2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
K_chile22
RealGM
Posts: 16,754
And1: 8,645
Joined: Jul 15, 2015
   

Re: RE: Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread 

Post#1261 » by K_chile22 » Tue Jan 3, 2017 4:10 am

HurricaneKid wrote:
red96 wrote:Harden with another tripple double. 3rd game in a row.


I've been going after RWB for his absurd triple doubles so I'm going to stay intellectually honest here. This one was Ricky Davis-like.

Hou was up 8 with the ball and he got an assist with 10 seconds left. After the opposition stopped trying.

This BS needs to stop.

Even if he didn't get it 20-something 9 and 10 is pretty damn good lol who cares that he wanted a triple double

They also had to get a shot off as the shot clock was at 2 and the wizards completely left Harrell all alone near the basket, wasn't really forced
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
Posts: 42,372
And1: 20,896
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Bucks in 7?
 

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread 

Post#1262 » by AussieBuck » Tue Jan 3, 2017 4:12 am

He wants that MVP and knows his old teammate is getting a lot of publicity for the triple doubles so he's chasing a few extra. I think it's all good entertainment. :dontknow:
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.


GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
User avatar
red96
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,226
And1: 2,393
Joined: Oct 09, 2008
Location: Where hope is still alive.

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread 

Post#1263 » by red96 » Tue Jan 3, 2017 5:08 am

AussieBuck wrote:He wants that MVP and knows his old teammate is getting a lot of publicity for the triple doubles so he's chasing a few extra. I think it's all good entertainment. :dontknow:

Yeah, the tripple double is overrated in a way. Is a 20-12-8 game any less than an 20-10-10 game? Its just that the latter stat line has a name so it's perceived as being better.
"Morey decided in 2007 that Steve Francis was to be the "franchise player" of the Rockets only to play what... 5 games? Morey didn't think Marc Gasol was worth a look that year,"
-baki "the Rockets fan"
User avatar
Young_Star11
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,282
And1: 1,767
Joined: Oct 28, 2005
Location: RealGM
   

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread 

Post#1264 » by Young_Star11 » Tue Jan 3, 2017 5:38 am

The triple double is a bit arbitrary, but you can say the same about all stats..
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,149
And1: 33,846
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread 

Post#1265 » by Slava » Tue Jan 3, 2017 2:47 pm

Too early for Giannis to be in the MVP conversation? 2nd in the league in both PER and RPM right now.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
Ballerhogger
RealGM
Posts: 47,741
And1: 17,306
Joined: Jul 06, 2014
       

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread 

Post#1266 » by Ballerhogger » Tue Jan 3, 2017 3:05 pm

Slava wrote:Too early for Giannis to be in the MVP conversation? 2nd in the league in both PER and RPM right now.

If he can get to 4th seed quickly and hold it then we talk about it ...Their record is so far from CLE right now. :banghead:
Ballerhogger
RealGM
Posts: 47,741
And1: 17,306
Joined: Jul 06, 2014
       

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread 

Post#1267 » by Ballerhogger » Tue Jan 3, 2017 3:06 pm

Young_Star11 wrote:The triple double is a bit arbitrary, but you can say the same about all stats..

As shown by draymond last night. :nod:
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,149
And1: 33,846
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread 

Post#1268 » by Slava » Tue Jan 3, 2017 3:28 pm

Ballerhogger wrote:
Slava wrote:Too early for Giannis to be in the MVP conversation? 2nd in the league in both PER and RPM right now.

If he can get to 4th seed quickly and hold it then we talk about it ...Their record is so far from CLE right now. :banghead:


They are 8th in the league right now based on SRS, not that a lot of voters are going to consider it but I think they can kick on from the all star break and climb the ladder.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
Screwston
Rookie
Posts: 1,069
And1: 643
Joined: Mar 10, 2014

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread 

Post#1269 » by Screwston » Tue Jan 3, 2017 3:39 pm

Slava wrote:Too early for Giannis to be in the MVP conversation? 2nd in the league in both PER and RPM right now.


Maybe if it wasn't for Harden n WB.

Looks like the Rockets will end up 3rd(maybe even 2nd) and are on the pace to win close to 60 games, so more than likely Harden will get it
Ballerhogger
RealGM
Posts: 47,741
And1: 17,306
Joined: Jul 06, 2014
       

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread 

Post#1270 » by Ballerhogger » Tue Jan 3, 2017 3:39 pm

Slava wrote:
Ballerhogger wrote:
Slava wrote:Too early for Giannis to be in the MVP conversation? 2nd in the league in both PER and RPM right now.

If he can get to 4th seed quickly and hold it then we talk about it ...Their record is so far from CLE right now. :banghead:


They are 8th in the league right now based on SRS, not that a lot of voters are going to consider it but I think they can kick on from the all star break and climb the ladder.

