NBA Trade Thread
Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10
Re: NBA Trade Thread
-
chefo
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,285
- And1: 2,427
- Joined: Apr 29, 2009
Re: NBA Trade Thread
The Bulls have an iron logic—we (our C) have problems scoring inside, we need more and better passers, and we suck at rebounding, especially on D. Hmm, if only I could get a player that would help ‘bigly’ with all three for a copy machine and a box of three-day old doughnuts... nah, something, something... whatever. Or perhaps, pairing a high scoring wing with a dominant big would be a good idea? Nah, I don’t think anybody EVER got anywhere trying that one.
Re: NBA Trade Thread
-
ChettheJet
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,033
- And1: 2,386
- Joined: Jul 02, 2014
-
Re: NBA Trade Thread
[/quote]You don't not go after Drummond because of Carter. What does Carter do better than him? Nothing. He doesn't score better, he doesn't rebound better, he's not a better passer, he doesn't provide the blocks and steals that Drummond does. Drummond is top notch in rebounding and even assists from the Center position. What does WCJ do that's above average at the NBA level?
You wanna know one stat that WCJ trumps Drummond in? Missed games. WCJ, who's been in the league less than 2 years, has already missed more games in his career than Drummond has in his 8 years.
WCJ is vastly overrated by this F.O. he's an OK player, whos durability stinks. Hes gonna be like Dunn and Lauri, where his value depreciates as he gets closer to his rookie deal expiring
You take Carter over a 2 year deal with Drummond because the $20M+ difference in salary can be spent on a pretty good player at the PG or SF.
Chi town wrote:Dresden wrote:I'm not a big Paxson supporter, but I don't find that much wrong with what he said at his presser about the Bulls not knowing what they have right now. They have been wracked by injuries this year. More so than most teams I'd say. Starting SF has played 6 games all year. Backup SF has been out a lot. Starting PF out 6 weeks. Starting center out 6 weeks. Key backup (Dunn) out for a long stretch. Backup C out for quite awhile. A lot of these guys you really don't know about. It would be dumb, IMO, to deal someone like Gafford or Hutch until we see what they can do. And the trade value of others, like Mark., is probably at an all time low. Smart GM's don't deal guys when their value bottoms out.
If we hadn't been hit so hard with injuries, I would guess we would be fighting for a playoff spot right now. Esp. if Porter hadn't gone down. I agree, they still don't have a star in the making anywhere on the team, but they weren't going to pick one up in a trade either. About the only player dealt that really would have helped us was Capela, but I think they are pretty set on Carter at this point, so that didn't make a ton of sense either.
Two things are very clear.
1. Boylen can’t coach. In game he is awful and has cost us plenty of games with no adjustments and awful rotations.
2. We need a PG if the current cast will work. I think Pax knew that and it’s why he wanted Collison in FA and Morant in the draft.
If we had an elite passing PG like CP3 our guys would look really good. We don’t so we see Zach learning the hard way and Coby showing no idea of what to do.
OK so I agree with Dresden. The 'next man up' rah rah crap just doesn't fly when you get on the court. If the guy coming off the bench is as good as the starter they would be splitting the 48 minutes. You construct a roster with the money you have to spend and if you're paying somebody more money to come off the bench than the starter, you've made a bad evaluation on one or both. Your bench is either backup quality or developing young guys. So when your starter at the SF goes down like Porter Hutchison doesn't instantly have what it takes because they introduce him in the darkness. When Hutchison goes down Shaq Harrison doesn't become a SF he just plays there. They might introduce Dunn as the SF but he isn't one either. And neither of them is a good shooter at the PG so they're worse as the SF. When Carter gets hurt you throw Gafford in there and hope he learns how to play with the first unit. When he gets hurt you call Felicio who you know darn well from practice hasn't made any progress that's why he's 4th string. When Markkanen gets hurt Young steps up and you see he's a capable starter but also why he's been coming off the bench for the last half of his career.
