Fat wrote:Knicks in 4 still alive
So is my Celtics in 5
Moderators: bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, Dirk
Fat wrote:Knicks in 4 still alive
Tim_Hardawayy wrote:sp6r=underrated wrote:Diop wrote:15/60 threes is just straight gross
The way the Celtics play is analytically correct but when they're missing shots it is just brutal to watch.
I'd argue if you're the more talented team, you actually hurt yourself by focusing too much on the 3-point shot, since you're diluting your talent to something that's higher variance. More blowouts, but point differential doesn't matter in the playoffs.
76ciology wrote:Tatum and Brown will be better. No way they’ll score this bad hunting Brunson and KAT.
Capn'O wrote:I wonder what Paul Reed's feelings are about metal bats.
LakerLegend wrote:LeBron was literally more athletic at 35 than he was at 20

Lunartic wrote:NYPiston wrote:The Celtics played as poorly as they could with no Porzingis most of the game and still went to OT. I can't imagine that is good news for the Knicks but credit to them for pulling it out at the end.
Nonsensical

Tommy Heinsohn wrote:The game is not over until they look you in the face and start crying.
Wolfgang630 wrote:Americas team won
He is, skill set and mentality is there. This was about coaching and scheme. Get his easier shots closer to the hoop to get him going.uncleduck13 wrote:Tatum ain’t good enough to lead a repeat
thelead wrote:15-60 from 3.... 60 freakin' 3's... 45 missed 3's. This isn't the game I grew up loving.
Congrats to NY though
Fat wrote:Celtics had a bad game? Or did they get clamped.
Diop wrote:good fight Knicks, bad choke job by Celtics.
I still think Celts in 6, hopefully it doesn't continue to be a brick fest
AFM wrote:Celtics ugly af to watch I’m glad they lost