Wes_Tiny_Abe_ wrote:
No Nike swoosh on the official NBA game ball.
No, just a giant Spalding logo. Oh, for simpler times...
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
Wes_Tiny_Abe_ wrote:
No Nike swoosh on the official NBA game ball.
Bickerstaff wrote:Wes_Tiny_Abe_ wrote:
No Nike swoosh on the official NBA game ball.
No, just a giant Spalding logo. Oh, for simpler times...
Wes_Tiny_Abe_ wrote:
Who would you rather make an appearance at their grand opening?
Kevin Durant or Lebron James?
Other than expensive overpriced footwear has Nike really contributed anything worthwhile to professional Basketball?
All of the legendary professional team issued basketball gear from back in the day was made by Spalding, Champion, MacGregor, Rawlings etc...
The Bullets during their existence never wore anything made by Nike.
fishercob wrote:I think I just found video of WTA in his younger days: http://vimeo.com/40983667
ST21 wrote:Wes_Tiny_Abe_ wrote:
Who would you rather make an appearance at their grand opening?
Kevin Durant or Lebron James?
Other than expensive overpriced footwear has Nike really contributed anything worthwhile to professional Basketball?
All of the legendary professional team issued basketball gear from back in the day was made by Spalding, Champion, MacGregor, Rawlings etc...
The Bullets during their existence never wore anything made by Nike.
ok so? it's not supposed to specialize in just NBA gear or anything so what's your point?
Wes_Tiny_Abe_ wrote:ST21 wrote:Wes_Tiny_Abe_ wrote:
Who would you rather make an appearance at their grand opening?
Kevin Durant or Lebron James?
Other than expensive overpriced footwear has Nike really contributed anything worthwhile to professional Basketball?
All of the legendary professional team issued basketball gear from back in the day was made by Spalding, Champion, MacGregor, Rawlings etc...
The Bullets during their existence never wore anything made by Nike.
ok so? it's not supposed to specialize in just NBA gear or anything so what's your point?
My point is all they have contributed to professional basketball is expensive overpriced footwear and thats it.
MacGregor > Nike
Recently they acquired the NFL license and now they have raised the prices of NFL team merchandise.
A basic NFL team t shirt now sells for $25+
fishercob wrote:This is a great piece. I actually thought of WTA. http://m.theatlanticcities.com/politics ... n-dc/2914/
jmrosenth wrote:That was a really good read. I lived on U Street from 99-2003. I guess I didn't really realize I was a pioneer at the time. Truth be told it was closer to the Adams Morgan side of U Street, and we didn't really venture past 16th Street (except for visit's to Ben's, Republic Gardens/State of the Union, or 9:30 Club), but still, there was a crack house on my block when I moved in that was later condemned and converted into, surprise, condos.
C-Droppa wrote:
I think your view on NIKE may be a little bit blown out of proportion and maybe even a little biased. To say they haven't contributed anything to professional is a little far-fetched. I mean just recently who do you think designed those team USA jerseys that were so proudly worn to represent in the Olympics. Or what about those NIKE basketball camps such as the Nike Hoops Summit which displays top young talent for the NBA future. Not only that probably more than 60% of NBA players wear Nikes on there feet...from Jordans, Lebrons, Kobes, Pennys, Huraches, Hyperflights, Hyperdunks, etc...etc..etc. Nike also is a leading contributor when it comes to technological advancements in shoes...You have to admit, while maybe being overpriced, the ability to be able to track things such as your vertical, distance you ran, steps per second and other crap due to sensors in your shoes (Nike +) is kind of cool.
By no means do I work or Nike or anything like that, but I have a nice little collection of sneakers probably around 100 pair. I can't stand the way prices have risen but thats life. The hottest sneakers like retro jordans and such, get snatched up by resellers and re-sold on ebay for twice the amount. It's just the way our country is. I remember when gas was .99 and now I pay 4-5 dollars a gallon...but I can't say gas didn't contribute to cars. Remember when you could by a phone for 100 dollars and now phones going for 500+..crazy and over priced. But I can't say companies like Apple and Samsung haven't contributed anything.
Wes_Tiny_Abe_ wrote:fishercob wrote:This is a great piece. I actually thought of WTA. http://m.theatlanticcities.com/politics ... n-dc/2914/
Gentrifiers are the lowest level of human life form on the planet. They are scum. They are the gum stuck on the bottom of my shoes. They are disgusting. Everybody hates them. I am just more vocal about it than others.
fishercob wrote:Wes_Tiny_Abe_ wrote:fishercob wrote:This is a great piece. I actually thought of WTA. http://m.theatlanticcities.com/politics ... n-dc/2914/
Gentrifiers are the lowest level of human life form on the planet. They are scum. They are the gum stuck on the bottom of my shoes. They are disgusting. Everybody hates them. I am just more vocal about it than others.
Out of curiosity, did you read the piece?
Gentrification goes hand in hand with development. What's better -- "sanitized" urban neighborhoods, or drug and crime infested ones? I'm not arguing for one or the other, I'm curious as to your take.
jmrosenth wrote:WTA, I know you want to back to the good old days when DC was the murder capital of the world that had a mayor who was caught on videotape getting high, but those days are long gone. You are very much in the minority of folks who want to "keep it real". you should read the article that fishercob posted, seriously, and may also want to look at history from a wider perspective than the last 25 years. It wasn't until the late 60s that DC's demographics changed dramatically. My grandparents and many of their friends lived and owned businesses in Southeast DC.
Zonkerbl wrote:I'm considered an urban pioneer for being a white guy living in Anacostia and I object to being labeled as wanna-be urban and attention-seeking. I'm a govt employee paying child support -- I can either live in Anacostia or Gainesville. The "rent" I'm paying is a ton lower than I would have to pay living in an all-white enclave.
I get that obliterating a neighborhood's existing culture and replacing it with an obnoxious white culture would be sad. And I get that white people are usually jerks. I get that when rents go up, people who rent rather than own can get driven out of a neighborhood involuntarily. Well, maybe that's not all bad, if you believe what was in that article.
Diversity is good, though. Trick is to finish off the whole "emerging from decades of economic stagnation" stage with a diverse, strongly knit community full of people who take care of each other. That would take the sting out of the higher rents.