But all of that is just due to Boylen not knowing how to coach. And you know what you're also saying is his assistant coaches either hate his guts, are complete idiots or want to see him fail so they can take over when he's fired because otherwise they would sit down with him and say, Jim I think we need to try something else because this isn't working and you're my friend and I don't want you to look bad. Or do you think all the assistant coaches do is collect the balls at the end of practice?
Re: NBA Trade Thread
-
MrSparkle
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,411
- And1: 11,204
- Joined: Jul 31, 2003
- Location: chicago
Re: NBA Trade Thread
chefo wrote:The Bulls have an iron logic—we (our C) have problems scoring inside, we need more and better passers, and we suck at rebounding, especially on D. Hmm, if only I could get a player that would help ‘bigly’ with all three for a copy machine and a box of three-day old doughnuts... nah, something, something... whatever. Or perhaps, pairing a high scoring wing with a dominant big would be a good idea? Nah, I don’t think anybody EVER got anywhere trying that one.
Committed to their picks.
It takes roughly 3.5 years for Paxson to own up one of his draft picks. He loves trading them at that last deadline before RFA status, or letting them walk, when he decides they're not worth keeping.
So we'll see what happens with Carter, but frankly I don't think he'd seriously pursue Embiid if Joel announced "I WANT TO BE A BULL" in July. Paxson would be like.. "Ok, we'll give you next year's 1st, top-10 protected, Carter, and you have to take Felicio. Might sweeten the pot with Arci." In his head, he has WCJ - the Bulls center for the next 12 years.
Aw well. One thing's for sure. Collins and Capela are going to own our "cornerstone" big men on the glass (and probably PPG) for the next 3 years. Too bad their starting guard is capable of scoring and assisting better than our entire guard rotation combined.
Re: NBA Trade Thread
-
micromonkey
- Starter
- Posts: 2,022
- And1: 627
- Joined: Jun 24, 2010
-
Re: NBA Trade Thread
Happy for wiggins. I think we should see the best version of him (whatever that may be) with the dubs.
Re: NBA Trade Thread
-
Dan Z
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,485
- And1: 9,172
- Joined: Feb 19, 2002
- Location: Chicago
-
Re: NBA Trade Thread
micromonkey wrote:Happy for wiggins. I think we should see the best version of him (whatever that may be) with the dubs.
I'm interested to see how he does. Many people ripped on him and I get it. He put up stats but that's about it.
But he's in a good spot right now and will be the third option. Maybe a change of scenery is what he needed?
Re: NBA Trade Thread
- BullChit
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,917
- And1: 3,879
- Joined: Jan 17, 2011
- Location: Sydney, Australia
-
Re: NBA Trade Thread
Cheers! I knew I was correct somehow someway...mtron32 wrote:SfBull wrote:BullChit wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong but the Otto trade had an effect on our win-loss record ultimately costing us in the Draft.
If I am not wrong then the Otto trade was a bad move... If I am wrong disregard this post.
Sent from my CPH1979 using Tapatalk
A negative effect like Niko had.
The way the draft changes, Otto had no effect on our draft odds, that was Niko
Sent from my CPH1979 using Tapatalk
eMar arnell eRozen... The "D" stands for "Defence"
Re: NBA Trade Thread
-
PrimzyBulls81
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,933
- And1: 1,226
- Joined: Feb 09, 2013
Re: NBA Trade Thread
Bucks adding Marvin Williams to the mix! Another great piece for title run.. If they dont come out of East this season, they never will. Despite Boston, Toronto and Miami being tough. Im not counting much on Philly, they look like a mess even within not just outside.
Re: NBA Trade Thread
-
Chi town
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,541
- And1: 9,159
- Joined: Aug 10, 2004
Re: NBA Trade Thread
PrimzyBulls81 wrote:Bucks adding Marvin Williams to the mix! Another great piece for title run.. If they dont come out of East this season, they never will. Despite Boston, Toronto and Miami being tough. Im not counting much on Philly, they look like a mess even within not just outside.
Bucks are the fav to win it all IMO. I think they are better than the Clippers too.
Tor, BOS, Heat, Pacers, Sixers in that order after them.
