ImageImageImage

Around the NBA (2.0), 2018-19 (Non-Celtics Talk)

Moderators: bisme37, canman1971, Froob, snowman, shackles10, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, Darthlukey

User avatar
Edug27
RealGM
Posts: 11,741
And1: 8,216
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: Around the NBA (2.0), 2018-19 (Non-Celtics Talk) 

Post#181 » by Edug27 » Tue Jul 3, 2018 12:45 pm

Iguodaladon wrote:
wickerhd wrote:Just not that concerned about Cousins and Golden State. The Achilles will keep him off the court until at least January and almost no likelihood that he’ll reach his former level of play. The one year contract doesn’t come with bird rights, so in the unlikely event he does return to star level, there is no way the Warriors will be able to retain him next season.


Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums


I'm not too bothered either by it, but Cousins at 50% will still be better than Javale mcGee and Zaza


Dubs don’t need Cousins to be 100% or even his regular self. The Hampton 5 lineup is the lineup they’ll use a majority of the time. Cousins just gives them the ability to switch it up with a force down low to bang bodies. But Boston shouldn’t be worries about GS right now. We need to focus on winning the East and dominating there first.
KGboss
RealGM
Posts: 21,217
And1: 10,097
Joined: Mar 03, 2011
Location: Boston Garden
       

Re: Around the NBA (2.0), 2018-19 (Non-Celtics Talk) 

Post#182 » by KGboss » Tue Jul 3, 2018 12:55 pm

I was annoyed yesterday only because it sets a precedent for ring chasing moving forward.

On the flip side no one even knows if boogie is going to be able to run again or making it 5 games before something else pops. A lot of big guys as a lot of others have said dont recover from these kinds of injuries.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Curmudgeon
RealGM
Posts: 42,912
And1: 26,734
Joined: Jan 20, 2004
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Around the NBA (2.0), 2018-19 (Non-Celtics Talk) 

Post#183 » by Curmudgeon » Tue Jul 3, 2018 1:54 pm

Meh. I remember when Chamberlain joined the Lakers, everyone said they couldn't be beaten. They were. They lost three straight finals after Chamberlain arrived, finally won a title in 1972, then lost in the finals in 73, after Chamberlain and Baylor were gone (but Gail Goodrich and Connie Hawkins had arrived).

As for Cousins, he has yet to play in a single playoff game in his entire career.
"Numbers lie alot. Wins and losses don't lie." - Jerry West
"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells
"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
User avatar
celticfan42487
RealGM
Posts: 27,554
And1: 15,390
Joined: Jul 22, 2005
Location: Billerica, MA
       

Re: Around the NBA (2.0), 2018-19 (Non-Celtics Talk) 

Post#184 » by celticfan42487 » Tue Jul 3, 2018 2:23 pm

Curmudgeon wrote:Meh. I remember when Chamberlain joined the Lakers, everyone said they couldn't be beaten. They were. They lost three straight finals after Chamberlain arrived, finally won a title in 1972, then lost in the finals in 73, after Chamberlain and Baylor were gone (but Gail Goodrich and Connie Hawkins had arrived).

As for Cousins, he has yet to play in a single playoff game in his entire career.


But to be fair, the Warriors were already said to be unbeatable before adding Cousins.

It would just go from unbeatable to even more unbeatable. Or he never plays a second of Warriors basketball and they're still unbeatable.
Image
Joshyjess
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,992
And1: 8,972
Joined: Jun 20, 2018
         

Re: Around the NBA (2.0), 2018-19 (Non-Celtics Talk) 

Post#185 » by Joshyjess » Tue Jul 3, 2018 2:25 pm

I predict that Cousins will be Golden States Achilles heel
Curmudgeon
RealGM
Posts: 42,912
And1: 26,734
Joined: Jan 20, 2004
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Around the NBA (2.0), 2018-19 (Non-Celtics Talk) 

Post#186 » by Curmudgeon » Tue Jul 3, 2018 3:27 pm

celticfan42487 wrote:
Curmudgeon wrote:Meh. I remember when Chamberlain joined the Lakers, everyone said they couldn't be beaten. They were. They lost three straight finals after Chamberlain arrived, finally won a title in 1972, then lost in the finals in 73, after Chamberlain and Baylor were gone (but Gail Goodrich and Connie Hawkins had arrived).

As for Cousins, he has yet to play in a single playoff game in his entire career.


But to be fair, the Warriors were already said to be unbeatable before adding Cousins.

