ImageImageImage

General Boston Sports Thread

Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob, canman1971

User avatar
31to6
RealGM
Posts: 20,727
And1: 31,305
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Tatum train

Re: General Boston Sports Thread 

Post#1861 » by 31to6 » Tue Feb 5, 2019 1:44 am

Captain_Caveman wrote:
sam_I_am wrote:
truth18 wrote:1. Brady
2. Jordan
3a. Gretzky
3b. Ruth

North American goats.


I love Tom Brady and respect his ability and intangibles, but Jordan is way in front in my opinion. When you watch Brady, he makes the simple look easy. When he makes the clutch throw it looks like something every NFL quarterback could do. Jordan had all of that too - he never gets enough credit for how incredibly dedicated to mastering the fundamentals he was. And that is because of the fact that when you watched him play, his jaw dropping talent overwhelmed you. If Brady could throw like Aaron Rogers, run like Cam Newton and maintain all his his clutch abilities and decision making....then he would be the MJ of football. Jordan won 6 titles in 8 years and it would have been 8/8 if he didn’t take 2 years off for baseball. Maybe would have been 8/10 if Bulls didn’t blow it up too soon.

I think Brady is the Larry Bird of football if Larry took care of himself better and had stayed healthy. Bird’s wasn’t always the most physically gifted player but his teams always had a shot to win.


Jordan never beat a real team, and dominated with stacked teams in an expansion era with no rival.


Beat the Pistons coming off two titles, Magic's Lakers, Drexler's Blazers, Barkley's Suns, Ewing's Knicks, Miller's Pacers, Payton/Kemp Sonics -- all good teams.

The part in red above is spot on. I love Brady but he's probably more Bill Russell than MJ. And as a Boston fan I'm pretty good with that.
Paul Pierce appreciation society.
User avatar
31to6
RealGM
Posts: 20,727
And1: 31,305
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Tatum train

Re: General Boston Sports Thread 

Post#1862 » by 31to6 » Tue Feb 5, 2019 1:51 am

but can we get back to

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

that's 6! C's up next! LLLLEEEETTTTT'SSS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO **** ALL Y'ALL!!!!
Paul Pierce appreciation society.
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: General Boston Sports Thread 

Post#1863 » by Captain_Caveman » Tue Feb 5, 2019 2:33 am

31to6 wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
sam_I_am wrote:
I love Tom Brady and respect his ability and intangibles, but Jordan is way in front in my opinion. When you watch Brady, he makes the simple look easy. When he makes the clutch throw it looks like something every NFL quarterback could do. Jordan had all of that too - he never gets enough credit for how incredibly dedicated to mastering the fundamentals he was. And that is because of the fact that when you watched him play, his jaw dropping talent overwhelmed you. If Brady could throw like Aaron Rogers, run like Cam Newton and maintain all his his clutch abilities and decision making....then he would be the MJ of football. Jordan won 6 titles in 8 years and it would have been 8/8 if he didn’t take 2 years off for baseball. Maybe would have been 8/10 if Bulls didn’t blow it up too soon.

I think Brady is the Larry Bird of football if Larry took care of himself better and had stayed healthy. Bird’s wasn’t always the most physically gifted player but his teams always had a shot to win.


Jordan never beat a real team, and dominated with stacked teams in an expansion era with no rival.


Beat the Pistons coming off two titles, Magic's Lakers, Drexler's Blazers, Barkley's Suns, Ewing's Knicks, Miller's Pacers, Payton/Kemp Sonics -- all good teams.

The part in red above is spot on. I love Brady but he's probably more Bill Russell than MJ. And as a Boston fan I'm pretty good with that.


The Pistons and Lakers teams were washed and injured by the time those series hit. Rest of those teams were meh, save maybe the 1998 Pacers.
User avatar
31to6
RealGM
Posts: 20,727
And1: 31,305
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Tatum train

Re: General Boston Sports Thread 

Post#1864 » by 31to6 » Tue Feb 5, 2019 3:05 am

Captain_Caveman wrote:
31to6 wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
Jordan never beat a real team, and dominated with stacked teams in an expansion era with no rival.


Beat the Pistons coming off two titles, Magic's Lakers, Drexler's Blazers, Barkley's Suns, Ewing's Knicks, Miller's Pacers, Payton/Kemp Sonics -- all good teams.

The part in red above is spot on. I love Brady but he's probably more Bill Russell than MJ. And as a Boston fan I'm pretty good with that.


