Bob8 wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:Luka was a liability on defense in game 2.
The Celtics targeted him over and over and the Mavs defense collapsed because he couldn't keep anyone in front of him.
This could have easily been a blowout if Boston had made their open 3s.
Luka's obviously a great player but a lot of his work on offense gets undone by his defense when he plays like this. This was easily one of the worst defensive performances I've seen on this stage by a superstar.
He can get by on defense against a 4-out offense with the 5 roaming behind him. He has no one to bail him out against Boston's 5-out. He has to step up.
Celtics scored 107 and 105 points and we're talking about Mavs D? Really? On the other hand Mavs scored miserably 88 and 97? Do you really believe that Mavs lost because of D?
In game 2 Mavs outside Luka have been able to hit 11% of open 3s. They made 2 3s.
But if you insist talking about Luka's D, Mavs plan is to direct Celtics penetration to help, which I agree is more capable than Luka to defend, and to rotate him and others primarily defenders to shooters. I understand that GB is not the place for serious discussion, but basketball is a little more complex than it seems.
The Mavs defensive gameplan is not to collapse in the paint and leave the Celtics shooters wide open on the perimeter. This is what happened repeatedly in game 2 off of Boston's dribble penetration against Luka. So I appreciate your smug energy, but I'd argue that making the argument that the Mavs defense was sound in game 2 isn't "serious discussion", if anything.
The reason why it didn't cost Dallas more points and a blowout was Boston's lower-than-usual conversion on their open 3s. You don't evaluate a scheme merely by the outcome in a single game, but also by the process and the type of shots it generates. Dallas played with fire all game long on defense and it started with Luka's defense.
Obviously, Luka played great on offense, and Dallas's shooters shot horribly. This was another issue for Dallas. Not the sole issue.
I don't know why I would need to make the second point when highlighting the first.
Maybe you have a Luka problem. I don't know.