ImageImageImage

Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

Revived
RealGM
Posts: 37,451
And1: 22,229
Joined: Feb 17, 2011

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1701 » by Revived » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:01 pm

BobbieL wrote:I also do think the players need to learn how to win games in the playoffs. I believe the Warriors got to the playoffss in 13 and 14 before going on this great run 15 -18. Yes, they had talent but they also made the playoffs and losing he;lped make them better. Trading for Bogut in 13, signing Iggy in 14. The Suns need that kind of move - a Bogut type signing this offseason.

So when I think of adding veterans - unless they are younger like Favors or Smart --- I am wanting veterans with two years left on their deals in most cases to help bridge the gap as Chriss, Bender, Jackson and Ayton mature. I don;'t know what Knight has left in the tank but with two years left on his deal - he fits that timeline. Maybe it seems stupid to give up a first round pick to help facilitate a move with Chandler or Dudleys contract but those things are spent money and would rather not extend the pain byt stretching those deals - plus the Suns don't need more rookies at this point

Its a fine line - I want my cake and eat it too - but I think this team needs win some games and push for the 8th spot this season. Not stupid long term signings - over pays on one years unless the right player comes along. Its why Dragic for two years - could be a very good option.

I agree but I don’t think the fans here will like that type of move without realizing it’s required. Even Warriors fans booed the Bogut for Ellis trade, I can’t imagine what Suns fans would do for that type of trade.

TJ Warren is like our version of Monta Ellis, a good but flawed player that needs to be traded but fans will be up in arms about.
TeamTragic
General Manager
Posts: 9,000
And1: 7,028
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
 

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1702 » by TeamTragic » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:01 pm

Saberestar wrote:
Phoenix could be involved in a Leonard deal, however, as a third team facilitator. Leonard reportedly has expressed interest in playing for the Los Angeles Lakers, and the Lakers have enough young assets to potentially satisfy the Spurs.

Phoenix could get involved by taking Luol Deng’s contract off the Lakers’ hands – he has two years and $36 million left on his deal – in exchange for one of Los Angeles’ young players. Say, for example, point guard Lonzo Ball.

This much is certain: The Suns will not trade their No. 1 pick for Leonard.

https://amp.azcentral.com/amp/707198002?__twitter_impression=true


Image
User avatar
LukasBMW
Suns Forum SlamDRUNK Contributor
Posts: 4,827
And1: 4,291
Joined: Jun 21, 2007
Location: Phoenix AZ & San Diego CA
 

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1703 » by LukasBMW » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:05 pm

GoranTragic wrote:
Saberestar wrote:
Phoenix could be involved in a Leonard deal, however, as a third team facilitator. Leonard reportedly has expressed interest in playing for the Los Angeles Lakers, and the Lakers have enough young assets to potentially satisfy the Spurs.

Phoenix could get involved by taking Luol Deng’s contract off the Lakers’ hands – he has two years and $36 million left on his deal – in exchange for one of Los Angeles’ young players. Say, for example, point guard Lonzo Ball.

This much is certain: The Suns will not trade their No. 1 pick for Leonard.

https://amp.azcentral.com/amp/707198002?__twitter_impression=true


We get involved to help the Lakers unload the Deng contract? As a reward we get Lonzo **** Ball?

Image


F-that.

I want Kuzma.

Then we still make the trade with Memphis to get #4

Doncic/Knight/Ulis
Booker/Daniels
JJ/TJ
Kuzma/Chriss
Ayton/Bender/Sauce

Parsons and Deng rot on IR until they become assets we can use with our future picks to address the spots where guys don't work.
Image
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1704 » by BobbieL » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:11 pm

GoranTragic wrote:
Saberestar wrote:
Phoenix could be involved in a Leonard deal, however, as a third team facilitator. Leonard reportedly has expressed interest in playing for the Los Angeles Lakers, and the Lakers have enough young assets to potentially satisfy the Spurs.

