Back again: Getting OKC a wing

Moderators: Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers

User avatar
Kings2013
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,829
And1: 932
Joined: Jul 18, 2013
Location: The beautiful capital of California

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#141 » by Kings2013 » Wed Nov 2, 2016 11:09 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:I'm not sold that Gay is available. Having watched their last game, he is the only player not named Cousins who can create or score. And they want to be competitive. I think Gay might just get enough touches and shots to be some version of happy, and the Kings might get enough offense out of him to be some version of happy, and the whole thing is setting up for a Gay re-signing next summer that will leave a bunch of us wondering wait what just happened. (And then blow up 6 months later).


It's what happens when you have arguably a top 5 talent at a position, you try to make it work

It's about chemistry and continuity too. I think when Collison comes back, and the schedule turns more favorable, team can potentially turn corner. But the league is full of mediocre players, full. Getting weak draft assets, or some young player who might not turn anything that you couldn't pay for through FA, Rudy can be a second banana potentially for a few years yet, and be possibly be convinced to stay

Omri on the other hand was mentioned. A talented player who I assume hasn't been fit. I hate to see him not being utilized, but maybe that will change
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,322
And1: 20,917
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#142 » by HartfordWhalers » Thu Nov 3, 2016 12:07 pm

Kings2013 wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:I'm not sold that Gay is available. Having watched their last game, he is the only player not named Cousins who can create or score. And they want to be competitive. I think Gay might just get enough touches and shots to be some version of happy, and the Kings might get enough offense out of him to be some version of happy, and the whole thing is setting up for a Gay re-signing next summer that will leave a bunch of us wondering wait what just happened. (And then blow up 6 months later).


It's what happens when you have arguably a top 5 talent at a position, you try to make it work

It's about chemistry and continuity too. I think when Collison comes back, and the schedule turns more favorable, team can potentially turn corner. But the league is full of mediocre players, full. Getting weak draft assets, or some young player who might not turn anything that you couldn't pay for through FA, Rudy can be a second banana potentially for a few years yet, and be possibly be convinced to stay

Omri on the other hand was mentioned. A talented player who I assume hasn't been fit. I hate to see him not being utilized, but maybe that will change


Oh, I wouldn't really think there is anyone out there actually arguing Gay is a top 5 sf.
Chinook
Head Coach
Posts: 6,646
And1: 3,784
Joined: Jan 12, 2015
       

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#143 » by Chinook » Thu Nov 3, 2016 3:30 pm

bondom34 wrote:
Chinook wrote:So the pick is protected from 21-30? Doesn't that mean that if it's in the top-20, it's Philly's? That seems like quite the gamble from a team so dependent on a player who's already missed time in his career for injuries.

Other way around
Read on Twitter


He worded it wrong


Thanks. I wouldn't call that fake. If they keep Westbrook, they have a good chance at being top-10.
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,527
And1: 6,865
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#144 » by Andre Roberstan » Thu Nov 3, 2016 4:09 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:
Kings2013 wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:I'm not sold that Gay is available. Having watched their last game, he is the only player not named Cousins who can create or score. And they want to be competitive. I think Gay might just get enough touches and shots to be some version of happy, and the Kings might get enough offense out of him to be some version of happy, and the whole thing is setting up for a Gay re-signing next summer that will leave a bunch of us wondering wait what just happened. (And then blow up 6 months later).


It's what happens when you have arguably a top 5 talent at a position, you try to make it work

It's about chemistry and continuity too. I think when Collison comes back, and the schedule turns more favorable, team can potentially turn corner. But the league is full of mediocre players, full. Getting weak draft assets, or some young player who might not turn anything that you couldn't pay for through FA, Rudy can be a second banana potentially for a few years yet, and be possibly be convinced to stay

Omri on the other hand was mentioned. A talented player who I assume hasn't been fit. I hate to see him not being utilized, but maybe that will change


Oh, I wouldn't really think there is anyone out there actually arguing Gay is a top 5 sf.


LeBron
KD
Kawhi
PG13
(insert Melo/Hayward/Butler here)

Gay's probably top 10. I don't think you can make an argument for top 5 at all.
Image
Mystical Apples
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,393
And1: 1,349
Joined: Jul 06, 2015
 

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#145 » by Mystical Apples » Thu Nov 3, 2016 7:56 pm

Kings2013 wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:I'm not sold that Gay is available. Having watched their last game, he is the only player not named Cousins who can create or score. And they want to be competitive. I think Gay might just get enough touches and shots to be some version of happy, and the Kings might get enough offense out of him to be some version of happy, and the whole thing is setting up for a Gay re-signing next summer that will leave a bunch of us wondering wait what just happened. (And then blow up 6 months later).


