Image ImageImage Image

Bears thread 13

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,298
And1: 6,684
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1101 » by Dresden » Yesterday 3:26 pm

IliketheBullsNBearstoo wrote:Did Swift and Monangai do enough to shut down the trade for Kamara talk(or any other RB)?

Would like to see what Booker can add to our defense if he can play like he did in preseason. We need to add a disrupter to that front 4, it would just take this defense to another level.

And the Moody situation is interesting. Probably going to lose him.


Definitely.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,298
And1: 6,684
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1102 » by Dresden » Yesterday 3:31 pm

nomorezorro wrote:you actually don't even have to judge the qbs against each other at all. "in hindsight, was there a better player available at the pick?" is an extremely facile form of draft evaluation that treats the draft like a much more exact science than it actually is. caleb doesn't need to have been the best possible pick to be a good pick; he just needs to be a good qb.


Good point. You can only go on the information you had at the time, you don't get to see how they perform the first few years and then go back and make your pick. With Maye, he played at NC, not exactly a powerhouse school known for producing QB's. And we'd already had one bomb of a QB from that school. Imagine if he passed on Caleb Williams for Maye, and Maye struggled the way Caleb has? Which is very likely, given how the Bears never seem to be able to develop young QB's.
jnrjr79
Head Coach
Posts: 6,734
And1: 3,992
Joined: May 27, 2003
Location: Chicago

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1103 » by jnrjr79 » Yesterday 3:51 pm

Dresden wrote:
jnrjr79 wrote:
fleet wrote:It will be a potentially awkward situation when the Bears have to let Moody go to another team. And he will definitely be grabbed up. I don’t know how this turns out, Moody could crash to earth next week, but the bloody contract we paid to Santos is increasingly more ill-conceived even after it was il conceived in the first place. I like Santos, but that wasn’t necessary.


Googling around, it seems his guaranteed money is basically done after this year. Wouldn’t shock me if they think about making a change to Moody.


I think it's hard to switch to Moody. His track record is pretty spotty. He might be fine for a year, and then suddenly start missing chip shots and cost you games. It's something you won't know until it happens. Santos is the most accurate kicker the Bears have ever had I believe. It's a tough call.


I think they'll look at it, but ultimately not do it, basically because the sample size will be small enough that it'll be viewed as too risky when you have a known commodity around.
patryk7754
General Manager
Posts: 8,983
And1: 1,564
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1104 » by patryk7754 » Yesterday 4:38 pm

fleet wrote:
patryk7754 wrote:
fleet wrote:Let’s come back in 2 weeks with the ability to stop the run, and ability to run.

A wild concept

….that we manifested into reality

is this what coaching looks like?
panthermark
RealGM
Posts: 21,696
And1: 4,000
Joined: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Undisclosed: MJ's shadow could be lurking....
         

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1105 » by panthermark » Yesterday 4:46 pm

IliketheBullsNBearstoo wrote:Did Swift and Monangai do enough to shut down the trade for Kamara talk(or any other RB)?

Would like to see what Booker can add to our defense if he can play like he did in preseason. We need to add a disrupter to that front 4, it would just take this defense to another level.

And the Moody situation is interesting. Probably going to lose him.


Kamara getting trucked by a DB and giving up a sack was enough for me, but I wasn't really longing for a trade prior to the game. I just though KM needed more touches inside.
Jealousy is a sickness.......get well soon....
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,298
And1: 6,684
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1106 » by Dresden » Yesterday 4:50 pm

Right now, it's looking like our biggest needs are :

1). outside corner (although this is temporary, if Jaylen and Terrell both fully recover)

2) Pass rushers

3) O line- all three positions
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,298
And1: 6,684
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1107 » by Dresden » Yesterday 4:52 pm

Will be interesting to see what the jets do at QB next week. Does Fields get another shot? Do they try to trade for someone? Tyrod doesn't seem like the answer. I guess at this point you just play for the #1 pick.
NZB2323
RealGM
Posts: 14,465
And1: 10,992
Joined: Aug 02, 2008

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1108 » by NZB2323 » Yesterday 5:00 pm

Dresden wrote:Right now, it's looking like our biggest needs are :

1). outside corner (although this is temporary, if Jaylen and Terrell both fully recover)

2) Pass rushers

3) O line- all three positions


Yeah, it’s tough because when healthy we might have the best secondary in the league but they’re always injured.