Phoenix could get involved by taking Luol Deng’s contract off the Lakers’ hands – he has two years and $36 million left on his deal – in exchange for one of Los Angeles’ young players. Say, for example, point guard Lonzo Ball.

This much is certain: The Suns will not trade their No. 1 pick for Leonard.

https://amp.azcentral.com/amp/707198002?__twitter_impression=true


Image


maybe I missing with the cap and Bordon is on the ball
but Deng + Ball = 25
suns renounce everybody, waive Ulis and Williams and House = 19m
not sure that math adds up

oh unless you tell me we are going to stretch Chandler or Dudley to take - wait for it Luol bleeping Deng -- and basically kill the cap space plus stretch a guy for multiple year or worse - attach a first for somebody to take Dudley or Chandler for Deng and Ball

like i said - the way i help this move is trade the 16 for Kuzma so the Lakers have a first to attach to Deng to another team. PERIOD!
User avatar
NapoleonII
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,612
And1: 4,961
Joined: Aug 31, 2007

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1705 » by NapoleonII » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:12 pm

I really like Kuzma's game.

He's got Robert Horry 2.0 written all over him.
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1706 » by BobbieL » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:14 pm

Revived wrote:
BobbieL wrote:I also do think the players need to learn how to win games in the playoffs. I believe the Warriors got to the playoffss in 13 and 14 before going on this great run 15 -18. Yes, they had talent but they also made the playoffs and losing he;lped make them better. Trading for Bogut in 13, signing Iggy in 14. The Suns need that kind of move - a Bogut type signing this offseason.

So when I think of adding veterans - unless they are younger like Favors or Smart --- I am wanting veterans with two years left on their deals in most cases to help bridge the gap as Chriss, Bender, Jackson and Ayton mature. I don;'t know what Knight has left in the tank but with two years left on his deal - he fits that timeline. Maybe it seems stupid to give up a first round pick to help facilitate a move with Chandler or Dudleys contract but those things are spent money and would rather not extend the pain byt stretching those deals - plus the Suns don't need more rookies at this point

Its a fine line - I want my cake and eat it too - but I think this team needs win some games and push for the 8th spot this season. Not stupid long term signings - over pays on one years unless the right player comes along. Its why Dragic for two years - could be a very good option.

I agree but I don’t think the fans here will like that type of move without realizing it’s required. Even Warriors fans booed the Bogut for Ellis trade, I can’t imagine what Suns fans would do for that type of trade.

TJ Warren is like our version of Monta Ellis, a good but flawed player that needs to be traded but fans will be up in arms about.


I have studied how the Warriors were built pretty closely - they signed David Lee in 2010 = so that was after Curry in 09 and before Klay in 11. But besides the draft of BArnes, Ezeli and what was the key, GReen in 12 - in spring of 13 - when management realized it was CurryKlay show - they used Ellis for Bogut. the next year, two picks for Iggy, signing Blake for cheap one year; signing Livingston for pretty cheap.

to your point - Warren is that guy if you read my posts - you know my targeted players so no need to post them - but who is the Suns "Bogut" that kind of takes a player not needed for abetter player for the roster to help the team win.
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1707 » by BobbieL » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:16 pm

LukasBMW wrote:
GoranTragic wrote:


We get involved to help the Lakers unload the Deng contract? As a reward we get Lonzo **** Ball?

Image


F-that.

I want Kuzma.

Then we still make the trade with Memphis to get #4

Doncic/Knight/Ulis
Booker/Daniels
JJ/TJ
Kuzma/Chriss
Ayton/Bender/Sauce

Parsons and Deng rot on IR until they become assets we can use with our future picks to address the spots where guys don't work.



Kuzma for the 16th pick - Lakers can attach their own first or a future first with the Suns 16 for a team to take Luol Deng.

