mpharris36 wrote:Knickstape1214 wrote:
Honestly, I've always been reasonable when it comes to trading Melo (my Celtics trade proposals actually were approved by the Celtics fans on RealGM). I know his value isn't that high, but I see it like this
- Anderson's contract is PUTRID and significantly worse than Melo's. Yes, that final year is that harmful, IMO.
- They want Melo more than we necessarily want (need) to trade him.
- Morey is probably being pressured by Paul and Harden to get a deal done.
- The trade should be viewed as a trade for Melo (which would be a late first + Anderson) BUT Houston needs to pay up for us accepting Anderson, which is where the young prospect and another pick comes in.
The trade isn't as simple as Melo to Houston, it's Melo to Houston while we take back a garbage contract in return for a player who does nothing for us in our current state and hurts our long-term flexibility.
I don't disagree but then you see what Paul George got back and you have to realize a team taking on a even better player with 1 year on his contract doesn't get that much in return.
Personally I wouldn't have even been happy with Oladipo and Sabonis for Melo. And Paul George is significantly better than Melo at this point in his career. And PG13 didn't have a NTC...so looking at from every angle, the knicks have every right to hold out for the best possible offer. But I don't think the knicks could get Capela + 2 future 1st rounders for just taking back Ryan Anderson.
And yes I agree Anderson deal is putrid...
Pacers had the Celtics offer on the table and, IIRC, everyone accepted it until the Pacers' GM decided to pull the plug at the last minute - I believe Woj reported that (or some semblance of that story).
Dipo and Sabonis are two young players, one of whom is on a rookie deal and the other is on a fair contract for what he provides + the way the market is going. The Pacers also weren't accepting garbage contracts in return - they were basically just trying to match contracts instead of value, which was beyond stupid on their end because they should have gotten at least one pick. If the Pacers were forced to take on a bad contract, you'd have a point...but there was no Ryan Anderson in the trade. Having Paul George also basically say he's going to LA wasn't helping the Pacers get value, either.
If the Knicks can't get the deal they want, then they simply won't trade him. It's that simple to me. Melo, Houston, and the Knicks all need to come to terms with the fact that if a deal needs to get done, all three need to agree on it. If Anderson had the same contract as Melo, the deal would be done - the fact that he has 3 years (when Melo, IMO, really only has 1) is a dealbreaker and that's where the value comes in -
me asking for the deal I just proposed has basically nothing to do with Melo and everything to do with Anderson. That is my point - that's why I'm stingy as hell with this. I think you're looking at my deal saying everything being brought in is value for Melo, when I'm really looking at is as a deal for Melo + a deal for Anderson's contract. I've already said Melo's value is low, but Anderson's contract brings the demand way up.