (if anyone) decides to trade for him knows this and would have to take a risk.


Yeah, but he played awful last season. He needs to show that was because of the injury and not an actual decline in production.
User avatar
FriedRise
RealGM
Posts: 14,499
And1: 13,606
Joined: Jan 13, 2015
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1032 » by FriedRise » Tue Jul 9, 2024 4:52 pm

Red8911 wrote:
boundbymusic wrote:If he proves he's healthy and back to normal there will be partners. The cap is increasing every year. Look at some of these other deals being signed and Zach's money doesn't look AS bad as long as he's pre-injury Zach (and he waives his trade kicker).

He’s fully healthy right now but doesn’t mean he won’t get hurt again in the future. Proving you’re healthy for a short amount of time doesn’t matter.

Zach’s an injury prone player, whoever (if anyone) decides to trade for him knows this and would have to take a risk.


I just hate having to sell low on a player whose value we can reasonably expect to bounce back, especially when he's fully healthy right now.

If we wait and play the long game, we can let the market shift a bit. You never know what's gonna happen during the season... some key player on a contender getting injured, or some rising team doing better than expected and deciding to go all-in (like Indiana did with Siakam last year), or maybe Zach works himself back to playing like an all star since he'll have more shots available to him now compared to these last few years. If we move him now, the only guaranteed thing is us losing whatever little draft capital we have - and for what?

If Zach is truly injury prone and gets injured again, then yeah his value is gonna stay about the same as it is now. Nothing will have changed except one year less on his contract, which one might argue could improve his trade value a little bit because he's owed less money.
SirKaiser
Sophomore
Posts: 212
And1: 102
Joined: Jan 05, 2022

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1033 » by SirKaiser » Tue Jul 9, 2024 4:53 pm

boozapalooza wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46

This statistic is hard to believe

I believe it. As a fan base I feel like we have short term memory, or selective memory of his play over the last 2-3 years. When he isn't hurt or making bone-headed plays because he's trying to do too much, the dude can ball like few others in the NBA.

Seems insane to me that we are so desperate to part with him that we would even consider attaching picks.
ChettheJet
General Manager
Posts: 8,046
And1: 2,387
Joined: Jul 02, 2014
       

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1034 » by ChettheJet » Tue Jul 9, 2024 5:01 pm

Red8911 wrote:He’s fully healthy right now but doesn’t mean he won’t get hurt again in the future. Proving you’re healthy for a short amount of time doesn’t matter.

Zach’s an injury prone player, whoever (if anyone) decides to trade for him knows this and would have to take a risk.



That's legit. Zach doesn't have the weak ankle that he aggravates every other year and misses games. Any team interested that somehow feels a couple of 2nd round picks eases their concerns is willing to trade for him either way. This prove he's healthy bi, he could be string for 30 games and get injured in #31 it would be pure chance who he is playing for in game #31. When healthy even on Bull's teams with little help he was an all star, with DeRozan he fell into the trap of he got his for three games now I'm going to get mine for a couple so it looks like my team.

That's what Zach needs to eliminate from his game. There's no denying that after a bad start when Zach was injured the Bulls made some kind of of improvements and got out from under that 5-19 start. He had to see that and come to the conclusion if when he returned if he bought into the move the ball, find the open shot and control the iso from Demar there were wins to be found.

Well Demar is gone so if a healthy Lavine can say to himself that if I eliminate the iso and with Giddey as the PG, Coby and Ayo becoming better playmakers, if I am willing to be one of the open shooters to stretch the floor, there will be wins to be had. So if he buys in and let's Billy decide who is in and how much Zach has two options. Get paid a lot to stay and with Coby, Patrick, Ayo, Smith be part of the shooting group, instead of needing to outscore everybody or he looks good and at some point another team thinks he's the scorer they are lacking and a deal appears.
boundbymusic
Senior
Posts: 591
And1: 337
Joined: Jun 07, 2012
Location: Austin, TX
       

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1035 » by boundbymusic » Tue Jul 9, 2024 6:19 pm

jnrjr79 wrote:
boundbymusic wrote:If he proves he's healthy and back to normal there will be partners. The cap is increasing every year. Look at some of these other deals being signed and Zach's money doesn't look AS bad as long as he's pre-injury Zach (and he waives his trade kicker).


He doesn't need to waive his trade kicker. It will have nominal to no effect whatsoever, because it can only gap-fill any difference between how much the cap has gone up vs. whether his 8% raises have kept up, which they basically have.


Noted.

It is amazing though, looking at his contract in comparison to others who have signed recently. You start comparing and it doesn't look nearly as bad as the media/twittersphere make it out to seem.

https://www.spotrac.com/nba/contracts/_/sort/average/dir/desc
jnrjr79
Head Coach
Posts: 6,810
And1: 4,060
Joined: May 27, 2003
Location: Chicago

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1036 » by jnrjr79 » Tue Jul 9, 2024 6:58 pm

boundbymusic wrote:
jnrjr79 wrote:
boundbymusic wrote:If he proves he's healthy and back to normal there will be partners. The cap is increasing every year. Look at some of these other deals being signed and Zach's money doesn't look AS bad as long as he's pre-injury Zach (and he waives his trade kicker).