The Pistons and Lakers teams were washed and injured by the time those series hit. Rest of those teams were meh, save maybe the 1998 Pacers.


Teams the Bulls beat in the finals: Lakers 58 wins, Blazers 57 wins, Suns 62 wins, Sonics 64 wins, and oh **** I'd left off the Stockton/Malone Jazz which were 64 wins and 62 wins.

Teams the Celtics beat in the finals during the 80s: Rockets 40 wins (not a typo! do we remember/care? no), Lakers 54 wins, Rockets 51 wins.

I agree the league was a bit diluted in the 90s from expansion before the global infusion hit, but that handicap applied to the Bulls along with everyone else. Simply put especially that second three-peat I don't know that that MJ and that Pippen lose to much of anyone ever.
Paul Pierce appreciation society.
B-Ball Freak
RealGM
Posts: 16,233
And1: 11,457
Joined: Jun 09, 2003
     

Re: General Boston Sports Thread 

Post#1865 » by B-Ball Freak » Tue Feb 5, 2019 3:07 am

Lol at "Jordan never beat a real team", the internet never ceases to amaze me.
User avatar
31to6
RealGM
Posts: 20,727
And1: 31,305
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Tatum train

Re: General Boston Sports Thread 

Post#1866 » by 31to6 » Tue Feb 5, 2019 3:11 am

Teams the Bulls beat on the way to the finals: 1991 Pistons 50 wins you're right I'd forgotten how quickly they dropped off. Best Knicks team = 60 wins under COY Riley in 1993. Best Magic team = 60 wins in 1996 with prime Shaq. Best Pacers team = 58 wins in 1998 under COY Bird only team to make the Jordan Bulls sweat in a game 7 because Bird is Basketball Jesus.

I don't think I'll see 6-in-18 in the NFL again from the same coach and QB that's absolutely ridiculous. But I don't expect to see 6-in-6 in the NBA again either. Random thought -- and obviously football's infinitely more of a team game with one-off playoff randomness, but in Brady's most dominant individual years they didn't win it all.
Paul Pierce appreciation society.
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: General Boston Sports Thread 

Post#1867 » by Captain_Caveman » Tue Feb 5, 2019 3:34 am

31to6 wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
31to6 wrote:
Beat the Pistons coming off two titles, Magic's Lakers, Drexler's Blazers, Barkley's Suns, Ewing's Knicks, Miller's Pacers, Payton/Kemp Sonics -- all good teams.

The part in red above is spot on. I love Brady but he's probably more Bill Russell than MJ. And as a Boston fan I'm pretty good with that.


The Pistons and Lakers teams were washed and injured by the time those series hit. Rest of those teams were meh, save maybe the 1998 Pacers.


Teams the Bulls beat in the finals: Lakers 58 wins, Blazers 57 wins, Suns 62 wins, Sonics 64 wins, and oh **** I'd left off the Stockton/Malone Jazz which were 64 wins and 62 wins.

Teams the Celtics beat in the finals during the 80s: Rockets 40 wins (not a typo! do we remember/care? no), Lakers 54 wins, Rockets 51 wins.

I agree the league was a bit diluted in the 90s from expansion before the global infusion hit, but that handicap applied to the Bulls along with everyone else. Simply put especially that second three-peat I don't know that that MJ and that Pippen lose to much of anyone ever.


Honest question: Were you old enough for those Pistons and Lakers series? I'm thinking you definitely wouldn't disagree with me if you were. The equivalent of the LeBron beating the Celts in 2011-12 and talking about how he beat a great "KG Celtics" team. Sure... after we kept wrecking him and just got too old to do it anymore. Those teams were laid out and played out.
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: General Boston Sports Thread 

Post#1868 » by Captain_Caveman » Tue Feb 5, 2019 3:40 am

31to6 wrote:Teams the Bulls beat on the way to the finals: 1991 Pistons 50 wins you're right I'd forgotten how quickly they dropped off. Best Knicks team = 60 wins under COY Riley in 1993. Best Magic team = 60 wins in 1996 with prime Shaq. Best Pacers team = 58 wins in 1998 under COY Bird only team to make the Jordan Bulls sweat in a game 7 because Bird is Basketball Jesus.

I don't think I'll see 6-in-18 in the NFL again from the same coach and QB that's absolutely ridiculous. But I don't expect to see 6-in-6 in the NBA again either. Random thought -- and obviously football's infinitely more of a team game with one-off playoff randomness, but in Brady's most dominant individual years they didn't win it all.


B-Ball Freak wrote:Lol at "Jordan never beat a real team", the internet never ceases to amaze me.