I dont think he's gets on ballot if the team doesn't finish just right behind the raptors. That means hes going have to get them passed Boston. Plus you have everyone out west Kd,Westbrook,Harden+Lebron out east . The east is still very much in shambles and were not even at ASB yet. The hawks are in 5th place.. The hawks.. Posting -1.6 diff. The standings are going to be up and down all year unless the bucks make a significant improvement.
User avatar
red96
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,226
And1: 2,393
Joined: Oct 09, 2008
Location: Where hope is still alive.

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread 

Post#1271 » by red96 » Tue Jan 3, 2017 4:02 pm

Slava wrote:Too early for Giannis to be in the MVP conversation? 2nd in the league in both PER and RPM right now.
All of that is fine and all, but dude is on 13th best team in the league and the Buck are at .515% wins :nonono: If he has a shot, than why not guys on 30 win teams? 20 win teams even. An MVP player is only good enough to get his team to .500? No freaking way.
"Morey decided in 2007 that Steve Francis was to be the "franchise player" of the Rockets only to play what... 5 games? Morey didn't think Marc Gasol was worth a look that year,"
-baki "the Rockets fan"
HurricaneKid
General Manager
Posts: 8,093
And1: 5,052
Joined: Jul 13, 2010
Location: Sconnie Nation
 

Re: RE: Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread 

Post#1272 » by HurricaneKid » Tue Jan 3, 2017 4:05 pm

K_chile22 wrote:
HurricaneKid wrote:
red96 wrote:Harden with another tripple double. 3rd game in a row.


I've been going after RWB for his absurd triple doubles so I'm going to stay intellectually honest here. This one was Ricky Davis-like.

Hou was up 8 with the ball and he got an assist with 10 seconds left. After the opposition stopped trying.

This BS needs to stop.

Even if he didn't get it 20-something 9 and 10 is pretty damn good lol who cares that he wanted a triple double

They also had to get a shot off as the shot clock was at 2 and the wizards completely left Harrell all alone near the basket, wasn't really forced


He was brutal. 6/24 from the field, 6 TOs.

Getting a statistical landmark after the opposing team has ceded victory is shameful. Not quite shooting at your own basket, but in that general vicinity. When he thinks he needs to do that to compete with a guy averaging a triple double based on that team's "strategy" of getting him at least 2-4 uncontested rebounds a game, we have all lost.
fishnc wrote:If I had a gun with two bullets and I was in a room with Hitler, Bin Laden, and LeBron, I would shoot LeBron twice.
User avatar
red96
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,226
And1: 2,393
Joined: Oct 09, 2008
Location: Where hope is still alive.

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread 

Post#1273 » by red96 » Tue Jan 3, 2017 4:18 pm

Harden should be the clear MVP. They're stats a nearly identical, Russell with 2 more ppg, but Harden is way more efficient, has more win shares, best game in modern history, ect. The Rockets are 5.5 ahead of the Thunder and only 1 and 3.5 games behind the Spurs and Warriors while being banged up. Who called that? The eye test even shows Harden does more to make his team better. The Thunder are where everyone expected them to be, while the Rockets are 5-7 seeds higher than they were projected. In my eye's Harden has a steady lead over Westbrook and he's pulling away more and more every game.
"Morey decided in 2007 that Steve Francis was to be the "franchise player" of the Rockets only to play what... 5 games? Morey didn't think Marc Gasol was worth a look that year,"
-baki "the Rockets fan"
User avatar
K_chile22
RealGM
Posts: 16,754
And1: 8,645
Joined: Jul 15, 2015
   

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread 

Post#1274 » by K_chile22 » Tue Jan 3, 2017 4:28 pm

HurricaneKid wrote:
K_chile22 wrote:
HurricaneKid wrote:
I've been going after RWB for his absurd triple doubles so I'm going to stay intellectually honest here. This one was Ricky Davis-like.

Hou was up 8 with the ball and he got an assist with 10 seconds left. After the opposition stopped trying.

This BS needs to stop.

Even if he didn't get it 20-something 9 and 10 is pretty damn good lol who cares that he wanted a triple double

They also had to get a shot off as the shot clock was at 2 and the wizards completely left Harrell all alone near the basket, wasn't really forced


He was brutal. 6/24 from the field, 6 TOs.

Getting a statistical landmark after the opposing team has ceded victory is shameful. Not quite shooting at your own basket, but in that general vicinity. When he thinks he needs to do that to compete with a guy averaging a triple double based on that team's "strategy" of getting him at least 2-4 uncontested rebounds a game, we have all lost.

He had a bad game and triple doubles are vastly overrated, yes. But shaming him for getting a triple double is one of the weirder things I've seen. What should he have done at that last second then? Shoot over 3 guys and make his % even worse? Take a shot clock violation? Or pass to the guy all by himself at the rim. Cmon dude, you're acting like the shot clock was off and they didn't need to shoot it lol
User avatar
red96
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,226
And1: 2,393
Joined: Oct 09, 2008
Location: Where hope is still alive.

