KamikazeK wrote:Gotta keep winning so it isn't all for naught. Let's go for that 82-0 or maybe even 96.
I like where your head's at.
Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob
KamikazeK wrote:Gotta keep winning so it isn't all for naught. Let's go for that 82-0 or maybe even 96.

Shak_Celts wrote:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
KillahGhostface wrote:Shak_Celts wrote:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
And we have A LOT of posters here actively rooting against one of them.
Shame. SHAME.

Smart2Nesmith43 wrote:KillahGhostface wrote:Shak_Celts wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
And we have A LOT of posters here actively rooting against one of them.
Shame. SHAME.
I don't understand the thought process behind hating a player from another team. Just don't watch the Grizzlies if Smart bothers you that much. Go for a walk, read a book, watch a movie, find another hobby instead.

GoGreen wrote:This is the best team since '08 right?
I know we're only 5 games in and these teams haven't been world beaters, but I haven't seen this kind of high level, smooth, unselfish play since then.
They're playing the RIGHT WAY. That's what has me so excited about this group.
ConstableGeneva wrote:WAY TOO EARLY FUN STAT: The Celtics starting five is averaging 99.75 ppg (while missing two 4th quarters). Dating back to 1997-98, the previous high was 93.2 ppg by the 2005 Phoenix Suns. The 1986 Celtics starting five averaged 89.5 ppg.
Parliament10 wrote:GoGreen wrote:This is the best team since '08 right?
I know we're only 5 games in and these teams haven't been world beaters, but I haven't seen this kind of high level, smooth, unselfish play since then.
They're playing the RIGHT WAY. That's what has me so excited about this group.
This is highly remininscent of the 07-08 team.
Let's hope that it translates into rings.

31to6 wrote:Parliament10 wrote:GoGreen wrote:This is the best team since '08 right?
I know we're only 5 games in and these teams haven't been world beaters, but I haven't seen this kind of high level, smooth, unselfish play since then.
They're playing the RIGHT WAY. That's what has me so excited about this group.
This is highly remininscent of the 07-08 team.
Let's hope that it translates into rings.
'09 was CRANKING until KG hurt his ACL in Utah.
I hope to hear some analyst -- some time this season -- remember this.
Parliament10 wrote:31to6 wrote:Parliament10 wrote:This is highly remininscent of the 07-08 team.
Let's hope that it translates into rings.
'09 was CRANKING until KG hurt his ACL in Utah.
I hope to hear some analyst -- some time this season -- remember this.
Yes. If it wasn't for injuries, we would have won 2, maybe 3 Rings.

Fencer reregistered wrote:Tatum's iso offense is more Pierce-like than ever. Rocking the ball at ankle height, then rising for a 3? Pierce did a lot of that. Driving into a large crowd and scoring? Pierce did a lot of that too.
Pierce to the eye did it with pure power, while Tatum feels a little shiftier, but basically it's the same thing.
Except for the final-possession 2s from the elbow, of course. That worked a lot better for Pierce (and Kobe) than it did for Tatum, so I'm glad he dropped it.
AlCelticFan wrote:Fencer reregistered wrote:Tatum's iso offense is more Pierce-like than ever. Rocking the ball at ankle height, then rising for a 3? Pierce did a lot of that. Driving into a large crowd and scoring? Pierce did a lot of that too.
Pierce to the eye did it with pure power, while Tatum feels a little shiftier, but basically it's the same thing.
Except for the final-possession 2s from the elbow, of course. That worked a lot better for Pierce (and Kobe) than it did for Tatum, so I'm glad he dropped it.
I wonder how much of this is direct one-on-one influence from Pierce, and Sam Cassell as well?