LarryBirdsFingr wrote:Acquiring another big that compliments rwIII or is better than him is next priority, has to feel like long term, no?
I'd love a tall, playmaking PG too. 2 spots from Hali still kills me.
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:Acquiring another big that compliments rwIII or is better than him is next priority, has to feel like long term, no?
hugepatsfan wrote:keevsnick1 wrote:For all those wondering why people like @dangercart are claiming we are **** it's basically this:
If Fournier walks and tatum misses all nba we are less than 2 million below the tax next year for just twelve players.
So bringing back fournier as currently constituted is next to impossible unless you believe the c's are going 20 million into the tax. They are not.
So okay how do you fix that? You could dump kemba, but at roughly 75 million owed over two years that's an albatross. You are talking like two firsts just to move off the deal for the privilege of resigning fournier. You could dump tt but you'd need to replace him on the roster anyway since you need a decent backup due to robs health issues. You no longer have the financial flexibility via a large tpe to add a big wing which you still desperately need.
In short you are financially jammed up with no way out except to shed talent on a team that nobody thinks is good enough as is.
I don't see it the same at all. I'm not going to sit here and say our cap situation is "clean" or anything. But having avoided the tax this year and thus removed ANY AND ALL CONCERNS ABOUT REPEATER TAX RATES EVER KICKING IN BEFORE KEMBA'S DEAL EXPIRES, a point that I cannot stress enough, I do not see this big financial crunch.
NBA luxury tax is not crippling. Repeater tax rates are. We don't have to worry about that. I see no reason to believe that we're going to be pinching pennies in '21-22 or '22-23. Remember, in addition to the contracts we have on the books now, ownership was ok with Ainge offered Hayward a contract in the reported range of $25M/year before CHA came in over that. They were ok adding that much salary to the books we have now. Because a backloaded deal for Hayward would have still kept us below the tax line this year and thus removed any worry about repeater rates. Those have always been what's crippling, not regular tax. We are in the clear.
I just do not see significant financial crunch the next two years when it comes to adding role players. The issue is going to be if we want to trade for a star. Dipping below the cap to sign one outright is not practical when you crunch the numbers, even if Kemba had never been signed in the first place. The only path we have to acquiring another star is via trade and I just do not think we have the assets for that.
Andrew McCeltic wrote:djFan71 wrote:Andrew McCeltic wrote:Again, you’re banking almost entirely on Langford or Nesmith turning into starting caliber players. Or, I guess, Grant turning into a scorer who can maneuver around larger players in the post. We have limited flexibility and limited upside.
Not really. You're definitely hoping one becomes a quality rotation player. But you have 7 starter quality already: Smart, Jays, Kemba, Fournier, TT, Rob.
If either of those 2 pan out to 25 mpg guy and PP does too, you're in solid shape. Big thing as always is we need our stars to turn out to be superstars.
Quality rotation players won’t make this roster significantly better - there has to be a path to upgrade the core. You can’t trade Nesmith for someone like John Collins.
And yeah, the other possibility is that Brown and Tatum might have major leaps left in their game. Tatum probably does. But they’re both developing horrible habits this season - hopefully they play better with better spacing.
darrendaye wrote:keevsnick1 wrote:hugepatsfan wrote:Play out this year, hope for the best, whatever. Nothing I've seen leaves me excited. But lookin ahead to this offseason where I expect Fournier to be re-signed with Bird Rights, the pieces I like and would like to keep...
Kemba (not giving up picks to move him) / Pritchard
Smart / Fournier
Brown / ???
Tatum / ???
??? / R Williams
That's the main 10 man rotation. I have 4 ??? spots. In order to fill those spots we have the following trade chips:
Nesmith
Langford
G Williams
Our 1st round pick
Future picks
The pure salary matching trade pieces are as follows:
Thompson's $9.7M expiring deal
$11.05M left on
$4.767M Kanter TPE
$5M Theis TPE
In free agency we will have the tax payer's MLE and the bi-annual exception to use, along with minimum salary deals of course. Bird rights on Semi as well, though I really hope he isn't re-signed unless it's 3rd string depth. Also bird rights on Wagner and early bird rights on Kornet should either emerge as worthy to re-sign as 3rd string depth or somehow break out into more the rest of the way here.
Ainge needs to be aggressive about finding the right players who fit the role and accept it. Doesn't necessarily have to be vets, but those are generally better bets to be good fits for that.
For all those wondering why people like @dangercart are claiming we are **** it's basically this:
If Fournier walks and tatum misses all nba we are less than 2 million below the tax next year for just twelve players.
So bringing back fournier as currently constituted is next to impossible unless you believe the c's are going 20 million into the tax. They are not.
So okay how do you fix that? You could dump kemba, but at roughly 75 million owed over two years that's an albatross. You are talking like two firsts just to move off the deal for the privilege of resigning fournier. You could dump tt but you'd need to replace him on the roster anyway since you need a decent backup due to robs health issues. You no longer have the financial flexibility via a large tpe to add a big wing which you still desperately need.
In short you are financially jammed up with no way out except to shed talent on a team that nobody thinks is good enough as is.
But how would this be any different if they had traded for Barnes? Or even saved and used the full TPE in the off-season? This was always going to be the scenario. And this is coming from someone who littered the trade threads with posts about not making any trades. The cost was 2 2nd round picks for half a season. I just don't see how Gordon or Barnes on the team is such a game changer in terms of convincing the owners to pay significant lux tax for that team.
