ImageImageImage

The Positivity Thread

Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts

User avatar
kmgarnett21
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,868
And1: 398
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
       

Re: The Positivity Thread 

Post#121 » by kmgarnett21 » Fri Jun 26, 2015 9:28 pm

I haven't bought the NBA League Pass in about 3-4 years. Gonna have to this year.
User avatar
urinesane
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,012
And1: 2,887
Joined: May 10, 2010
 

Re: The Positivity Thread 

Post#122 » by urinesane » Fri Jun 26, 2015 9:52 pm

kmgarnett21 wrote:I haven't bought the NBA League Pass in about 3-4 years. Gonna have to this year.


Get ballstreams instead... way better.
User avatar
Basti
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,609
And1: 3,844
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: Æ ha en ståkukk!
   

Re: The Positivity Thread 

Post#123 » by Basti » Sat Jun 27, 2015 9:36 am

urinesane wrote:
kmgarnett21 wrote:I haven't bought the NBA League Pass in about 3-4 years. Gonna have to this year.


Get ballstreams instead... way better.


I second this notion.

But I also heard League Pass has gotten better. Either way, you probably won't regret buying either one.
User avatar
urinesane
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,012
And1: 2,887
Joined: May 10, 2010
 

Re: The Positivity Thread 

Post#124 » by urinesane » Sat Jun 27, 2015 7:36 pm

Basti wrote:
urinesane wrote:
kmgarnett21 wrote:I haven't bought the NBA League Pass in about 3-4 years. Gonna have to this year.


Get ballstreams instead... way better.


I second this notion.

But I also heard League Pass has gotten better. Either way, you probably won't regret buying either one.


Even if it's better than it was (it was terrible) League Pass is still like $200 for all teams with blackouts.

I'll take the $60ish bill of ballstreams with no blackouts and DVR of past years games too.
yitur
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,943
And1: 898
Joined: Sep 11, 2011
   

 

Post#125 » by yitur » Sat Jun 27, 2015 7:51 pm

It's off the topic but can someone tell me ballstream has the se qualities but cheaper right? Also is it legal?
yitur
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,943
And1: 898
Joined: Sep 11, 2011
   

 

Post#126 » by yitur » Sat Jun 27, 2015 7:59 pm

Back to the topic, you guys have an amazingly bright future ahead of you. I'm hopefull that lakers will be your rivals for the next decade, by that I mean you guys are a sure thing while we have many ifs. It will be great to watch your team grow into one of the powerhouses in the NBA.
User avatar
urinesane
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,012
And1: 2,887
Joined: May 10, 2010
 

Re: 

Post#127 » by urinesane » Sat Jun 27, 2015 8:04 pm

yitur wrote:It's off the topic but can someone tell me ballstream has the se qualities but cheaper right? Also is it legal?


It's better than LP and cheaper... not sure if legal (but it's not a scam).
User avatar
AQuintus
RealGM
Posts: 10,425
And1: 2,458
Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
   

Re: Re: 

Post#128 » by AQuintus » Sat Jun 27, 2015 8:13 pm

urinesane wrote:not sure if legal (but it's not a scam).


IIRC, it's a really grey area in the law. Pretty sure that it's an illegal copyright violation in the USA, but it's not illegal in the country that hosts ballstream's servers.

Edit:

And under US law, only the copier (in this case, ballstreams) is in violation of copyright. So, anyone that uses the service should be fine.*


*This is not intended to be legal advice. If you're unsure about any of this, consult an attorney.
Image
LofJ
RealGM
Posts: 12,826
And1: 11,026
Joined: Mar 29, 2014
   

Re: The Positivity Thread 

Post#129 » by LofJ » Sat Jun 27, 2015 9:52 pm

Just wanted to post to say how happy I am for you guys. Towns is going to be an amazing player. He reminds me of Rasheed Wallace, but without the craziness. He is going to be a damn good player for a long time, I'm glad you got him.
Dleavitt24
Junior
Posts: 331
And1: 61
Joined: Mar 26, 2015
 

Re: The Positivity Thread 

Post#130 » by Dleavitt24 » Fri Jul 3, 2015 6:53 pm

There has been a lot of b%#&ing and complaining about random stuff on these threads so here is something positive.

