Fantasy Trade Thread

Hardcore6erFan · Post #1041 » by **Hardcore6erFan** » Sat Jun 14, 2014 3:29 pm

Trade 1
#47 for #26, Haslem

Trade 2
#32, Furkan Aldemir for #25, Garcia

Trade 3
Sixers out: #39, Young
Sixers in: #15, #43, Hawks 2015 2nd (31-44 protected), Grizzlies 2017 2nd, Perkins

Thunder out: #21, #29, Grizzlies 2017 2nd, Perkins
Thunder in: #39, Young

Hawks out: #15, #43, Hawks 2015 2nd (31-44 protected)
Hawks in: #21, #29

Trade 4
Sixers out: #25, #52, #54, Hawks 2015 2nd (31-44 protected), Nuggets 2016 2nd, Anderson, cap space
Sixers in: #8, #19, Landry, Terry, Outlaw, Evans

Kings out: #8, Landry, Terry, Outlaw, Evans
Kings in: #25, Kings 2015 1st, Boozer, Anderson

Bulls out: Boozer, #19, Kings 2015 1st
Bulls in: #52, #54, Hawks 2015 2nd (31-44 protected), Nuggets 2016 2nd, TPE

Trade 5
Sixers out: #8, #19, #26, Richardson
Sixers in: #4, Magic 2015 2nd, Nash

Magic out: #4, Magic 2015 2nd
Magic in: #7, #19, #26

Lakers out: #7, Nash
Lakers in: #8, Richardson

3 Parker
4 Exum
10 Gordon
15 Nurkic

42uptop · Post #1042 » by **42uptop** » Sat Jun 14, 2014 4:03 pm

^ I was with this until trade 4. The Kings 2015 1st is a valuable asset, as is the 19th pick. I don't see Chicago giving up all that just to get rid of Boozer, who they can amnesty if push comes to shove.

And as for Sacramento, they reportedly want to trade their pick for an established player who can help them win. Boozer is well past his prime, on the last year of his deal, and he's a bad fit with Cousins. I think you should cut Sacramento out of the deal and just make it 19th + filler to Philadelphia for some seconds

ProcessDoctor · Post #1043 » by **ProcessDoctor** » Sat Jun 14, 2014 6:26 pm

I think we've gotta jump on getting Boozer and picks from Chicago, then use those assets to get up to #5 to get Vonleh.

Chi out: Boozer, #16, #19
Chi in: #39, #52

Phi out: #10, #39, #52, Thad
Phi in: #5, #16, Boozer

Utah out: #5
Utah in: #10, #19, Thad

MCW
Young?/Lavine?/Harriston?(#16)
Wiggins or Parker(#3)
Vonleh(#5)
Noel

Hardcore6erFan · Post #1044 » by **Hardcore6erFan** » Sat Jun 14, 2014 6:37 pm

sixers238 wrote:I think we've gotta jump on getting Boozer and picks from Chicago, then use those assets to get up to #5 to get Vonleh.

Chi out: Boozer, #16, #19
Chi in: #39, #52

Phi out: #10, #39, #52, Thad
Phi in: #5, #16, Boozer

Utah out: #5
Utah in: #10, #19, Thad

MCW
Young?/Lavine?/Harriston?(#16)
Wiggins or Parker(#3)
Vonleh(#5)
Noel

I likey. But I want Exum at #5

76ciology · Post #1045 » by **76ciology** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:18 am

How about this?

NOEL GETS TRADED ON DRAFT DAY.

Cavs is familiar with Noel. Yes, they passed up on him on draft day last year. Thing could have changed with a 100% Noel with a revamped shooting mechanics.

Noel and the 10th gets traded for Cavs' 1st overall pick. Cavs felt that Noel is a top 3 pick material in this year's pick. And they know that giving up a top 3 pick with the top 10 pick is a good trade for them, in terms of value. With their current indecisiveness with no clear direction moving forward, the trade gives them flexibility to either stick with Noel and the 10th pick or trade him for Love and increase their chance of landing LBJ.

Kyrie
Waiters
Deng or LBJ
Benett or Love
Noel or Varejao/Tristan

For the 76ers, they feel confident with a MCW-Biid-Wiggins core.

76ers starting line-up:
MCW/Wroten
Wiggins
Hollis Thompson
Thad
Embiid

LloydFree · Post #1046 » by **LloydFree** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:45 am

^^^Waiting for the Cleveland trolls reaction to this.. :-?

Agnostifarian · Post #1047 » by **Agnostifarian** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 11:25 am

OleSchool wrote:
Hound Dog wrote:Rumor has it that Utah likes Young, would Philly trade Young for their 23rd pick?

Young for UTH's 23rd? I would

Thad is Young. If we start throwing away 25 year old guys that have we have been developing on our team for seven years for the hope that we get some new project to develop at #23... Well, then we're flat out ****!

Thad Young is not a problem in Philly.

sixers23 · Post #1048 » by **sixers23** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 11:45 am

Agnostifarian wrote:
OleSchool wrote:
Hound Dog wrote:Rumor has it that Utah likes Young, would Philly trade Young for their 23rd pick?

Young for UTH's 23rd? I would

Thad is Young. If we start throwing away 25 year old guys that have we have been developing on our team for seven years for the hope that we get some new project to develop at #23... Well, then we're flat out ****!

Thad Young is not a problem in Philly.

But he's likely to leave after next season

OleSchool · Post #1049 » by **OleSchool** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 12:12 pm

Agnostifarian wrote:
OleSchool wrote:
Hound Dog wrote:Rumor has it that Utah likes Young, would Philly trade Young for their 23rd pick?

