ImageImageImageImageImage

2021 Offseason & Offseason Grades

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

Offseason grade

A
7
25%
B
17
61%
C
3
11%
D
1
4%
F
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 28

User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 69,041
And1: 21,549
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2021 Offseason 

Post#1041 » by nate33 » Tue Aug 3, 2021 4:30 pm

prime1time wrote:Interesting take from Hollinger, he'd expect the Wizards to get draft compensation for taking Jordan...
As I noted yesterday, the best pathway to a Spencer Dinwiddie sign-and-trade for the Wizards is by lumping him into the Russell Westbrook trade with the Lakers. Routing, say, Kyle Kuzma directly to Brooklyn eliminates any aggregation issues, and allows the Wizards to trade a $13 million player for a $20 million player, which they couldn't otherwise. More importantly, it's likely the only way for Brooklyn to stuff DeAndre Jordan into this, which is the only way to make the financial math work on the Nets' part given the huge luxury tax bill they would otherwise face. The more interesting angle is what draft compensation might be involved and which direction it would be going if the Wizards are swallowing the two years and nearly $20 million left on Jordan's deal.

I'm not sure what Hollinger means by "aggregation issues".

You can't receive a player in a trade and then immediately package him with another player and send him elsewhere, but that wouldn't be what is happening here. The Westbrook trade hasn't actually happened yet. This Dinwiddie thing would happen as part of the Westbrook trade when it is executed on August 6th. I don't understand why aggregation is a problem. Maybe he's referring to something else that I'm just not understanding.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 53,964
And1: 9,956
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: 2021 Offseason 

Post#1042 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Tue Aug 3, 2021 4:34 pm

nate33 wrote:
DCZards wrote:
nate33 wrote:Comparing this team to last team, I feel like we are equal or better at almost every position.

One might argue that Westbrook is better than Dinwiddie, but I disagree. If nothing else, Dinwiddie's lower usage rate will be an advantage. And he's a better off ball shooter, which will prevent the loading up on Beal and our post players.

Holiday is a slight upgrade over Ish/Neto. KCP is a massive upgrade over the out-of-position minutes at SG played by Neto. KCP's minutes at SF are an upgrade over Troy Brown/Hutchison. Mathews (if retained) will be better. Avdija will be better. Hachimura will be better. Bertans will probably be better by virtue of being in shape. Kispert and Kuzma provide more depth than we've had at forward before. Gafford will be better and will play the entire season.

The only possible area of decline is Bryant/Harrell versus Lopez/Len. And I'm not sure which way that will go.

I guess it's possible that the coach will be worse. Brooks actually coached pretty well last year.

I’m was with you up until that last part. Brooks coached decently last year. But I thought he was too much of a puppet for how Westbrook and Beal wanted to play. There were times when I would have liked to see Brooks take more control of how the team was playing, especially offensively.

Wes is a fresh face/voice whose starting off with a very different team than the one Brooks coached. I think Unseld Jr has a good chance to be a better coach than Brooks simply because he’ll have a chance to put in place his system and will be working hand-in-hand with a GM who selected him for the job.

I’m hoping that Wes can bring the same kind of cultural change to the Zards that Rivera has brought to the WFT.

Fair point. It's not like I loved Brooks' coaching or anything. But he did somehow get a team of lousy defenders to play pretty darn good defense after the Covid hiatus. I don't know how much of a role coaching played in that, but it's plausible that Brooks was a big factor.

Maybe Wes will be just as good defensively, or even better. I don't know. I'm just not ruling out the possibility that Brooks actually had a positive effect last year.


:nod:

Really good post, nate. In all my hating on Scott Brooks I never thought about it this way. The problem is he did not by choice play the better defenders. Matthews and Bunga were better options than midget guards in my opinion if the fence is what you’re looking for.

A boatload of hilarious errors that I’m gonna leave for a while right where they are

What Scott Brooks did do is make the playoffs when the wizards had a 99.5% chance against them making it
Bye bye Beal.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 53,964
And1: 9,956
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: 2021 Offseason 

Post#1043 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Tue Aug 3, 2021 4:35 pm

This has been the most brilliant WIZARDS off-season of the 21st-century, and the best that I can recall of any Wizards off-season.

Edited to add—From a fan since the 70s.
Bye bye Beal.
prime1time
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,784
And1: 2,056
Joined: Nov 02, 2016
         

Re: 2021 Offseason 

Post#1044 » by prime1time » Tue Aug 3, 2021 5:26 pm

Illuminaire wrote:
prime1time wrote:Now after the fact you're trying to falsely give the impression that this would in any way guarantee a top 3 pick.