[instagram]https://instagram.com/p/4rpfoBRhx5/[/instagram]

https://instagram.com/p/4rpfoBRhx5/
theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 18,514
And1: 4,973
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Location: California
 

Re: The Positivity Thread 

Post#131 » by theGreatRC » Fri Jul 3, 2015 7:42 pm

Dleavitt24 wrote:There has been a lot of b%#&ing and complaining about random stuff on these threads so here is something positive.

[instagram]https://instagram.com/p/4rpfoBRhx5/[/instagram]

https://instagram.com/p/4rpfoBRhx5/


So Drew and Zach are working out together?
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,165
And1: 21,809
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Positivity Thread 

Post#132 » by Klomp » Fri Jul 17, 2015 4:57 am

I'm getting really excited about the offensive potential of this team. The duo of Wiggins & Towns could be scary good, and I think Towns will be better right away offensively than most think. That's not even including guys like LaVine, Rubio, Martin or Bjelica. Defense will be the key to the team's growth, but we've seen how KG can have an effect on the team defense. I don't expect Towns to be Anthony Davis right away on that side of the ball, but he won't have to be when playing next to Garnett.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
ZellJr
Sophomore
Posts: 146
And1: 13
Joined: Jul 14, 2015
   

Re: The Positivity Thread 

Post#133 » by ZellJr » Fri Jul 17, 2015 5:49 am

Klomp wrote:I'm getting really excited about the offensive potential of this team. The duo of Wiggins & Towns could be scary good, and I think Towns will be better right away offensively than most think. That's not even including guys like LaVine, Rubio, Martin or Bjelica. Defense will be the key to the team's growth, but we've seen how KG can have an effect on the team defense. I don't expect Towns to be Anthony Davis right away on that side of the ball, but he won't have to be when playing next to Garnett.

Once again leaving Shabazz out.

And you literally just told me he doesn't get slighted. Yet here you are, slighting him. Wiggins and towns can be scary good, why not shabazz? What is particularly off putting about his hand that you can overlook Wiggins and towns' flaws but not shabazz's? When he was healthy, he was playing much better than Wiggins, who had logged far more minutes in his career than shabazz has.

Carry on.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,165
And1: 21,809
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Positivity Thread 

Post#134 » by Klomp » Fri Jul 17, 2015 6:43 am

ZellJr wrote:
Klomp wrote:I'm getting really excited about the offensive potential of this team. The duo of Wiggins & Towns could be scary good, and I think Towns will be better right away offensively than most think. That's not even including guys like LaVine, Rubio, Martin or Bjelica. Defense will be the key to the team's growth, but we've seen how KG can have an effect on the team defense. I don't expect Towns to be Anthony Davis right away on that side of the ball, but he won't have to be when playing next to Garnett.

Once again leaving Shabazz out.

And you literally just told me he doesn't get slighted. Yet here you are, slighting him. Wiggins and towns can be scary good, why not shabazz? What is particularly off putting about his hand that you can overlook Wiggins and towns' flaws but not shabazz's? When he was healthy, he was playing much better than Wiggins, who had logged far more minutes in his career than shabazz has.

Carry on.

Are you kidding me?!
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Note30
Head Coach
Posts: 6,119
And1: 1,872
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
 

Re: The Positivity Thread 

Post#135 » by Note30 » Fri Jul 17, 2015 3:48 pm

Klomp wrote:
ZellJr wrote:
Klomp wrote:I'm getting really excited about the offensive potential of this team. The duo of Wiggins & Towns could be scary good, and I think Towns will be better right away offensively than most think. That's not even including guys like LaVine, Rubio, Martin or Bjelica. Defense will be the key to the team's growth, but we've seen how KG can have an effect on the team defense. I don't expect Towns to be Anthony Davis right away on that side of the ball, but he won't have to be when playing next to Garnett.

Once again leaving Shabazz out.

