Image ImageImage Image

Trade Thread 2: Make your offers here

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

thxfrthmmrs
Sophomore
Posts: 215
And1: 83
Joined: Jul 07, 2011
     

Re: Trade Thread 2: Make your offers here 

Post#1161 » by thxfrthmmrs » Tue May 1, 2018 11:37 pm

aramada wrote:
thxfrthmmrs wrote:
aramada wrote:
Beal is a 24 year old all star who has had to be in the shadow of Wall. He's good enough to be a number one option. Those are not cheap.
With a little bit of polishing, he can become a superstar and be a 1-2 punch with Lauri. Adding Dunn, you have a nice core for the next few years.
That option would prevent us from overpaying LaVine, who I doubt will ever be as good as Beal and will have to be hidden defensively for the rest of his career. Mahinmi is a bad contract but a clear upgrade at back up Center.
By my calculations, Bulls would also keep enough cap room for a max contract (and more) in the summer of 2019 with Lopez, Grant, Asik (-3MM), and Holiday coming off the books.


Are you related to Brad Beal? I am sure not even his mother thinks that highly of him. He averaged something like 22-4-5 in significant amount of games with Wall out this year, while the team had a so-so record. He's a nice 2nd or 3rd option, not someone worth both 6th, 12th pick along with Portis, Valentine.


I don't know Beal - met his brother who went to Loyola once, total dbag, but that's it - but it's fair to say that I value him more as an NBA player than you do.

It's kind of interesting that your first argument against him is his stats line, which not only got him an all-star selection, but also top 15 on the scoring list despite sharing the ball with Wall. He also improved on all aspects of his game since the previous year (TRB%, AST%, STL%, BLK% all went up) outside of a slight slump in shooting. That his team had a "so-so" (i.e. enough for playoffs) record can only partially be blamed on him - this is clearly Wall's team, even when he's injured.
You are right in saying that he is not a first option because it's not his role. But I guarantee you that his value is really high because if you put him in a situation to be a primary option, his production will go even higher (into top 10 in scoring) and even if he doesn't become a superstar, he will still be a multiple all-star guy. Just check out where SGs who grew into leaders, like Butler, Oladipo, or DeRozan, were when they were 24. Besides DeMar who had scarily similar stats, he's way ahead of these guys.

In this context, he is head and shoulder above any other piece involved in this deal. Val and Portis haven't proved they can be starters in this league + Portis is expiring. If you want to get a sense of the value of #6, just check out players that have been selected at that spot. In the past 40 years (starting on a good note with Bird in 1978), 8 players (20%) became all-stars, but only 3 of them (Bird, Antoine Walker, and B Roy) had more than one selection. Only Bird made it to HOF. Years of great historical drafts produced Melvin Turpin (1984), Chris Kaman (2003), and Danilo Gallinari (2008). Lastly, Washington is only getting #12 by combining our #22 with their #15, just to get another chance at talent. #22 could potentially be removed from the deal. The real controversial piece is how LaVine would need to be released as a result, which I can understand.


So your argument is his numbers could be better but they aren't because he was a #2 option behind Wall, however you conceded that he isn't a #1 option. It's easy to say that someone can pad their stats if they're put in a position as #1 option, i.e. Devin Booker, a Young Kevin Love, etc. And if Beal is your #1 option, your team just aren't that good. I personally think he's a really good #3 option on a contender, and #2 option on a good playoff team. Consider this, where would he rank in the ranks of Warriors, Rockets, even Wolves, Sixers, Thunder and Pelicans (healthy)?

Also mind you that he actually played 6 full seasons now. Players don't often break out after 6 seasons. Furthermore, his stats were actually better last season, when he played more games with Wall in the lineup. This season he got more playing time as #1 option but stats regressed, whether it's PER, RPM, ORTG and DRTG. I think it's safe to say he has peaked or neared his peak.

Also if you look at what we have gotten for Butler, a universally better player on a better contract, we swapped the 16th for 7th (in a weaker draft no less), got a older rookie coming off an awful 1st year, and a athletic guy coming off a torn ACL. But somehow you are willing to pay THAT much for Beal, and here's the real kicker, we still have to take on the dead weight of an awful contract in Mahinmi who makes Shrek's contract look like a steal. I would give a HARD PASS.
xpmar9x
Analyst
Posts: 3,502
And1: 208
Joined: Feb 18, 2010

Re: Trade Thread 2: Make your offers here 

Post#1162 » by xpmar9x » Tue May 1, 2018 11:43 pm

sco wrote:
xpmar9x wrote:
GimmeDat wrote:
We'd basically have to include RoLo and Asik to match salary, because Otto is on roughly 26m.... I feel like Portis would on the outs considering Porter can play 4 part time.

