Kalela wrote:Kemba is a huge downgrade to Kyrie and whoever the Celtics sign to replace Horford - assuming they will - will be an even bigger downgrade.
Wrong on kemba
Moderators: bisme37, canman1971, Froob, snowman, shackles10, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, Darthlukey
Kalela wrote:Kemba is a huge downgrade to Kyrie and whoever the Celtics sign to replace Horford - assuming they will - will be an even bigger downgrade.
Kalela wrote:Kemba is a huge downgrade to Kyrie and whoever the Celtics sign to replace Horford - assuming they will - will be an even bigger downgrade.

ParticleMan wrote:kemba vs kyrie, last year:
https://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.fcgi?request=1&sum=0&player_id1_hint=kemba+Walker&player_id1_select=Kemba+Walker&y1=2019&player_id1=walkeke02&idx=players&player_id2_hint=kyrie+Irving&player_id2_select=Kyrie+Irving&y2=2019&player_id2=irvinky01&idx=players
very similar per 36. the main difference is efficiency, which is very important, but this could be offset some by having better teammates and a better scheme. not to mention that kemba is a bulldog who shows up every day, not some aloof emo woke dude.

LarryBirdsFingr wrote:ParticleMan wrote:kemba vs kyrie, last year:
https://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.fcgi?request=1&sum=0&player_id1_hint=kemba+Walker&player_id1_select=Kemba+Walker&y1=2019&player_id1=walkeke02&idx=players&player_id2_hint=kyrie+Irving&player_id2_select=Kyrie+Irving&y2=2019&player_id2=irvinky01&idx=players
very similar per 36. the main difference is efficiency, which is very important, but this could be offset some by having better teammates and a better scheme. not to mention that kemba is a bulldog who shows up every day, not some aloof emo woke dude.
Honestly I think kemba could have a career year here and be even more efficient than before.

LarryBirdsFingr wrote:ParticleMan wrote:kemba vs kyrie, last year:
https://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.fcgi?request=1&sum=0&player_id1_hint=kemba+Walker&player_id1_select=Kemba+Walker&y1=2019&player_id1=walkeke02&idx=players&player_id2_hint=kyrie+Irving&player_id2_select=Kyrie+Irving&y2=2019&player_id2=irvinky01&idx=players
very similar per 36. the main difference is efficiency, which is very important, but this could be offset some by having better teammates and a better scheme. not to mention that kemba is a bulldog who shows up every day, not some aloof emo woke dude.
Honestly I think kemba could have a career year here and be even more efficient than before.
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:Kalela wrote:Kemba is a huge downgrade to Kyrie and whoever the Celtics sign to replace Horford - assuming they will - will be an even bigger downgrade.
Wrong on kemba
sam_I_am wrote:LarryBirdsFingr wrote:Kalela wrote:Kemba is a huge downgrade to Kyrie and whoever the Celtics sign to replace Horford - assuming they will - will be an even bigger downgrade.
Wrong on kemba
The problem with Kyrie is that his offense was really streaky and if he isn’t making baskets, his misses aren’t really helping the team. His half court offense is often just him on an island with a defender, him making a brilliant hesitation move with ball control rarely ever seen ..... while his 4 teammates stand around and watch. Even though Kemba is also a high usage player I see him as being more decisive and quick with his attacks which means the pace will be quicker. At least with IT, the ball would move around and it looked like the other players were involved, even if he too had just as high a usage rate. I think it’s just better if the ball moves around even if at the end it’s still 1 guy taking most of shots - like with Curry in GS.
So although most talent evaluators rate Kyrie higher and he is bigger and younger .... the production will be about the same and I think the other talent will be more involved and engaged and happier to play with Kemba. I guess we’ll see.

Kalela wrote:Kemba is a huge downgrade to Kyrie and whoever the Celtics sign to replace Horford - assuming they will - will be an even bigger downgrade.
La Flame wrote:Kemba's gonna be way better than Kyrie was for us just because he's gonna buy into the offensive scheme
jwise44 wrote:If kemba signs, I will officially be rooting for the Celtics after the rockets next year...if they trade for capela, too I may try to convince my girlfriend to move to Boston instead of nyc because that’s my 2 favorite players in the league on one team

LarryBirdsFingr wrote:ParticleMan wrote:kemba vs kyrie, last year:
https://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.fcgi?request=1&sum=0&player_id1_hint=kemba+Walker&player_id1_select=Kemba+Walker&y1=2019&player_id1=walkeke02&idx=players&player_id2_hint=kyrie+Irving&player_id2_select=Kyrie+Irving&y2=2019&player_id2=irvinky01&idx=players
very similar per 36. the main difference is efficiency, which is very important, but this could be offset some by having better teammates and a better scheme. not to mention that kemba is a bulldog who shows up every day, not some aloof emo woke dude.
Honestly I think kemba could have a career year here and be even more efficient than before.
Slartibartfast wrote:LarryBirdsFingr wrote:ParticleMan wrote:kemba vs kyrie, last year:
https://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.fcgi?request=1&sum=0&player_id1_hint=kemba+Walker&player_id1_select=Kemba+Walker&y1=2019&player_id1=walkeke02&idx=players&player_id2_hint=kyrie+Irving&player_id2_select=Kyrie+Irving&y2=2019&player_id2=irvinky01&idx=players
very similar per 36. the main difference is efficiency, which is very important, but this could be offset some by having better teammates and a better scheme. not to mention that kemba is a bulldog who shows up every day, not some aloof emo woke dude.
Honestly I think kemba could have a career year here and be even more efficient than before.
Very reasonable thought. But the same thing happened for IT and Kyrie and it didn't amount to much.
The problem with Kemba and Kyrie and IT playing to their best is that it makes everyone else secondary and it doesn't really take the team anywhere special.
We've seen this for several years now. The first two IT year we get bounced in the first round. Then IT puts up near 30 a game, gets MVP hype and we were on the verge of getting swept by the Bulls in the first round until Rondo got hurt. Then we barely survive against a middling Wizards team and get obliterated by the Cavs (with our lone victory the result of Smart leading the charge at PG). Next year we lose Kyrie and magically become a tough playoff team with Rozier and Smart running the show. Then we get Kyrie back and flameout.
It's not just us either. Lillard gets worshipped in Portland and he has some amazing heroics for sure, but I watched that same team get obliterated by the Pelicans in the same way we almost got swept by the Bulls.
Everyone wants to take advantage of the rule and style changes that make it possible for quick bomber guards to dominate games, but doing so has elevated a lot of one-trick ponies to the superstar stage where their teams then collapse when their one trick isn't enough.
Other than Kyrie playing the Robin to LBJ's Batman, it hasn't worked.