If you came of age in the 90s, and grew up watching Gatorade ads, of course you think those 90s teams were great.

I came up in the 80s and know otherwise. The Celtics had to walk through Monsterland in the 80s to even get a chance to play the Lakers. Bird would have had like 9 rings if all he had to do was play beat teams like the Ewing Knicks on his way to play the Drexler Blazers or whoever the hell was on that Suns team with Barkley.

MJ was a great player, but put him in the 80s and he's lucky to win two. Put Kobe, LeBron, Bird, Magic, Duncan in the 90s, and they have even more rings.
leper-con
General Manager
Posts: 8,969
And1: 4,204
Joined: Jun 26, 2003
Location: Centre Court

Re: General Boston Sports Thread 

Post#1869 » by leper-con » Tue Feb 5, 2019 3:44 am

If memory serves Magic and Scott but tore hamstrings and were out in the finals.

the pistons were depleted and were on the down side.

POrtland I believe was at full strength.

Utah gave it the old college try..
User avatar
31to6
RealGM
Posts: 20,727
And1: 31,305
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Tatum train

Re: General Boston Sports Thread 

Post#1870 » by 31to6 » Tue Feb 5, 2019 3:47 am

leper-con wrote:If memory serves Magic and Scott but tore hamstrings and were out in the finals.

the pistons were depleted and were on the down side.

POrtland I believe was at full strength.

Utah gave it the old college try..


Magic and Scott were hurt vs. the Pistons the year before, not against the Bulls.

You skipped a bunch of 60+ win teams in there.
Paul Pierce appreciation society.
User avatar
31to6
RealGM
Posts: 20,727
And1: 31,305
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Tatum train

Re: General Boston Sports Thread 

Post#1871 » by 31to6 » Tue Feb 5, 2019 3:49 am

Captain_Caveman wrote:
31to6 wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
The Pistons and Lakers teams were washed and injured by the time those series hit. Rest of those teams were meh, save maybe the 1998 Pacers.


Teams the Bulls beat in the finals: Lakers 58 wins, Blazers 57 wins, Suns 62 wins, Sonics 64 wins, and oh **** I'd left off the Stockton/Malone Jazz which were 64 wins and 62 wins.

Teams the Celtics beat in the finals during the 80s: Rockets 40 wins (not a typo! do we remember/care? no), Lakers 54 wins, Rockets 51 wins.

I agree the league was a bit diluted in the 90s from expansion before the global infusion hit, but that handicap applied to the Bulls along with everyone else. Simply put especially that second three-peat I don't know that that MJ and that Pippen lose to much of anyone ever.


Honest question: Were you old enough for those Pistons and Lakers series? I'm thinking you definitely wouldn't disagree with me if you were. The equivalent of the LeBron beating the Celts in 2011-12 and talking about how he beat a great "KG Celtics" team. Sure... after we kept wrecking him and just got too old to do it anymore. Those teams were laid out and played out.


Yes. Started watching every game in 1988 at age 12. Already conceded the Pistons but there's plenty of other competition there.
Paul Pierce appreciation society.
User avatar
31to6
RealGM
Posts: 20,727
And1: 31,305
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Tatum train

Re: General Boston Sports Thread 

Post#1872 » by 31to6 » Tue Feb 5, 2019 3:52 am

Captain_Caveman wrote:
31to6 wrote:Teams the Bulls beat on the way to the finals: 1991 Pistons 50 wins you're right I'd forgotten how quickly they dropped off. Best Knicks team = 60 wins under COY Riley in 1993. Best Magic team = 60 wins in 1996 with prime Shaq. Best Pacers team = 58 wins in 1998 under COY Bird only team to make the Jordan Bulls sweat in a game 7 because Bird is Basketball Jesus.

I don't think I'll see 6-in-18 in the NFL again from the same coach and QB that's absolutely ridiculous. But I don't expect to see 6-in-6 in the NBA again either. Random thought -- and obviously football's infinitely more of a team game with one-off playoff randomness, but in Brady's most dominant individual years they didn't win it all.


B-Ball Freak wrote:Lol at "Jordan never beat a real team", the internet never ceases to amaze me.


If you came of age in the 90s, and grew up watching Gatorade ads, of course you think those 90s teams were great.

I came up in the 80s and know otherwise. The Celtics had to walk through Monsterland in the 80s to even get a chance to play the Lakers. Bird would have had like 9 rings if all he had to do was play beat teams like the Ewing Knicks on his way to play the Drexler Blazers or whoever the hell was on that Suns team with Barkley.

