Residual-Heat wrote:
Ideally he would be starting SG next season alongside a PG that can shoot while playing back up PG role as well. Or just a guard that comes off the bench and gives you minutes at both spots, either way he needs to play 30+mpg.
This whole thread/ argument comes down to the fact that Fultz sucks with the future core. The OP dislikes Suggs because he isn’t a volume shooter at SG in his second season.
This might come as a shock to the rest of Orlando’s board, but shooting guards don’t need to be volume scorers from 3 to be efficient in the nba. Point guards, on the other hand, DO if they aren’t getting to the line OR racking up high assist numbers.
You can’t be **** at all 3 and have your main feature be scoring in the most one dimensional way imaginable.
Fultz and Suggs don’t work as a back court combo. That’s why Suggs doesn’t start and the Cole/Suggs back court is an infinitely better tandem. Suggs closes out games and rightfully so.
The answer to this stupid thread is that Fultz is the starter for
the rest of the season. Why? Because where else would Fultz be? He’s not coming off the bench at $17m and he doesn’t fit next to the best defender on the team. Mosley has to configure his lineups because of his shortcomings.