All Things #1 Pick 2017 Take 2

DusterBuster · Post #1521 » by **DusterBuster** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:54 am

StojkoVrankovic wrote:
DusterBuster wrote:
winsomme2 wrote:

And Philly doesn't care about the medical??

Philly has a medical staff?!

Yup, here he is looking over Fultz's medical records.......

Well played sir, well played.

Jakeopp · Post #1522 » by **Jakeopp** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:54 am

Celtics_Champs wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:Tatum will be the pick at 3 if the Celtics keep the pick in my opinion

I think it's this Dennis smith Jr guy. He's sneaking up all.over the place sort of like how Brown did last year

Hoping we can swap 3 for 5/10 and get our guy at 5...best case scenario at this point

24istheLAW · Post #1523 » by **24istheLAW** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:54 am

Captain_Caveman wrote:
The Corey's wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
Because you are totally spazzing lol.

I said from the start if danny traded this pick id lose my **** mind.

I wasn't lying.

Cool. I am saying that I fully support this trade.

A highly likely future top 5 pick in return for taking a guy we wanted anyways?

Even if it means Thomas is getting maxed out in a year?

FakeScreenName123 · Post #1524 » by **FakeScreenName123** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:54 am

Read on Twitter

Bingo. ARGH.

Post #1525 » by **sully00** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:54 am

The Corey's wrote:
albas89 wrote:
meatball sub wrote:Lakers pick conveys between 2-5. Still possible to get #1 & 2 next year. Hopefully the Kings will still suck in 2 years if that Laker pick is out of the top 5 though.

No, it's not possible. We traded away all of our luck with the #1 pick this year. You don't get #1 every year.......... fml

Sixers got it and all they had to do was give up pick 3 and pick 4 or 5 next year.

Every asset in the world danny had last year the Sixers wouldn't of taken to give up pick number 1.

Your missing the back end guarantee. So if the '18 pick is not 2-5 they get the Kings '19. As a trade asset it is just so awesome you either get a top 5 pick in '18 or a '19 pick from the most F'd franchise in the league. This is an almost impossible to acquire trade asset especially since Ainge can mix in some juice with the BRK pick.

DK-All Day · Post #1526 » by **DK-All Day** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:54 am

We are going to max out IT.

**** this shut man. About to go crazy.

Squigglepuffin · Post #1527 » by **Squigglepuffin** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:55 am

winsomme2 wrote:
Squigglepuffin wrote:
Gant wrote:
OK, so it's either a really strong Laker pick or an unprotected King's pick in 2019.

Obviously Danny was never going to draft Fultz either way. I would guess the medical went bad

And Philly doesn't care about the medical??

Some teams doctors don't see some injuries as a big deal and others do.

Either way Danny obviously doesn't think Fultz is so far superior than other players in the draft

StojkoVrankovic · RIP texas celtic, 12/10/14 - 12/10/14

Slow down folks, Jackson might be gone before we even pick

greenroom31 · Post #1529 » by **greenroom31** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:55 am

Read on Twitter

Post #1530 » by **Shak_Celts** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:55 am

No way in hell I can watch hours of video on 4 more of the top prospects this season. All I have watched is Fultz and Ball (little JJ)!!

I want Fultz!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy???????????

DusterBuster · Post #1531 » by **DusterBuster** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:55 am

DK-All Day wrote:We are going to max out IT.

**** this shut man. About to go crazy.

Wait, you don't want to keep IT?

Jaqua92 · Post #1532 » by **Jaqua92** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:55 am

winsomme2 wrote:
derblitzenator wrote:
greenroom31 wrote:
If this deal will be signed before the draft and therefore isn't contingent on Jackson being available, it really isnt about him. We may take Fox, Tatum, Ball, Monk -- hell you really don't know. It's no longer safe to assume Jackson is the target.

Exactly. There are probably two targets the Celtics have after Jackson and Fultz.

Read on Twitter

This is the problem right here because Jackson looks like a role player and Ball looks like a pass first PG. the only player IMO that has star potential is Fultz.

Thinking there is not much separation in the top 4 is really bad scouting

While I think this trade blows, i will trust pro scouters over internet fans for sure.

KamikazeK · Post #1533 » by **KamikazeK** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:56 am

Well there's nothing we can do about it at this point so I'm not going to let it bother me.

However, now that we've chosen this path, I hope Danny Ainge is capable of putting together a roster that can contend for a championship.

jfs1000d · Post #1534 » by **jfs1000d** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:56 am

GregB wrote:
Celtics_Champs wrote:Does this mean we can sign a max fa without making any more moves ?

because I'm still down to roll with our crew plus Griffin or Hayward if you guys are.

Essentially, We have to waive all of our FA's , stash Yabu and dump Demetrius Jackson with cash.

I am down with that.

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app

DK-All Day · Post #1535 » by **DK-All Day** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:56 am

What makes you guys think Ainge won't pull this junk next year?

This whole year has been a big waste.

Squigglepuffin · Post #1536 » by **Squigglepuffin** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:56 am

CelticsPride18 wrote:

Read on Twitter

This is a **** joke.

This reporter is not legit IMO

DusterBuster · Post #1537 » by **DusterBuster** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:56 am

Jaqua92 wrote:
While I think this trade blows, i will trust pro scouters over internet fans for sure.

This guy gets it.

Jakeopp · Post #1538 » by **Jakeopp** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:56 am

24istheLAW wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
The Corey's wrote:
I said from the start if danny traded this pick id lose my **** mind.

I wasn't lying.

Cool. I am saying that I fully support this trade.

A highly likely future top 5 pick in return for taking a guy we wanted anyways?

Even if it means Thomas is getting maxed out in a year?

Yeah, no way he's going to be worth that at this point in his career. Not even sure how he's going to look coming off of his injury and potential surgery...Fultz made a ridiculous amount of sense but apparently Danny was blind to it

DK-All Day · Post #1539 » by **DK-All Day** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:57 am

DusterBuster wrote:
DK-All Day wrote:We are going to max out IT.

**** this shut man. About to go crazy.

Wait, you don't want to keep IT?

Not for the max.

The Corey's · Post #1540 » by **The Corey's** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:57 am

sully00 wrote:
The Corey's wrote:
albas89 wrote:
No, it's not possible. We traded away all of our luck with the #1 pick this year. You don't get #1 every year.......... fml

Sixers got it and all they had to do was give up pick 3 and pick 4 or 5 next year.

Every asset in the world danny had last year the Sixers wouldn't of taken to give up pick number 1.

Your missing the back end guarantee. So if the '18 pick is not 2-5 they get the Kings '19. As a trade asset it is just so awesome you either get a top 5 pick in '18 or a '19 pick from the most F'd franchise in the league. This is an almost impossible to acquire trade asset especially since Ainge can mix in some juice with the BRK pick.

That's one way to look at it. I mean to bet that the kings will be top 5 is alot to assume when they haven't been top 5 in quite some time.

There's also the logic that the Celtics should.have both those picks with no protections.