It would just go from unbeatable to even more unbeatable. Or he never plays a second of Warriors basketball and they're still unbeatable.


I don't think Cousins moves the needle one way or the other. In fact, when Cousins goes into Carmello mode he can just as easily lose a game singlehandedly as win one. It will be a challenge for Kerr and that locker room to keep Boogie in line.
"Numbers lie alot. Wins and losses don't lie." - Jerry West

"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells

"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
User avatar
celticfan42487
RealGM
Posts: 27,554
And1: 15,390
Joined: Jul 22, 2005
Location: Billerica, MA
       

Re: Around the NBA (2.0), 2018-19 (Non-Celtics Talk) 

Post#187 » by celticfan42487 » Tue Jul 3, 2018 3:31 pm

Curmudgeon wrote:
celticfan42487 wrote:
Curmudgeon wrote:Meh. I remember when Chamberlain joined the Lakers, everyone said they couldn't be beaten. They were. They lost three straight finals after Chamberlain arrived, finally won a title in 1972, then lost in the finals in 73, after Chamberlain and Baylor were gone (but Gail Goodrich and Connie Hawkins had arrived).

As for Cousins, he has yet to play in a single playoff game in his entire career.


But to be fair, the Warriors were already said to be unbeatable before adding Cousins.

It would just go from unbeatable to even more unbeatable. Or he never plays a second of Warriors basketball and they're still unbeatable.


I don't think Cousins moves the needle one way or the other. In fact, when Cousins goes into Carmello mode he can just as easily lose a game singlehandedly as win one. It will be a challenge for Kerr and that locker room to keep Boogie in line.


Well, I think that's underselling him by an extreme margin. But yeah the Warriors are winning the title without any effort again this year with Boogie.

As for an actual in fact, according to the Elias Sports Bureau, the 2018-19 Warriors will be the sixth team in NBA history -- and first since the 1975-76 Celtics -- to have five All-Stars from the previous season.

So yeah, he's significant. A 50% Cousins next season is likely still a top 5 Center in the league who is a very good 3 point shooter, rebounder, and passer. So he'll do just fine playing off the ball as a roleplayer for the Warriors.
Image
Valid
RealGM
Posts: 13,263
And1: 12,656
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Location: New Jersey

Re: Around the NBA (2.0), 2018-19 (Non-Celtics Talk) 

Post#188 » by Valid » Tue Jul 3, 2018 4:19 pm

celticfan42487 wrote:
Curmudgeon wrote:
celticfan42487 wrote:
But to be fair, the Warriors were already said to be unbeatable before adding Cousins.

It would just go from unbeatable to even more unbeatable. Or he never plays a second of Warriors basketball and they're still unbeatable.


I don't think Cousins moves the needle one way or the other. In fact, when Cousins goes into Carmello mode he can just as easily lose a game singlehandedly as win one. It will be a challenge for Kerr and that locker room to keep Boogie in line.


Well, I think that's underselling him by an extreme margin. But yeah the Warriors are winning the title without any effort again this year with Boogie.

As for an actual in fact, according to the Elias Sports Bureau, the 2018-19 Warriors will be the sixth team in NBA history -- and first since the 1975-76 Celtics -- to have five All-Stars from the previous season.

So yeah, he's significant. A 50% Cousins next season is likely still a top 5 Center in the league who is a very good 3 point shooter, rebounder, and passer. So he'll do just fine playing off the ball as a roleplayer for the Warriors.

Even though he has never done that in his career and is widely viewed as a selfish player?
Valid
RealGM
Posts: 13,263
And1: 12,656
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Location: New Jersey

Re: Around the NBA (2.0), 2018-19 (Non-Celtics Talk) 

Post#189 » by Valid » Tue Jul 3, 2018 5:08 pm

So apparently, Butler is "fed up" in Minnesota:

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2784327-report-jimmy-butler-fed-up-with-nonchalant-timberwolves-karl-anthony-towns?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=programming-national

It's crazy. Just a year ago, people were looking at the Timberwolves as the next up-and-coming team out West. Now they look ready to fall apart.
KGboss
RealGM
Posts: 21,217
And1: 10,097
Joined: Mar 03, 2011
Location: Boston Garden
       

Re: RE: Re: Around the NBA (2.0), 2018-19 (Non-Celtics Talk) 

Post#190 » by KGboss » Tue Jul 3, 2018 5:10 pm

Valid wrote:So apparently, Butler is "fed up" in Minnesota:

