dirkforpres wrote:2006 deserves the biggest asterisk possible. There’s no debate
Everyone shot a bunch of FT's that year including our boy Dirk.
* Denied
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
dirkforpres wrote:2006 deserves the biggest asterisk possible. There’s no debate
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Mickey8 wrote:Well Kobe was going nowhere until Stern gifted them Pau Gasol who was one of the best big men in the game at that time .
Karate Diop wrote:HabsAndDubs wrote:Karate Diop wrote:
1. I didn't specifically call out the Bucks but the fact you immediately went there is telling...
2. Kyrie is injury prone, Harden is not.
3. The first team I thought of was the Raptors and their victory over Golden State. The Raptors for all intents and purposes were the NBA champions that year, but if there weren't multiple injuries to Golden State it's hard to see that being the outcome...
Why does this matter though? Who cares who the best team in 2019 is? Golden state lost the finals because they had two of their three best players injured, but that doesn’t mean they still didn’t lose. If hypotheticals mattered, we wouldn’t watch the games.
It doesn't matter when it comes to arguing who the NBA champion was that year, it is relevant when discussing who the best team in the league was that year.
My point was that people who put asterisks on championships tend to confuse the two when they're not necessarily the same.
My personal belief is that short of cheating no championship should have an asterik next to it.
Pelon chingon wrote:*2002
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Memories wrote:Mickey8 wrote:Well Kobe was going nowhere until Stern gifted them Pau Gasol who was one of the best big men in the game at that time .
If you're going to talk about somebody gifting a team a player, at least get the people responsible right. Like Jerry West/Chris Wallace.
By that same logic, the Celtics were going nowheresville until Celtic alumni Kevin McHale gifted them Kevin freaking Garnett. That's a big ass astrick right there.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Texas Chuck wrote:Memories wrote:Mickey8 wrote:Well Kobe was going nowhere until Stern gifted them Pau Gasol who was one of the best big men in the game at that time .
If you're going to talk about somebody gifting a team a player, at least get the people responsible right. Like Jerry West/Chris Wallace.
By that same logic, the Celtics were going nowheresville until Celtic alumni Kevin McHale gifted them Kevin freaking Garnett. That's a big ass astrick right there.
Oh no, I checked the Celtics titles very very carefully, including 2008.
* Denied
Texas Chuck wrote:dirkforpres wrote:2006 deserves the biggest asterisk possible. There’s no debate
Everyone shot a bunch of FT's that year including our boy Dirk.
* Denied
Karate Diop wrote:mademan wrote:Karate Diop wrote:There's a difference between putting an asterik next to a championship and arguing that a certain NBA champion in a given year clearly was not the best team in the league and only wound up on top at the end because of some fortunate / dubious breaks...
health is part of the game. Should the Bucks title be under-appreciated because the Nets put together a team built out of glass or that the Lakers 2 best players are either frail or old?
1. I didn't specifically call out the Bucks but the fact you immediately went there is telling...
2. Kyrie is injury prone, Harden is not.
3. The first team I thought of was the Raptors. The Raptors for all intents and purposes beat the Warriors and were NBA champions in 2019, and should be remembered as such... But that doesn't mean it's irrational to believe that the Raptors would have gotten wrecked had GS been healthy. There was a noticeable difference in peaks between both teams when healthy.
eyeatoma wrote:You guys still dont' get it. Playoff accomplishment don't matter when you're up for your 1st MVP. When you're up for your 3rd in a row, damn straight it matters, as the only ones who done it are top 15 players of all time who have won rings.
uncleoswald wrote:kobe was usually good, but against the 2004 pistons he was not good.
i feel like it would be a more faithful retelling of history to say he was good against the pistons, on account of the fact that he was usually good.
i suggest the 2004 pistons get an asterisk.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Cavsfansince84 wrote:I take offense to you putting an asterisk on the 71 Utah Stars title. You should be ashamed.
Texas Chuck wrote:Damn. Damn. I really don't want to hand out an asterisk to the 04 Pistons, but that case is nearly airtight. Kobe normally good, not good here, and lots of people really love Kobe and we had a huge Kobe fan just handing out asterisks left and right earlier this week so this would totally please him.
Yep, gonna have to allow this one.
2004 Detroit Pistons*
Texas Chuck wrote:Lots of talk in recent days about which titles should have asterisks. So I have undergone an exhaustive research project and present you with an undisputed list of champions who should not have their achievement marred in any way by that peskiest of special characters: *
All teams not on the below list remain open for debate to be asterisked if you can justify it, but these must forever be excluded. You are welcome, but please attribute credit.
Spoiler:
lonniefire wrote:This is a rebuttal to the KD Lebron Steph thread but I’m letting you know that this thread is going backfire on you, very badly. because there was a lot truth to what he was saying on that thread.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
DukeH wrote:Plenty, RealGM Bucks Board is the Golden Dawn of forums.
Memories wrote:Mickey8 wrote:Well Kobe was going nowhere until Stern gifted them Pau Gasol who was one of the best big men in the game at that time .
If you're going to talk about somebody gifting a team a player, at least get the people responsible right. Like Jerry West/Chris Wallace.
By that same logic, the Celtics were going nowheresville until Celtic alumni Kevin McHale gifted them Kevin freaking Garnett. That's a big ass astrick right there.
theFireBlanket wrote:Asterisk thread wrt: use of Chuck in a basketball forum without actually alluding to (a list compiled by) Charles Barkley.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Texas Chuck wrote:lonniefire wrote:This is a rebuttal to the KD Lebron Steph thread but I’m letting you know that this thread is going backfire on you, very badly. because there was a lot truth to what he was saying on that thread.
1. Dude the people who already don't like me aren't going to dislike me any more over this lol. Also, are you threatening me?![]()
2. No, no there wasn't any truth to what he was saying in that ridiculous thread. It was merely in the latest of his attempt to denigrate anyone he perceives as a threat to his favorite players. Nothing more, nothing less. And we should never support such transparent rubbish.