NBADraft2003 wrote:AirP. wrote:NBADraft2003 wrote:You’re not getting 1st round picks for all them dudes, especially Precious and KZ. That’s laughable, the Rockets got four unprotected 1st round picks that we don’t have and four pick swaps to go along with that. And no, Tyler isn’t nor was he valued higher than Jarrett Allen either. That’s fine if you want to believe it, it’s completely different than what actually happened though.
At the beginning of the year when this was possible, yeah you were.
They got 4 unprotected picks, 3 of them will or should be at the end of the first round... Milwaulkee and Brooklyn's 1st round picks of 2022, Brooklyn's 2024 pick should be late in the 1st round too and only the 2026 pick may be be a good pick. The swaps with Brooklyn PROBABLY won't happen till possibly 2027. I personally don't see the Rockets having a worse pick then Brooklyn for a long time.
If you just look at the picks without the context of where those picks come from it looks better, but in all reality, Houston traded Harden for 3 picks that could make their bad rotation, 1 pick that could possibly be a good starter and 1 pick swap that could net them a starter/rotation piece... they also got Levert but had him moved for Oladipo.... LeVert or Oladipo will probably be way better then anyone Houston drafts from those picks they got. Harden's price was CHEAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It wasn’t. If teams valued KZ or Precious that high, they would’ve traded up to get them, they didn’t. Anything is possible in what if scenarios, which is all that you’re basing this stuff on. “What if Team X valued KZ and Precious enough to give 1st round picks.” That wasn’t happening. All those picks will probably be at the end of the 1st round but do tanking teams care? No. That’s more assets that they get, they have complete control of Brooklyn’s future if something goes wrong(pray it doesn’t nt). Brooklyn gave up a lot for James, we didn’t have what they wanted. It is what it is.
Yes, tanking teams care about where first round picks are, obviously they'd want higher pick but Brooklyn couldn't offer them anything but near the end of the first round picks. 82games did research on what picks netted what types of players... you can read their numbers here...
http://www.82games.com/nbadraftpicks.htmHere is some of their notes...
So at a glance you can see the first five picks tend towards stars and solid types with no complete busts.
The 6-10 range show about 1/3 of the picks reaching star status, but lots of role players as well.
The mid first round (11-20) is much more a crap shoot with as many busts as stars.
Late first round (21-30) only 6% of picks become stars, and less than half even make it to role player caliber stats.
NBADraft2003 wrote:And the draft is a complete crap shoot. Draymond Green turned out to be a better player than most guys in his draft class. Isaiah Thomas also was much better than most of his draft class. Where you are picked does not matter. In the next few years, they are going to have somebody that will be better than Caris and Vic. Especially the latter. Context is, they got 4 unprotected picks that we don’t have nor could’ve gotten and Brooklyn gave up complete unprotected control on picks in the future. Knock on wood, all it takes is one or two injuries to their top players and that’s it.
Interesting... you don't think Miami couldn't have found 4 first round picks to give to Houston? For starters they could have given OKC some compensation to take the protections off of the 2023 pick they had to allow Miami to trade their 2025 1st rounder. I honestly believe a contender would have given 2 first round picks(picks near the end of the 1st round) at near the start of this season to acquire D.Robinson so they'd have his Bird rights to retain him long term after his historic year of shooting. I'm pretty sure many teams would have been fine giving up 2 non top 10 picks for Herro at the beginning of this year, at the time he was looked at/valued like a top 5 pick which is a very expensive pick to acquire. Precious at the time was looked at as a solid pick at that time with no summer camp and a short preseason. Yes, I think Miami had the ability to find 4 if not 5 first round picks to send to Houston. Also, had Bam been in the trade, there would have been a lot less assets that went out the door.
The point is that Riley/Miami didn't want to give up nearly everything to get Harden, MIAMI was the team that walked away from the trade, not Houston. That should tell you that Houston felt that Miami had or could get enough for Harden but Miami didn't want to give up what was needed.