If it’s true that we can get a pass rusher for a 4th round pick, I would do that in a heartbeat, but if teams are asking for a 1st or 2nd, I’d pass.
HearshotKDS
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,928
And1: 1,077
Joined: Apr 17, 2010
 

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1109 » by HearshotKDS » Yesterday 5:41 pm

One major thing Moody needs to work on is kickoffs. Can not have a kicker who regularly kicks touchbacks since the opposing team now starts at the 35 and Moody kicked a ton of kicks into the end zone. Or at least I assume its Moody, im not checking if they have Taylor taking kicks.
jnrjr79
Head Coach
Posts: 6,734
And1: 3,992
Joined: May 27, 2003
Location: Chicago

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1110 » by jnrjr79 » Yesterday 6:05 pm

HearshotKDS wrote:One major thing Moody needs to work on is kickoffs. Can not have a kicker who regularly kicks touchbacks since the opposing team now starts at the 35 and Moody kicked a ton of kicks into the end zone. Or at least I assume its Moody, im not checking if they have Taylor taking kicks.


It was Moody. I noted the same thing as well. In both games he's had instances where he failed to get his kick into the drop zone.
patryk7754
General Manager
Posts: 8,983
And1: 1,564
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1111 » by patryk7754 » Yesterday 6:17 pm

jnrjr79 wrote:
HearshotKDS wrote:One major thing Moody needs to work on is kickoffs. Can not have a kicker who regularly kicks touchbacks since the opposing team now starts at the 35 and Moody kicked a ton of kicks into the end zone. Or at least I assume its Moody, im not checking if they have Taylor taking kicks.


It was Moody. I noted the same thing as well. In both games he's had instances where he failed to get his kick into the drop zone.

Is there something I’m missing with this? I keep seeing analysts talk about how difficult it is for kickers to adjust to the new rules. Don’t they have to kick it between the goal line and the 20. Why is it all of the sudden so difficult for them to kick it inside the 5 yard line.

I guess a decade of just kicking out of the back of the endzone has made it “difficult” but it’s kind of pathetic they can’t adjust. Literally make millions of dollars to kick a ball into a certain area couple times a week and can’t do that. Legit pisses me off.
Betta Bulleavit
General Manager
Posts: 7,769
And1: 2,881
Joined: Oct 29, 2004
       

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1112 » by Betta Bulleavit » Yesterday 6:57 pm

patryk7754 wrote:
jnrjr79 wrote:
HearshotKDS wrote:One major thing Moody needs to work on is kickoffs. Can not have a kicker who regularly kicks touchbacks since the opposing team now starts at the 35 and Moody kicked a ton of kicks into the end zone. Or at least I assume its Moody, im not checking if they have Taylor taking kicks.


It was Moody. I noted the same thing as well. In both games he's had instances where he failed to get his kick into the drop zone.

Is there something I’m missing with this? I keep seeing analysts talk about how difficult it is for kickers to adjust to the new rules. Don’t they have to kick it between the goal line and the 20. Why is it all of the sudden so difficult for them to kick it inside the 5 yard line.

I guess a decade of just kicking out of the back of the endzone has made it “difficult” but it’s kind of pathetic they can’t adjust. Literally make millions of dollars to kick a ball into a certain area couple times a week and can’t do that. Legit pisses me off.

It's actually more difficult than you might think. Taking something off of a kick without messing with the angle of it can be challenging. Especially when most kickers haven't trained for that as the NFL is the only level where it applies. And even at this level, its pretty new.
jnrjr79
Head Coach
Posts: 6,734
And1: 3,992
Joined: May 27, 2003
Location: Chicago

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1113 » by jnrjr79 » Yesterday 7:11 pm

patryk7754 wrote:
jnrjr79 wrote:
HearshotKDS wrote:One major thing Moody needs to work on is kickoffs. Can not have a kicker who regularly kicks touchbacks since the opposing team now starts at the 35 and Moody kicked a ton of kicks into the end zone. Or at least I assume its Moody, im not checking if they have Taylor taking kicks.