Re: NBA Trade Thread
-
StunnerKO
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,017
- And1: 3,143
- Joined: Sep 25, 2017
Re: NBA Trade Thread
-
MeloRoseNoah
- Starter
- Posts: 2,229
- And1: 1,410
- Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Re: NBA Trade Thread
John Paxson: Hold my coffee. I will get right on with that. He was the #4 pick in the 2016 draft, and our evaluation of as a prospect remains unchanged. He's a superstar talent that needs the right environment to blossom.
Re: NBA Trade Thread
-
wolffy
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,301
- And1: 665
- Joined: Dec 07, 2002
- Location: Pa.
-
Re: NBA Trade Thread
nomorezorro wrote:
absolute joke franchise. zero reason to follow this team until meaningful changes are made at the top
Its a shocking mindset from Pax. ...until you remember that if he knew what a good roster looked like we wouldn't be in the situation we are now. Hes proven he cant evaluate talent or coaching. This is a glimpse into the mind of a failure gm.
Re: NBA Trade Thread
-
MeloRoseNoah
- Starter
- Posts: 2,229
- And1: 1,410
- Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Re: NBA Trade Thread
wolffy wrote:nomorezorro wrote:
absolute joke franchise. zero reason to follow this team until meaningful changes are made at the top
Its a shocking mindset from Pax. ...until you remember that if he knew what a good roster looked like we wouldn't be in the situation we are now. Hes proven he cant evaluate talent or coaching. This is a glimpse into the mind of a failure gm.
His biggest accomplishment is bringing in a bunch of PER 15 bums like Hinrich Deng Gordon and Nocioni for a round 1 playoff exit. The difference was that he had a real coach back then.
But Bum Ass Paxson doesn’t believe in NBA coaching. Talent trumps all and it will be built and gathered thanks to him. Now, he has been exposed as a trash player and talent evaluator at all levels who was lucky enough to ride of the coattails of MJ and Thibs.
Cut this tool 10 mil annual salary down to $1 until the team makes the playoff. If not, GTFO.
Re: NBA Trade Thread
- holv03
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,078
- And1: 1,803
- Joined: May 11, 2001
- Location: Cheshire, CT
-
Re: NBA Trade Thread
Dragan Bender would be a good addition to this team. He is only 22 years old and maybe some playing time could help him develop into a better player.
Re: NBA Trade Thread
- DASMACKDOWN
- Forum Mod - Bulls

- Posts: 30,241
- And1: 15,500
- Joined: Nov 01, 2001
- Location: Cookin' with Derrick Rose
Re: NBA Trade Thread
Lets face it, Paxson has been in his position too long to even be inventive.
Its not like Paxson was some GM genius who led us to championships. He isn't a standard bearer like Riley who has a set culture around the organization. He isn't Ainge where he has wheeled and dealed into great teams.
He is the 3rd longest current tenured front office and the only one in the top 5 longest that hasn't won a title.
That's 17 long years of job security.
The Bulls are actually going through changes even as a franchise. By next season, a new in house announcer. We will have a new announce team replacing Neil Funk. All we need is a new coach and front office to usher in the next decade of Bulls basketball
Its not like Paxson was some GM genius who led us to championships. He isn't a standard bearer like Riley who has a set culture around the organization. He isn't Ainge where he has wheeled and dealed into great teams.
He is the 3rd longest current tenured front office and the only one in the top 5 longest that hasn't won a title.
That's 17 long years of job security.
The Bulls are actually going through changes even as a franchise. By next season, a new in house announcer. We will have a new announce team replacing Neil Funk. All we need is a new coach and front office to usher in the next decade of Bulls basketball
Re: NBA Trade Thread
-
MrSparkle
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,411
- And1: 11,204
- Joined: Jul 31, 2003
- Location: chicago
Re: NBA Trade Thread
wolffy wrote:nomorezorro wrote:
absolute joke franchise. zero reason to follow this team until meaningful changes are made at the top
Its a shocking mindset from Pax. ...until you remember that if he knew what a good roster looked like we wouldn't be in the situation we are now. Hes proven he cant evaluate talent or coaching. This is a glimpse into the mind of a failure gm.