Andrew McCeltic wrote:Masslive mentioned one other possibility, which is using the remaining $10 million TPE in a sign and trade for a free agent. Not much there - if you’re lucky you get Jamychal Green or Justise Winslow.
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:Acquiring another big that compliments rwIII or is better than him is next priority, has to feel like long term, no?
Captain_Caveman wrote:New team:
Kemba/Pritchard/Waters
Jaylen/Smart/Langford/Edwards
Fournier/Nesmith/Ojeleye
Tatum/GWill/Wagner
RWill/Thompson/Kornet/Tacko
JediMasterRevan wrote:Captain_Caveman wrote:JediMasterRevan wrote:
Depends on cap and what he resigns for. 15 mill is probably too much for it too happen.
We can do 4/80m no problem.
So pay him more than he gets now?
Lets say we do.
Let say evan resigns for 20 mill a year.
Lets say we ship kemba for no salary past 202 summer
Lets say we keep out 1st rounders and use mle the next offseason
Lets say we let smart walk for nothing.
In summer of 2022 when we should be chasing beal we will have about 115 million in salaries.
Brown-30mill
tatum-32 million
Tpe player-10 mill
Rookies-5 mill
Nesmith/romeo/pp/grant/timelord- 17.5 mill
Fournier-20mill
And that is only 11 players.
Captain_Caveman wrote:New team:
Kemba/Pritchard/Waters
Jaylen/Smart/Langford/Edwards
Fournier/Nesmith/Ojeleye
Tatum/GWill/Wagner
RWill/Thompson/Kornet/Tacko
PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
djFan71 wrote:Andrew McCeltic wrote:Masslive mentioned one other possibility, which is using the remaining $10 million TPE in a sign and trade for a free agent. Not much there - if you’re lucky you get Jamychal Green or Justise Winslow.
That might be really hard/impossible with the hard cap, I haven't checked and it depends on Fournier anyways.
But, that's basically MLE money anyways.
Andrew McCeltic wrote:djFan71 wrote:Andrew McCeltic wrote:Masslive mentioned one other possibility, which is using the remaining $10 million TPE in a sign and trade for a free agent. Not much there - if you’re lucky you get Jamychal Green or Justise Winslow.
That might be really hard/impossible with the hard cap, I haven't checked and it depends on Fournier anyways.
But, that's basically MLE money anyways.
Doesn’t the hard cap go away when you roll over into next season?
Green has a player option, he’d have to want to leave Denver and take a 3 million dollar raise.
Winslow would have to take a pay cut from his current 13 million, he’s an unrestricted free agent and his shot has been atrocious since he came back from injury. He’s the best case scenario, Ojeleye goes to Memphis.
darrendaye wrote:LarryBirdsFingr wrote:Acquiring another big that compliments rwIII or is better than him is next priority, has to feel like long term, no?
For me, ideally getting a center sized stretch 5 and a guy long but athletic enough to play alongside him and cover up his mistakes would be ideal in the short term. I'd have loved to grab Covington. Another good communicator out there with him and enough strength to push with centers on switches.
Also depends where you see Tatum's best fit, playing more at the 4 or 3. I know we're all about position-less ball now, but, I don't know that I like the matchup against Giannis, Durant, LeBron, or Simmons.
hugepatsfan wrote:keevsnick1 wrote:For all those wondering why people like @dangercart are claiming we are **** it's basically this:
If Fournier walks and tatum misses all nba we are less than 2 million below the tax next year for just twelve players.
So bringing back fournier as currently constituted is next to impossible unless you believe the c's are going 20 million into the tax. They are not.
So okay how do you fix that? You could dump kemba, but at roughly 75 million owed over two years that's an albatross. You are talking like two firsts just to move off the deal for the privilege of resigning fournier. You could dump tt but you'd need to replace him on the roster anyway since you need a decent backup due to robs health issues. You no longer have the financial flexibility via a large tpe to add a big wing which you still desperately need.
In short you are financially jammed up with no way out except to shed talent on a team that nobody thinks is good enough as is.
I don't see it the same at all. I'm not going to sit here and say our cap situation is "clean" or anything. But having avoided the tax this year and thus removed ANY AND ALL CONCERNS ABOUT REPEATER TAX RATES EVER KICKING IN BEFORE KEMBA'S DEAL EXPIRES, a point that I cannot stress enough, I do not see this big financial crunch.
NBA luxury tax is not crippling. Repeater tax rates are. We don't have to worry about that. I see no reason to believe that we're going to be pinching pennies in '21-22 or '22-23. Remember, in addition to the contracts we have on the books now, ownership was ok with Ainge offered Hayward a contract in the reported range of $25M/year before CHA came in over that. They were ok adding that much salary to the books we have now. Because a backloaded deal for Hayward would have still kept us below the tax line this year and thus removed any worry about repeater rates. Those have always been what's crippling, not regular tax. We are in the clear.
I just do not see significant financial crunch the next two years when it comes to adding role players. The issue is going to be if we want to trade for a star. Dipping below the cap to sign one outright is not practical when you crunch the numbers, even if Kemba had never been signed in the first place. The only path we have to acquiring another star is via trade and I just do not think we have the assets for that.