[GMAT 2013] Discussion
Moderators: Snakebites, MadNESS, Fadeaway_J
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
- Jake0890
- Forum Mod - Pacers

- Posts: 5,983
- And1: 807
- Joined: Jul 12, 2012
- Location: Indianapolis, IN
-
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
Yeah, I'd like to play again as well. Maybe Karm could put up the sign-ups a little sooner than expected? 
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
- Jake0890
- Forum Mod - Pacers

- Posts: 5,983
- And1: 807
- Joined: Jul 12, 2012
- Location: Indianapolis, IN
-
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
Spoke too soon. It's up.
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
-
Karmaloop
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,686
- And1: 1,777
- Joined: Sep 24, 2009
-
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
Jake0890 wrote:Yeah, I'd like to play again as well. Maybe Karm could put up the sign-ups a little sooner than expected?
...they're up.
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
- Jake0890
- Forum Mod - Pacers

- Posts: 5,983
- And1: 807
- Joined: Jul 12, 2012
- Location: Indianapolis, IN
-
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
So, as long as you didn't quit you're eligible to play? What about those who didn't submit write-ups?
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
-
Karmaloop
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,686
- And1: 1,777
- Joined: Sep 24, 2009
-
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
Jake0890 wrote:So, as long as you didn't quit you're eligible to play? What about those who didn't submit write-ups?
I'm not going to make that a rule. Anyone who commishes has the right to decide that for themselves, but it'll be weighted against them.
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
- SCourGe OF GoD
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,073
- And1: 51
- Joined: Dec 09, 2011
-
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
Karmaloop wrote:Jake0890 wrote:So, as long as you didn't quit you're eligible to play? What about those who didn't submit write-ups?
I'm not going to make that a rule. Anyone who commishes has the right to decide that for themselves, but it'll be weighted against them.
agreed. vets like sambone will always have a spot ...even w/out writeups since peeps are busy outside of this.

JR : Next Gen
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
- Kinger95
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,506
- And1: 3,734
- Joined: Jan 30, 2013
-
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
Jake0890 wrote:Kinger95 wrote:So far my Detroit squad has been ranked 5,6,7,8,9 a 12 and the pacers gm ranked me 15th! Like I know I didn't win but I've got Westbrook,Drummond,Hendo and Thad,6 1sts and max cap space. I was expecting anything from like 4-8
Hop off my nuts, man. I don't care what you expected. I didn't like your team as much as 14 others, so you got 15th.
Seems like every time I come here someone has something to say about "Indiana GM did this...". Not sure why I've got such a bad rep here. I've tried to remain nothing but nice and "professional" through this game.
Bness just ranked me 1st, and karm ranked me 5th and they are two of the most credible posters on this board so u can understand why I was suprized to see your ranking jake

Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
- Jake0890
- Forum Mod - Pacers

- Posts: 5,983
- And1: 807
- Joined: Jul 12, 2012
- Location: Indianapolis, IN
-
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
Kinger95 wrote:Jake0890 wrote:Kinger95 wrote:So far my Detroit squad has been ranked 5,6,7,8,9 a 12 and the pacers gm ranked me 15th! Like I know I didn't win but I've got Westbrook,Drummond,Hendo and Thad,6 1sts and max cap space. I was expecting anything from like 4-8
Hop off my nuts, man. I don't care what you expected. I didn't like your team as much as 14 others, so you got 15th.
Seems like every time I come here someone has something to say about "Indiana GM did this...". Not sure why I've got such a bad rep here. I've tried to remain nothing but nice and "professional" through this game.
Bness just ranked me 1st, and karm ranked me 5th and they are two of the most credible posters on this board so u can understand why I was suprized to see your ranking jake
Opinions differ, I guess.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
-
Karmaloop
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,686
- And1: 1,777
- Joined: Sep 24, 2009
-
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
Kinger95 wrote:Bness just ranked me 1st, and karm ranked me 5th and they are two of the most credible posters on this board so u can understand why I was suprized to see your ranking jake
That's the beauty of rankings, it's completely subjective. One person might be high on your team, while another think it's a hot pile of garbage.
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
- HornetJail
- RealGM
- Posts: 46,627
- And1: 14,309
- Joined: Feb 05, 2012
-
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
Winner announced in Ranking Thread!
Karma's right. I was ranked as high as 5th and as low as bottom five, as I've got a few controversial players. Rankings can go any way.
Karma's right. I was ranked as high as 5th and as low as bottom five, as I've got a few controversial players. Rankings can go any way.
investigate Adam Silver
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
- Kinger95
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,506
- And1: 3,734
- Joined: Jan 30, 2013
-
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
I think that's also what makes this game so addictive. It's nearly impossible to build a team that you think is 100% perfect and everyone think the same so u come back trying to improve.

Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
-
Karmaloop
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,686
- And1: 1,777
- Joined: Sep 24, 2009
-
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
Kinger95 wrote:I think that's also what makes this game so addictive. It's nearly impossible to build a team that you think is 100% perfect and everyone think the same so u come back trying to improve.
And Kinger, I have to enforce the 250 rule otherwise everyone else wants me to bend them. Just go post in other forums, and you'll be there in no time. 250 really isn't that many posts.
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
- Kinger95
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,506
- And1: 3,734
- Joined: Jan 30, 2013
-
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
I'll have a convo with myself like golem so I can get my count up.Except ill be like Elias was last game and calling parsons my "precious"...... Lol

Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
- Kinger95
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,506
- And1: 3,734
- Joined: Jan 30, 2013
-
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
I put the rockets as my # 1 team too so he might actually be delt for less than his superstar value

Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
- keondrunk
- Junior
- Posts: 376
- And1: 80
- Joined: Jan 15, 2009
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
I thought the rankings would have everyone from 1 to 20... isn't this how you guys do it?
That would be awesome.
That would be awesome.
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
-
Karmaloop
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,686
- And1: 1,777
- Joined: Sep 24, 2009
-
Re: [GMAT 2013] Discussion
keondrunk wrote:I thought the rankings would have everyone from 1 to 20... isn't this how you guys do it?
That would be awesome.
You can go through and do it on a spreadsheet. lukekarts was 2nd, and I believe ATL placed 3rd. GSW was 5th IIRC.
Return to Trades and Transactions Games




