Mos_Heat wrote:MyUniBroDavis wrote:Mos_Heat wrote:Because I'm not a fan of neither Shcroder nor Harrell. I think they spent to much resources for bench guys
Clips finished 2nd/5th on offense/defense. To me they didn't lose much if any on offense, and got better defensively
I mean theyre bench guys that played the most minutes overall in their team
I dont really see how
Rondo/green/dwight/javale
Schroder/matthrws/marc/harrell
Isnt a huge upgrade
A bit bummed we couldnt get glenn rob 3 or batum tho ngl
It's a huge upgrade in a vacuum. But they don't really need much from a C spot, cuz their best C is AD. And their best PG is Lebron, so the fit is more important than an overall level of players. To me someone like Patty Mills or George Hill and Dwight would've been better than Schroder and Harrell
Your argument essentially boils down to their best players are at C and PG, so they don't need much there? That's just so highly disingenuous, tbh.
AD needed help covering Jokic, Gasol helps out there and he's a great fit with both LeBron and AD. Harrell can help keep leads, eat huge minutes himself to help the guys stay fresh. Good fit with LeBron (obviously Ibaka's even better), TBD with AD, but a small lineup with 2 shooters, Bron, Harrell, and AD seems like a great lineup still. And he's someone you can probably flip too
At PG: I mean we know LeBron teams NEED that secondary playmaker to help the non-LeBron minutes. Schroder is that guy, can score himself, and can spot up and shoot. Clear upgrade over Rondo in the RS, and probably won't be as good as Rondo's best in the PS, but on average will probably be even. Similar to Harrell, helps keep leads when LeBron is out and reduces his minutes.
I mean even by your logic these are good moves, I'm just not seeing it. I don't think theyre' an A+++ or anything like that but C+ seems laughably low