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2784327-report-jimmy-butler-fed-up-with-nonchalant-timberwolves-karl-anthony-towns?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=programming-national

It's crazy. Just a year ago, people were looking at the Timberwolves as the next up-and-coming team out West. Now they look ready to fall apart.
So I guess the rest of the league needs to evaluate who is the problem here...Butler or KAT and Wiggins.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Valid
RealGM
Posts: 13,263
And1: 12,656
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Location: New Jersey

Re: RE: Re: Around the NBA (2.0), 2018-19 (Non-Celtics Talk) 

Post#191 » by Valid » Tue Jul 3, 2018 5:11 pm

KGboss wrote:
Valid wrote:So apparently, Butler is "fed up" in Minnesota:

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2784327-report-jimmy-butler-fed-up-with-nonchalant-timberwolves-karl-anthony-towns?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=programming-national

It's crazy. Just a year ago, people were looking at the Timberwolves as the next up-and-coming team out West. Now they look ready to fall apart.
So I guess the rest of the league needs to evaluate who is the problem here...Butler or KAT and Wiggins.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

I would venture to say that all three are at fault somewhat.

Remember that Butler caused some issues in Chicago, so it's entirely possible that he might just not be an easy guy to get along with. As for Towns and Wiggins? Neither player has any commitment to playing defense, so I'm sure that must be frustrating for a defensive guy like Butler.

Butler's value is also trash at this point relative to what it had been in the past. Chronic knee issues, turns 29 in September, up for a new contract next summer, etc. If the Timberwolves try to move him, they shouldn't expect to get much for him.
User avatar
mbsnmisc
Starter
Posts: 2,008
And1: 3,721
Joined: Feb 13, 2012
Location: Murrells Inlet SC
     

Re: Around the NBA (2.0), 2018-19 (Non-Celtics Talk) 

Post#192 » by mbsnmisc » Tue Jul 3, 2018 5:25 pm

Valid wrote:So apparently, Butler is "fed up" in Minnesota:

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2784327-report-jimmy-butler-fed-up-with-nonchalant-timberwolves-karl-anthony-towns?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=programming-national

It's crazy. Just a year ago, people were looking at the Timberwolves as the next up-and-coming team out West. Now they look ready to fall apart.

I don't know how accurate this article is, but despite KAT's prolific talent, I don't think he plays winning basketball. I have brought up this play from last year a couple of times, and to me it shows a weakness in Town's psyche. The play was in the BOS at MN game. KAT threw down a monster dunk on Baynes. They go to a timeout. My feed stays in arena for commercials/halftime. Towns was almost crying on the bench. I don't mean angry bitching trying to work a call NBA complaining. It was more, I didn't get my way, I always get my way, pouting.

I will be the first to admit that I am drawing conclusions about a young mans character from 3 minutes of video. From all accounts he is a fine citizen of the NBA and the Minneapolis community. It was just odd. More Glenn Davis'y than I expected. It may mean nothing, it may mean he will have a nice career, but never leads a team to a championship. Time will tell.
colaroaster
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,700
And1: 796
Joined: Jul 18, 2013
Location: jp morgan, rockefellers, rothschild, vanderbilt, danny ainge
   

Re: Around the NBA (2.0), 2018-19 (Non-Celtics Talk) 

Post#193 » by colaroaster » Tue Jul 3, 2018 5:41 pm

lunch with league executives today should be interesting
User avatar
K For Three
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,498
And1: 33,242
Joined: Jan 03, 2018
       

Re: Around the NBA (2.0), 2018-19 (Non-Celtics Talk) 

Post#194 » by K For Three » Tue Jul 3, 2018 6:48 pm

Image
Joshyjess
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,992
And1: 8,972
Joined: Jun 20, 2018
         

Re: Around the NBA (2.0), 2018-19 (Non-Celtics Talk) 

Post#195 » by Joshyjess » Tue Jul 3, 2018 9:59 pm

Whew, the Wizards signed Howard. I was afraid that he was going to some how end up on the C's bench. That is one headache I am glad that we avoided!
Valid
RealGM
Posts: 13,263
And1: 12,656
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Location: New Jersey

Re: Around the NBA (2.0), 2018-19 (Non-Celtics Talk) 

Post#196 » by Valid » Tue Jul 3, 2018 10:21 pm

Joshyjess wrote:Whew, the Wizards signed Howard. I was afraid that he was going to some how end up on the C's bench. That is one headache I am glad that we avoided!