You really shouldn't claim someone is lying (falsely giving impressions) while completely miss-stating their argument. Let's compare:

Code: Select all

We were on track for a franchise changing top five pick this year if we traded Beal.

VS

Code: Select all

 guarantee a top 3 pick


I'm sure you can spot the difference.

I'll add in that in late March, the Wizards were 15-28. They had the 5th worst record in the league that month. Willbecocks advocated for trading Beal, so it's safe to infer that yes, he also wanted the Wiz to tank. (Correct me if I'm wrong there, Will!)

If the Wizards simply held their position, they would have a 44% chance at a top-5 pick. Not great. But with a roster explosion, it's fair to expect them to be worse, not the same or better. If they managed to drop to the third worst team by the end of the season, they would have a 67% chance of a top-5 pick.

You can argue whether those odds are best described by '"on track" or not, but I would say 44-67% odds are more in line with that language, than they are with your claim that "this is a myth."

This post brought to you by the Strawmen Incineration League Office. Thanks for listening to my Ted Talk. :D

I'm going to respond to you in two posts. Now, the reason I said top 3 pick, is because I don't see Suggs and Barnes as franchise-changing players. Maybe you and the other poster feel like Barnes and Suggs are on that level, so let's assume that they are for the sake of discussion. Also, let's assume that we go through the lottery and we get a top 5 pick so we can draft one of these players. What happens next season? Are we going to compete next season after tanking and having our franchise player in his 1st year? Probably not, so basically we will tank again. This time we don't get as lucky we draft right outside the top 5, let's say #6. We don't manage to draft a franchise-changing player in this draft, but the one from the previous draft is showing promise.

So we will continue to tank. Next season we win the lottery again! Top 5 pick, franchise player! Now we have two franchise players. At the same time our culture is just a disaster. In addition, ownership is grumbling, he's tired of losing. But he's ameliorated by the fact that we have 2 yong franchise players who show promise. The GM tells them, there's light at the end of the tunnel but we need to have just one more bad season. So we have one more bad season and against all the odds, we get a top 5 pick again! Now we are ready to build our championship contender. By all accounts tanking has treated us well. 3 out of 4 years we have gotten coveted top 5 picks! By any definition, this would have to be considered successful tanking.

This was the Wizards from 2010 to 2013. We drafted John Wall (franchise player), Jan Vesely (#6 pick), Bradley Beal (franchise player) and Otto Porter (#3 pick). We never even came close to winning a championship. Even when tanking "works" it's still just hope. Meanwhile, in exchange for that hope you pay dearly. The price of the ticket? A winning culture.

So you get things like this...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/dc-sports-bog/post/remembering-andray-blatche/2012/07/17/gJQAT5JmrW_blog.html
Starting the first home game of what would be his final season in Washington, Blatche grabbed the mic and said “This is your captain, Andray Blatche.” By the end of the night, he was complaining about his role. “You can’t keep having me pick and pop and shooting jumpshots,” he said then. “Gimme the ball in the paint. That’s where I’m most effective at. I’ve been saying that since training camp.”

Before JaVale McGee’s manic attempt for a triple double, there was Andray Blatche’s manic attempt for a triple double, which included jumping in frustration at a foul call, and throwing up his arms in agony when Cartier Martin rebounded a missed shot he wanted. “The ball’s coming to him; your instinct is to catch it,” Phil Chenier said, as Blatche grimaced. “I like getting stats, but I hate to see players play for stats. He’s just standing there, the ball’s coming right to him. What is he supposed to do, let it go by him?...If Andray’s the leader you want him to be, go over, pat Martin on the back, and say don’t worry about it.” Instead, Blatche attempted to race the length of the floor in 4 seconds to rebound his own missed shot.”