It's what happens when you have arguably a top 5 talent at a position, you try to make it work

It's about chemistry and continuity too. I think when Collison comes back, and the schedule turns more favorable, team can potentially turn corner. But the league is full of mediocre players, full. Getting weak draft assets, or some young player who might not turn anything that you couldn't pay for through FA, Rudy can be a second banana potentially for a few years yet, and be possibly be convinced to stay


Even in a vacuum top 15 SF is a major stretch. There's no rule mandating X% offense should come from a specific position. Usage finds the most efficient players which places Gay outside the top 2 (or 3) for playoff teams w/options.... like adding a 2nd PnR PG, for example.

Gay's value in most cases will = floor spacing starter + bench usage. Which begs the question of Gay vs. "lesser" non-sticky shooters who defend. Or if we're even valuing players rather than net skill contributions (including diminishing returns).
geometry
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#146 » by Pillendreher » Thu Nov 3, 2016 8:03 pm

Isn't he talking about Cousins?

Sent from my A0001 using RealGM mobile app
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
Kings2013
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,829
And1: 932
Joined: Jul 18, 2013
Location: The beautiful capital of California

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#147 » by Kings2013 » Thu Nov 3, 2016 8:04 pm

Mystical Apples wrote:
Kings2013 wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:I'm not sold that Gay is available. Having watched their last game, he is the only player not named Cousins who can create or score. And they want to be competitive. I think Gay might just get enough touches and shots to be some version of happy, and the Kings might get enough offense out of him to be some version of happy, and the whole thing is setting up for a Gay re-signing next summer that will leave a bunch of us wondering wait what just happened. (And then blow up 6 months later).


It's what happens when you have arguably a top 5 talent at a position, you try to make it work

It's about chemistry and continuity too. I think when Collison comes back, and the schedule turns more favorable, team can potentially turn corner. But the league is full of mediocre players, full. Getting weak draft assets, or some young player who might not turn anything that you couldn't pay for through FA, Rudy can be a second banana potentially for a few years yet, and be possibly be convinced to stay


Even in a vacuum top 15 SF is a major stretch. There's no rule mandating X% offense should come from a specific position. Usage finds the most efficient players which places Gay outside the top 2 (or 3) for playoff teams w/options.... like adding a 2nd PnR PG, for example.

Gay's value in most cases will = floor spacing starter + bench usage. Which begs the question of Gay vs. "lesser" non-sticky shooters who defend. Or if we're even valuing players rather than net skill contributions (including diminishing returns).


we are talking about him being utilized to his strengths offensively under Joerger or anywhere as in this year, which places his efficiency just fine
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,527
And1: 6,865
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#148 » by Andre Roberstan » Thu Nov 3, 2016 8:08 pm

Pillendreher wrote:Isn't he talking about Cousins?

Sent from my A0001 using RealGM mobile app


Yeah, he might be.
Image
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,322
And1: 20,917
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#149 » by HartfordWhalers » Thu Nov 3, 2016 8:34 pm

dbrandon wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:Isn't he talking about Cousins?

Sent from my A0001 using RealGM mobile app


Yeah, he might be.


No, it was about Gay being utilized correct. It is a long standing position.
Mystical Apples
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,393
And1: 1,349
Joined: Jul 06, 2015
 

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#150 » by Mystical Apples » Thu Nov 3, 2016 8:55 pm

Kings2013 wrote:
Mystical Apples wrote:
Kings2013 wrote:
It's what happens when you have arguably a top 5 talent at a position, you try to make it work

It's about chemistry and continuity too. I think when Collison comes back, and the schedule turns more favorable, team can potentially turn corner. But the league is full of mediocre players, full. Getting weak draft assets, or some young player who might not turn anything that you couldn't pay for through FA, Rudy can be a second banana potentially for a few years yet, and be possibly be convinced to stay


Even in a vacuum top 15 SF is a major stretch. There's no rule mandating X% offense should come from a specific position. Usage finds the most efficient players which places Gay outside the top 2 (or 3) for playoff teams w/options.... like adding a 2nd PnR PG, for example.

Gay's value in most cases will = floor spacing starter + bench usage. Which begs the question of Gay vs. "lesser" non-sticky shooters who defend. Or if we're even valuing players rather than net skill contributions (including diminishing returns).


we are talking about him being utilized to his strengths offensively under Joerger or anywhere as in this year, which places his efficiency just fine


We agree he'll be fine.
geometry
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#151 » by Pillendreher » Thu Nov 3, 2016 8:57 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:
dbrandon wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:Isn't he talking about Cousins?

Sent from my A0001 using RealGM mobile app


Yeah, he might be.


No, it was about Gay being utilized correct. It is a long standing position.


Wait - he actually believes Gay to be a Top 5 player/SF?
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
Mystical Apples
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,393
And1: 1,349
Joined: Jul 06, 2015
 

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#152 » by Mystical Apples » Thu Nov 3, 2016 9:08 pm

Pillendreher wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:
dbrandon wrote:
Yeah, he might be.


No, it was about Gay being utilized correct. It is a long standing position.


Wait - he actually believes Gay to be a Top 5 player/SF?


Somewhere between top 5 and fine.
geometry

Return to Trades and Transactions