How many assets we'd have to cough up depends on how much the salary relief helps them, imo, but on our end, I'd be wary of giving up too much value given how much cap flexibility we'd be foregoing.

My head's saying leave that alone, but Otto is a great piece. Dunn/Lavine/Porter/Lauri/Bamba, for instance, has a lot of potential. We would have a poor bench and little assets, though.


Dunn/Lavine/Porter/Lauri/Bamba really intrigues me (or Ayton, Bagley, JJJ :lol:)

Taking Porter and Mahinmi back possible if we sent Rolo, Asik, Portis, and Felicio? They could then flip Gortat/Morris in another trade, if wanted. Taking those future contracts of Otto/Ian will hurt, but I love that above core. Likely include 22.

Sign Hezonja for cheap. Resign Nwaba/Vonleh for cheap.

Dunn - Grant - Payne
Lavine - Valentine - Nwaba - Kilpatrick
Porter - Hezonja
Lauri - Vonleh
1st - Mahinmi

...hmmm, maybe not worth the cap flexibility.

The wiz would need to have made a decision that they want Oubre over Porter and that Portis is better than Morris. I don't think either is really true.


It's not that the Wiz value Oubre over Porter, its the fact they cant pay their 3rd option (Otto) over $26m/yr. Honestly, neither should we. If anything I'd rather take a flyer on Oubre for a year, see if he's worth the resign. Cheaper price too.

Would love Beal, wouldnt want to give up 6 for him however.
Davell
Junior
Posts: 458
And1: 242
Joined: Feb 24, 2017
     

Re: Trade Thread 2: Make your offers here 

Post#1163 » by Davell » Tue May 1, 2018 11:52 pm

Shepnowski brought up Ingram today. Mentioned the "what if" of the Lakers getting LeBron and George. Brought up Deng and Ingram for Holiday and 22.

I'm in. Granted, I don't see the Lakers doing that, because I really don't see them getting those guys.
PrimzyBulls81
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,933
And1: 1,226
Joined: Feb 09, 2013

Re: Trade Thread 2: Make your offers here 

Post#1164 » by PrimzyBulls81 » Wed May 2, 2018 7:12 am

Ingram and Deng POS contract for Holiday and 22?? hell no,.. stupid trade
User avatar
GimmeDat
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 23,930
And1: 16,927
Joined: Sep 27, 2013
Location: Australia
 

Re: Trade Thread 2: Make your offers here 

Post#1165 » by GimmeDat » Wed May 2, 2018 7:57 am

PrimzyBulls81 wrote:Ingram and Deng POS contract for Holiday and 22?? hell no,.. stupid trade


You know we're talking about Brandon and not Andre, right? I'd do that every damn day of the week.
realEAST
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,855
And1: 1,347
Joined: Mar 25, 2016
   

Re: Trade Thread 2: Make your offers here 

Post#1166 » by realEAST » Wed May 2, 2018 8:27 am

What would you think about snatching WCS for cheap? I think he is pretty good defender with room to grow on that side as he becomes stronger, great fit along Markk as very fluid big capable of defending perimeter and protecting the rim. He has developed mid range jumper and is solid passer (3 assist per game), and is decent rim runner, so won't be player less on offense.

My biggest concern? Best prospects we are looking at in Draft are bigs.
PrimzyBulls81
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,933
And1: 1,226
Joined: Feb 09, 2013

Re: Trade Thread 2: Make your offers here 

Post#1167 » by PrimzyBulls81 » Wed May 2, 2018 8:32 am

GimmeDat wrote:
PrimzyBulls81 wrote:Ingram and Deng POS contract for Holiday and 22?? hell no,.. stupid trade


You know we're talking about Brandon and not Andre, right? I'd do that every damn day of the week.