And you literally just told me he doesn't get slighted. Yet here you are, slighting him. Wiggins and towns can be scary good, why not shabazz? What is particularly off putting about his hand that you can overlook Wiggins and towns' flaws but not shabazz's? When he was healthy, he was playing much better than Wiggins, who had logged far more minutes in his career than shabazz has.

Carry on.

Are you kidding me?!


When troll mod gets baited.
ZellJr
Sophomore
Posts: 146
And1: 13
Joined: Jul 14, 2015
   

Re: The Positivity Thread 

Post#136 » by ZellJr » Fri Jul 17, 2015 5:10 pm

Klomp wrote:
ZellJr wrote:
Klomp wrote:I'm getting really excited about the offensive potential of this team. The duo of Wiggins & Towns could be scary good, and I think Towns will be better right away offensively than most think. That's not even including guys like LaVine, Rubio, Martin or Bjelica. Defense will be the key to the team's growth, but we've seen how KG can have an effect on the team defense. I don't expect Towns to be Anthony Davis right away on that side of the ball, but he won't have to be when playing next to Garnett.

Once again leaving Shabazz out.

And you literally just told me he doesn't get slighted. Yet here you are, slighting him. Wiggins and towns can be scary good, why not shabazz? What is particularly off putting about his hand that you can overlook Wiggins and towns' flaws but not shabazz's? When he was healthy, he was playing much better than Wiggins, who had logged far more minutes in his career than shabazz has.

Carry on.

Are you kidding me?!

What did I say that was wrong? Did you or did you not leave Shabazz out there? How is that not slighting him? I don't understand what you're being defensive about. This is literally factual. There's no debate to be had here.
Note30
Head Coach
Posts: 6,119
And1: 1,872
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
 

Re: The Positivity Thread 

Post#137 » by Note30 » Fri Jul 17, 2015 5:32 pm

ZellJr wrote:
Klomp wrote:
ZellJr wrote:Once again leaving Shabazz out.

And you literally just told me he doesn't get slighted. Yet here you are, slighting him. Wiggins and towns can be scary good, why not shabazz? What is particularly off putting about his hand that you can overlook Wiggins and towns' flaws but not shabazz's? When he was healthy, he was playing much better than Wiggins, who had logged far more minutes in his career than shabazz has.

Carry on.

Are you kidding me?!

What did I say that was wrong? Did you or did you not leave Shabazz out there? How is that not slighting him? I don't understand what you're being defensive about. This is literally factual. There's no debate to be had here.


I think it's because he's getting crucified for excluding one player, I mean he also didn't place Dieng or the other dum dums we have at PF. And Dieng was probably our most reliable player this year apart from Wiggy. He played 70+ games and is definitely a part of our core. Klomp is just surprised you nitpicked him.
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,823
And1: 8,855
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

Re: The Positivity Thread 

Post#138 » by C.lupus » Fri Jul 17, 2015 5:37 pm

ZellJr wrote:
Klomp wrote:
ZellJr wrote:Once again leaving Shabazz out.

And you literally just told me he doesn't get slighted. Yet here you are, slighting him. Wiggins and towns can be scary good, why not shabazz? What is particularly off putting about his hand that you can overlook Wiggins and towns' flaws but not shabazz's? When he was healthy, he was playing much better than Wiggins, who had logged far more minutes in his career than shabazz has.

Carry on.

Are you kidding me?!

What did I say that was wrong? Did you or did you not leave Shabazz out there? How is that not slighting him? I don't understand what you're being defensive about. This is literally factual. There's no debate to be had here.

What did you say that was wrong? How about this?
ZellJr wrote: When he was healthy, he was playing much better than Wiggins, who had logged far more minutes in his career than shabazz has.

At the time Shabazz went down, their minutes were about the same. And Shabazz may have been outplaying him at the time (and that is debatable) but Wiggins was a 19 year old rookie with less than half a season of experience at the time while Shabazz was a 22 year old second year player. There is a debate to be had here.