One thing I genuinely disagree with is the idea of locking yourself into the 'buyer' or 'seller' mentality. So much for flexibility.
If Otto Porter could've gotten Drummond or Capela done (in a 3-way obviously), that should've been something considered.
Re: NBA Trade Thread
-
sco
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,426
- And1: 9,217
- Joined: Sep 22, 2003
- Location: Virtually Everywhere!
Re: NBA Trade Thread
MrSparkle wrote:wolffy wrote:nomorezorro wrote:
absolute joke franchise. zero reason to follow this team until meaningful changes are made at the top
Its a shocking mindset from Pax. ...until you remember that if he knew what a good roster looked like we wouldn't be in the situation we are now. Hes proven he cant evaluate talent or coaching. This is a glimpse into the mind of a failure gm.
One thing I genuinely disagree with is the idea of locking yourself into the 'buyer' or 'seller' mentality. So much for flexibility.
If Otto Porter could've gotten Drummond or Capela done (in a 3-way obviously), that should've been something considered.
Investing in C's when the league is about guards now, is a bad idea.

Re: NBA Trade Thread
-
MrSparkle
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,411
- And1: 11,204
- Joined: Jul 31, 2003
- Location: chicago
Re: NBA Trade Thread
sco wrote:MrSparkle wrote:wolffy wrote:
Its a shocking mindset from Pax. ...until you remember that if he knew what a good roster looked like we wouldn't be in the situation we are now. Hes proven he cant evaluate talent or coaching. This is a glimpse into the mind of a failure gm.
One thing I genuinely disagree with is the idea of locking yourself into the 'buyer' or 'seller' mentality. So much for flexibility.
If Otto Porter could've gotten Drummond or Capela done (in a 3-way obviously), that should've been something considered.
Investing in C's when the league is about guards now, is a bad idea.
Well, you're investing out of a $27m injury reserve. I'm not saying to add FRPs, but Otto and sweetener like Valentine?
I've been 1000% against investing in centers since about 2008. But apples and oranges. An expiring Drummond is halfway worth the risk, you see how he fits. Capela's athleticism would actually allow Boylen to play his wild blitz defense, and he's not exactly an outrageous salary.
Re: NBA Trade Thread
- rtblues
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,802
- And1: 2,577
- Joined: Jul 12, 2008
Re: NBA Trade Thread
DASMACKDOWN wrote:Lets face it, Paxson has been in his position too long to even be inventive.
Its not like Paxson was some GM genius who led us to championships. He isn't a standard bearer like Riley who has a set culture around the organization. He isn't Ainge where he has wheeled and dealed into great teams.
He is the 3rd longest current tenured front office and the only one in the top 5 longest that hasn't won a title.
That's 17 long years of job security.
The Bulls are actually going through changes even as a franchise. By next season, a new in house announcer. We will have a new announce team replacing Neil Funk. All we need is a new coach and front office to usher in the next decade of Bulls basketball
THIS! +1,000,000
Sums it all up pretty perfectly.
As long as we're wishing and hoping, I'd like to add new ownership to the mix.
"I wouldn’t call it a rebuild; more of a retool.” - Gar Forman, June 2016
Re: NBA Trade Thread
- Chicagoat
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,025
- And1: 1,041
- Joined: Jan 12, 2017
-
Re: NBA Trade Thread
Not sure about the price. But I want to trade for Langford.
Sent from my LG-H872 using RealGM mobile app
Sent from my LG-H872 using RealGM mobile app
AKME? More like MEAK with how they're afraid to make a move to push us in one direction.
Continuity

Continuity
Re: NBA Trade Thread
-
PrimzyBulls81
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,933
- And1: 1,226
- Joined: Feb 09, 2013
Re: NBA Trade Thread
Chicagoat wrote:Not sure about the price. But I want to trade for Langford.
Sent from my LG-H872 using RealGM mobile app
Trade deadline is over..