https://www.espn.com/nba/news/story?id=5023170
It's the last thing a bad team on a long losing streak needs -- a tantrum and a boycott from a young player who was just starting to put up some good numbers.Andray Blatche was benched after the first 7½ minutes of the Washington Wizards' 95-86 overtime loss to the Charlotte Bobcats on Tuesday night. Coach Flip Saunders said Blatche didn't want to listen when the coach tried to talk to him about playing better defense. "He didn't want to hear it," Saunders said. "I told him, 'If you don't come and talk, if you don't want to be coached, you're not going to play.' We had coaches go up to him three different times, they said he didn't want to play. Fifteen years, never seen anything like it. "He can be [mad] at me, whatever, but you never leave your teammates out to dry like that. Not when you've lost 11 games in a row and you've got a chance to win a game. Uncalled-for. We'll deal with it," Saunders said. Asked if Blatche will play in Wednesday night's game at Indiana, Saunders said: "I would doubt it. I don't know, but I would doubt it."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/wizards/wizards-struggle-to-stay-positive-through-disheartening-campaign/2012/01/15/gIQARs2k1P_story.html
The Wizards have been unable to hide their disappointment with the difficult start, with slouched shoulders and sullen faces becoming the most common sights on the court. They’ve been booed at home and lost all but one of their road games by at least 14 points. An NBA scout who watched the Wizards’ 31-point loss Friday said the body language was so bad that it looked as if every player wanted to be taken out of the game.

I lived through that, and you want to know what I really think? I think that when a team decides that they have to lose in order to win, up becomes down and down becomes up. You can feel free to disagree with me, but I think the bad habits that Wall picked up early in his career, are what ultimately prevented him from reaching his potential. And this is with everything actually working!
User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 14,520
And1: 6,411
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

Re: 2021 Offseason 

Post#1045 » by doclinkin » Tue Aug 3, 2021 5:46 pm

prime1time wrote:
willbcocks wrote:Sheppard seems solid at the tactics but not the strategy. We were on track for a franchise changing top five pick this year if we traded Beal. Instead we're making tweaks to move us from a 35 win team to a 40 win team

This is a myth. We were not on track for a franchise-changing top-five pick. We were on track for the lottery. The lottery offers no guarantee. Yes, after covid and injuries we were one of the worst teams. Let's start there. So what you would have done is what? Tank the rest of the season? Mind you other teams actually tanked the season so if all you do is just play it out we wouldn't have caught Houston, OKC, Cleveland, Orlando, Detroit or Minnesota. So what you're really advocating for is trading Beal/Westbrook and going into a rebuild. Now after the fact you're trying to falsely give the impression that this would in any way guarantee a top 3 pick. This is ultimately the end of all rebuilds. Hope that you get a top pick to draft a franchise-changing player. And then hope that said player actually becomes a franchise-changing talent.

We have no idea what Cade Cunningham, Evan Mobley, Jalen Green or Jalen Suggs will become. Let's say there's John Wall straight out of college is in this draft. Where would he rank among those 4 players? Let's say Beal straight out of college is in this draft class. Where would you rank him amongst those 4 players? When you get a Luka Doncic or a Trae Young - especially super early in your rebuild - rebuilds look amazing. Will any of these top 4 picks have that kind of impact in their first 3 seasons? At best the likelihood is doubtful. So it's more likely than not that we get a chance to draft one of the top players, and doubtful that any of those top 4 players are genuine franchise changing talents (by this I mean clearly better than Bradley Beal).

Hoping that you end up with a franchise-changing player isn't a strategy or a plan. On the other hand, putting together a solid team and creating a winning culture that can attract franchise-changing talent in free agency is a strategy. Especially when you already have a star in Bradley Beal.


_Westbrook_ coached pretty well last year. Player motivation, defensive development by Rui. Feeding the Bigs in the paint. etc.

Brook's only useful innovations what that Sheppard fed him a trio of skilled centers, two who were veteran enough not to totally crap the bed. So he played them. Other than that see how many leads we gave up in the first quarter. Brooks was chronically underprepared as usual, and his stubborn reliance on a trio of scrappy undersized guards put us in a hole. He was coaching to try to save his career, so of course he would play veterans more than young players as often as he could, but yeah, no, if you heard Tommy's breakdown of coach after coach in interview sessions giving the same book on how to beat the Wizards, what was obvious to us fans was opaque to Brooks.

Wes by all reports is a grinder. Meticulous in preparation and game planning. Innovative in thought. And while Brooks was known for player development-- other than 3 all-stars, who has he developed? Westbrook, Durant, and the Beard were going to succeed no matter what. Wes by contrast found a way to scheme the sloth footed Jokic into a net positive on defense. You think Wes would have been unable to find a use for Troy Brown jr? Or benched Garrison Mathews? I doubt that coaching will be the thing that causes us to lose games, at least at the rate that Brooks left us constantly playing catch up.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,471
And1: 5,758
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: 2021 Offseason 

Post#1046 » by NatP4 » Tue Aug 3, 2021 5:47 pm

I don’t really see any holes on the roster. If they move one of Bryant/Harrell (hopefully Bryant) then Jay Huff will step in as a perfectly adequate 3C. We also still have Anthony Gill and Garrison Mathews who have shown to be quality rotation/backup pieces. there is a ton of rim protection and added a couple of guards that actually defend in KCP, Holiday, and Dinwiddie. The lower usage from the starting PG will allow Deni and Rui to have much bigger roles. It’s easy to envision a heavy pick and roll offense with Dinwiddie and Beal as the featured guards and Gafford as the roll man, with all kinds of spot up shooting from Kispert, Bertans, and KCP on the wing. Deni and Rui will be the X factors as always.

