RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #9 (Kevin Garnett)

Moderators: trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ

OhayoKD
Head Coach
Posts: 6,042
And1: 3,933
Joined: Jun 22, 2022

Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #9 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 7/27/28 

Post#21 » by OhayoKD » Tue Jul 25, 2023 10:04 pm

One_and_Done wrote:You'll get more traction for Oscar than Mikan. I want to nominate KD, but when he's getting no support I'd be throwing my vote away.

Actually Mikan is probably the favorite at this point.

That said, I know you're a bit of a modernist and you've been considering Giannis so maybe you'd find this an interesting read:
Spoiler:
MyUniBroDavis wrote:2017 Curry

Was thinking of putting Giannis above but I feel it was the perfect offensive performance on a great team, level of play it’s hard to beat but I don’t know if I’d pick Curry over giannis in a vacuum



2021 Giannis

I’m a bit conflicted here, but contextually I do think he should be on here already.

One thing I will say though is that I was looking through the retro player of the years for 2019 and 2020, while I thought he deserved a spot here, my assumption for why Giannis hasn’t been chosen yet or had much consideration was because people were lower on his offense than I was, I now realize it looks like people really didn’t rate him highly on defense?

The peak Duncan vs peak Giannis on offense thread suprised me a bit, I didn’t think it would be so clear cut, my assumption was that people weren’t high on his offense as much as his defense.

The basis of my argument comes from 2021 and 2022 giannis not being a different defender than 2019 or 2020 giannis, rather less effort in the regular season (and I know this past season they mixed up their screen coverages like Miami for postseason versatility), supported by his impact data in the playoffs, the bucks going from league average to probably best or near best in the league defensively in the playoffs

I don’t think 2021 or 2022 Giannis is intrinsically a different defender than his 2019 or 2020 versions, I do think that in general they took those defensive seasons off and ramped it up in the playoffs.

So my arguments on 2021 Giannis defensively will revolve around the impact of his defense in 2019, and in 2020 first and foremost

I wasn’t going to make much of a take about giannis’s defence mostly because I didn’t realize what the general opinion was vs I guess my opinion on his defence.

However, for this to make sense a base assumption is that 2021 playoff giannis on D is the same as 2019 or 2020 RS giannis on D, although there’s an argument for him being better than his 2019 self at least.

So ive kinda gotten the vibe that people (based off retro player of the year voting) didn’t think of him as a super clear DPOY those two years? 2020 I can understand because of ADs postseason exploits, but purely RS wise, those two were imo the best DPOY seasons post 2010.

I realize that might seem like a wild take (I honestly thought it was a pretty normal take) but It’s just that… it just seemed kind of obvious?

First of all, data when he did play vs when he didnt

NOTE: for games with giannis, I got it for 2019 but since it was the same as the on court percentage +_

2019
72 games
105.3 def rtg with giannis

10 games, 108.5 def rtg
(107.7 def rtg 8 games, 2 without starters)


- Avg off rtg faced (10 games) - 108.9
- Avg off rtg faced (8 games) - 108.5

2020
102.5 def rtg with giannis 63 games

108.6 (7 games)
108.5 (10 games, 2 in bubble 1 without starters)

- avg off rtg faced 109.2
- Avg off rtg faced 108.45

So in the 20 or so games that they played without giannis, the bucks were a slightly better than league average defense given their competition, taking only the 15 games their starters played or that weren’t in the bubble, they’re still slightly above average

Not the biggest of samples and there are a few outlier results both ways as is the nature of games in small samples, but still not insignificant. The bucks with giannis otoh, are a -5.2 defense in 2019 and a -7.7 defense in 2020.

