JDs_loot wrote:
Beating the knicks means everything to the nets. You guys have an inferiority complex. fact.
And losing to the Nets is the end of the world for the Knicks.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
JDs_loot wrote:
Beating the knicks means everything to the nets. You guys have an inferiority complex. fact.
King_John wrote:poeman wrote:Brooklyn with a flawed win
- Knicks shot terribly
- Nets were unreal from 3-point land
- Knicks without pg and back up center
- Nets turnovers are a problem if you have not noticed
Knicks still found a way to come back through this but continued to have trouble creating shots without Felton and they were 29% from FG...
Nets had like 20 turnovers and were shooting lights out. Still it was close today...It's a weak loss, nothing serious
what is wrong with you people??...the Nets shot 42 % from the floor overall...how is that shooting lights out
also you could say the Nets had 20 turnovers and you still lost.
poeman wrote:King_John wrote:poeman wrote:Brooklyn with a flawed win
- Knicks shot terribly
- Nets were unreal from 3-point land
- Knicks without pg and back up center
- Nets turnovers are a problem if you have not noticed
Knicks still found a way to come back through this but continued to have trouble creating shots without Felton and they were 29% from FG...
Nets had like 20 turnovers and were shooting lights out. Still it was close today...It's a weak loss, nothing serious
what is wrong with you people??...the Nets shot 42 % from the floor overall...how is that shooting lights out
also you could say the Nets had 20 turnovers and you still lost.
what a big deal considering you missed my other points...The Nets were lights out from 3-point land, see my bullet point.
Also, why are the Nets fans acting like they won a playoff series after the win?
therealbig3 wrote:JDs_loot wrote:If I was a real net fan, I'd hate the knicks too. It must be hard hearing knick chants in your own building.
Odd thing to say, since there were "Brooklyn" chants in MSG at the end of the game tonight.JDs_loot wrote:No no no! We're the Yankees, you're lower than the mets. Even if you win a chip, New York will always be a knick town.
The Yankees actually win though...the Knicks don't.
The Knicks are more famous for getting lit up by opposing team's players than actually being good.
JDs_loot wrote:rj2496 wrote:JDs_loot wrote:If I was a real net fan, I'd hate the knicks too. It must be hard hearing knick chants in your own building.
It also must be hard for Knicks fan to hear the BROOKLYN chants in MSG as the clock hits 0:00 and the Nets walk off the court with a Win.
Like three people chanting? I saw the game, I didn't even hear those chants, but if you say so, fine.
Are you really going to compare fan-bases in NY? Really?
therealbig3 wrote:poeman wrote:King_John wrote:[quote="poeman"]Brooklyn with a flawed win
- Knicks shot terribly
- Nets were unreal from 3-point land
- Knicks without pg and back up center
- Nets turnovers are a problem if you have not noticed
Knicks still found a way to come back through this but continued to have trouble creating shots without Felton and they were 29% from FG...
Nets had like 20 turnovers and were shooting lights out. Still it was close today...It's a weak loss, nothing serious
what is wrong with you people??...the Nets shot 42 % from the floor overall...how is that shooting lights out
also you could say the Nets had 20 turnovers and you still lost.
what a big deal considering you missed my other points...The Nets were lights out from 3-point land, see my bullet point.
Also, why are the Nets fans acting like they won a playoff series after the win?
JDs_loot wrote:Yankees, Mets, Rangers, Knicks are ingrained in NY. The nets mean **** to NY.
JDs_loot wrote:vincecarter4pres wrote:JDs_loot wrote:Beating the knicks means everything to the nets. You guys have an inferiority complex. fact.
Just out of curiosity, have you ever visited either the Knicks or Nets Boards?
Because on your board there are pretty much literally 2 to 3 uninstigated Nets threads every week where even the ones that are ignored go at least 3 pages and the popular ones go 10 to 15.
There's at least a thread a month started about something a Knicks fan Nets Board lurker took to heart.
Sure we talk about your team here and there, most of us don't like your team at all, but there is maybe 1 or 2 threads a season started on your team and it's usually something thread worthy and relevant.
Knicks fans have an even bigger complex by far and then try to constantly push all that analogy nonsense about we're the Mets and you're the Yankees, etc., but the truth is, we've both been the Mets so far. If anything we're the Mets and you guys are the Jets.
No no no! We're the Yankees, you're lower than the mets. Even if you win a chip, New York will always be a knick town.
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Who here was comparing fan bases? I think every Nets fan can acknowledge the Knicks fan base trumps the Nets by a large margin. After all the Knicks have been around since the 40's and the Nets are a brand new team.
therealbig3 wrote:JDs_loot wrote:Yankees, Mets, Rangers, Knicks are ingrained in NY. The nets mean **** to NY.
You'd like to think so, but the reality is that the Yankees are in their own tier, and then there's everyone else.
JDs_loot wrote:Who here was comparing fan bases? I think every Nets fan can acknowledge the Knicks fan base trumps the Nets by a large margin. After all the Knicks have been around since the 40's and the Nets are a brand new team.
I give you props for admitting that. A lot of net fans won't.
JDs_loot wrote:therealbig3 wrote:JDs_loot wrote:Yankees, Mets, Rangers, Knicks are ingrained in NY. The nets mean **** to NY.
You'd like to think so, but the reality is that the Yankees are in their own tier, and then there's everyone else.
Are you even from NY?
JDs_loot wrote:The Knicks, Yankees, Rangers, Islanders, Giants, Jets are all more significant then the Nyets, and it's always going to be that way. Deal with it.
poeman wrote:Brooklyn with a flawed win
- Knicks shot terribly
- Nets were unreal from 3-point land
NJ...spent plenty of time in NYC, never lived further than 45 minutes away, listen to the FAN and ESPN NY every day...trust me, I know plenty about the sports culture of NY, and the Knicks are not comparable to the Yankees, not even close.
JDs_loot wrote:The bottom line is the Nets don't mean anything to most new york sports fans. The knicks don't like the nets because the nets think they can move in on our turf. We take pleasure in your suffering.
The Knicks, Yankees, Rangers, Islanders, Giants, Jets are all more significant then the Nyets, and it's always going to be that way. Deal with it.
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.