Combine all that with a competent head coach for once. I see a really good team.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 33,130
And1: 18,640
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: 2021 Offseason 

Post#1047 » by dckingsfan » Tue Aug 3, 2021 5:59 pm

NatP4 wrote:I don’t really see any holes on the roster. If they move one of Bryant/Harrell (hopefully Bryant) then Jay Huff will step in as a perfectly adequate 3C. We also still have Anthony Gill and Garrison Mathews who have shown to be quality rotation/backup pieces. there is a ton of rim protection and added a couple of guards that actually defend in KCP, Holiday, and Dinwiddie. The lower usage from the starting PG will allow Deni and Rui to have much bigger roles. It’s easy to envision a heavy pick and roll offense with Dinwiddie and Beal as the featured guards and Gafford as the roll man, with all kinds of spot up shooting from Kispert, Bertans, and KCP on the wing. Deni and Rui will be the X factors as always.

Combine all that with a competent head coach for once. I see a really good team.

It is going to be interesting to see what the final roster ends up being - is Tommy done? And yes, how well will our rookie coach do his first year - seeing doc's post above gives me some renewed fanaticism :D.
User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 14,520
And1: 6,411
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

Re: 2021 Offseason 

Post#1048 » by doclinkin » Tue Aug 3, 2021 6:05 pm

nate33 wrote:
prime1time wrote:Interesting take from Hollinger, he'd expect the Wizards to get draft compensation for taking Jordan...
As I noted yesterday, the best pathway to a Spencer Dinwiddie sign-and-trade for the Wizards is by lumping him into the Russell Westbrook trade with the Lakers. Routing, say, Kyle Kuzma directly to Brooklyn eliminates any aggregation issues, and allows the Wizards to trade a $13 million player for a $20 million player, which they couldn't otherwise. More importantly, it's likely the only way for Brooklyn to stuff DeAndre Jordan into this, which is the only way to make the financial math work on the Nets' part given the huge luxury tax bill they would otherwise face. The more interesting angle is what draft compensation might be involved and which direction it would be going if the Wizards are swallowing the two years and nearly $20 million left on Jordan's deal.

I'm not sure what Hollinger means by "aggregation issues".



I think he means roster bloat. How to pack DAJ + Harrell + Kuzma into a front court that has Gafford, Bryant, Rui, Deni, Isaiah Todd, Jay Huff. If you can figure out how to aggregate a mob into some kind of 3-for-1 trade, then you aren't taking on salary for players who won't play, or who have to split minutes.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,258
And1: 7,357
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: 2021 Offseason 

Post#1049 » by FAH1223 » Tue Aug 3, 2021 6:10 pm

Read on Twitter
Image
User avatar
Illuminaire
Veteran
Posts: 2,970
And1: 606
Joined: Jan 04, 2010
 

Re: 2021 Offseason 

Post#1050 » by Illuminaire » Tue Aug 3, 2021 6:14 pm

prime1time wrote:A lot of interesting arguments that are worth discussion.


I mainly replied to you because you accused someone of lying, based on words they never wrote and arguments they never made. Can you respond to that, specifically?

As for the basketball side of things, you make great points, even though I would disagree with one of your main ones. I'm going to wait on that until there is some acknowledgement of the entire reason I responded to you in the first place, however. :)
User avatar
Rafael122
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,684
And1: 3,392
Joined: Oct 11, 2004
       

Re: 2021 Offseason 

Post#1051 » by Rafael122 » Tue Aug 3, 2021 6:32 pm

FAH1223 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Folks are jumping on this implying racial undertones, but I really just think he's pissed off Russ asked out. Ted doesn't have a grasp on the NBA when it comes to player movement.
Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.
80sballboy
RealGM
Posts: 23,939
And1: 5,750
Joined: Jul 15, 2006
       

Re: 2021 Offseason 

Post#1052 » by 80sballboy » Tue Aug 3, 2021 6:38 pm

No more comments on loudmouth Ted, who never seems to look in the mirror, but loves to place the blame on Brooks, Wall, and now Russ.
Rolo to the Magic. So no more skyhook.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: 2021 Offseason 