And leaving someone off a list that was never intended to be comprehensive, whether it was intentional or not, is NOT slander. Your whole premise of Shabazz being slighted on this forum is flawed and you made that assumption based on two days of being here. In fact there has been a lot of Shabazz talk here in the last two years and a lot of posters think very highly of him. and we did have a Shabazz thread already that you didn't see because you didn't bother to look past page one.

You are the one being defensive here and you need to chill with the name calling (calling Klomp dense in the other thread).
ZellJr
Sophomore
Posts: 146
And1: 13
Joined: Jul 14, 2015
   

Re: The Positivity Thread 

Post#139 » by ZellJr » Fri Jul 17, 2015 5:48 pm

C.lupus wrote:
ZellJr wrote:
Klomp wrote:Are you kidding me?!

What did I say that was wrong? Did you or did you not leave Shabazz out there? How is that not slighting him? I don't understand what you're being defensive about. This is literally factual. There's no debate to be had here.

What did you say that was wrong? How about this?
ZellJr wrote: When he was healthy, he was playing much better than Wiggins, who had logged far more minutes in his career than shabazz has.

At the time Shabazz went down, their minutes were about the same. And Shabazz may have been outplaying him at the time (and that is debatable) but Wiggins was a 19 year old rookie with less than half a season of experience at the time while Shabazz was a 22 year old second year player. There is a debate to be had here.

And leaving someone off a list that was never intended to be comprehensive, whether it was intentional or not, is NOT slander. Your whole premise of Shabazz being slighted on this forum is flawed and you made that assumption based on two days of being here. In fact there has been a lot of Shabazz talk here in the last two years and a lot of posters think very highly of him. and we did have a Shabazz thread already that you didn't see because you didn't bother to look past page one.

You are the one being defensive here and you need to chill with the name calling (calling Klomp dense in the other thread).
I've actually been lurking for the past few years. I just recently registered, but that doesn't mean I haven't been here. I follow pretty much every game thread.

And the age makes little difference when you're comparing a guy who's logged far more minutes than the other. Wiggins was playing 40 minutes a game since the start of the season. Bazz had logged a fraction of that.

And no one said anything about slander. Slighting and slander are not synonyms. It's a snub, which is synonymous with underappreciation. It's not something I would bring up if Klomp wasn't adamant on specifically NOT slighting shabazz. But here he is mentioning Bjelica(who hasnt even played), Towns(who hasnt played, and has looked less than stellar in summer league), etc. while leaving out Shabazz. That's just bizarre behavior.

Like I said, I've been around for a while. I follow the forum. And while there are a number of guys who legitimately appreciate him, the overall impression is that he's more of a sideshow for the rest of you. Which explains why you guys often leave him out of plans for the team's future.

Notice my key words. "Most", "Often", "Some". This does not mean all. Please, people, stop reaching for the low hanging fruit. Generalities are a thing. Generally does not mean always or all.
User avatar
urinesane
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,012
And1: 2,887
Joined: May 10, 2010
 

Re: The Positivity Thread 

Post#140 » by urinesane » Fri Jul 17, 2015 5:49 pm

ZellJr wrote:
Klomp wrote:I'm getting really excited about the offensive potential of this team. The duo of Wiggins & Towns could be scary good, and I think Towns will be better right away offensively than most think. That's not even including guys like LaVine, Rubio, Martin or Bjelica. Defense will be the key to the team's growth, but we've seen how KG can have an effect on the team defense. I don't expect Towns to be Anthony Davis right away on that side of the ball, but he won't have to be when playing next to Garnett.

Once again leaving Shabazz out.

And you literally just told me he doesn't get slighted. Yet here you are, slighting him. Wiggins and towns can be scary good, why not shabazz? What is particularly off putting about his hand that you can overlook Wiggins and towns' flaws but not shabazz's? When he was healthy, he was playing much better than Wiggins, who had logged far more minutes in his career than shabazz has.

Carry on.


This is called THE POSITIVITY THREAD.

Keep your troll bait elsewhere. Bad start to your account imo.

This thread isn't here for you to start a flamewar about something that isn't real (i.e. most fans ACTUALLY really like Bazz on this board).

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves