BobbieL wrote:Bogyo wrote:Mulhollanddrive wrote:I think the next 3 years is a good time to be bad, unless Curry retires to play baseball.
Watson talked about this, that he's not looking at Cleveland or GSW or Spurs or OKC, he's looking at Portland in 5 years time with their back court as our competition.
Probably a smart thing to do. Although you never know in the NBA. If GSW gets Durant this offseason it might just mess them up enough that a well constructed team could beat them. Or they win 80 games

.
I do like this strategy, ofcourse it would need some (a lot?) of patience from fans, management and ownership, and I'm not so sure about these three.
The Grizzlies, Warriors and Thunders -
they all SUCKED for a long time. Sucked like the Suns are sucking this year - to get to where they are. Its tough and painful.
Booker is the building block. I think he can be like Klay Thompson. A true two guard.
That's one piece - they have a lot more to go - but draft picks, cap space - its a start. I think Bledsoe is another building block. TJ warren. Alex Len. Knight is tricky one. IF he is willing to be a back up guard - (still getting paid his 14m) - will be his best role. Or he is traded
Durant to GSW makes no sense to me. He needs to the ball. He is an alpha like Curry is.
Which is why it bothers me, and some others here, that there are fans that want to blow up the team...again...along with the GM. It takes patience; and yes, it is quite difficult and 'un-fun' to go through this all, as we are, while being patient.
But look at the Warriors from '97/'98 season through their '01/'02 season:
19-63
21-29
19-63
17-65
21-61
Other than their '98/'99 season, where their record was .420, they were perennially .250ish or worse; that's just flat out atrocious, and that was 5 years straight.
The Grizzlies have been sub-.300 for 10 of their 21 seasons in the league, or almost half, of their existence.
And OKC/Seattle was sub-.300 for two straight seasons, following a 35-47 and a 31-51 seasons.
We've only been that bad once since our first season in '68/'69...and that's this season, with our 25-57 ('12/'13) and our 29-53 ('03/'04) seasons being the only other 'putrid' seasons we've suffered. That's pretty remarkable.
Then add in the fact that this season is the only season in McD's tenure that we've suffered so, and that we can fairly confidently attribute at least some of our losses to the 'tank' effort.
I think a fair number of Suns' fans don't know what it's like to be truly 'terrible' for any extended period of time, and thus, know how to be patient during a rebuild period. And I only know how it feels to be a fan of a 'terribad' team thanks to my 'fandom' of the Orioles in the MLB. And please don't take this the wrong way; I'm trying not to come across with a 'holier then thou' attitude. I'm just trying to bring to light the fact that we as Suns' fans aren't used to this type of situation, and yes, me included.
Anyway, I just hope Sarver gives McD another 2 seasons beyond this one to make us a playoff team again. I'd much rather 'suck' next year, than for McD to make a couple of minor 'vet' moves that may improve us enough to get an 8th seed, but in the long run, will hinder our development over the long haul. I'm ok with trading Knight, Chandler, Tucker, or even Bledsoe for other veterans, but what I don't want to see, is keeping those guys, while adding other moderately-high-priced veterans, while trading away our young core.
This is what I'd like to see on our Roster next season; anyone else is 'gravy'. (With Bledsoe and Knight as the ONLY guys I'd be ok with being traded away, as I REALLY hope we keep Teletovic, as well as Leuer, even though he's seen his minutes diminish)
Bledsoe / Goodwin (as a 1 or 2)
Booker
Warren / Bogdanovic (as a 2 or 3)
Leuer / Teletovic
Len
Rookie, Rookie, and Rookie.
That makes 11
Weems, Tucker, Chandler, Price, Pressy and Jenkins can all go away...