Ferry Avenue wrote:mjkvol wrote:Ferry Avenue wrote:The need isn't necessarily for a "big three" but for one of the top players to be a three-level scorer who can spearhead the team in the clutch and be a dependable scoring option at those times. Embiid cannot perform in that capacity and it's questionable whether Maxey can as well.
So what creates the apparent need for a "big three" is not that the precise quantity of three players per se is necessarily needed, but that the top two players on this particular team cannot be depended on to function in a critical way in the NBA.
To use an NFL analogy it'd be like having the best running back in the game (Embiid) coupled with one of the top wide receivers (Maxey), absent an adequate quarterback. Obviously such a team will stall in the playoffs, and likewise this team always does as well.
What would a Ferry post be without at least one 'spearhead' and a convoluted NFL analogy?
What would one of your responses to such a post be if it wasn't devoid of any substantive content and in its stead only meaningless allusions to the posting style of an anonymous message board poster? At this point you're more predictable than I am.
"Posting style"? I, as well as most others on here post whether the team is winning or losing and have different viewpoints on different subjects based on what is happening with the team. You and a couple of others who only post after losses or bad runs are like a skipping record, droning on about the exact same thing over and over and over.