I want nothing to do with Deng. It sucks to have 27m of bad cap right now , possibly 42 with Knight - talk about close to 60m with Deng. Ugh
User avatar
Kerrsed
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 29,876
And1: 16,578
Joined: Mar 31, 2009
Location: Land of the Internet Memes
Contact:
     

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1708 » by Kerrsed » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:23 pm

BobbieL wrote:
jredsaz wrote:
AtheJ415 wrote:
Next offseason will depend on this offseason, but it is very doable to get to max if we dump Dudley or Chandler. The key is Book waiting the one offseason to extend. Also, plenty of those guys listed are straight UFA, like Kemba, who is an obvious fit here. Also, PG, our needed position, has a ton of guys and not many teams who need one, depressing the market further. The point is not that we should project the specific star that is likely to sign here. All I know is that the odds of getting a star who fits are drastically higher next offseason than this offseason.

I never said Booker, Jackson, and Ayton don't need to win games. What I said is that the urgency to win games is not so immediate and great that we should lock our cap space up for 3-4 years on role players at big salaries in an effort to win 1 offseason earlier given the giant opportunity cost. The idea that we need to spend big money on role players to win with a bunch of 20 year olds at the expense of a potential max offering next offseason is one of the worst thoughts i have read. It has 0 logic.

I am fine signing a role player to a 1 year deal to maintain the cap space next year. That is fine. Signing role players in any manner that impacts our cap next offseason, which is our best chance to max anybody in FA in probably the next decade, is beyond stupid. I mean look at the role player deals teams have made that are similar to your proposition trying to win now with youth. It cost LA Russell and will probably cost them Ball to dump Deng. It cost us a huge amount of cap space for Dudley, which we wish we didn't have right now. Chandler too. Only Reddick has really worked in the manner you mention, and that is just because it was for 1 year.


Who is this max free agent man?! Klay isn't leaving. Kawhi is on his way to LA with PG. Middleton, Harris, Kemba, are all good but would be over paid max guys. Love and Gasol could really back fire on a long max deal. RFAs like Russel you have to pay for. And Booker is signing his extension as soon as he is able.

Deng, Mozgov, Dudley and Chandler were awful signings and everyone called it at the time. That is not what I am proposing at all.

My point is they aren't winning a ring in the next few years regardless of who they sign. Honestly, they need to make sure they structure their cap so that in three or four years from know the only contracts they have locked in are Booker, Jackson, and Ayton. That's when a signing like your talking about could actually push them over the top. Until then it's about putting together a team that can start learning how to win basketball games. If we can land that guy through trade I'm all about it. If they can get in in FA great, maintain flexible short term deals to keep that an option. But waiting until next year and maxing out Kemba Walker isn't a franchise changing move.


I agree that the team needs to have the cap right for Booker Jackson and Ayton in four years

I also do think the players need to learn how to win games in the playoffs. I believe the Warriors got to the playoffss in 13 and 14 before going on this great run 15 -18. Yes, they had talent but they also made the playoffs and losing he;lped make them better. Trading for Bogut in 13, signing Iggy in 14. The Suns need that kind of move - a Bogut type signing this offseason.

So when I think of adding veterans - unless they are younger like Favors or Smart --- I am wanting veterans with two years left on their deals in most cases to help bridge the gap as Chriss, Bender, Jackson and Ayton mature. I don;'t know what Knight has left in the tank but with two years left on his deal - he fits that timeline. Maybe it seems stupid to give up a first round pick to help facilitate a move with Chandler or Dudleys contract but those things are spent money and would rather not extend the pain byt stretching those deals - plus the Suns don't need more rookies at this point

Its a fine line - I want my cake and eat it too - but I think this team needs win some games and push for the 8th spot this season. Not stupid long term signings - over pays on one years unless the right player comes along. Its why Dragic for two years - could be a very good option.


I still believe that if we cant find a way to trade up BEFORE the draft, we will end up making a trade with the Hornets for Kemba. I believe they are the ones that gave a promise to Shai and will be moving Walker. Will be around #16 & Warren. Warren is an upgrade over all their starting SF's, and Kemba is easily an upgrade over any PG that we have had in the past 7 years. Kemba gets paid about $250K more than Warren this upcoming season. Provides 20+ points, solid 3 point shooting, veteran playmaking and leadership, and decent defense for the PG position. I also believe will we end up using what capspace we have to go after a PF like Favors or Randle for semi cheap or McD may try to risk it for the biscuit and hit a grand slam by trying to sign Cousins.

Booker is expecting McD to go all out, and has repeated him numerous times in numerous interviews. Like it or not, Kemba would help in that aspect, and while some here clamber for Dragics return, the fact is that Kemba is younger, more easily attainable, and had a better season last year (Both offensively and Defensively) than Dragic. Kemba is an all-star now 2 years in a row, but will be looking for a major payday soon. But is that one addition enough for Booker and what he expects McD to do with all the BIG CHANGES talk? I dont think so, i think instead of using that capspace to take on a dead contract like Deng or Parsons for a pick, he is going to throw it at a guy like Cousins. While Gordons name has been thrown about a lot in regards to us, i think Orlando matches whatever he is offered 100% (Thank God). Cousins on the other hand is the mystery man. Coming back from injury, does the Pelicans sink that much money into retaining him, or spends that to improve their roster in other ways. Suns would be adding a great defender that can hit the 3 if need be, and one of the best passing bigs in the league (Averaging 5.5 Assists) to Igors pass heavy system. Either its going to be phenomenal...or its going to fail hard, its all depending on Cousins health.

But when all is said and done, this is the starting 5 i think McD will be going after: Kemba/Booker/Jackson/Cousins/Ayton. If it happens, it will be GLORIOUS.....or a trainwreck.
Its #DUMPSTERFIRE SEASON! #TeamTRAINWRECK -KERRSED- The Mod, The Myth, The Legend
Image
Revived
RealGM
Posts: 37,451
And1: 22,229
Joined: Feb 17, 2011

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1709 » by Revived » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:27 pm

LukasBMW wrote:
GoranTragic wrote:


We get involved to help the Lakers unload the Deng contract? As a reward we get Lonzo **** Ball?

Image


F-that.

I want Kuzma.

Then we still make the trade with Memphis to get #4

Doncic/Knight/Ulis
Booker/Daniels
JJ/TJ
Kuzma/Chriss
Ayton/Bender/Sauce

Parsons and Deng rot on IR until they become assets we can use with our future picks to address the spots where guys don't work.

Forget Kuzma, Ingram is the prize to get from the Lakers.

He will be a stud. If we can get him while keeping Booker, Jackson and Ayton....my goodness.
Saberestar
RealGM
Posts: 22,364
And1: 16,997
Joined: May 21, 2010

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1710 » by Saberestar » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:30 pm

Come one guys...Kuzma has a lot of more value than the #16 pick.

He had an amazing rookie season, perfect modern SF/PF who just needs to improve a little bit his defense.

Josh Jackson and Kuzma have the same value around the league IMO...probably even a little bit higher Kuzma.
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1711 » by BobbieL » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:33 pm

Kerrsed wrote:
BobbieL wrote:
jredsaz wrote:
Who is this max free agent man?! Klay isn't leaving. Kawhi is on his way to LA with PG. Middleton, Harris, Kemba, are all good but would be over paid max guys. Love and Gasol could really back fire on a long max deal. RFAs like Russel you have to pay for. And Booker is signing his extension as soon as he is able.

Deng, Mozgov, Dudley and Chandler were awful signings and everyone called it at the time. That is not what I am proposing at all.

My point is they aren't winning a ring in the next few years regardless of who they sign. Honestly, they need to make sure they structure their cap so that in three or four years from know the only contracts they have locked in are Booker, Jackson, and Ayton. That's when a signing like your talking about could actually push them over the top. Until then it's about putting together a team that can start learning how to win basketball games. If we can land that guy through trade I'm all about it. If they can get in in FA great, maintain flexible short term deals to keep that an option. But waiting until next year and maxing out Kemba Walker isn't a franchise changing move.


I agree that the team needs to have the cap right for Booker Jackson and Ayton in four years

I also do think the players need to learn how to win games in the playoffs. I believe the Warriors got to the playoffss in 13 and 14 before going on this great run 15 -18. Yes, they had talent but they also made the playoffs and losing he;lped make them better. Trading for Bogut in 13, signing Iggy in 14. The Suns need that kind of move - a Bogut type signing this offseason.

So when I think of adding veterans - unless they are younger like Favors or Smart --- I am wanting veterans with two years left on their deals in most cases to help bridge the gap as Chriss, Bender, Jackson and Ayton mature. I don;'t know what Knight has left in the tank but with two years left on his deal - he fits that timeline. Maybe it seems stupid to give up a first round pick to help facilitate a move with Chandler or Dudleys contract but those things are spent money and would rather not extend the pain byt stretching those deals - plus the Suns don't need more rookies at this point

Its a fine line - I want my cake and eat it too - but I think this team needs win some games and push for the 8th spot this season. Not stupid long term signings - over pays on one years unless the right player comes along. Its why Dragic for two years - could be a very good option.


I still believe that if we cant find a way to trade up BEFORE the draft, we will end up making a trade with the Hornets for Kemba. I believe they are the ones that gave a promise to Shai and will be moving Walker. Will be around #16 & Warren. Warren is an upgrade over all their starting SF's, and Kemba is easily an upgrade over any PG that we have had in the past 7 years. Kemba gets paid about $250K more than Warren this upcoming season. Provides 20+ points, solid 3 point shooting, veteran playmaking and leadership, and decent defense for the PG position. I also believe will we end up using what capspace we have to go after a PF like Favors or Randle for semi cheap or McD may try to risk it for the biscuit and hit a grand slam by trying to sign Cousins.

Booker is expecting McD to go all out, and has repeated him numerous times in numerous interviews. Like it or not, Kemba would help in that aspect, and while some here clamber for Dragics return, the fact is that Kemba is younger, more easily attainable, and had a better season last year (Both offensively and Defensively) than Dragic. Kemba is an all-star now 2 years in a row, but will be looking for a major payday soon. But is that one addition enough for Booker and what he expects McD to do with all the BIG CHANGES talk? I dont think so, i think instead of using that capspace to take on a dead contract like Deng or Parsons for a pick, he is going to throw it at a guy like Cousins. While Gordons name has been thrown about a lot in regards to us, i think Orlando matches whatever he is offered 100% (Thank God). Cousins on the other hand is the mystery man. Coming back from injury, does the Pelicans sink that much money into retaining him, or spends that to improve their roster in other ways. Suns would be adding a great defender that can hit the 3 if need be, and one of the best passing bigs in the league (Averaging 5.5 Assists) to Igors pass heavy system. Either its going to be phenomenal...or its going to fail hard, its all depending on Cousins health.

But when all is said and done, this is the starting 5 i think McD will be going after: Kemba/Booker/Jackson/Cousins/Ayton. If it happens, it will be GLORIOUS.....or a trainwreck.


i have already stated what i think the Suns can give Kupchak that other teams might not be able to give - granted, I haven't studied others teams caps - but between expirings and non guaranteed contracts- Mitch can get both short and long term cap relief. plus the Suns can give 16 and Warren too and hell - possibly a pretty heavily protected first rounder of their own in 2019 - 2021

Out: Dudley, Warren, Williams, Ulis - 16 and if they want 31

In: Kemba and Marvin - would take Hermangomez but I doubt Mitch is giving up

Mitch can waive Williams and Ulis and save 7m right now; Dudley expiring where as Marvin is not so savings there - have picks 11, 16 and 31 to rebuild. Howard, Lamb and Dudley off books would create cap space
JMac1
Suns Forum Training Specialist
Posts: 10,032
And1: 4,004
Joined: May 23, 2009

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1712 » by JMac1 » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:34 pm

Saberestar wrote:Come one guys...Kuzma has a lot of more value than the #16 pick.

He had an amazing rookie season, perfect modern SF/PF who just needs to improve a little bit his defense.

Josh Jackson and Kuzma have the same value around the league IMO...probably even a little bit higher Kuzma.


How old is Kuzman? Who does he play for? What the league thinks and what reality is, is two different things. You don't make decision based off of what the league thinks. If you do that, they control the narrative and decide who has value and you better believe it will be Lakers' players over Suns' players. After one year Kuzman has more value than JJ :nonono:
Saberestar
RealGM
Posts: 22,364
And1: 16,997
Joined: May 21, 2010

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1713 » by Saberestar » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:39 pm

JMac1 wrote:
Saberestar wrote:Come one guys...Kuzma has a lot of more value than the #16 pick.

He had an amazing rookie season, perfect modern SF/PF who just needs to improve a little bit his defense.

Josh Jackson and Kuzma have the same value around the league IMO...probably even a little bit higher Kuzma.


How old is Kuzman? Who does he play for? What the league thinks and what reality is, is two different things. You don't make decision based off of what the league thinks. If you do that, they control the narrative and decide who has value and you better believe it will be Lakers' players over Suns' players. After one year Kuzman has more value than JJ :nonono:

Yes, Kuzma is a couple of years older than Jackson but he has played better than him in his rookie season.

I prefer Jackson over Kuzma, but I imagine that their value around the league in a trade have to be pretty similar at the moment.

What I want to say is that Kuzma is a really good young player under a cheap contrat for the next three seasons...you are not getting him for the #16 pick in this draft.
TeamTragic
General Manager
Posts: 9,000
And1: 7,028
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
 

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1714 » by TeamTragic » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:41 pm

Saberestar wrote:Come one guys...Kuzma has a lot of more value than the #16 pick.

He had an amazing rookie season, perfect modern SF/PF who just needs to improve a little bit his defense.

Josh Jackson and Kuzma have the same value around the league IMO...probably even a little bit higher Kuzma.


You clearly have selective memory:

- immature young player
- played with Lonzo Ball
- could be the next D'Angelo Russell

Lakers can go dump their trash on a different team.
User avatar
sunskerr
General Manager
Posts: 9,764
And1: 5,968
Joined: Feb 20, 2010
 

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1715 » by sunskerr » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:42 pm

Kerrsed wrote:But when all is said and done, this is the starting 5 i think McD will be going after: Kemba/Booker/Jackson/Cousins/Ayton. If it happens, it will be GLORIOUS.....or a trainwreck.


Can everyone just please stop with this twin towers stuff? It's not coming back. Like, arrrrghh. Staaaahp
JMac1
Suns Forum Training Specialist
Posts: 10,032
And1: 4,004
Joined: May 23, 2009

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1716 » by JMac1 » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:44 pm

Saberestar wrote:
JMac1 wrote:
Saberestar wrote:Come one guys...Kuzma has a lot of more value than the #16 pick.

He had an amazing rookie season, perfect modern SF/PF who just needs to improve a little bit his defense.

Josh Jackson and Kuzma have the same value around the league IMO...probably even a little bit higher Kuzma.


How old is Kuzman? Who does he play for? What the league thinks and what reality is, is two different things. You don't make decision based off of what the league thinks. If you do that, they control the narrative and decide who has value and you better believe it will be Lakers' players over Suns' players. After one year Kuzman has more value than JJ :nonono:

Yes, Kuzma is a couple of years older than Jackson but he has played better than him in his rookie season.

I prefer Jackson over Kuzma, but I imagine that their value around the league in a trade have to be pretty similar at the moment.

What I want to say is that Kuzma is a really good young player under a cheap contrat for the next three seasons...you are not getting him for the #16 pick in this draft.


I agree. Kuzma plays a better role than JJ does. Kuzman doesn't have JJ upside and multitude of ability. Kuzman is a medium tough 3D guy that spaces the floor and rebounds ok. He is a solid role-player, JJ can be an elite role-player/allstar. His shooting will limit his ceiling. He definitely has Kawhi/Butler ceiling. Maybe won't get as high as Leonard, but definitely reach Butler status, and as a number 3 option, that's fine.
User avatar
Kerrsed
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 29,876
And1: 16,578
Joined: Mar 31, 2009
Location: Land of the Internet Memes
Contact:
     

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1717 » by Kerrsed » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:51 pm

sunskerr wrote:
Kerrsed wrote:But when all is said and done, this is the starting 5 i think McD will be going after: Kemba/Booker/Jackson/Cousins/Ayton. If it happens, it will be GLORIOUS.....or a trainwreck.


Can everyone just please stop with this twin towers stuff? It's not coming back. Like, arrrrghh. Staaaahp


What does twin towers have to do with anything? Is an inch that big of a difference to make Chriss ok and Cousins not? I mean if thats the case, then we totally cant play 7"1 Bender next to Ayton because, like twin towers and stuff. Give me a freakin break, there are a ton of PF's in this league that are 6"10 or 6"11. :roll:
Its #DUMPSTERFIRE SEASON! #TeamTRAINWRECK -KERRSED- The Mod, The Myth, The Legend
Image
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,152
And1: 61,004
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1718 » by bwgood77 » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:56 pm

Saberestar wrote:
JMac1 wrote:
Saberestar wrote:Come one guys...Kuzma has a lot of more value than the #16 pick.

He had an amazing rookie season, perfect modern SF/PF who just needs to improve a little bit his defense.

Josh Jackson and Kuzma have the same value around the league IMO...probably even a little bit higher Kuzma.


How old is Kuzman? Who does he play for? What the league thinks and what reality is, is two different things. You don't make decision based off of what the league thinks. If you do that, they control the narrative and decide who has value and you better believe it will be Lakers' players over Suns' players. After one year Kuzman has more value than JJ :nonono:

Yes, Kuzma is a couple of years older than Jackson but he has played better than him in his rookie season.

I prefer Jackson over Kuzma, but I imagine that their value around the league in a trade have to be pretty similar at the moment.

What I want to say is that Kuzma is a really good young player under a cheap contrat for the next three seasons...you are not getting him for the #16 pick in this draft.


Yes, he played a lot better overall. I have no idea about value right now. I doubt the Lakers will want to trade him anyway unless they have to, and if they did it would be to clear space, and the 16 pick will come with more salary than Kuzma makes anyway so it wouldn't make sense for them.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,152
And1: 61,004
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1719 » by bwgood77 » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:59 pm

sunskerr wrote:
Kerrsed wrote:But when all is said and done, this is the starting 5 i think McD will be going after: Kemba/Booker/Jackson/Cousins/Ayton. If it happens, it will be GLORIOUS.....or a trainwreck.


Can everyone just please stop with this twin towers stuff? It's not coming back. Like, arrrrghh. Staaaahp


Yeah, I was trying to picture Cousins off a torn Achilles chasing around 4s, especially small ball ones. I don't think we will have interest in Cousins. I mean the only possibility would be if he takes a small deal and had little interest elsewhere...but even then, I think bringing in Ayton it wouldn't make sense.

He'll probably end up in Dallas with DSJr, Doncic, Barnes and Dirk.
User avatar
sunskerr
General Manager
Posts: 9,764
And1: 5,968
Joined: Feb 20, 2010
 

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1720 » by sunskerr » Sun Jun 17, 2018 12:00 am

Kerrsed wrote:
sunskerr wrote:
Kerrsed wrote:But when all is said and done, this is the starting 5 i think McD will be going after: Kemba/Booker/Jackson/Cousins/Ayton. If it happens, it will be GLORIOUS.....or a trainwreck.


Can everyone just please stop with this twin towers stuff? It's not coming back. Like, arrrrghh. Staaaahp


What does twin towers have to do with anything? Is an inch that big of a difference to make Chriss ok and Cousins not? I mean if thats the case, then we totally cant play 7"1 Bender next to Ayton because, like twin towers and stuff. Give me a freakin break, there are a ton of PF's in this league that are 6"10 or 6"11. :roll:


Speed, quickness and skill set matters too. And yes I would prefer Chriss and Bender to hit the gym and work on their post defense so they can play center alone.

Return to Phoenix Suns