Young for UTH's 23rd? I would

Thad is Young. If we start throwing away 25 year old guys that have we have been developing on our team for seven years for the hope that we get some new project to develop at #23... Well, then we're flat out ****!

Thad Young is not a problem in Philly.

You are right, but Thad came out last year and said he didn't want to part of the rebuilding process. Trading him is more of a favor to him, being loyal to a guy who's worked his butt off for us.

Let him go to contender, maybe not Utah cause they in the same boat as we are. But send him to SAS, CHI, LAC, GSW, etc. for a late 1st.

Post #1050 » by **Foshan** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 12:45 pm

If CLV takes Embiid, and looks to make plays for winning, I wouldn't be surprised to see something go down with Thad for Bennett.

OleSchool · Post #1051 » by **OleSchool** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 12:56 pm

Foshan wrote:If CLV takes Embiid, and looks to make plays for winning, I wouldn't be surprised to see something go down with Thad for Bennett.

But at this point in time is Bennett damaged? after that rookie year it may be hard mentally to come back from that.

Agnostifarian · Post #1052 » by **Agnostifarian** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:20 pm

OleSchool wrote:
Foshan wrote:If CLV takes Embiid, and looks to make plays for winning, I wouldn't be surprised to see something go down with Thad for Bennett.

But at this point in time is Bennett damaged? after that rookie year it may be hard mentally to come back from that.

If he gets a good power washing, maybe the CLE comes off...

MRxBLACK · Post #1053 » by **MRxBLACK** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:26 pm

OleSchool wrote:
Foshan wrote:If CLV takes Embiid, and looks to make plays for winning, I wouldn't be surprised to see something go down with Thad for Bennett.

But at this point in time is Bennett damaged? after that rookie year it may be hard mentally to come back from that.

I think Bennett had everything going against him last year: injury, fitness issues from injury, Mike Brown, tremendous pressure, inconsistent playing time. Unless he is an Bynum-like headcase I would be willing to do that above deal.

OleSchool · Post #1054 » by **OleSchool** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:02 pm

MRxBLACK wrote:
OleSchool wrote:
Foshan wrote:If CLV takes Embiid, and looks to make plays for winning, I wouldn't be surprised to see something go down with Thad for Bennett.

But at this point in time is Bennett damaged? after that rookie year it may be hard mentally to come back from that.

I think Bennett had everything going against him last year: injury, fitness issues from injury, Mike Brown, tremendous pressure, inconsistent playing time. Unless he is an Bynum-like headcase I would be willing to do that above deal.

Doesn't he have a breathing problem? asthma?

I know he played with it his whole life, so it probably aint a problem for him, but looking at it from afar I think some fans were speculating that was his problem.

LloydFree · Post #1055 » by **LloydFree** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:08 pm

Foshan wrote:If CLV takes Embiid, and looks to make plays for winning, I wouldn't be surprised to see something go down with Thad for Bennett.

I do that deal in a second. Doubt Cleveland would even consider it. Thad doesn't give them anything that Tristan Thompson already provides and he can't play beside him.
I could see Bennett for Asik, to give Embiid some time to develop with less pressure.

51X3RF4N · Post #1056 » by **51X3RF4N** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:42 pm

How about Thad, #32 and Noel for #1 and Bennett?

As a Sixers fan, do you like it? Giving up Noel for essentially a guarantee of getting both Embiid and Wiggins...

WVU · Post #1057 » by **WVU** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:46 pm

51X3RF4N wrote:How about Thad, #32 and Noel for #1 and Bennett?

As a Sixers fan, do you like it? Giving up Noel for essentially a guarantee of getting both Embiid and Wiggins...

As much as I want to see Noel in a sixers uniform this year, I'd jump on this. I don't think Cleveland does it without us including #10 though.. I dont see them trading out of the first round completely.

Bennett would be an awesome pick up as I still think he is going to be a good player. Doubt Cleveland goes for this deal though

OleSchool · Post #1058 » by **OleSchool** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:47 pm

51X3RF4N wrote:How about Thad, #32 and Noel for #1 and Bennett?

As a Sixers fan, do you like it? Giving up Noel for essentially a guarantee of getting both Embiid and Wiggins...

I wouldn't do that, wanna see what we have in Noel first. Besides, Clev. passed on Noel last year

*edit*

Just saw you didn't include 3, Cleve def. wouldn't do that deal

51X3RF4N · Post #1059 » by **51X3RF4N** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:13 pm

What about removing Bennett?

Thad, #32, and Noel for #1?

Does that change it from either standpoint?

I'm not sure Bennett should make or break a deal like that. I guess the question is essentially, would you trade Noel right now if it guarantees Wiggins and Embiid are Sixers? Or would you keep Noel and take your chances on getting 1 of the 2 above mentioned players at #3, and just be happy with it?

Essentially would you trade Noel for Embiid straight up? Or Noel for Wiggins straight up?

WVU · Post #1060 » by **WVU** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:16 pm

51X3RF4N wrote:What about removing Bennett?

Thad, #32, and Noel for #1?

Does that change it from either standpoint?

I'm not sure Bennett should make or break a deal like that. I guess the question is essentially, would you trade Noel right now if it guarantees Wiggins and Embiid are Sixers? Or would you keep Noel and take your chances on getting 1 of the 2 above mentioned players at #3, and just be happy with it?

Essentially would you trade Noel for Embiid straight up? Or Noel for Wiggins straight up?

Only way I'm parting with Noel is if we are getting BOTH Wiggins and Embiid. That's a pipe dream though cause I can't see any way we get the #1 overall all while keeping #3