LittleRooster wrote:
I’d love this. Part of me wonders if he lasts that long though
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Then you trade up you have 2 2nds use the gigher one n your 13th should get you near 10
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
LittleRooster wrote:
I’d love this. Part of me wonders if he lasts that long though
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Daver wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:Packers really should be begging to trade down.
Why oh why wpuld you want to trade down is ypu can get that slsnt receiver from Ohio state at 13 if anything use your higher 2nd n your 1st to move up.
ReasonablySober wrote:Daver wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:Packers really should be begging to trade down.
Why oh why wpuld you want to trade down is ypu can get that slsnt receiver from Ohio state at 13 if anything use your higher 2nd n your 1st to move up.
I don't think he's a special enough player to take at #13.
M-C-G wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:Daver wrote:
Why oh why wpuld you want to trade down is ypu can get that slsnt receiver from Ohio state at 13 if anything use your higher 2nd n your 1st to move up.
I don't think he's a special enough player to take at #13.
If we are talking JSN, I think he unlocks the entire offense for this team. Who wouldn't give up a first round pick for a 21 year old cooper kupp? Because I think that is what you are getting.
LUKE23 wrote:MikeIsGood wrote:I have been completely and entirely checked-out. Is JSN who we're targeting? If he's healthy I am **** excited for that. He was my favorite player in all of college football two seasons ago.
Lots of smoke there, I think he's the guy we will take if he's there. I could see Texans taking him one pick ahead of us. If that happens, I think we go edge or OT. I just can't see us taking a TE at 13 given the other needs and how deep that position is.
ReasonablySober wrote:M-C-G wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:
I don't think he's a special enough player to take at #13.
If we are talking JSN, I think he unlocks the entire offense for this team. Who wouldn't give up a first round pick for a 21 year old cooper kupp? Because I think that is what you are getting.
I'd rather have a young Travis Kelce, tbh.
LUKE23 wrote:I'm still going to be surprised if we go TE over WR/Edge/OT at 13. I could see us trading up to land a guy we want late first/early 2nd. The Packers have a ton of needs and TE is really deep this year. It just makes more sense to wait.
nagawicka wrote:LUKE23 wrote:I'm still going to be surprised if we go TE over WR/Edge/OT at 13. I could see us trading up to land a guy we want late first/early 2nd. The Packers have a ton of needs and TE is really deep this year. It just makes more sense to wait.
It's a really really strong TE class, and a really really weak WR class. Why would we draft a WR and not a TE in the first round? I think we pick one TE at Rd2, one later; it's even more likely we pick two DL/DTs Rd2.
nagawicka wrote:LUKE23 wrote:I'm still going to be surprised if we go TE over WR/Edge/OT at 13. I could see us trading up to land a guy we want late first/early 2nd. The Packers have a ton of needs and TE is really deep this year. It just makes more sense to wait.
It's a really really strong TE class, and a really really weak WR class. Why would we draft a WR and not a TE in the first round? I think we pick one TE at Rd2, one later; it's even more likely we pick two DL/DTs Rd2.
MikeIsGood wrote:nagawicka wrote:LUKE23 wrote:I'm still going to be surprised if we go TE over WR/Edge/OT at 13. I could see us trading up to land a guy we want late first/early 2nd. The Packers have a ton of needs and TE is really deep this year. It just makes more sense to wait.
It's a really really strong TE class, and a really really weak WR class. Why would we draft a WR and not a TE in the first round? I think we pick one TE at Rd2, one later; it's even more likely we pick two DL/DTs Rd2.
I feel like your thinking is backwards here. If a class is weak, take the strong player while you can; if the class is strong, you're comfortable getting a quality player with a lesser pick.
Swan Vox wrote:My PFF 3 Round mock let me take:
13: Tyree Wilson
42: Sam LaPorta
45: Jalen Hyatt
78: Quan Martin
Wilson was there at 13 in all three mocks I did. I thought the guy was a top ten lock??? Am I missing something? JSN was gone in all three as well.
ReasonablySober wrote:MikeIsGood wrote:nagawicka wrote:It's a really really strong TE class, and a really really weak WR class. Why would we draft a WR and not a TE in the first round? I think we pick one TE at Rd2, one later; it's even more likely we pick two DL/DTs Rd2.
I feel like your thinking is backwards here. If a class is weak, take the strong player while you can; if the class is strong, you're comfortable getting a quality player with a lesser pick.
My thinking here is why take JSN early when you could get Jonathan Mingo in the 2nd? There isn't really a guy you can do that with in Kincaid. Musgrave is the closest, but I wonder if he's off the Packers board because of medicals.
M-C-G wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:MikeIsGood wrote:
I feel like your thinking is backwards here. If a class is weak, take the strong player while you can; if the class is strong, you're comfortable getting a quality player with a lesser pick.
My thinking here is why take JSN early when you could get Jonathan Mingo in the 2nd? There isn't really a guy you can do that with in Kincaid. Musgrave is the closest, but I wonder if he's off the Packers board because of medicals.
Why take Justin Jefferson when you can get Van Jefferson in the second?
nagawicka wrote:LUKE23 wrote:I'm still going to be surprised if we go TE over WR/Edge/OT at 13. I could see us trading up to land a guy we want late first/early 2nd. The Packers have a ton of needs and TE is really deep this year. It just makes more sense to wait.
It's a really really strong TE class, and a really really weak WR class. Why would we draft a WR and not a TE in the first round? I think we pick one TE at Rd2, one later; it's even more likely we pick two DL/DTs Rd2.