Keep in mind budenholzer is weird with rotations, giannis only plays 30 minutes a game not because he’s unable to play longer but because budenholzer is known to be SUPER conservative in this regard

His on court and raw net rtg compared to other ATG defensive teams

https://syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/2185159-ranking-the-nbas-20-best-defenses-of-all-time.amp.html

On court def rtg

2019 bucks
G 104.5 in 2019 (-3.7 net) (110.4 league avg)

2020 bucks
G 99.6 in 2020 (-7.9 net) (110.6 league avg)

1999 Spurs
David Robinson 92.0 (-2.4) (102.2 league avg)

2004 pistons
Wallace 94.8 (-2.0 net) (102.9 league avg)

2004 Spurs
Duncan 92.1 (-5.4 net) (102.9 league abg)

2005 Spurs
Duncan 94.5 (-8.9 net) (106.1 league avg)

2008 Celtics
Garnett 97.3 (-4.1 net) (107.5 league avg)

2014 pacers
Hibbert 98.9 (-2.9 net) (106.7 league avg)

In this comparison Giannis looks pretty solid, his 2019 season maybe a bit behind, his 2020 season fully deserving to be here.

I’m of the belief that top end defensive impact is limited in the past few years, the advent of three point shooting just means there are less shots to contest at the rim, and the pick and roll means especially in the playoffs you need versatility. Furthermore, even in the RS this leads to the defensive impact one individual can have to be a bit limited in comparison.

Kind of similar to how offensive numbers are inflated nowadays, defensive numbers are probably deflated (in terms of blocked shots and everything) because less blockable shots at the rim occur compared to back then (like it’s easier to block someone driving in a Congested paint than in a 5 out while ur drawn out to the three point line)

I think offensive impact isn’t as inflated maybe because general offensive “scheme evolution” and to a large extent more lax rules as well just means teams can do a bit better when their stars leave the court, but this pretty much has the opposite effect defensively

I think here’s where a bit of an issue comes in for me. Like how I believe it’s probably silly to say, oh devin booker averaged XXX he’s as good as Kobe, it’s also similarly strange for me to think that all the best defenders of today are clearly inferior to the defenders back then.

Or another way to say it, comparing the best defenders now to the best defenders back then, maybe I would get it more had TD and KG been so far head over shoulders above everyone else in defensive impact stuff, the first few Boston KG and some years of TD were, but as a whole while they stand out it’s not in the sense that they consistently dwarfed everyone else like currys offensive impact stuff I think, rather it seems there were usually a few guys that had really high impact in general

Another way to say it, I think the potential defensive impact today has lessened, and that especially on good teams if you transport a guy like Mutombo to todays game, he would not be AS impactful, despite his in eta impact based off rapm and what not making him seem like a (non russell) GOAT defender candidate with how much he dwarfed everyone else

Like, when we talk about how KG is perfect defensively today, I agree, but I don’t think that means he’s more impactful today than he was in the 2000s, I think this means he has less of a dropoff than some others would. This isn’t to say the others wouldn’t be absolutely fantastic but I think defenders have less impact in general today. I feel if you take a Rudy Gobert, whose absurdly dominant as an interior defender he’s probably gonna be a perennial DPOY candidate

Like he’s probably about as good as a mutombo, but even if we say a bit worse, who by some RAPM data consistently dwarfed the competition, and some of his post prime years were competitive or even better than some prime TD years, so I think peak Gobert is probably in the running for DPOY and in that category, even if he probably didn’t peak as high on that end (thats a whole can of worms)

The likes of TD and KG do dominate their era in metrics like defensive RAPM far more than Gobert does, although bigs don’t tend to dominate that as much as they did back then.

I used bball ref for the stuff above, admittedly just because it is far easier and older data seems hard to find.

Luck adjusted RAPM vs regular RAPM is a can of worms imo, luck adjustments generally work better in testing but for multiple years apparently they’re worse so take that with a grain of salt. (They may be worse in individual testing)

Regular defensive RAPM
2019 Giannis ranked 2nd behind PG
2020 Giannis ranks 1st by a lot

Regular luck adjusted defensive RAPM
2019 Giannis ranked 1st by a lot
2020 Giannis ranks 1st by a lot

To be clear, ranking second isn’t a sort of death sentence, this is NPI rapm so it’s a bit more noisy and to my knowledge TD never ranked first in his career, although was really close a bunch, Garnett only did so in his Celtics run, and while he was a clear first in 3/5 years 08 was the only year with a large seperation between him and second

Just checking a user named shadows data on apbr who seems respected, giannis’s placements are the same although the gaps are different (he’s a clear second with PG as a crazy first in 2019, and he’s a clear first with a Decent amount of seperation but not a crazy amount over bron in 2020. It’s still roughly equal to most of they Boston KG years though, and it should be noted high end defensive values are higher in general).