He doesn't need to waive his trade kicker. It will have nominal to no effect whatsoever, because it can only gap-fill any difference between how much the cap has gone up vs. whether his 8% raises have kept up, which they basically have.


Noted.

It is amazing though, looking at his contract in comparison to others who have signed recently. You start comparing and it doesn't look nearly as bad as the media/twittersphere make it out to seem.

https://www.spotrac.com/nba/contracts/_/sort/average/dir/desc


Yeah, it sure seems like the Bulls are ready to move on no matter what, but you have to imagine Zach's market is going to improve if he can play well and stay healthy, because his deal is going to look not so expensive very soon.
Hangtime84
RealGM
Posts: 21,067
And1: 4,763
Joined: Aug 18, 2006
Location: Rogers Park
     

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1037 » by Hangtime84 » Tue Jul 9, 2024 7:09 pm

Zach deal will look very good to those teams who recently signed these rookies to max deals that underperform
Jcool0 wrote:
aguifs wrote:Do we have a friggin plan?


If the Bulls do, you would be complaining to much to ever hear it.


NBA fan logic we need to trade one of two best players because (Player X) one needs to shine more.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,747
And1: 9,233
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1038 » by Chi town » Tue Jul 9, 2024 9:21 pm

League Circles wrote:I have a feeling that AK is going to ruin the good moves so far this summer by trading Zach for bad contracts for reasons of locker room chemistry and "helping" us try to keep our pick next summer.

I think I'm going to be very disappointed when we trade a high level SG in his prime for trash.

… when we don’t need to
Indomitable
RealGM
Posts: 26,035
And1: 6,710
Joined: Jul 11, 2001
Location: Yelzenbah!
     

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1039 » by Indomitable » Wed Jul 10, 2024 2:59 am

coldfish wrote:Zach wants to play on a good team. No good team is even in a position to take on Zach without offloading a huge amount of bad contracts. Chicago isn't going to make a trade that actually makes them worse. It seems that even Klutch understands this.

Overall, Zach and the Bulls are married to each other. Either Zach is going to have to play for the Bulls as is or he is going to have to fake injuries for the next few years. I get the impression that the Bulls are OK with either.


Then why do we keep hearing stupid trades. We are trying to attach assets to take back worst players .

If this is true. I need to become a real Nuggets or Spur fan.

My God does this team really to lack this much business acumen.
:banghead:
Indomitable
RealGM
Posts: 26,035
And1: 6,710
Joined: Jul 11, 2001
Location: Yelzenbah!
     

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1040 » by Indomitable » Wed Jul 10, 2024 3:48 am

MGB8 wrote:
Red8911 wrote:
FriedRise wrote:
I thought KC reported that Zach didn't actually ask for a trade?

Zach knew that the Bulls have been shopping him (this is nothing new)
Bulls stood pat for the 3rd year in a row and began the season with a miserable 5-19 start
Zach told Bulls, "hey, since this is clearly not working and y'all are shopping me anyway, why don't we work together to find me a new team?" Bulls agreed.
Zach got injured, Bulls played better, no trade options can materialize because he's injured
Zach got cleared and tried to play a handful of games, but ultimately got injured again that led to surgery
Bulls continued to try to move him, but obviously no takers because he's still injured

To me, this is two sides trying to amicably work together to find a solution. Zach is not some locker room cancer that gives a "trade me or else" ultimatum like some of these other stars did. If he's not moved by the start of training camp, I think he's gonna remain professional like he always has.

Yeah originally I guess he didn’t officially ask for a trade but he clearly wants out. Even last season his body language during games showed us that he doesn’t care anymore.

KC also reported yesterday that both sides are motivated to get him traded. They are basically working together at this point to get it done.


They should focus more on Zach reintegrating into the new look Bulls. Then the rest will take care of itself. The Bulls are still to asset poor to be sending out assets just to move off of Zach’s contact.

Does that move help the team at all?

Nope. Bulls won’t be truly competitive for at least 2-3 years, and by that time, LaVine’s contract is either expiring or up. In the interim, losing Zach won’t provide for room for some quality FA or even a move where the Bulls would take on bad salary for an asset (because the Bulls have t shown any interest in doing that, ever).

Moving Zach for assets is one thing - that would help the team. But moving him even for a pure salary dump is unlikely to really have any benefit except to ownership’s wallets a little bit. Maybe an extra couple of losses towards a tank.

This is starting to feel petty and personal, like how things got with Thibs at the end. Not a good look for an org that already has a pretty bad reputation.


This is petty and childish. Make trades that make you better.

This team poisons every player

Jimmy bad guy
Lauri is not tough
Zach is bad


All these guys seemed liked or at least respected. The organization is a joke.
:banghead:

Return to Chicago Bulls