OakleyDokely wrote:Scase wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:
ya, people don't realize just how bad it was pre Masai.
They sucked for most their history, but they didn't suck enough to get top picks (other than for the Bargnani year which took a lot of lottery luck), and they were generally unwatchable other than for a couple VC years. The best part of most seasons were the meme's posted on this board.
That's not to say Masai has been great lately or that he shouldn't be replaced, but a mediocre Masai is 5x better than what we had prior.
We havent been much better post chip though. It's been a constant decline that resulted in 2 of the 5 worst post expansion era seasons in franchise history. And while I won't throw too much **** at him for the covid season, you gotta accept the whole body of work. People can say how we won 48 games post chip, but without the context of what that team actually was, and what they would have resulted in it's meaningless. Instead of tearing it down, we tried to win with a flawed core and have gotten progressively worse, and we're right back at BC/Babcock era win rates.
Ultimately I'm of the mindset that it can't get much worse than it currently is, I've seen the worst and the best of this team, so I'm prepared for the future of it.
It depends on who they are replaced with because there are a lot options much worse than a Masai/Webster duo.
You can be bad record wise and also take Giddey or Suggs instead of Barnes. That's how it gets worse and that's what happened a lot pre Masai.
Well yeah, but that's not specific to Ed Rogers taking over. Being bad record wise, and picking Giddey or Suggs at least keeps you in the bad to try again next time. But getting a fantastic centre piece, and still building out a middling treadmill-esque team isn't exactly difficult. We've seen it plenty of times before both in Toronto and elsewhere, hell, we're seeing it right now.
Yes you can do worse than Masai/Bobby, but you can also do much better than the spot we've been in for years. "It could always be worse" is a defeatist attitude of which I'm not a big fan.
Vampirate wrote:Scase wrote:Vampirate wrote:
Keep in mind it's quite possible we could be going into the Bulls direction as a franchise as an MO.
It's been very disappointing the last few years, but it could get much worse.
Eh could it though? IMO the worst place for a team is being stuck in the middle, not being a 20 win team, but exactly where we are now. Obviously that's subjective, but for me, this is the bottom of the barrel. At least with really low win teams you have the promise of high draft picks and getting lucky with some breakout prospect.
In the middle you have picks that rarely ever amount to anything substantial, and just sniff the playoffs while never being a real threat. One has a chance to break out, the other doesn't, it's designed to hit the bare minimum bar of "competitive" for people to keep buying.
I don't want to turn this into a tanking thread, so I'll just say, from my perspective, we're in the worst position possible currently and I can't see it getting much worse.
I'm going to remind you that Masai drafted Barnes. Masai has a lot to blame for the last couple of years, but it's one thing to have a middling franchise, it's quite another to have a middling franchise with actual no young blue chip prospect to potentially build around.
We could be stuck in the same situation but have Suggs instead of Barnes (and Suggs is a great role player, but not a building block).
That Barnes pick is why I still hold Masai in high regard, despite the last few years, he went away from the hype of Suggs.
Now you say we are like the Bulls well who exactly who are the Bulls building around? Josh Giddey? Coby White?
Ok and? What you do with it is what matters. The Cavs drafted lebron, and then they put horrendous teams around him, should they be applauded?
We drafted Barnes, and have proceeded to build a middling team. I have faith in Masai's drafting acumen, I don't think I have ever spoken ill of that, he's great at it. But there is much more to a team than drafting. Building a middling team with a blue chip or without one, you still have a middling team. Results are what matter.
Also I think you might be a bit confused, I didn't say we are like the bulls, you were the one who brought the bulls up