It was Moody. I noted the same thing as well. In both games he's had instances where he failed to get his kick into the drop zone.

Is there something I’m missing with this? I keep seeing analysts talk about how difficult it is for kickers to adjust to the new rules. Don’t they have to kick it between the goal line and the 20. Why is it all of the sudden so difficult for them to kick it inside the 5 yard line.

I guess a decade of just kicking out of the back of the endzone has made it “difficult” but it’s kind of pathetic they can’t adjust. Literally make millions of dollars to kick a ball into a certain area couple times a week and can’t do that. Legit pisses me off.


I don't know what "millions of dollars" has to do with anything. If it were easy, no kickers would struggle with it.
patryk7754
General Manager
Posts: 8,983
And1: 1,564
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1114 » by patryk7754 » Yesterday 7:17 pm

I don’t think it’s very difficult to kick a ball within a 20x50 yard zone.
jnrjr79
Head Coach
Posts: 6,734
And1: 3,992
Joined: May 27, 2003
Location: Chicago

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1115 » by jnrjr79 » Yesterday 7:26 pm

patryk7754 wrote:I don’t think it’s very difficult to kick a ball within a 20x50 yard zone.


Well, then it sounds like you have a lucrative job opportunity awaiting you. Congrats.
User avatar
molepharmer
Head Coach
Posts: 6,789
And1: 1,278
Joined: Feb 27, 2002

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1116 » by molepharmer » Yesterday 7:35 pm

Not making excuses for Moody but A Jahns was at the game and said he noticed Moody throwing up grass during every tv time out to try to get an idea on what the wind was doing; wind was very inconsistent from what Moody told Jahns. The one KO I remember he kicked inside the 5, Saints returned to the about the 33yd line. In general, Bears could improve their kick/punt coverage, even if they are statistically about league average.
TGibson (1/28/17); "..."a 4 or 5 on a scale of 1 to 10 for drama"...What's the worst? "...yelling matches with Thibs, everybody is just going crazy and I'm just sitting there...like, 'Don't call my name please..."
HearshotKDS
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,928
And1: 1,077
Joined: Apr 17, 2010
 

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1117 » by HearshotKDS » Yesterday 8:29 pm

Tim Jenkins has his "highlight analysis" up for anyone that enjoys his content. I wouldnt call him an expert but hes on the list that gets All-22 early and I dont pay for access to it so its nice to see better angles of some of the key plays:



His opinion on the DJ moore throw in the endzone that hit the defenders helmet starts at 13:52 for anyone masochistic enough to want to rewatch that.
NZB2323
RealGM
Posts: 14,465
And1: 10,992
Joined: Aug 02, 2008

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1118 » by NZB2323 » Yesterday 8:37 pm

patryk7754 wrote:I don’t think it’s very difficult to kick a ball within a 20x50 yard zone.


Go to a football field, try and do it, create a video, and then post it here.

Kicking a football exactly 45-64 yards without having it go 25 yards to the left or right every time in every type of weather sounds damn near impossible to me.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,298
And1: 6,684
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1119 » by Dresden » Yesterday 8:42 pm

patryk7754 wrote:I don’t think it’s very difficult to kick a ball within a 20x50 yard zone.


I'm with you. Especially since they have nothing else to do all week but practice kicking. A landing zone 20 yards deep does not seem like it would be that hard to land it in. But since a touchback gets you out to the 35, I don't know you're losing that much by just taking the touchback. Maybe 10 yards if all goes well, but there's always the chance of a long return too.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,298
And1: 6,684
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears thread 13 

Post#1120 » by Dresden » Yesterday 8:43 pm

Santos seemed to land it around the 5 just about every time.

Return to Chicago Bulls