Post#1053 » by Ruzious » Tue Aug 3, 2021 6:39 pm

FAH1223 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Ted, Bradley Beal says Wuzzup dawg?
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
CntOutSmrtCrazy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,456
And1: 3,481
Joined: Dec 08, 2011

Re: 2021 Offseason 

Post#1054 » by CntOutSmrtCrazy » Tue Aug 3, 2021 6:41 pm

Lopez signs with Magic one year deal. That hook is coming our way four times a year now. :noway:

Wonder how much they signed him for, was hoping to maybe get him back for a decent one year deal but I guess Tommy has bigger plans.
Frichuela
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,442
And1: 3,584
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
 

Re: 2021 Offseason 

Post#1055 » by Frichuela » Tue Aug 3, 2021 6:41 pm

Ted is and always has been the big elephant in the room. He is such a muppet and the key reason for this franchise underachievement.
80sballboy
RealGM
Posts: 23,939
And1: 5,750
Joined: Jul 15, 2006
       

Re: 2021 Offseason 

Post#1056 » by 80sballboy » Tue Aug 3, 2021 6:45 pm

Read on Twitter
?s=20
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 33,130
And1: 18,640
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: 2021 Offseason 

Post#1057 » by dckingsfan » Tue Aug 3, 2021 6:52 pm

CntOutSmrtCrazy wrote:Lopez signs with Magic one year deal. That hook is coming our way four times a year now. :noway:

Wonder how much they signed him for, was hoping to maybe get him back for a decent one year deal but I guess Tommy has bigger plans.

Mo Bamba & Carter say, "don't look to keep us in '22-'23.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: 2021 Offseason 

Post#1058 » by Ruzious » Tue Aug 3, 2021 6:54 pm

nate33 wrote:
prime1time wrote:Interesting take from Hollinger, he'd expect the Wizards to get draft compensation for taking Jordan...
As I noted yesterday, the best pathway to a Spencer Dinwiddie sign-and-trade for the Wizards is by lumping him into the Russell Westbrook trade with the Lakers. Routing, say, Kyle Kuzma directly to Brooklyn eliminates any aggregation issues, and allows the Wizards to trade a $13 million player for a $20 million player, which they couldn't otherwise. More importantly, it's likely the only way for Brooklyn to stuff DeAndre Jordan into this, which is the only way to make the financial math work on the Nets' part given the huge luxury tax bill they would otherwise face. The more interesting angle is what draft compensation might be involved and which direction it would be going if the Wizards are swallowing the two years and nearly $20 million left on Jordan's deal.

I'm not sure what Hollinger means by "aggregation issues".

You can't receive a player in a trade and then immediately package him with another player and send him elsewhere, but that wouldn't be what is happening here. The Westbrook trade hasn't actually happened yet. This Dinwiddie thing would happen as part of the Westbrook trade when it is executed on August 6th. I don't understand why aggregation is a problem. Maybe he's referring to something else that I'm just not understanding.

Maybe he's talking about something like us throwing in Harrell if we take DAJ? If it'll make it work, I don't have a big problem putting in Harrell's expiring contract and taking back DAJ's 2 year deal - as long as Brooklyn throws in a future pick.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: 2021 Offseason 

Post#1059 » by Ruzious » Tue Aug 3, 2021 6:56 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
CntOutSmrtCrazy wrote:Lopez signs with Magic one year deal. That hook is coming our way four times a year now. :noway:

Wonder how much they signed him for, was hoping to maybe get him back for a decent one year deal but I guess Tommy has bigger plans.

Mo Bamba & Carter say, "don't look to keep us in '22-'23.

Right - I don't think they'll be too pleased to try that 3-headed center thing when they're on their contract year. And they're all centers - I don't think any of them can play some PF.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
keynote
General Manager
Posts: 9,388
And1: 2,594
Joined: May 20, 2002
Location: Acceptance
         

Re: 2021 Offseason 

Post#1060 » by keynote » Tue Aug 3, 2021 6:57 pm

Didn't think we were going to sign Lopez, and I'm fine letting Len walk as well.

Still: I kinda liked having a super heavyweight as our third big. It's a nice luxury to be able to throw a beefy 7'er with 6 fouls against Embiid and Jokic.

A low priority luxury, to be sure. But if we part with either Bryant or Harrell, I'd prefer a galoot over another 6'10"-in-shoes type.
Always remember, my friend: the world will change again. And you may have to come back through everywhere you've been.

Return to Washington Wizards