lilfishi22 wrote:SideSwipe wrote:Matt1979 wrote:
We'll surely that's a coaching failing. Trying to shoehorn players into a system rather than adapting to what's available.
Yeah, coach the team you have, not the team you want to have.
An adaptive system is the best way to go, not a rigid system. A rigid system will result in more round hole square peg scenarios. What made the Nash/D'Antoni Era so fun is it was the perfect pairing of adaptive free-flowing offense with the perfect adaptive free-flowing offensive point guard.
The problem is the dual PG back court which is severely lacking in playmaking skills and bball IQ. Early Tony Parker had the same playmaking issues but he also played with one of the GOAT in Timmie in an offense run by Pops which made a high BBall IQ Timmie their #1 offensive option.
We're lacking BBall IQ in many positions
This is one reason there is a part of me that wants to make a run at Rubio, and (gulp) pair him with Knight. Knight gets shots, Rubio gets assists. Both can still handle. The elephant in the room is what happens to Bledsoe (our best player)?
I am not by any means totally convinced of it, but a pass first PG would be a welcome change of scenery for a bit. Maybe as a killer 3 guard rotation?