Re: RE: Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread 

Post#1275 » by red96 » Tue Jan 3, 2017 4:30 pm

HurricaneKid wrote:
K_chile22 wrote:
HurricaneKid wrote:
I've been going after RWB for his absurd triple doubles so I'm going to stay intellectually honest here. This one was Ricky Davis-like.

Hou was up 8 with the ball and he got an assist with 10 seconds left. After the opposition stopped trying.

This BS needs to stop.

Even if he didn't get it 20-something 9 and 10 is pretty damn good lol who cares that he wanted a triple double

They also had to get a shot off as the shot clock was at 2 and the wizards completely left Harrell all alone near the basket, wasn't really forced


He was brutal. 6/24 from the field, 6 TOs.

Getting a statistical landmark after the opposing team has ceded victory is shameful. Not quite shooting at your own basket, but in that general vicinity. When he thinks he needs to do that to compete with a guy averaging a triple double based on that team's "strategy" of getting him at least 2-4 uncontested rebounds a game, we have all lost.
Westbrook has had a ton of TD's like that,but thats why everyone goes crazy for Westbrook. All his TRIPPLE DOUBLES. Thats the-be-all-end-all for a lot of the talking heads on ESPN. Even though Harden is beating Westbrook in almost every statistical category, and leading his team to more victories, is all about the TRIPPLE DOUBLES. So now Harden has no choice to fish for a few more if he wants to win what should clearly be his to begin with, but this wasn't an example. Harden simple made the smart basketball play. Should he have jacked it up instead?
"Morey decided in 2007 that Steve Francis was to be the "franchise player" of the Rockets only to play what... 5 games? Morey didn't think Marc Gasol was worth a look that year,"
-baki "the Rockets fan"
User avatar
Hero
RealGM
Posts: 38,327
And1: 53,515
Joined: Apr 05, 2012
Location: Edward Gardens
 

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread 

Post#1276 » by Hero » Tue Jan 3, 2017 5:17 pm

Slava wrote:Too early for Giannis to be in the MVP conversation? 2nd in the league in both PER and RPM right now.


In the conversation sure. As in consideration for a top 5 finish.
Gibson22
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,921
And1: 912
Joined: Jun 23, 2016
 

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread 

Post#1277 » by Gibson22 » Tue Jan 3, 2017 5:34 pm

red96 wrote:Harden should be the clear MVP. They're stats a nearly identical, Russell with 2 more ppg, but Harden is way more efficient, has more win shares, best game in modern history, ect. The Rockets are 5.5 ahead of the Thunder and only 1 and 3.5 games behind the Spurs and Warriors while being banged up. Who called that? The eye test even shows Harden does more to make his team better. The Thunder are where everyone expected them to be, while the Rockets are 5-7 seeds higher than they were projected. In my eye's Harden has a steady lead over Westbrook and he's pulling away more and more every game.


Best game in modern history
What
Gibson22
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,921
And1: 912
Joined: Jun 23, 2016
 

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread 

Post#1278 » by Gibson22 » Tue Jan 3, 2017 5:35 pm

walk with me wrote:1. Russ
2. Harden
3. CP3
4. Kawhi
5. LBJ
6. KD

extra points for being on a team with no superstars for me



There's no for me. this is mvp discussion.
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,149
And1: 33,846
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread 

Post#1279 » by Slava » Tue Jan 3, 2017 5:40 pm

red96 wrote:
Slava wrote:Too early for Giannis to be in the MVP conversation? 2nd in the league in both PER and RPM right now.
All of that is fine and all, but dude is on 13th best team in the league and the Buck are at .515% wins :nonono: If he has a shot, than why not guys on 30 win teams? 20 win teams even. An MVP player is only good enough to get his team to .500? No freaking way.


Are you trying to be in contention for the biggest homer on RealGM? I'm not saying he is the MVP, I'm saying he should be getting in the conversation and a few votes.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,149
And1: 33,846
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: 2016-17 MVP Discussion Thread 

Post#1280 » by Slava » Tue Jan 3, 2017 5:41 pm

Ballerhogger wrote:
Slava wrote:
Ballerhogger wrote:If he can get to 4th seed quickly and hold it then we talk about it ...Their record is so far from CLE right now. :banghead:


They are 8th in the league right now based on SRS, not that a lot of voters are going to consider it but I think they can kick on from the all star break and climb the ladder.

I dont think he's gets on ballot if the team doesn't finish just right behind the raptors. That means hes going have to get them passed Boston. Plus you have everyone out west Kd,Westbrook,Harden+Lebron out east . The east is still very much in shambles and were not even at ASB yet. The hawks are in 5th place.. The hawks.. Posting -1.6 diff. The standings are going to be up and down all year unless the bucks make a significant improvement.


There's no ballot as far as I'm aware.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:

Return to The General Board