BigtimeNBAfan wrote:Lakers lose by 37 without Lonzo. What is their record without Lonzo now? Say what you want about him, but they sure play better with him.
That really doesn’t say much about Ball at all. What’s with people on here carrying on like he’s a rookie Magic level guard?
The Lakers stupidly decided to rely totally upon him in his rookie season instead of having some other decent playmaking options too.
It makes sense for Lonzo’s development but it’s pretty absurd for a team that wanted to build on their awful recent history.
When you’re relying on Enis, Ingram, Clarkson and Hart to run the offence you’re going to have a bad time.