MJ was a great player, but put him in the 80s and he's lucky to win two. Put Kobe, LeBron, Bird, Magic, Duncan in the 90s, and they have even more rings.


Uhm.. what you're saying about the 90s you seem to be doing to the 80s. 83 Sixers were great. Peak Celtics and Lakers = great. I'm supposed to be wowed by the Moncrief Bucks and Bernard King Knicks?
Paul Pierce appreciation society.
User avatar
31to6
RealGM
Posts: 20,727
And1: 31,305
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Tatum train

Re: General Boston Sports Thread 

Post#1873 » by 31to6 » Tue Feb 5, 2019 3:55 am

Teams the 80s Lakers beat in the finals:
1980 Sixers = 59 wins, 1982 Sixers = 58 wins, 1985 C's = 63 wins, 87 C's = 59 wins, 88 Pistons = 54 wins.

Best teams LA beat on the way to the finals:
Defending champ Sonics 1980: 56 wins
1982 Spurs = 48 wins
1983 Spurs = 53 wins
1984 beat the 38 win Kings, 43 win Mavs, and 41 win Suns
1985 Nuggets = 52 wins
1987 beat the 37 win Nuggets, 42 win Warrios, and 37 win Sonics in the WCF
1988 Mavs = 53 wins
1989 Suns = 55 wins
**Ironically in 1991, the year they went on to lose to Jordan's Bulls in the Finals, they had just beaten the 63-win TrailBlazers.

Best teams the 80s Celtics beat on the way to the finals:
81 Sixers = 62 wins = one of the greatest victories in franchise history
84 Bucks = 50 wins
86 Bucks = 57 wins

So tougher in the East than in the West during the 80s, on balance. But let's be honest the Sixers, Celtics and Lakers were the ONLY great teams in that decade, and the Sixers only lasted half of it. Moncrief/Sikma Bucks were good but acting like the Shaq Magic or Ewing Knicks are nowhere near their level? "Monsterland?" Cmon.. know your biases.
Paul Pierce appreciation society.
B-Ball Freak
RealGM
Posts: 16,233
And1: 11,457
Joined: Jun 09, 2003
     

Re: General Boston Sports Thread 

Post#1874 » by B-Ball Freak » Tue Feb 5, 2019 3:58 am

Captain_Caveman wrote:
31to6 wrote:Teams the Bulls beat on the way to the finals: 1991 Pistons 50 wins you're right I'd forgotten how quickly they dropped off. Best Knicks team = 60 wins under COY Riley in 1993. Best Magic team = 60 wins in 1996 with prime Shaq. Best Pacers team = 58 wins in 1998 under COY Bird only team to make the Jordan Bulls sweat in a game 7 because Bird is Basketball Jesus.

I don't think I'll see 6-in-18 in the NFL again from the same coach and QB that's absolutely ridiculous. But I don't expect to see 6-in-6 in the NBA again either. Random thought -- and obviously football's infinitely more of a team game with one-off playoff randomness, but in Brady's most dominant individual years they didn't win it all.


B-Ball Freak wrote:Lol at "Jordan never beat a real team", the internet never ceases to amaze me.


If you came of age in the 90s, and grew up watching Gatorade ads, of course you think those 90s teams were great.

I came up in the 80s and know otherwise. The Celtics had to walk through Monsterland in the 80s to even get a chance to play the Lakers. Bird would have had like 9 rings if all he had to do was play beat teams like the Ewing Knicks on his way to play the Drexler Blazers or whoever the hell was on that Suns team with Barkley.

MJ was a great player, but put him in the 80s and he's lucky to win two. Put Kobe, LeBron, Bird, Magic, Duncan in the 90s, and they have even more rings.


Trash MJ to prop up Brady, I get it...its ok, they can both be GOATs.
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: General Boston Sports Thread 

Post#1875 » by Captain_Caveman » Tue Feb 5, 2019 4:23 am

31to6 wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
31to6 wrote:
Teams the Bulls beat in the finals: Lakers 58 wins, Blazers 57 wins, Suns 62 wins, Sonics 64 wins, and oh **** I'd left off the Stockton/Malone Jazz which were 64 wins and 62 wins.

Teams the Celtics beat in the finals during the 80s: Rockets 40 wins (not a typo! do we remember/care? no), Lakers 54 wins, Rockets 51 wins.

I agree the league was a bit diluted in the 90s from expansion before the global infusion hit, but that handicap applied to the Bulls along with everyone else. Simply put especially that second three-peat I don't know that that MJ and that Pippen lose to much of anyone ever.


Honest question: Were you old enough for those Pistons and Lakers series? I'm thinking you definitely wouldn't disagree with me if you were. The equivalent of the LeBron beating the Celts in 2011-12 and talking about how he beat a great "KG Celtics" team. Sure... after we kept wrecking him and just got too old to do it anymore. Those teams were laid out and played out.


Yes. Started watching every game in 1988 at age 12. Already conceded the Pistons but there's plenty of other competition there.


Aw, man... look, I like you, and I thought after 6 months of giving hellacious beatings in this thread, that I was done.

Spoiler:
BUT I DON'T HAVE TO BE, MOTHER ****! LOL
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: General Boston Sports Thread 

Post#1876 » by Captain_Caveman » Tue Feb 5, 2019 4:27 am

31to6 wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
31to6 wrote:Teams the Bulls beat on the way to the finals: 1991 Pistons 50 wins you're right I'd forgotten how quickly they dropped off. Best Knicks team = 60 wins under COY Riley in 1993. Best Magic team = 60 wins in 1996 with prime Shaq. Best Pacers team = 58 wins in 1998 under COY Bird only team to make the Jordan Bulls sweat in a game 7 because Bird is Basketball Jesus.

I don't think I'll see 6-in-18 in the NFL again from the same coach and QB that's absolutely ridiculous. But I don't expect to see 6-in-6 in the NBA again either. Random thought -- and obviously football's infinitely more of a team game with one-off playoff randomness, but in Brady's most dominant individual years they didn't win it all.


B-Ball Freak wrote:Lol at "Jordan never beat a real team", the internet never ceases to amaze me.


If you came of age in the 90s, and grew up watching Gatorade ads, of course you think those 90s teams were great.

I came up in the 80s and know otherwise. The Celtics had to walk through Monsterland in the 80s to even get a chance to play the Lakers. Bird would have had like 9 rings if all he had to do was play beat teams like the Ewing Knicks on his way to play the Drexler Blazers or whoever the hell was on that Suns team with Barkley.

MJ was a great player, but put him in the 80s and he's lucky to win two. Put Kobe, LeBron, Bird, Magic, Duncan in the 90s, and they have even more rings.


Uhm.. what you're saying about the 90s you seem to be doing to the 80s. 83 Sixers were great. Peak Celtics and Lakers = great. I'm supposed to be wowed by the Moncrief Bucks and Bernard King Knicks?


Man, you already said you didn't see the 80s. I'm not telling these old timers about the 60s, why you trying to tell me about Dr. J and the Bad Boys? Come on!
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: General Boston Sports Thread 

Post#1877 » by Captain_Caveman » Tue Feb 5, 2019 4:45 am

B-Ball Freak wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
31to6 wrote:Teams the Bulls beat on the way to the finals: 1991 Pistons 50 wins you're right I'd forgotten how quickly they dropped off. Best Knicks team = 60 wins under COY Riley in 1993. Best Magic team = 60 wins in 1996 with prime Shaq. Best Pacers team = 58 wins in 1998 under COY Bird only team to make the Jordan Bulls sweat in a game 7 because Bird is Basketball Jesus.

I don't think I'll see 6-in-18 in the NFL again from the same coach and QB that's absolutely ridiculous. But I don't expect to see 6-in-6 in the NBA again either. Random thought -- and obviously football's infinitely more of a team game with one-off playoff randomness, but in Brady's most dominant individual years they didn't win it all.


B-Ball Freak wrote:Lol at "Jordan never beat a real team", the internet never ceases to amaze me.


If you came of age in the 90s, and grew up watching Gatorade ads, of course you think those 90s teams were great.

I came up in the 80s and know otherwise. The Celtics had to walk through Monsterland in the 80s to even get a chance to play the Lakers. Bird would have had like 9 rings if all he had to do was play beat teams like the Ewing Knicks on his way to play the Drexler Blazers or whoever the hell was on that Suns team with Barkley.

MJ was a great player, but put him in the 80s and he's lucky to win two. Put Kobe, LeBron, Bird, Magic, Duncan in the 90s, and they have even more rings.


Trash MJ to prop up Brady, I get it...its ok, they can both be GOATs.


I don't need to prop up Brady. He does a fine job of it all by himself.

As to MJ, sure... great player, but also overrated by people of a certain age. Dude never learned how to play team ball, and didn't win anything until he was 30. Granted he was up against real teams before he had one of his own, but it also wasn't very close, either. He came up in an era where athletes still got hyped and exalted. Rick Reilly writing constant glowing articles about him, and Nike and Gatorade telling a generation of kids to be like Mike. But if you were older, and understood what great basketball was, you also saw the side of him that was selfish and not that cerebral. You saw the league change rules to help market him. And you saw a slew of **** franchise teams that watered-down the league and left him with no true rival.

Said as far back as 2010 that LeBron was playing at a level higher than MJ ever did, and still believe it now. He'll never be the GOAT, because that argument was long ago -- by people of a certain age -- made to be about a ring count (while somehow ignoring that there was once another star with nearly twice as many of them as MJ has).

Back to Brady, well... there is no such rival for him, and if we are talking about the respective GOATs in each major US team sport, that is hallowed ground and the standards are higher. Winning 6 rings in no joke in any sport or era, but despite living an an era where we have become a culture of criticism, who hate and dissect these great athletes 24/7 instead of washing their balls in Sports Illustrated cover stories every couple of weeks, Brady has been more impressive. His kill list is (much) more impressive, having taken out no less than 7 MVPs or co-MVPs in the playoffs during their MVP seasons. The guy is a serial killer. He's not in Vegas drinking and gambling. He is prepping all year just to take you out. He never had to wait to have a real team put around him to start winning championships, and takes them to the AFCCG or the Super Bowl even when he doesn't. And for all the talk about MJ's competitive streak, he is also a guy who retired in the prime of his career... twice.

Verdict, MJ was phenomenal. Brady is better.
B-Ball Freak
RealGM
Posts: 16,233
And1: 11,457
Joined: Jun 09, 2003
     

Re: General Boston Sports Thread 

Post#1878 » by B-Ball Freak » Tue Feb 5, 2019 5:13 am

I mean no wonder why you think Brady is better than MJ, it sounds like MJ broke your heart when you were a kid. We'll just agree to disagree about the topic because I have no doubt in my mind you'll be back with another ten paragraph post.
soxfan2003
RealGM
Posts: 11,953
And1: 4,264
Joined: May 30, 2003
   

Re: General Boston Sports Thread 

Post#1879 » by soxfan2003 » Tue Feb 5, 2019 11:23 am

Moncrief I see as one of the most underrated basketball player of all time by the general public. Not enough people remember him since he played for the Bucks but the guy flat out deserved to go in the HOF even though his career was short. 5 times voted in the top 10 for MVP and they were deserved. 2 times DPOY. His career was long since he got injuries.

;t=16s

Kings Knicks not comparable to the Bucks in my opinion even though King before his knee injury could score like crazy when he was hot but Milwaukee absolutely was excellent. They swept a Celtics team with Bird/Maxwell/Parish/McHale and young Ainge.

Moncrief helped beat the Bulls with young but still absolutely great Jordan 3-1. He outplayed MJ in my opinion in that series and by the media not even considered Bucks best player that year. When Philly with MVP Moses, Dr. J, Mo Cheeks, Andrew Toney almost swept the playoffs with a Warriors type team for the pre 3 ball era,the Milwaukee Bucks were their only loss in playoffs. Philly was good enough to sweep Lakers. I doubt the loss to Bucks was a coincidence/bad luck. People forget that but honestly Moncrief at his best was one of the best 2 way guards in NBA history. Yes, his defense was better than offense but he was still capable of torching you on offense even if you were good defensively. His game wouldn't translate as well on offense nowadays but very unfair to judge him for not hitting many 3's when no one was really taking them back then.

In 1983, Bucks beat Celtics with Parish/Bird/McHale in playoffs since Celtics had to scramble to try to keep up with their guards that were just much better than Boston's. Celtics didn't have high enough quality and experienced guards at the time....Ainge became a very good player but his NBA career got off to a slower start at first since he had literally played MLB.....

Frankly if DJ who I liked is in the HOF, I for sure think Moncrief should be. Moncrief for his best 5 years was just much better than DJ. No disrespect to DJ who had better longevity but Moncrief wasn't just a defender -- 2 times DPOY -- but could get you 20+ a game very efficiently. DJ got in since he was on championship teams and for his finals MVP in Seattle but 5 best years of Moncrief were impressive.
Joshyjess
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,888
And1: 8,752
Joined: Jun 20, 2018
         

Re: General Boston Sports Thread 

Post#1880 » by Joshyjess » Tue Feb 5, 2019 2:39 pm

Anybody going to the Pats Victory Parade?

Return to Boston Celtics