FriedRise wrote:The Suns would've been better off if they got a point guard instead of Bradley Beal. They could've saved themselves some pain and agony if they'd just paid attention to AK's team building failures in doubling down on wing scorers who don't defend without any point guard or interior defense.
They were a 64-win team two seasons ago, but that was because with Chris Paul there, which allowed Booker to focus on just being a scorer. Then they had so many 3&D players up and down their roster who can pick up the slack and chip in for 15-20pts a night. They traded all that depth for KD (kinda hard to argue with that), but then the next moves should've been to replenished their depth - not completely gut their already thin roster for another 3rd scorer who also doesn't defend.
Clippers too- chronically underachieving (even in the first year, when they had a healthy Kawhi). And the Heat of course (2/4- pretty disappointing for 2 superstars and a top-5 PF).
I think everyone’s enamored with the 90s Bulls concept. PG-less. But thing is, you had 3 All-Defensive players, 1 elite playmaker, and it was a different era.
Murray, Curry, Jrue, rejuvenated Rondo/Lebron, Lowry, Kyrie, Parker… the last teams to win without star PGs were the Heat (struggled mightily considering their roster) and Kobe/Fisher Lakers.