DelAbbot wrote:Duffman100 wrote:ItsDanger wrote:Some need that dopamine fix of a win to keep the play in possibility alive. They have no patience for placing the team in a better position to secure a high draft pick. What for right? It's all luck anyways. Better to win now!
Some like to watch the team cheer for win because at the core of sports, that's the entire point.
And I laugh at your 'patience' comment when you're the first one to jump on Dick, Ochai etc when they underperform in a small sample size.
Go cheer for wins capped at 45 forever. Congratulations on play-ins year in and year out.
Give it a break harping about cheering for losses - we cheering for losses are cheering for 60 wins seasons in the future. Don't pretend you don't understand.
I mean a big part of the problem here is that you (and others) think the only way to break 45 wins is by tanking - despite there being ample evidence that tanking does not guarantee success nor is there any evidence it is any superior to team building.
Tanking is surely one way to build. Results can be argued. But everyone can acknowledge that there is a basis of logic to the process.
However, there are other ways to build to - yet the holier than thou TWO people cant seem to acknowledge that these routes exist. You drive other posters nuts because you have a superiority complex and you try to talk down on anyone who disagrees with you. Hell, even this post I am quoting needs to throw in a "if you don't want to tank you're happy with 45 wins!". No. No one has ever said that except you TWO people who need to create an argument that doesn't exist to feel better about yourself.