SupremeHustle wrote:Just for reference:
Reddick
Redick
Red dick
Riddick

Roddick

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
SupremeHustle wrote:Just for reference:
Reddick
Redick
Red dick


ShootingtheJ wrote:
Where are you getting the idea that Zubac is some defensive dynamo? He's simply not, in any way. He's neither switchable nor a massive rim protector.
Also, what financial flexibility does he give us? We're over the cap forever either way.
LuessiT wrote:
He hasn't attempted a single 18 footer this year and attempted 5 last year. Like it's highly projectable that Zubac will develope a reasonable 3 pointer over his career but it's rather improbable that he'll develope one over his current contract and nearly impossible this season. Only way I'd entertain a deal for Zubac is if the value is overwhelmingly in our favor (which this deal may be, though I'm way lower on Lou than most).
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
LuessiT wrote:SupremeHustle wrote:WRau1 wrote:Middleton + Forbes for Porter Jr + Barton + Harris + 1st
(Saw this recommend on a DEN website)
Lopez + Merrill for Bamba + Aminu
DDV + DJA + DJW + 1st for Rubio
Rubio/
Jrue/Harris/PatC
Porter Jr/Barton/Craig
Giannis/Aminu
Bamba/Portis
Or go with Jrue/Harris backcourt and bring Rubio off of the bench.
These are solid moves.
If the Bucks could pull that off the Denver trade for Middleton and Forbes I think they'd have to go for it. I was higher on Porter Jr. last season and Harris is just an expensive, slightly worse version of Donte, but I think that deal makes the Bucks better. Maybe not this year, but going forward for sure.
The Rubio deal is bad. He's been terrible and he has us paying Donte + a FRP. Wouldn't give up either for him and certainly not both.
midranger wrote:For his career (7th year currently), he’s:
42.5% 10-16 feet
50% 16-3pt
77% FT
Obviously low volume for all because he’s so effective at the rim, but making midrange shots shouldn’t be anyone’s concern with zubac
LuessiT wrote:midranger wrote:For his career (7th year currently), he’s:
42.5% 10-16 feet
50% 16-3pt
77% FT
Obviously low volume for all because he’s so effective at the rim, but making midrange shots shouldn’t be anyone’s concern with zubac
Low volume? He attempted under 10 shots from the 16-3pt range IN HIS NBA CAREER. That's no volume. I've been arguing that my guy Cheick Diallo can develop a 3 pointer and rn he's out of the league cause he can't make 3's and has a much better pedigree as a shooter. This discussion is absolutely silly.
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
skones wrote:ShootingtheJ wrote:
Where are you getting the idea that Zubac is some defensive dynamo? He's simply not, in any way. He's neither switchable nor a massive rim protector.
Also, what financial flexibility does he give us? We're over the cap forever either way.
Funny you should ask, because I've got evidence here whereas you just state things like "nor a massive rim protector" without anything to actually support your case. He was elite last season, and saying otherwise is just comically misinformed.
13th in the league in DRAPM
+3.5 DEF RAPTOR
2.79 D-LEBRON
Making his defense 3.3 PP100 better last regular season and over 10 PP100 better in the playoffs.
2.4 DRPM grading out at 10th for his position last season
-17.8 DIFF% inside 6 feet last season
-15.6 DIFF% inside 10 feet last season
Here's a breakdown
These numbers are BECAUSE of the rim protection he provided. You seriously don't see the value of a young starting 5 getting paid 7.5M each of the next two seasons to a team that's tapped out? You don't think that allows you to squeeze money elsewhere into your roster?
ShootingtheJ wrote:
No, that's not how the cap works. We'll have the tax MLE with our without him.
WRau1 wrote:LuessiT wrote:SupremeHustle wrote:
These are solid moves.
If the Bucks could pull that off the Denver trade for Middleton and Forbes I think they'd have to go for it. I was higher on Porter Jr. last season and Harris is just an expensive, slightly worse version of Donte, but I think that deal makes the Bucks better. Maybe not this year, but going forward for sure.
The Rubio deal is bad. He's been terrible and he has us paying Donte + a FRP. Wouldn't give up either for him and certainly not both.
Everyone on MIN has been terrible because they are a terribly constructed team. DDV straight up isn't worth Rubio.
AussieBuck wrote:Brook Lopez makes nearly washed Al Horford look lightening quick. Shooting is icing, we need an NBA player at the starting 5. Brook isn't one anymore unless you cater the whole team around hiding his lack of ability to move.
MoreTrife wrote:Love seeing two buffoons have a buffoon competition.
skones wrote:ShootingtheJ wrote:
No, that's not how the cap works. We'll have the tax MLE with our without him.
You're clearly not following. Nowhere did I claim that obtaining him would suddenly create cap space. Cap strapped teams need to squeeze value out of salary slots. A starting center at 7.5M with upward mobility represents that. This isn't a terribly difficult concept to understand.
ShootingtheJ wrote:WRau1 wrote:LuessiT wrote:
The Rubio deal is bad. He's been terrible and he has us paying Donte + a FRP. Wouldn't give up either for him and certainly not both.
Everyone on MIN has been terrible because they are a terribly constructed team. DDV straight up isn't worth Rubio.
Oh, so DDV gets you Olidipo but not Rubio?
ShootingtheJ wrote:skones wrote:ShootingtheJ wrote:
No, that's not how the cap works. We'll have the tax MLE with our without him.
You're clearly not following. Nowhere did I claim that obtaining him would suddenly create cap space. Cap strapped teams need to squeeze value out of salary slots. A starting center at 7.5M with upward mobility represents that. This isn't a terribly difficult concept to understand.
The Clippers thought so highly of him that their offseason focus was to replace him. He's regressed this year.
If he is valuable, than we could move him to a 3rd team where he fits better. I do actually like him, but he's kind of a tweener. He just doesn't fit great next to Giannis.
Bucksfan28 wrote:AussieBuck wrote:Brook Lopez makes nearly washed Al Horford look lightening quick. Shooting is icing, we need an NBA player at the starting 5. Brook isn't one anymore unless you cater the whole team around hiding his lack of ability to move.
Start BPJ and let Brook work against second units?