To be blunt, I’m way too lazy to make a Google doc with the files from the shotcharts website, especially since it’s easily publically available and accessible. While comparing across seasons with standard deviations is important, for this I’ll only put the top 2 values each year with the name of first place if it seems significant.

While this seems dumb and might not tell enough, I think it’ll be clear what im trying to say when I put in the data. For giannis’s 2020 year I’ll add more incase there’s doubt for that year specifically

RAPM regular 2010
2.77 (Tim Duncan)
2.7
RAPM regular 2011
4.25 (Garnett)
3.19
RAPM regular 2012
4.21 (Taj Gibson)
3.46
RAPM regular 2013
4.06 (Garnett)
3.39
RAPM regular 2014
2.47 (Iggy)
2.21
RAPM regular 2015
2.57 (Tony Allen)
2.55
RAPM regular 2016
2.54 (Kawhi)
2.45 (Green)
RAPM regular 2017
2.32 (Gobert)
2.03
RAPM regular 2018
2.73(Covington)
2.56
RAPM regular 2019
2.03 (Wayoff P)
1.79 (Giannis)
RAPM regular 2020
3.49 (Giannis)
2.49 (Matthews)
2.28 (Schroder)
RAPM regular 2021
2.74 (Gobert)
2.25 (Conley)
2.1 (PJ Dozier)
RAPM regular 2022
2.41 (George Hill)
2.23 (Kenrich Williams)

The overall DRAPM declines as a whole I think after a certain point, Giannis’s is almost certainly the highest here in terms of seperation from second as a percentage and in terms of standard deviations from 0.

This site has luck adjustments too

LARAPM 2010
2.99 (Bogut)
2.87
LARAPM 2011
5.39 (Garnett)
4.65 (Dwight)
3.99 (Caron Butler)
3.89 (Asik)
LARAPM 2012
3.01 (Taj Gibson)
2.87
LARAPM 2013
3.93 (Garnett)
3.14 (Sanders)
2.61
2.59
LARAPM 2014
4.11 (Splitter)
4.09 (Kemba!?)
3.95 (Cp3)
LARAPM 2015
2.47 (Tony Allen)
2.21 (Bogut)
LARAPM 2016
2.33 (Jokic!?)
2.19 (Kawhi)
2.1 Tim Duncan)
LARAPM 2017
1.82 (Gilchrist)
1.81 (Covington)
1.76 (Dray)
LARAPM 2018
2.04 (Gobert)
1.8 (Dejountay)
LARAPM 2019
2.18 (Giannis)
1.71 (Bledsoe)
1.71 (Lopez)
1.69 (Turner)
1.61 (Gobert)
LARAPM 2020
3.19 (Giannis)
2.07 (Matthews)
2.04 (Middleton)
1.93 (Lopez)
1.8 (Marc)
LARAPM 2021
2.11 (BaldEagleOfTruthCaruso)
1.87 (Gobert)
1.66 (Conley)
LARAPM 2022
1.98 (Horford)
1.41 (Draymond)
1.38 (Lonzo)

Added more for giannis since I think a collinearnity issue is something talked about with RAPM stuff, so that’s something worth mentioning here with it being maybe similar to the Warriors RAPM stuff on offense being too dominant during the Curry era to properly assess impact

In any case, the only other high minutes guy in the 2020 squad with a def net rtg of more than -3 is Matthews at -6.2 (99.9 on court def rtg). Then it’s DiVincenzo at -2.7 (101.7) and lopez at -2.3 (102.1). Meanwhile the entire starting lineup outside of giannis is a near neutral or has a positive (bad) def net rtg, George hill has a -6.4 net rtg with an on court rtg of 101.6, but played less than a quarter of the minutes (and it was a trade). Others that ranked well basically played less than 509 minutes, and the starters were all essentially neutrals.

LEBRON data ranks 2020 Giannis as 6th and 2019 Giannis as 30th over the past 15 years, caveat that I don’t think it’s adjusted for standard deviations per season (I think it’s the raw values) and more importantly it tends to overrate bigs, and Giannis doesn’t block as many shots as some others do.

Beyond that, the bucks defense despite Giannis playing limited minutes was genuinely ATG, both first place defence a, 2020 in particular in the games Giannis played was a -8.1 rel DRTG defense, which I think might be the best non Celtics mark ever (slightly worse than 08) although I might be mistake I think it outdoes any of the Spurs marks

(Caveat that a -8 defense wi a 110 avg off rtg isn’t a higher percentage drop relative to the league than a -7 vs a 70 average or something which makes more sense to use honestly, at the same time the current era is one where players rest guys and Bud REALLY rests giannis a lot to be safe so maybe it evens out in terms of pure level of play)

Now if Giannis had a problem defending in the playoffs I get it, but their playoff defense in 2019, 2021, and 2022 was the best in the nba

2019 -7.1 playoff league avg def rtg
2020 -2.8 playoff league avg def rtg
2021 -6.7 playoff league avg def rtg
2022 -7.4 playoff league avg def rtg

They had a problem with dropping too much esp in 2020 iirc (I think they adjusted after giannis got hurt lol) I don’t really blame giannis for coaching incompetence tho, they actually varied their pick and roll coverage more


More importantly to me though, this does make it seem like they were coasting in the RS, I mean at the end of the day 2021 and 2022 bucks were far from a decent defense despite their RS numbers

(From here onward I’m using NBA.com data, just because it didn’t have league averages before but that’s not that important here)

As for his RS defense vs playoff defense

2021 RS
Giannis def net rtg -3.4 (107.4 on court)

2021 playoffs
Giannis def net rtg -5.6 (103.7 on court)

(Second best high minutes guy is Lopez, -0.4 and 105.4, I don’t know if I’m tripping but EVERY rotation player outside of that is a negative in defense in raw impact lol).

Checking it more so, it looks like some of it comes from the heat series, which they just blew them tf out and munched on them in garbage time, altho even taking that out, giannis is now has a def net rtg of -7.5 and an on court def rtg of 105.6, and PJ is next best at -3.2 with an on court of 105.8. Unless I’m tripping everyone other rotation guy is still a negative in defense though

Looking at the teams results they played against a first ranked offense in the nets (before someone says they Kyrie got hurt or harden missed the first part of the series, they were the first ranked offense witth harden and Durant missing more than half the season and Kyrie missing a third), the 18th offense in the heat, the 9th ranked offense in the hawks and the 7th ranked offense in the Suns).

2021

Vs the heat (110.6)
95.4 def rtg
Giannis 95.4 def rtg on-court (+5.4)

Vs the nets (117.3)
107.3 def rtg
Giannis 103.2 def rtg on-court (-11.7)

Vs hawks (114.3)
109.1 def rtg
(107.7 in the games giannis played)
(111.7 in the games giannis missed)
Giannis 106.2 def rtg on-court (-3.6)

Vs Suns (116.3)
112.1 def rtg
Giannis 108.0 def rtg on court (-12.4)

2022
Vs bulls (112.7)
94.4 def rtg
Giannis 91.3 def rtg on court (-4.3)

Vs Celtics (113.6)
108.8 def rtg
Giannis 104.2 def rtg on court (-15.1)

Some of this is mildly misleading, the Suns finished the season strong on offense as did the heat, and the hawks. The nets actually stayed like that consistently, the Celtics had the best offense over the second half of the year while the bulls were pretty poor as the season ended, but let’s just take it at face value

But viewing it as where teams were in terms of their level of play going into the playoffs would make the defense look even more favorable

Nevertheless, the bucks defense over these 6 series was very consistently elite, and as a whole on average probably on the ATG scale, so with giannis impact data looking like it’s the one that looks different I do think it’s fair to say the change was at least partially from him. His tracking data doesn’t change all too much but it’s still similar to his 2019 data if not better I think, although I’d have to check again but it definately wasn’t substantially worse

It’s hard to get definitive proof that he’s a better playoff defender than RS defender. I DONT think he’s quite as good as he was in the 2020 RS at least on a per minute basis (other than the finals lol) but at the same time by all metrics relative to era on a per minute basis that might’ve been one of the most dominant defensive regular seasons since play by play data has been announced, in fact impact stuff it does probably come out to first relative to his peers from the 1999-2021 span, so that’s not saying much

Otoh, I do think that the bucks being a decent RS defense while pretty obviously being a super elite defense in the playoffs, with the main person whose impact data gets better both years is giannis, is pretty significant.

Even this year, only the Warriors did better against the Celtics, and that’s with Tatum forgetting how to play basketball (and this is pretty much entirely due to their defense in the non-giannis minutes, they were a 104.2 offense with giannis in the court which should coincide with their starters, a 119.3 offense with him off the court. For comparison the offense with dray or Wiggins was 103.2 and 103.4).

As a whole, the bucks with giannis on the floor have been a hyper elite defense in 6 series in a row now, and taking the series as a whole (also keep in mind the Celtics and Suns had great second halves of the year and were the best offenses in the league those years from the midway point onwards after a sluggish start, although the Celtics playoff offense was a bit weird to me with Tatum being so inconsistent)

I don’t think it’s outlandish to say Giannis is as good as his 2020 RS in the playoffs, although maybe I wouldn’t go that far, tracking data isn’t full proof at all but it was utterly absurd in 2020 (and as a small note it was suuuper similar to 2016 playoff bron! :D )

In terms of like, his defensive attributes I don’t understand why this would be an outlandish take either

Giannis is a high IQ defender, rarely makes mistakes, has an absurd motor, and is a guy that can legitimately guard 1-5, 6ft11 with a freakishly long wingspan (that 7ft3 was measured when he was 6ft8.5, hes now at the point that he can casually grab the rim tiptoing now, 7ft6 is probably a safe bet)

Can cover stupid ground, like his max vert might not be absurd but I’ve never seen someone jump as far as he does, which might be more important for his defensive role in 2020 and 2021 where he was breaking up actions as a helpside defender (he’s probably the only guy ever other than wilt that dunks from the ft line because it’s comfortable that way lmao)

We tend to either underestimate the defensive IQ of current defenders or overestimate past defenders, sure Garnett and Duncan have a higher defensive Iq than giannis and guys like AD or Embiid but it’s not as if it’s comparing Magnus Carlson to like a kid playing chess for the first time lol, and draymonds smarter than all of them anyway.

Like generally the elite defenders are elite mentally as well, guys like giannis despite being freakishly athletic aren’t an exception to that, even if he’s not as cerebral as let’s say a draymond green is


https://www.reddit.com/r/MkeBucks/comments/9pq5vv/giannis_casually_grabbing_the_rim_with_his_feet/)

Overall, I think he’s an elite DPOY type defender. He’s shown the ability as a very deserved DPOY and especially 2020 he’s shown ATG defensive ability. His physical profile and motor and overall defensive IQ are in line with that as are his results, and I believe his playoff defense shows that

Like the Gap between him and garnett to me for example is probably mainly that Garnett is better at pick and roll coverages

I can fully understand not being as high on him defensively as I am but him being top 2 in player of the year voting only once and falling out of the top 3 is wild to me. At the very least he’s an ATG defender

I feel offensively there’s not really much to say, his impact data looks a bit worse because of the Miami series (the offense wasn’t bad or anything, but they killed them in garbage time and it’s hard to take much negative in a series that was such an utter sweep like that)

Beyond that if we’re evaluating him as a player by virtue of being a Greek Freak Giannis is kind of an amazing off ball big, from the virtue of setting good screens being stupidly athletic and being an incredible finisher, so he’s highly portable in an off ball role, although jrue isn’t the type that maximizes him in that role so it’s hard even though jrue is great.

Beyond that, imagining Giannis’s defensive impact in a role where he doesn’t have to do as much offensively would be insane considering his defensive impact already is where it’s at when he puts his mind to it, and he’s a good passer off the short roll too

Giannis honestly works REALLY well as a pick and roll partner, and it would probably give him the energy to be a historic level defender as well

On a side note: holding 2021 giannis’s injury against him when he then had potentially one of the absolute greatest finals performances ever on one leg on an injury that took him out of the first few days of training camp 3 months later is MAD corny lmao, that made it 10x more legendary and the fact that they might not win if someone hit the reset button doesn’t matter much to me since 1. He came back stupidly early and killed the city of Phoenix 2. In real life they actually won which really is all that matters vs whatever hypothetical scenario we draw up where him getting hurt leads to them losing.

I’m not 100% on him here, but I do think that his defense seems to be viewed as “oh it’s quite good” sometimes, he’s a legitimate DPOY type player that has shown the ability at least to match absolutely top of the line ATG defensive peaks, and may do so in the playoffs.

Giannis had one of the absolute best two way playoff performances ever

Admittedly, it’s a bit lame that I don’t have like much video watching for this cuz I just don’t have any time, so that’s a bit annoying, either way though giannis for me on defense is a guy that doesn’t play a role that impacts every shot or anything but his motor makes him impact the shots he can to the point that the defense actively does things so he can’t help because he’s such an absurd deterrent


04 KG

- extremely portable, absurd impact data, would be utterly dominant today, but his playoff scoring is an issue for me
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,034
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #9 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 7/27/28 

Post#22 » by MyUniBroDavis » Tue Jul 25, 2023 10:15 pm

OhayoKD wrote:
One_and_Done wrote:You'll get more traction for Oscar than Mikan. I want to nominate KD, but when he's getting no support I'd be throwing my vote away.

Actually Mikan is probably the favorite at this point.

That said, I know you're a bit of a modernist and you've been considering Giannis so maybe you'd find this an interesting read:
Spoiler:
MyUniBroDavis wrote:2017 Curry

Was thinking of putting Giannis above but I feel it was the perfect offensive performance on a great team, level of play it’s hard to beat but I don’t know if I’d pick Curry over giannis in a vacuum



2021 Giannis

I’m a bit conflicted here, but contextually I do think he should be on here already.

One thing I will say though is that I was looking through the retro player of the years for 2019 and 2020, while I thought he deserved a spot here, my assumption for why Giannis hasn’t been chosen yet or had much consideration was because people were lower on his offense than I was, I now realize it looks like people really didn’t rate him highly on defense?

The peak Duncan vs peak Giannis on offense thread suprised me a bit, I didn’t think it would be so clear cut, my assumption was that people weren’t high on his offense as much as his defense.

The basis of my argument comes from 2021 and 2022 giannis not being a different defender than 2019 or 2020 giannis, rather less effort in the regular season (and I know this past season they mixed up their screen coverages like Miami for postseason versatility), supported by his impact data in the playoffs, the bucks going from league average to probably best or near best in the league defensively in the playoffs

I don’t think 2021 or 2022 Giannis is intrinsically a different defender than his 2019 or 2020 versions, I do think that in general they took those defensive seasons off and ramped it up in the playoffs.

So my arguments on 2021 Giannis defensively will revolve around the impact of his defense in 2019, and in 2020 first and foremost

I wasn’t going to make much of a take about giannis’s defence mostly because I didn’t realize what the general opinion was vs I guess my opinion on his defence.

