DayofMourning wrote:3ammy3uck3ts wrote:
I think those are their averages thru the 1st 3 quarters;)
Bam and Herro maybe lol, when the 4th comes Spo needs them to defer to Wiggins Terry and Duncan, that’s his winning formula
Moderators: KingDavid, QUIZ, heat4life, MettaWorldPanda, Wiltside, IggieCC, BFRESH44
DayofMourning wrote:3ammy3uck3ts wrote:
I think those are their averages thru the 1st 3 quarters;)
MartyConlonJr wrote:I'd also say, and I dont know who it is to, but that logic about who cares if Trae is a bad defender that gets hunted, because Tyler is too and you can only hunt one guy at a time - I've never bought that argument.
Hunting someone doesn't always lead to a one on one exploitation and layup, it leads to team defense breakdowns where other guys need to cover for a lapse, that leads someone else open, and exhausts the defense. Having two negative defenders on court like that does make the oppositions offense exponentially better and wears out our D more.
I'm not even saying yes or no to Trae. I see the positives. I'm saying I see the sort of negatives too that tell me why a guy with his stats can't elevate a team. I'm deeply intrigued by what he can offer our lob threats and our opportunistic secondary scorers.
Pat Riley wrote:There are only two options regarding commitment. You're either IN or you're OUT. There is no such thing as life in-between.
James Johnson wrote:The culture is REAL.

jbsays wrote:
I was watching Wade highlights 2-3 weeks ago and seriously what stuck out to me was how good he threw lobs whether it was Shaq and Lebron or even guys like Haslem, White, or Beasley. Then I started wondering how did he get so good at it when he probably didn't even play with other guys who could finish them until college or guys that could really finish them until NBA. He was a great passer.
Shewasfly wrote:I figured it was always going to be a toss up who came out smelling better between Jimmy and Pat. I just didn't think it'd be this obvious this soon.
Pat hands down is looking like the a*shole. Jimmy got all his money and is turning around a losing franchise, while we are at death's door. On a 5 game losing streak (about to be 6) and can't even beat the worst teams in the league.
That's why I was so adamant about some of you not being so delusional about being happy JB is gone and it being a "win" for us.

3ballbomber wrote:Shewasfly wrote:I figured it was always going to be a toss up who came out smelling better between Jimmy and Pat. I just didn't think it'd be this obvious this soon.
Pat hands down is looking like the a*shole. Jimmy got all his money and is turning around a losing franchise, while we are at death's door. On a 5 game losing streak (about to be 6) and can't even beat the worst teams in the league.
That's why I was so adamant about some of you not being so delusional about being happy JB is gone and it being a "win" for us.
I thought we’ve moved on frm Jimmy. He took us as far as he cld. Wether we paid him or not his time was up here. He’s closer to retirement, our timeline doesn’t match. It’s a positive he’s gone. He showed he really didn’t care about anybody here as soon as money’s involved. He showed his true colors. That’s not a Heat leader we want. We move on & build for the future. Warriors current success has nothing to do w/ us & our future. Eventually Warriors will come crashing down. They don’t have enough to win a chip.

Beenie wrote:
Not a fan of this agenda
You can do better lol
carnageta wrote:Shewasfly wrote:I figured it was always going to be a toss up who came out smelling better between Jimmy and Pat. I just didn't think it'd be this obvious this soon.
Pat hands down is looking like the a*shole. Jimmy got all his money and is turning around a losing franchise, while we are at death's door. On a 5 game losing streak (about to be 6) and can't even beat the worst teams in the league.
That's why I was so adamant about some of you not being so delusional about being happy JB is gone and it being a "win" for us.
So you would rather have paid Jimmy the max and lock him up for another 2 years after this season?

3ballbomber wrote:Shewasfly wrote:I figured it was always going to be a toss up who came out smelling better between Jimmy and Pat. I just didn't think it'd be this obvious this soon.
Pat hands down is looking like the a*shole. Jimmy got all his money and is turning around a losing franchise, while we are at death's door. On a 5 game losing streak (about to be 6) and can't even beat the worst teams in the league.
That's why I was so adamant about some of you not being so delusional about being happy JB is gone and it being a "win" for us.
I thought we’ve moved on frm Jimmy. He took us as far as he cld. Wether we paid him or not his time was up here. He’s closer to retirement, our timeline doesn’t match. It’s a positive he’s gone. He showed he really didn’t care about anybody here as soon as money’s involved. He showed his true colors. That’s not a Heat leader we want. We move on & build for the future. Warriors current success has nothing to do w/ us & our future. Eventually Warriors will come crashing down. They don’t have enough to win a chip.

Beenie wrote:3ballbomber wrote:Shewasfly wrote:I figured it was always going to be a toss up who came out smelling better between Jimmy and Pat. I just didn't think it'd be this obvious this soon.
Pat hands down is looking like the a*shole. Jimmy got all his money and is turning around a losing franchise, while we are at death's door. On a 5 game losing streak (about to be 6) and can't even beat the worst teams in the league.
That's why I was so adamant about some of you not being so delusional about being happy JB is gone and it being a "win" for us.
I thought we’ve moved on frm Jimmy. He took us as far as he cld. Wether we paid him or not his time was up here. He’s closer to retirement, our timeline doesn’t match. It’s a positive he’s gone. He showed he really didn’t care about anybody here as soon as money’s involved. He showed his true colors. That’s not a Heat leader we want. We move on & build for the future. Warriors current success has nothing to do w/ us & our future. Eventually Warriors will come crashing down. They don’t have enough to win a chip.
The fuss around a timeline misalignment with Jimmy is moot because Mia doesn’t have one clear cut player to build around on its current roster.
Would have been better off sticking with him and be willing to execute bold trades to try and win a chip.
Instead, the team has become a laughing stock and the general sense is that the FO is committed to sticking with its core of Tito’s.
Been saying for years as a counter to all of the ‘trade Jimmy’ takes that once he’s gone, Mia ought to blow it up and start fresh because they will inevitably be a lotto team.
Shewasfly wrote:3ballbomber wrote:Shewasfly wrote:I figured it was always going to be a toss up who came out smelling better between Jimmy and Pat. I just didn't think it'd be this obvious this soon.
Pat hands down is looking like the a*shole. Jimmy got all his money and is turning around a losing franchise, while we are at death's door. On a 5 game losing streak (about to be 6) and can't even beat the worst teams in the league.
That's why I was so adamant about some of you not being so delusional about being happy JB is gone and it being a "win" for us.
I thought we’ve moved on frm Jimmy. He took us as far as he cld. Wether we paid him or not his time was up here. He’s closer to retirement, our timeline doesn’t match. It’s a positive he’s gone. He showed he really didn’t care about anybody here as soon as money’s involved. He showed his true colors. That’s not a Heat leader we want. We move on & build for the future. Warriors current success has nothing to do w/ us & our future. Eventually Warriors will come crashing down. They don’t have enough to win a chip.
Obviously we've moved on from Jimmy. He's on another team that's actually winning right now. We haven't known what that feels like in almost a couple weeks![]()
That's not what I'm talking about. Its the pretending that its a positive that he's gone that's the exact type of talk I'm referring to. Like what is the point of that lie? Who are we seeking to prove something to? Or are we just covering for Pat?
We have no worthwhile draft picks
Neither Bam or Herro are good enough as a centerpiece
We don't have trade pieces to go out and get a star to add to them
Pat and the FO has backed us into a very awful corner. I'm not all doom and gloom either. I'm hoping we pull a rabbit out of our hat and get back to contention next year. But I just have to point it out when people are being catty and petty against Jimmy instead of speaking the truth. We traded him because we had to (and it wasn't a great trade). Not because it was a positive.
3ballbomber wrote:Beenie wrote:3ballbomber wrote:
I thought we’ve moved on frm Jimmy. He took us as far as he cld. Wether we paid him or not his time was up here. He’s closer to retirement, our timeline doesn’t match. It’s a positive he’s gone. He showed he really didn’t care about anybody here as soon as money’s involved. He showed his true colors. That’s not a Heat leader we want. We move on & build for the future. Warriors current success has nothing to do w/ us & our future. Eventually Warriors will come crashing down. They don’t have enough to win a chip.
The fuss around a timeline misalignment with Jimmy is moot because Mia doesn’t have one clear cut player to build around on its current roster.
Would have been better off sticking with him and be willing to execute bold trades to try and win a chip.
Instead, the team has become a laughing stock and the general sense is that the FO is committed to sticking with its core of Tito’s.
Been saying for years as a counter to all of the ‘trade Jimmy’ takes that once he’s gone, Mia ought to blow it up and start fresh because they will inevitably be a lotto team.
Why does it have to be about building around someone? Why can’t we acquire players around the solid core we have that wld complement one another!? Jimmy wasn’t a prolific scorer, he was just a fierce competitor that was surrounded by the right players that cld compete w/ him. Remember It was Goran that was our leading scorer in the bubble going into the finals. Heat had complimentary players, whom if had been healthy, may have won vs LA. If anybody can remember Pat said we have enough suggesting his opinion Jimmy is the star we needed to win a championship. But Jimmy wasn’t up for that challenge missing games & being disinterested during the regular season & being often injured during vital games.
Miami aren’t going to rebuild after developing players like Bam & Herro who both have taken significant leaps. That takes a lot of effort, time & patience. We invest in our players, that’s what makes us successful. And sticking w/ Butler meant paying a 36yo that has already given us all he cld. There was really nothing left w/ our relationship w/ Butler, why we didn’t pay him. Completely diff situation in GSW w/ him playing nxt to perhaps the best shooter we’ve ever seen….but eventually they may come back to earth & then they’re left w/ an aging 37/38yo w/ your money, who may again be injured (history says it’s only a matter of time).
3ballbomber wrote:Beenie wrote:3ballbomber wrote:
I thought we’ve moved on frm Jimmy. He took us as far as he cld. Wether we paid him or not his time was up here. He’s closer to retirement, our timeline doesn’t match. It’s a positive he’s gone. He showed he really didn’t care about anybody here as soon as money’s involved. He showed his true colors. That’s not a Heat leader we want. We move on & build for the future. Warriors current success has nothing to do w/ us & our future. Eventually Warriors will come crashing down. They don’t have enough to win a chip.
The fuss around a timeline misalignment with Jimmy is moot because Mia doesn’t have one clear cut player to build around on its current roster.
Would have been better off sticking with him and be willing to execute bold trades to try and win a chip.
Instead, the team has become a laughing stock and the general sense is that the FO is committed to sticking with its core of Tito’s.
Been saying for years as a counter to all of the ‘trade Jimmy’ takes that once he’s gone, Mia ought to blow it up and start fresh because they will inevitably be a lotto team.
Why does it have to be about building around someone? Why can’t we acquire players around the solid core we have that wld complement one another!? Jimmy wasn’t a prolific scorer, he was just a fierce competitor that was surrounded by the right players that cld compete w/ him. Remember It was Goran that was our leading scorer in the bubble going into the finals. Heat had complimentary players, whom if had been healthy, may have won vs LA. If anybody can remember Pat said we have enough suggesting his opinion Jimmy is the star we needed to win a championship. But Jimmy wasn’t up for that challenge missing games & being disinterested during the regular season & being often injured during vital games.
Miami aren’t going to rebuild after developing players like Bam & Herro who both have taken significant leaps. That takes a lot of effort, time & patience. We invest in our players, that’s what makes us successful. And sticking w/ Butler meant paying a 36yo that has already given us all he cld. There was really nothing left w/ our relationship w/ Butler, why we didn’t pay him. Completely diff situation in GSW w/ him playing nxt to perhaps the best shooter we’ve ever seen….but eventually they may come back to earth & then they’re left w/ an aging 37/38yo w/ your money, who may again be injured (history says it’s only a matter of time).
3ballbomber wrote:Eventually Warriors will come crashing down. They don’t have enough to win a chip.