Say hello to the newest sun: Stephen Curry

Quackenboss · Post #141 » by **Quackenboss** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:54 pm

You definitely want Belinelli over Azubuike. Azubuike's the next coming of Maggette.

BertMacklin · Post #142 » by **BertMacklin** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:54 pm

If we got AZ we'd have to give up Barbs but would prob get belinelli.

RaisingArizona · Post #143 » by **RaisingArizona** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:54 pm

TASTIC wrote:make it AZubuike

dont want Bellinelli, Az's the better athlete, defender, and arguably shooter

Belliinelli is better than dragic, but AZubuike makes more sense.

Mr. Sun · Post #144 » by **Mr. Sun** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:55 pm

Someone explain to me why we want Wright?

aIvin adams · Post #145 » by **aIvin adams** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:56 pm

ryder wrote:You definitely want Belinelli over Azubuike. Azubuike's the next coming of Maggette.

other than maggette being overpayed, this isnt a bad thing.

The_Setz · Post #146 » by **The_Setz** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:56 pm

aIvin adams wrote:
ryder wrote:You definitely want Belinelli over Azubuike. Azubuike's the next coming of Maggette.

other than maggette being overpayed, this isnt a bad thing.

Yeah, I'm not sure why we wouldn't want someone who can score 20 a game if need be and can get to the line all day long. Hmmm.

Post #147 » by **TASTIC** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:58 pm

i love Azubuike's game, saw a lot of him this year and he has what we need. Cheap contract, great athlete, good 3 ball and plays D

He might shoot too much/take bad shots, but it's not like we'd be expecting 40mins a night from him

Moochiefried · Post #148 » by **Moochiefried** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:58 pm

What will are starting lineup look like now assuming Nash is staying?

aIvin adams · Post #149 » by **aIvin adams** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:58 pm

The_Setz wrote:
aIvin adams wrote:
ryder wrote:You definitely want Belinelli over Azubuike. Azubuike's the next coming of Maggette.

other than maggette being overpayed, this isnt a bad thing.

Yeah, I'm not sure why we wouldn't want someone who can score 20 a game if need be and can get to the line all day long. Hmmm.

also, azubuike is a better shooter

Post #150 » by **TASTIC** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:58 pm

^yeah PF seems to be a real hole...

starbosa10 · Post #151 » by **starbosa10** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:59 pm

Moochiefried wrote:What will are starting lineup look like now assuming Nash is staying?

nash/curry/dragic
jrich/barbs/bellenli or buike
hill(assuming he stays)/clark
wright?/amundson
beans/rolo

Post #152 » by **rsavaj** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:01 pm

ginobiliflops wrote:
ihateginobili wrote:THE DEAL WITH GS IS DONE. DO YOU PEOPLE NOT UNDERSTAND MY ENGLISH?

CURRY IS COMING TO PHOENIX.

AMARE IS GONE.

BARBOSA - GS WOULD LIKE TO INCLUDE HIM IN THE DEAL, ITS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN THOUGH. HE IS NOT THE DEAL BREAKER.

sorry for the caps.

ESPN says Amare for Biedrins, Curry and Wright.

on tv or online?

Post #153 » by **rsavaj** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:01 pm

Mr. Sun wrote:Someone explain to me why we want Wright?

loads of potential and we need bigs

pidi · Post #154 » by **pidi** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:01 pm

so we are going to resign stro - show???

RyGuy24 · Post #155 » by **RyGuy24** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:02 pm

ihateginobili wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:ihateginobili - Bulls/Suns talk completely dead? What players were being talked about and who turned the deal down

I understand if you can't answer any of these question

The talks were for shaqtus.

How? Shaq was already traded to Cleveland the day before.

SSOL · Post #156 » by **SSOL** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:02 pm

amare twitter:

Breaking News! Amar'e Stoudemire to the Lakers!!13 minutes ago from TwitterFon

ruiner · Post #157 » by **ruiner** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:02 pm

I think Wright could flourish here. Good size, really athletic, can hit shots away from the basket and pretty good finisher from what I've seen. I don't think he's close to a finished product.

BertMacklin · Post #158 » by **BertMacklin** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:02 pm

Man, we could use Chandler to make us unbelievable.

starbosa10 · Post #159 » by **starbosa10** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:03 pm

bence61541 wrote:Man, we could use Chandler to make us unbelievable.

not getting him

BertMacklin · Post #160 » by **BertMacklin** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:03 pm

Yeah I know I'm just saying............