life_saver wrote:Flash4thewin wrote:ILOVEIT wrote:
When did the Warriors become a winner after 20 years of sucking? NEW OWERSHIP.
The right owners who are willing to spend to WIN make the difference.
Trust me....Sac sucks because of Vivek. Wolves suck because of their ownership.
Wolves could have jimmy Butler, KAT, Wiggins, Kuminga and others...and they would be good.
The DLO trade set them back years....not because of the first round pick...but because DLO is AWFULLLLLLLLLLLLLLL.
Correct me if im wrong but haven’t the Bulls ownership stayed the same? They won 6 championship and then became a mess. Its not just ownership, its getting talented players.
ownership is always easy scapegoat. Owners are much more important in European soccer where you don't have salary caps but in American sports where all the leagues have salary caps, owner is less important imo..sometimes, you can have the best owner but might still suck just due to bad luck. Owner can only do so much
But sometimes... owners can do very dumb things to set franchises back.
- They can be part of the Joe Smith under-the-table contract signing... costing the Timberwolves several 1st rd picks in Garnett's prime.
- They can hire David Kahn and Kurt Rambis. And Ryan Saunders and Randy Wittman.
- They can trade draft picks for cash considerations.
- They can make silly promises to young, mercurial players like "I'll give you $150M if you promise to try harder."
- They can rip the franchise's only HOF player, Kevin Garnett,for "tanking" after trading him to Boston... only one year after Taylor's franchise asked Mark Madsen to shoot 7 three pointers in OT of game 82... so the Wolves could get an extra ping pong ball. And you know what they did with that extra draft slot? Yep. Traded it for cash considerations.