shrink wrote:What I find frustrating is that if you look at the lengths of the game threads, people post more in the losses than the wins. The importance of the last four games are magnified, starting with the Pelicans game, then the Lakers game, OKC, the all these DEN games. For us, each of these is legitimately a playoff game, and unsurprisingly for this team, we’ve gone 2-2. In the game with OKC, that literally was a one game chance to make the playoffs, people don’t have much to say. Is that because people just want to bitch? Is it because that game doesn’t match their rhetoric saying Finch, KAT or Gobert are always bad?
Now we have at least three more games against Denver. It would be a pretty big upset for any 8 seed to advance .. 93.5% of the time, the #1 seed does. Moreover, the Nuggets are fully heathy, and we’re missing two very important players in McDaniels and Naz. I expect a better showing than Game 1, but it would be foolish to expect to win this series. However, what I do expect is for some of the posters here to spend a lot of time and energy blaming their own specific scapegoats as the reason why the team didn’t win. That’s been the only consistent thing this season.
Welcome to life. There are always more negative things to point out than positive.
When things go badly, there are things to change and fix. When things go extremely well you just keep doing what you are doing.
Life needs both pessimists and optimists. Without people looking for flaws nothing would ever change and nothing would get better.
Without optimists people would do nothing but fight and people would not be able to push through tough times.
People point out things they don't like because they want the team to get better.
Everyone has a different version of what that looks like, and we sometimes we keep seeing the same problem over and over.
Sometimes it can look over the top.
It sounds like you would rather everyone post nothing but thumbs up emojis.
When TC made the all-in trade the stakes went way up.
Things mean more now than when we were drafting in the top 5 every single year.
Raised expectations = more frustration with failure.
I try to get in there with good things to say when the team plays well.
I try to pick out things that worked when we play badly.
Sometimes life gets in the way too.
You are getting myopic in your views lately and it's unlike the shrink I know who always wanted to squeeze out every little bit of trade value. I've heard nothing but excuses and attacks against negativity from you ever since the Gobert trade.
There is plenty of blame to go around
1. our GM took a massive risk making a historically costly trade for a player who has not made us any better
2. KAT has been here 8 years now and still has the same problems while his peers Jokic and Embiid are winning MVPs.
3. We have had massive 4th quarter offensive meltdowns consistently going back to last year's playoffs and our coach refuses to make any changes to his system and basically never calls any plays. It doesn't matter what personnel we run, result is the same.
4. Ant has not made the big leap as a playmaker yet that we all are hoping for. I believe the injuries have really hurt him over the past month, and as Jon K has alluded to, he isn't going left much anymore. He also blew a relatively easy left hand layup vs Denver.
I don't think that shoulder he fell on is healthy.
The Nuggets won 52 games this year. Many people expected 50+ wins from us too.
We are not that far apart as a 1 v 8 seed.
What happened in game 1 was a colossal embarrassment.
Our defense was actually pretty good the first 3 quarters, good enough to win the game had our offense been decent.
But our offense? 80 freaking points in 2023?
KAT was the biggest culprit. He was the focus of the offense and he consistently made bad decisions and took bad shots.
He's been here 8 years, he is the one consistent factor to the mediocrity through multiple head coaches and point guards.
Gobert also makes us easier to defend because the only thing you have to defend is the lob, which is a harder play to make than most people think. It's not something you can rely on. They're trapping any pick action involving him and we are going to need some good corner shooting to beat the way they are defending us.
NAW is playing great defense and we should keep having him chase Murray.
Unfortunately he is a poor shooter with poor form and isn't going to be able to can those corner 3's.
This is where we miss Jaden who can do both.
Denver added 2 great 3+D guys in the offseason in KCP and Brown for very little while we spent 5 1st round draft picks and 3 rotation players on Gobert. We were the 7 seed and they were they 6 seeds last year, separated by 2 games.
They've taken a step forward and we've taken a step back.
I put most of that on our GM.
Back to the topic of the thread, I'm willing to give Finch one more year because he overachieved last year and this year's roster was ill constructed for what he wants to do. But he has to be willing to change up what he is doing and be more firm with the players.
I think part of the problem with Ryan Saunders is he was too much friend and not enough authority figure.
I see Finch having respect problems too, KAT being "in his feelings" the biggest example.
I'd like to see him more assertive with the offense and the pecking order.
If these guys can't decide who gets the shots, he should decide for them.
And the big problem with his egalitarian offense is that much too often you have a less talented player like a McLaughlin, Prince, NAW, or Gobert trying to make a play. This is a big problem because a good defense is going to be able to force the shots to those players. This is why the 2nd unit offense has looked better at times with Naz and Nowell out there and Gobert off the floor as we have more consistent threats at each level.