So the Wizards get rid of Gortat because he was a problem in the locker room, but then they go and sign Dwight?

lol. Good luck with that, Wiz.
SMTBSI
RealGM
Posts: 15,920
And1: 25,281
Joined: Jun 27, 2014
 

Re: Around the NBA (2.0), 2018-19 (Non-Celtics Talk) 

Post#197 » by SMTBSI » Tue Jul 3, 2018 10:27 pm

Valid wrote:
Joshyjess wrote:Whew, the Wizards signed Howard. I was afraid that he was going to some how end up on the C's bench. That is one headache I am glad that we avoided!

So the Wizards get rid of Gortat because he was a problem in the locker room, but then they go and sign Dwight?

lol. Good luck with that, Wiz.

To be fair, the Wiz were one of those teams in the "we have to try something" position. Capped out, no truly exciting youth, no juicy trade chips, and several quite large steps away from contention. Yet way too good to completely blow it up, with their best players still plenty young and locked up long term.

It's a weird situation. In danger of the most aggressive form of treadmill. It's actually reasonable for them to be very risk tolerant.
Valid
RealGM
Posts: 13,263
And1: 12,656
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Location: New Jersey

Re: Around the NBA (2.0), 2018-19 (Non-Celtics Talk) 

Post#198 » by Valid » Tue Jul 3, 2018 10:29 pm

SMTBSI wrote:
Valid wrote:
Joshyjess wrote:Whew, the Wizards signed Howard. I was afraid that he was going to some how end up on the C's bench. That is one headache I am glad that we avoided!

So the Wizards get rid of Gortat because he was a problem in the locker room, but then they go and sign Dwight?

lol. Good luck with that, Wiz.

To be fair, the Wiz were one of those teams in the "we have to try something" position. Capped out, no truly exciting youth, no juicy trade chips, and several quite large steps away from contention. Yet way too good to completely blow it up, with their best players still plenty young and locked up long term.

It's a weird situation. In danger of the most aggressive form of treadmill. It's actually reasonable for them to be very risk tolerant.

Are they really that good though? Every year people keep waiting for them to take the "next step" and they never do. To me, they are the American version of the Toronto Raptors. If I were them, I would give it one more season. If they don't do anything next year, they need to blow it up.
SMTBSI
RealGM
Posts: 15,920
And1: 25,281
Joined: Jun 27, 2014
 

Re: Around the NBA (2.0), 2018-19 (Non-Celtics Talk) 

Post#199 » by SMTBSI » Tue Jul 3, 2018 10:36 pm

Valid wrote:
SMTBSI wrote:
Valid wrote:So the Wizards get rid of Gortat because he was a problem in the locker room, but then they go and sign Dwight?

lol. Good luck with that, Wiz.

To be fair, the Wiz were one of those teams in the "we have to try something" position. Capped out, no truly exciting youth, no juicy trade chips, and several quite large steps away from contention. Yet way too good to completely blow it up, with their best players still plenty young and locked up long term.

It's a weird situation. In danger of the most aggressive form of treadmill. It's actually reasonable for them to be very risk tolerant.

Are they really that good though? Every year people keep waiting for them to take the "next step" and they never do. To me, they are the American version of the Toronto Raptors. If I were them, I would give it one more season. If they don't do anything next year, they need to blow it up.

No, they're not that good. Like I said, "several quite large steps away from contention". I just think they're still way too good to blow it up.

Honestly, I've hated on them as much over the past few years as anyone. Have consistently said that I don't see it with them every time someone pegs them as flirting with contention.

But, Wall's 27, Beal's 25, they're both locked up long term (arguably for values that make them near untradable), and are good enough to keep their floor relatively high. It would probably cost assets to blow that team up, not yield them. Or at least wouldn't yield very much.

So, you can't win, you can't blow it up, and you're too good to be bad. Time to get a little reckless, imo.
truth18
RealGM
Posts: 38,601
And1: 42,854
Joined: Apr 17, 2011
Location: CELTICS NIGHTMARE

Re: Around the NBA (2.0), 2018-19 (Non-Celtics Talk) 

Post#200 » by truth18 » Tue Jul 3, 2018 11:33 pm

SMTBSI wrote:So, you can't win, you can't blow it up, and you're too good to be bad.


I have heard this muttered in hushed tones from the dark corners of Grunfeldia.

Image

Enjoy, Dwight.
YOU LOSE

Return to Boston Celtics