Nets to orl

Moderators: loserX, HartfordWhalers, Trader_Joe, Texas Chuck, Andre Roberstan, pacers33granger, Mamba4Goat, MoneyTalks41890

Gomagic44
Head Coach
Posts: 6,132
And1: 2,187
Joined: Jan 05, 2013
Location: Ibaka's Block Party

Re: Nets to orl 

Post#16 » by Gomagic44 » Tue Jun 18, 2013 5:01 pm

I'm not trying to be unrealistic with it but Humphries and marswag are not valuable assets. Jameer is on a slightly unfavorable contract, but he produces more than brooks. Davis is more capable than Humphries. The nets are in trouble because of cap space. The horrid joe Johnson and Ben Wallace contracts. Yea, they improved. About as much as they can. Although Boston is on its way out, and the Knicks stuck in cap hell as well
Trader_Joe
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 29,187
And1: 3,965
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
 

Re: Nets to orl 

Post#17 » by Trader_Joe » Tue Jun 18, 2013 5:07 pm

Gomagic44 wrote:I'm not trying to be unrealistic with it but Humphries and marswag are not valuable assets. Jameer is on a slightly unfavorable contract, but he produces more than brooks. Davis is more capable than Humphries. The nets are in trouble because of cap space. The horrid joe Johnson and Ben Wallace contracts. Yea, they improved. About as much as they can. Although Boston is on its way out, and the Knicks stuck in cap hell as well

I'm not saying Orlando would or should do this deal, my stance has been what better offers could they get and I have yet to be presented with one despite most Orlando fans saying they could do better.
Mikhail Prokhorov wrote:My posse usually needs another vacation after a vacation with me.
User avatar
mbn23
Pro Prospect
Posts: 966
And1: 76
Joined: Jan 30, 2009
     

Re: Nets to orl 

Post#18 » by mbn23 » Tue Jun 18, 2013 5:38 pm

Trader_Joe wrote:
Gomagic44 wrote:I'm not trying to be unrealistic with it but Humphries and marswag are not valuable assets. Jameer is on a slightly unfavorable contract, but he produces more than brooks. Davis is more capable than Humphries. The nets are in trouble because of cap space. The horrid joe Johnson and Ben Wallace contracts. Yea, they improved. About as much as they can. Although Boston is on its way out, and the Knicks stuck in cap hell as well

I'm not saying Orlando would or should do this deal, my stance has been what better offers could they get and I have yet to be presented with one despite most Orlando fans saying they could do better.


well it seems like the Magic front office have never been really high on Brooks. Getting an expiring contract in Humphries is nice and all, but Nelson is one of the few vets that I would like to see stay in a Magic uniform. Moving BBD for Humphries and Tyshawn Taylor. Taylor looked really good in the D-league and what little he did play this year he looked pretty good. Almost 50% 3pt. Both contracts are expiring contracts, so if Taylor doesn't look good, them no harm no fowl. As an added bonus Taylor played at Kansas as well.
Just Sayin
Trader_Joe
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 29,187
And1: 3,965
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
 

Re: Nets to orl 

Post#19 » by Trader_Joe » Tue Jun 18, 2013 5:41 pm

mbn23 wrote:well it seems like the Magic front office have never been really high on Brooks. Getting an expiring contract in Humphries is nice and all, but Nelson is one of the few vets that I would like to see stay in a Magic uniform. Moving BBD for Humphries and Tyshawn Taylor. Taylor looked really good in the D-league and what little he did play this year he looked pretty good. Almost 50% 3pt. Both contracts are expiring contracts, so if Taylor doesn't look good, them no harm no fowl. As an added bonus Taylor played at Kansas as well.

Again, I wasn't trying to sell the BK package, I was more wondering what Orlando would expect to get for Nelson and BBD as more than one poster said they could do better...including one who said they could get them young players or picks.
Mikhail Prokhorov wrote:My posse usually needs another vacation after a vacation with me.
User avatar
mbn23
Pro Prospect
Posts: 966
And1: 76
Joined: Jan 30, 2009
     

Re: Nets to orl 

Post#20 » by mbn23 » Tue Jun 18, 2013 5:43 pm

Trader_Joe wrote:
mbn23 wrote:well it seems like the Magic front office have never been really high on Brooks. Getting an expiring contract in Humphries is nice and all, but Nelson is one of the few vets that I would like to see stay in a Magic uniform. Moving BBD for Humphries and Tyshawn Taylor. Taylor looked really good in the D-league and what little he did play this year he looked pretty good. Almost 50% 3pt. Both contracts are expiring contracts, so if Taylor doesn't look good, them no harm no fowl. As an added bonus Taylor played at Kansas as well.

Again, I wasn't trying to sell the BK package, I was more wondering what Orlando would expect to get for Nelson and BBD as more than one poster said they could do better...including one who said they could get them young players or picks.


Well I realize that. I am not sure how high the value is on BBD, so I don't think we'll do much better than Humphries/Taylor.
Just Sayin
jjohns828
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,584
And1: 589
Joined: Jul 11, 2012
   

Re: Nets to orl 

Post#21 » by jjohns828 » Tue Jun 18, 2013 5:57 pm

Trader_Joe wrote:
mbn23 wrote:well it seems like the Magic front office have never been really high on Brooks. Getting an expiring contract in Humphries is nice and all, but Nelson is one of the few vets that I would like to see stay in a Magic uniform. Moving BBD for Humphries and Tyshawn Taylor. Taylor looked really good in the D-league and what little he did play this year he looked pretty good. Almost 50% 3pt. Both contracts are expiring contracts, so if Taylor doesn't look good, them no harm no fowl. As an added bonus Taylor played at Kansas as well.

Again, I wasn't trying to sell the BK package, I was more wondering what Orlando would expect to get for Nelson and BBD as more than one poster said they could do better...including one who said they could get them young players or picks.


I just personally don't think we should trade both of them. I think it's a sure thing we'll trade Afflalo, which leaves Davis and Nelson the only real veteran leaders on the team and I think even rebuilding teams need some veteran leadership to set an example. My preference is to keep Nelson for one more season and hope that one of our younger players is ready and experienced enough to be the locker room leader after next season when Nelson's contract is only half guaranteed.
PetroNet
Banned User
Posts: 6,461
And1: 136
Joined: Feb 27, 2012

Re: Nets to orl 

Post#22 » by PetroNet » Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:10 pm

why would the nets make this move? we lose our only tradeable asset that allows us to bring in salary and we dont gain much. nelson is nice as a backup PG, but our giant hole at pf is still there bbd is a terrible fit next to lopez. you need an elite rebounder and plus defender next to brook
User avatar
Mannchild
Magic Forum Mock Draft Co-Champ
Posts: 947
And1: 272
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
     

Re: Nets to orl 

Post#23 » by Mannchild » Wed Jun 19, 2013 2:02 am

Magic fan here and i would accept this deal in a heartbeat, especially is Brooks is the player we get back. Our number one priority right now should be getting out of Big Baby's contract and this allows that to happen.

Return to Trades and Transactions