I know.. Im just sick and tired of too skinny long legs guys on Bulls :lol: aka Holiday 2.0
Maybe if Ingram gets some muscles on that body,I would be intrigued.. but if he is soo good,why would
Lakers be dumb enough to trade him anyway... but to be honest,I didnt see any Laker game this season.
I know he has some skills,decent shot... but is he legit SF,game changer and good on D?
User avatar
dumbell78
General Manager
Posts: 9,137
And1: 5,476
Joined: Apr 03, 2012
Location: Sydney, Aus. by way of Muddy Water land (Chicago)
       

Re: Trade Thread 2: Make your offers here 

Post#1168 » by dumbell78 » Wed May 2, 2018 10:04 am

PrimzyBulls81 wrote:Ingram and Deng POS contract for Holiday and 22?? hell no,.. stupid trade


You're nuts, I do that in a nano second.
KC: Do you still think you're a championship-caliber team?
Gar: I never said that and correct me if I'm wrong.
KC: You were asked that question at the news conference announcing Thibodeau's dismissal and you answered yes
thxfrthmmrs
Sophomore
Posts: 215
And1: 83
Joined: Jul 07, 2011
     

Re: Trade Thread 2: Make your offers here 

Post#1169 » by thxfrthmmrs » Wed May 2, 2018 12:32 pm

PrimzyBulls81 wrote:
GimmeDat wrote:
PrimzyBulls81 wrote:Ingram and Deng POS contract for Holiday and 22?? hell no,.. stupid trade


You know we're talking about Brandon and not Andre, right? I'd do that every damn day of the week.


I know.. Im just sick and tired of too skinny long legs guys on Bulls :lol: aka Holiday 2.0
Maybe if Ingram gets some muscles on that body,I would be intrigued.. but if he is soo good,why would
Lakers be dumb enough to trade him anyway... but to be honest,I didnt see any Laker game this season.
I know he has some skills,decent shot... but is he legit SF,game changer and good on D?


I think what they're trying to do is unload Deng's contract and get both Lebron and George. Since Ingram plays the same position as both of them and not as good as them yet, he's expandable.

Ugly hairdo aside Ingram is a rising star and fits nicely on this team, dude doesn't even turn 21 until next season. I am even willing to give the 6th pick straight up for him if lakers are willing to do it.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,518
And1: 9,253
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Trade Thread 2: Make your offers here 

Post#1170 » by sco » Wed May 2, 2018 12:45 pm

thxfrthmmrs wrote:
PrimzyBulls81 wrote:
GimmeDat wrote:
You know we're talking about Brandon and not Andre, right? I'd do that every damn day of the week.


I know.. Im just sick and tired of too skinny long legs guys on Bulls :lol: aka Holiday 2.0
Maybe if Ingram gets some muscles on that body,I would be intrigued.. but if he is soo good,why would
Lakers be dumb enough to trade him anyway... but to be honest,I didnt see any Laker game this season.
I know he has some skills,decent shot... but is he legit SF,game changer and good on D?


I think what they're trying to do is unload Deng's contract and get both Lebron and George. Since Ingram plays the same position as both of them and not as good as them yet, he's expandable.

Ugly hairdo aside Ingram is a rising star and fits nicely on this team, dude doesn't even turn 21 until next season. I am even willing to give the 6th pick straight up for him if lakers are willing to do it.


Yeah, I'm with you. I'd definitely trade our 6th pick straight up if between MPj, Young, Mikal and Carter.

I think taking Deng's contract would be a smart move. It's 2 more seasons...i.e. opportunity cost is low if we start the season with Dunn, LaVine, Ingram, Lauri, #6/RoLo. Where are you going to plug in a big FA? After this season Deng's contract may be a decent asset. Also, our guys would benefit from having a great leader like Deng around. I'm not sure how much salary LA needs, but if somehow we can toss back Shrek in that deal, it would be a home run!
:clap:
xpmar9x
Analyst
Posts: 3,502
And1: 208
Joined: Feb 18, 2010

Re: Trade Thread 2: Make your offers here 

Post#1171 » by xpmar9x » Wed May 2, 2018 3:11 pm

Beal, J Smith, & #15 for Lopez, Asik, Valentine, Grant, & #6?

Wash saves $ and adds a top pick. Wall-Oubre-Porter-Morris-Gortat w Grant-Tomas-Denzel-#6?-Lopez off the bench.

We then pursue Jabari Parker. Still hard to let Lavine walk, unless he demands dumb money, to me $15-17m/yr is plenty fair. Maybe attempt a s&t for Boogie using Lavine? Can always sign Zach and trade later, like we did with Miro, hence why im all for resigning him AND still affording Jabari.

Dunn - (Lavine) - Payne
Beal - (Lavine) - Kilpatrick - Blakeney
Jabari - Holiday - #22
Lauri - BP/Jabari - Smith
BP - #15 - Felicio
leo921
Senior
Posts: 742
And1: 252
Joined: Jun 27, 2015
     

Re: Trade Thread 2: Make your offers here 

Post#1172 » by leo921 » Wed May 2, 2018 3:55 pm

Bulls trade - Portis (1.5m), #22 pick, 2019 1st round pick (top 3 protected)
for
Kings trade - Zach Randolph (12m) and the 7th pick

Kings - They have no first round pick in 2019 and they are still rebuilding. This trade gives them a young stretch 4 (36% from 3) with a 20PER to help the team. Portis and WCS is a nice young developing frontcourt and works well in PNR with Fox. Best part this gives the Kings 10 million more in cap room and a solid 2019 draft pick.

Fox/Mason
Hield/Carter
Bogdanovic/Jackson
Portis/Skal
WCS/Giles

Bulls - Take on money and sacrifice there 2019 pick in order to solidify there young core. In this instance the Bulls would have the 6th and 7th pick and I would take Bamba and Mikal Bridges. Gives us a young uptempo defensively solid team to devolp and we can still be players in FA in 2019 and 2020.

Dunn/Payne
Lavine/Nwaba
Mikal Bridges/Valentine
Markkanen/Zach Randolph
Bamba/Lopez
ChiCitySPORTS#1
RealGM
Posts: 20,287
And1: 5,550
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: West Loop

Re: Trade Thread 2: Make your offers here 

Post#1173 » by ChiCitySPORTS#1 » Wed May 2, 2018 4:16 pm

GimmeDat wrote:
PrimzyBulls81 wrote:Ingram and Deng POS contract for Holiday and 22?? hell no,.. stupid trade


You know we're talking about Brandon and not Andre, right? I'd do that every damn day of the week.


How sweet that would be. Interesting to see what we can get this offseason for eating some bad contracts. The above is about an ideal as a scenario you can get. Deng is a former Bull and a good vet, and he can retire here. That being said, I dont think the Lakers need to trade anyone else to sign 2 max FA's since they dumped Clarkson, Nance Jr., but fun to think about....

Dunn
Lavine
Ingram
Lauri
Bamba

:rockon:
aramada
Analyst
Posts: 3,019
And1: 950
Joined: Dec 27, 2008
   

Re: Trade Thread 2: Make your offers here 

Post#1174 » by aramada » Wed May 2, 2018 5:49 pm

thxfrthmmrs wrote:
So your argument is his numbers could be better but they aren't because he was a #2 option behind Wall, however you conceded that he isn't a #1 option. It's easy to say that someone can pad their stats if they're put in a position as #1 option, i.e. Devin Booker, a Young Kevin Love, etc. And if Beal is your #1 option, your team just aren't that good. I personally think he's a really good #3 option on a contender, and #2 option on a good playoff team. Consider this, where would he rank in the ranks of Warriors, Rockets, even Wolves, Sixers, Thunder and Pelicans (healthy)?


My argument is his numbers as #2/1b are already good enough to project even better as a primary guy. You trade him for his current production, but also based on potential knowing that he is not in his prime yet.
Devin Booker is 20 years old and on a terrible young team ... I'll wait before jumping to conclusions here. As for Kevin Love, it was pretty obvious that he had clear (mostly physical/athletic) limitations that prevented him to be a true leader on a playoff team.


thxfrthmmrs wrote:Also mind you that he actually played 6 full seasons now. Players don't often break out after 6 seasons. Furthermore, his stats were actually better last season, when he played more games with Wall in the lineup. This season he got more playing time as #1 option but stats regressed, whether it's PER, RPM, ORTG and DRTG. I think it's safe to say he has peaked or neared his peak.


Disagree with stats better last season. As I said before, his shooting went down a bit, hence his scoring, ORTG, and TS%, which all impact PER and RPM numbers. You are wrong about DRTG, which actually went down (ie better). His usage going up could help partly explain why his shooting numbers went down. If you want some perspective on shooting, look at the absolute reference for the position (in this era), James Harden. You'll notice that it's not a straight line, far from it. I'll just say here that I don't expect Beal to be Harden. But that's reflected in the deal, too. And I also expect Lauri developing as a legit 1b option, and Dunn becoming a "mini-Wall" type 3rd option so it's not like he wouldn't have any help. The stats I brought up showed that he is becoming a more complete player, which happens as you get more experience and should continue this way.

thxfrthmmrs wrote:Also if you look at what we have gotten for Butler, a universally better player on a better contract, we swapped the 16th for 7th (in a weaker draft no less), got a older rookie coming off an awful 1st year, and a athletic guy coming off a torn ACL. But somehow you are willing to pay THAT much for Beal, and here's the real kicker, we still have to take on the dead weight of an awful contract in Mahinmi who makes Shrek's contract look like a steal. I would give a HARD PASS.

[/quote]

Bulls valued Dunn more than anyone else and Thibs knew it, since they already considered trading Butler for him a year before - for the purpose of that deal he was still valued like a high pick. Zach had ACL issues but he was a starter pre-injury and his production was better than both Portis and Valentine. It was fair to expect that his ACL would not affect his production too much as his scoring style was more jumpshot based than attacking the basket (like D Rose) - hard to make conclusions so far as his PER36 and USG scoring went way up, but he is now a primary ball handler.
Now we clearly disagree on value, but if we break down trade pieces, I'd say that Dunn, LaVine, and 7 (minus the negative value of losing #16) is still way better than Val, Portis, and 6. Now I agree that Butler was better and on a better contract, but he was also 3 years older. Beal's contract will be 25% of the cap (% will decrease in future years), which is not too bad for your best player. Consider also that if you are not upgrading SG, then you have to sign LaVine to a contract comparable to Butler's (I'm not very high on him as a potential leader). So the real question is - is the difference in packages worth the Bulls taking on Mahinmi's? I'd say yes - this contract is bad, but Mahinmi is a legit back-up C (unlike Shrek), which makes it less negative in value.
The Box Office
Veteran
Posts: 2,525
And1: 1,466
Joined: Jun 14, 2016

Kawhi Leonard 

Post#1175 » by The Box Office » Wed May 2, 2018 11:31 pm

That would be my dream summer: getting Kawhi Leonard somehow and still keep the number 6 pick.
IrishBeatdown
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,742
And1: 1,052
Joined: Apr 13, 2011

Re: Trade Thread 2: Make your offers here 

Post#1176 » by IrishBeatdown » Thu May 3, 2018 2:11 am

Since Kawhi seems destined for a divorce from the spurs, I think its time to explore his potential value

The Box Office wrote:That would be my dream summer: getting Kawhi Leonard somehow and still keep the number 6 pick.


Chicago doesn't have the assets to make a deal without including the lottery pick, even with a future #1 and #22 from this year. I guess if they value Markkanen highly, they could take him and leave #6 overall but I don't see the spurs taking that deal without an additional asset (Portis?). There is also the issue of the spurs taking money back, which they will avoid at all costs. I see them being reluctant to take on Felicio or Asik money.
thxfrthmmrs
Sophomore
Posts: 215
And1: 83
Joined: Jul 07, 2011
     

Re: Trade Thread 2: Make your offers here 

Post#1177 » by thxfrthmmrs » Thu May 3, 2018 2:44 am

aramada wrote:
thxfrthmmrs wrote:
So your argument is his numbers could be better but they aren't because he was a #2 option behind Wall, however you conceded that he isn't a #1 option. It's easy to say that someone can pad their stats if they're put in a position as #1 option, i.e. Devin Booker, a Young Kevin Love, etc. And if Beal is your #1 option, your team just aren't that good. I personally think he's a really good #3 option on a contender, and #2 option on a good playoff team. Consider this, where would he rank in the ranks of Warriors, Rockets, even Wolves, Sixers, Thunder and Pelicans (healthy)?


My argument is his numbers as #2/1b are already good enough to project even better as a primary guy. You trade him for his current production, but also based on potential knowing that he is not in his prime yet.
Devin Booker is 20 years old and on a terrible young team ... I'll wait before jumping to conclusions here. As for Kevin Love, it was pretty obvious that he had clear (mostly physical/athletic) limitations that prevented him to be a true leader on a playoff team.


thxfrthmmrs wrote:Also mind you that he actually played 6 full seasons now. Players don't often break out after 6 seasons. Furthermore, his stats were actually better last season, when he played more games with Wall in the lineup. This season he got more playing time as #1 option but stats regressed, whether it's PER, RPM, ORTG and DRTG. I think it's safe to say he has peaked or neared his peak.


