Saberestar wrote:Ghost of Kleine wrote:ً (@swaveyquis) Tweeted:
“Yall giving Mikal too much credit” yet they defensive anchor sayin stuff like this lmaooo also called Chris Paul a winner and gave Ayton love
https://t.co/0f5xLUQJrk ?s=20
Typical Draymond here!
Awfully bitter and salty it seems about Bridges shutting down Curry. I guess we'll just have to do it again on Friday till he gets the message. Bridges is for real!...............DPOTY.

Didn't you watch the video?
Yeah! He did give solid praise to Bridges saying he played like an animal on defense, And was the head of the snake in that regard, And that was great of him of course! So he wasn't specifically/ directly slighting Bridges in the video clip. But moreover minimizing the win overall, Giving excuses as to why they lost:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/heavy.com/sports/golden-state-warriors/draymond-green-phoenix-suns-rematch/amp/Green pointed out that the Warriors did a lot to shoot themselves in the foot in the game, and that the Suns should not expect that to be something Golden State does repeatedly.
Subtle inference of our win being more luck than legitimate?
“Saying all of that, we were on the road with 23, 24 turnovers (22, actually),” Green said. “Yet with two-and-a-half minutes to go (actually, it was 4:12 left in the fourth quarter), I (missed) a left-hand layup, streaking down the floor with a chance to cut it to one. And so, in saying that, I love where we are still as a team. I am not sure you’ll find a game where myself, Steph (Curry) and Wigs (Andrew Wiggins) will play worse than we played (Tuesday) night. And we still had a chance to win that game right down the stretch.”
Another subtle inference that they had an uncharacteristic offensive scoring night. And by grouping Curry in that context of an off shooting/ offensive scoring night, it cleverly insinuates that the win overall was anomalous. And it also somewhat minimizes the legitimacy of the job that Bridges did on Curry. Basically implying that as great as Bridges defense was that night, he was only that successful due to Curry having such an aberration of an off night offensively, as opposed to Bridges defense being that elite. Again, I know that it's a matter of personal perspective here, And I apologize if I'm reading too much into things here. But in those comments, At least to me, he's minimizing our win by inferring that we basically won due to Curry (primarily) having a horrible shooting night along with himself and Wiggins, as well as their turnovers and that the suns should not expect this to happen repeatedly, hence subtly implying our win being more a result of pure luck than actual substance?
I just think that aside from the wonderful compliments to Bridges defense initially, He threw in some very clever, subtle digs at our win and by association Mikals' defense being key to our win, implying it was more of a result of their off night as a team ( defense on Curry included) rather than our legitimate status as an elite team.