whatisacenter wrote:https://theundefeated.com/features/james-harden-houston-rockets-disrespects-the-unwritten-rules-of-basketball/This has been my problem with Harden and his game. The guy is incredibly talented but makes a joke of the game with his antics.
“If you have that dude who’s not taking legit shots, waiting to hook your arm and go up and then call a foul, he might get away with one,” Santelli said. “But if you do that all the time, you better be the toughest dude in the gym. You better be ready to muscle up, because I don’t want to fight you, but it might go there.”
Hoop World hates it when that dude, who’s already a tough cover, starts calling ticky-tack touches every time you come near him. Or when she misses a clean look on game point, then calls foul after the ball clanks off the rim. Sometimes it really is a foul. But if you call too many, then nobody wants to give you any, and it sucks the fun out of a joyful experience
I read the article twice to make sure I get the true intention on the author which I think is genuine and harmless. I am not here to argue whether Harden should be criticized for the way he plays, he certainly should, I am here to say using training ground or street basketball example is kind like swapping concepts.
Say we have Curry Klay and Draymond play a pick up game, nobody is going to give a crap about ball movement, and we cannot say ahh they don't play the game the right way. Or if Draymond kicks Adams, pokes Lebron then James in a street ball game, 100% unintentional, people still gonna beat the crap out of him (I know I would). That's why NBA is a professional league with governing body, referee committee, replay center, hefty fines, media etc that training ground doesn't have, and the game itself is tied up with billions and billions of dollars which means the ultimate goal is to win at any cost. So to use training ground examples to reflect Harden not playing the game the right way is certainly not appropriate to begin with.
Do the players have a responsibility to keep the game clean and make it more enjoyable? They do, and that's called sportsmanship. Who takes the ultimate responsibility to evolve the game and make it compete with other major sports? The governing body, and that's called ruling. That's why we keep seeing rule changes, like hand checks, 5 sec, shooting motion, gathering steps, cylinder definition, with surely more to come. If the league thinks something is damaging the game, they will respond.
Based on that, I think though it's perfectly fine to say I like this and I like that, it's not for us to judge this is the right way to do it, or that is the wrong way to do it. Let alone cynical wishes like I hope xxx never have success in his career. Sports writers say stuff half as passion half as a job that they get paid to do, so we need to have our own interpretations when comprehending their work.
Here is a bad example from Broussard. So Houston symbolize everything wrong with basketball? Hasn't their GM been trying or even gambling their future just to get a shot at GS to entertain the fans too? Or did he take that "fine we ain't gonna beat them, let's just tank and wait a few years it's not worth trying" attitude? Who is that one guy to stand up to the Warriors year after year so that they don't have utter domination in the Western Conference unlike LeBron who gets a free trip to the finals? The guy is a sports analyst, a professional, due has been having a MVP vote for the past 20 years, if we have a standard on Harden what he should or should not do, then the same goes to Broussard.
And here is a great example from Lowe which I think is 10x worth reading and more insightful. Facts, deep analysis, yet not a single phrase like "I think he should", "I think he shouldnt", "this is seriously wrong".
http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/page/zachlowe26646342/how-philosophical-differences-define-rockets-warriors-seriesThe Warriors bend the rules, too. They just do it in ways that everyone has agreed upon as semi-acceptable parts of basketball culture. They sometimes set moving screens to free shooters. They grab and hold on defense when they can get away with it. And boy howdy, do they complain to referees.
The ways that Houston bends the rules are new and unfamiliar. The Rockets have argued the league's most experienced officials, the ones who comprise most playoff crews, are least likely to award Harden three-shot fouls.
Here's a thing the NBA has found after years of parsing data about officiating: Even though they earn heaps of free throws, most ball-dominant superstars do not get close to every call they deserve under the letter of the law. Most have a sizable ratio between incorrect non-calls -- those they deserve but don't get -- and undeserved fouls drawn. (Cut to Shaq nodding.)
For better or worse, Golden State's egalitarian style mitigates this sort of extreme foul ratio issue with Durant and Curry. (For the record, Kerr has coached with more urgency in these playoffs. He started the Death Lineup from the jump against Houston, and has been more willing to let Curry and especially Durant cook.) Kerr is of course correct that referees miss calls on both in every game, especially on drives. It's just that neither has the ball as much as Harden.
If the Rockets are victims, they are at least somewhat victims of their own math-based modernity -- of their unique dependence on Harden, and his step-back 3.