Disagree with stats better last season. As I said before, his shooting went down a bit, hence his scoring, ORTG, and TS%, which all impact PER and RPM numbers. You are wrong about DRTG, which actually went down (ie better). His usage going up could help partly explain why his shooting numbers went down. If you want some perspective on shooting, look at the absolute reference for the position (in this era), James Harden. You'll notice that it's not a straight line, far from it. I'll just say here that I don't expect Beal to be Harden. But that's reflected in the deal, too. And I also expect Lauri developing as a legit 1b option, and Dunn becoming a "mini-Wall" type 3rd option so it's not like he wouldn't have any help. The stats I brought up showed that he is becoming a more complete player, which happens as you get more experience and should continue this way.

thxfrthmmrs wrote:Also if you look at what we have gotten for Butler, a universally better player on a better contract, we swapped the 16th for 7th (in a weaker draft no less), got a older rookie coming off an awful 1st year, and a athletic guy coming off a torn ACL. But somehow you are willing to pay THAT much for Beal, and here's the real kicker, we still have to take on the dead weight of an awful contract in Mahinmi who makes Shrek's contract look like a steal. I would give a HARD PASS.



If you really have to split hair and squint your eyes that hard to justified rather Beal improved or not from prior year, then you don't have a convincing case that he's will still improve at a substantial rate. The fact that you admitted that his shooting (therefore his PER and RPM) regressed due to increase usage is a great telling sign whether he's an number 1 option. The most comical part is despite the fact that we're off to a great start in the rebuild, you suggest that we should put ourselves back in a corner by paying Brad Beal of all players as the best player on a contending team, that's just a great way to derail the rebuild process.

All responses you have gotten from your offer is you are overpaying for Beal. You are definitely the only person here who thinks Beal is a #1 option and is worth that offer. Don't get me wrong, I like Beal and don't mind at all to have him on the team. What you're failing to get is if we don't have to pay that much for him, why do I want to do your offer? Who am I bidding against? Do yourself a favor, put a poll out to the Wiz forum to see if Wiz is willing to take that offer. My bet is it's an overwhelming yes. Then also poll 5-10 other franchises to see if they will pay that price if they're in our position. I would bet it's an overwhelming no. So then if I may ask, why the hell do I want to overpay if I am not bidding against anyone.
User avatar
Ccwatercraft
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,150
And1: 1,769
Joined: Jul 11, 2017
       

Re: Trade Thread 2: Make your offers here 

Post#1178 » by Ccwatercraft » Fri May 4, 2018 5:01 am

thxfrthmmrs wrote:
PrimzyBulls81 wrote:
GimmeDat wrote:
You know we're talking about Brandon and not Andre, right? I'd do that every damn day of the week.


I know.. Im just sick and tired of too skinny long legs guys on Bulls :lol: aka Holiday 2.0
Maybe if Ingram gets some muscles on that body,I would be intrigued.. but if he is soo good,why would
Lakers be dumb enough to trade him anyway... but to be honest,I didnt see any Laker game this season.
I know he has some skills,decent shot... but is he legit SF,game changer and good on D?


I think what they're trying to do is unload Deng's contract and get both Lebron and George. Since Ingram plays the same position as both of them and not as good as them yet, he's expandable.

Ugly hairdo aside Ingram is a rising star and fits nicely on this team, dude doesn't even turn 21 until next season. I am even willing to give the 6th pick straight up for him if lakers are willing to do it.


Not discounting Ingram but if we were offering the number six and or the 22 with the willingness to take on a terrible contract we could probably do better.
His value is rising but it's only reasonable for one more year and then the man's got to get paid after that. if you tacked the deng contract we be paying 20 million salary for 2 yrs along with a draft pick for the rights to Ingram, next year 5mil , then a raise. Not that it will happen but id rather spend 30 on Paul george instead of 24 on Ingram/deng or just seriously shop one or both of our pics and see what's out there.

Side note, need to clear some roster space so we can take some chances. It's a buyer's market. I don't want to see deng parked next to asik and shrek.
N.O.R.E.
RealGM
Posts: 17,320
And1: 240
Joined: Apr 12, 2002

Re: Trade Thread 2: Make your offers here 

Post#1179 » by N.O.R.E. » Fri May 4, 2018 4:44 pm

leo921 wrote:Bulls trade - Portis (1.5m), #22 pick, 2019 1st round pick (top 3 protected)
for
Kings trade - Zach Randolph (12m) and the 7th pick


That's far too high a price for us to pay and far too much risk.

I'd much rather give up the #22 + Valentine for Ingram and Deng...
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,583
And1: 9,230
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Trade Thread 2: Make your offers here 

Post#1180 » by Dan Z » Fri May 4, 2018 4:55 pm

There's talk of the Knicks going after LeBron now that Fizdale is the coach (there's a thread on the General board). They'll need cap space to do it. What incentive would you need to take on Noah's contract? The #9 pick? Other? Or nothing (no interest in this at all)?

Return to Chicago Bulls