However, for this to make sense a base assumption is that 2021 playoff giannis on D is the same as 2019 or 2020 RS giannis on D, although there’s an argument for him being better than his 2019 self at least.

So ive kinda gotten the vibe that people (based off retro player of the year voting) didn’t think of him as a super clear DPOY those two years? 2020 I can understand because of ADs postseason exploits, but purely RS wise, those two were imo the best DPOY seasons post 2010.

I realize that might seem like a wild take (I honestly thought it was a pretty normal take) but It’s just that… it just seemed kind of obvious?

First of all, data when he did play vs when he didnt

NOTE: for games with giannis, I got it for 2019 but since it was the same as the on court percentage +_

2019
72 games
105.3 def rtg with giannis

10 games, 108.5 def rtg
(107.7 def rtg 8 games, 2 without starters)


- Avg off rtg faced (10 games) - 108.9
- Avg off rtg faced (8 games) - 108.5

2020
102.5 def rtg with giannis 63 games

108.6 (7 games)
108.5 (10 games, 2 in bubble 1 without starters)

- avg off rtg faced 109.2
- Avg off rtg faced 108.45

So in the 20 or so games that they played without giannis, the bucks were a slightly better than league average defense given their competition, taking only the 15 games their starters played or that weren’t in the bubble, they’re still slightly above average

Not the biggest of samples and there are a few outlier results both ways as is the nature of games in small samples, but still not insignificant. The bucks with giannis otoh, are a -5.2 defense in 2019 and a -7.7 defense in 2020.

Keep in mind budenholzer is weird with rotations, giannis only plays 30 minutes a game not because he’s unable to play longer but because budenholzer is known to be SUPER conservative in this regard

His on court and raw net rtg compared to other ATG defensive teams

https://syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/2185159-ranking-the-nbas-20-best-defenses-of-all-time.amp.html

On court def rtg

2019 bucks
G 104.5 in 2019 (-3.7 net) (110.4 league avg)

2020 bucks
G 99.6 in 2020 (-7.9 net) (110.6 league avg)

1999 Spurs
David Robinson 92.0 (-2.4) (102.2 league avg)

2004 pistons
Wallace 94.8 (-2.0 net) (102.9 league avg)

2004 Spurs
Duncan 92.1 (-5.4 net) (102.9 league abg)

2005 Spurs
Duncan 94.5 (-8.9 net) (106.1 league avg)

2008 Celtics
Garnett 97.3 (-4.1 net) (107.5 league avg)

2014 pacers
Hibbert 98.9 (-2.9 net) (106.7 league avg)

In this comparison Giannis looks pretty solid, his 2019 season maybe a bit behind, his 2020 season fully deserving to be here.

I’m of the belief that top end defensive impact is limited in the past few years, the advent of three point shooting just means there are less shots to contest at the rim, and the pick and roll means especially in the playoffs you need versatility. Furthermore, even in the RS this leads to the defensive impact one individual can have to be a bit limited in comparison.

Kind of similar to how offensive numbers are inflated nowadays, defensive numbers are probably deflated (in terms of blocked shots and everything) because less blockable shots at the rim occur compared to back then (like it’s easier to block someone driving in a Congested paint than in a 5 out while ur drawn out to the three point line)

I think offensive impact isn’t as inflated maybe because general offensive “scheme evolution” and to a large extent more lax rules as well just means teams can do a bit better when their stars leave the court, but this pretty much has the opposite effect defensively

I think here’s where a bit of an issue comes in for me. Like how I believe it’s probably silly to say, oh devin booker averaged XXX he’s as good as Kobe, it’s also similarly strange for me to think that all the best defenders of today are clearly inferior to the defenders back then.

Or another way to say it, comparing the best defenders now to the best defenders back then, maybe I would get it more had TD and KG been so far head over shoulders above everyone else in defensive impact stuff, the first few Boston KG and some years of TD were, but as a whole while they stand out it’s not in the sense that they consistently dwarfed everyone else like currys offensive impact stuff I think, rather it seems there were usually a few guys that had really high impact in general

Another way to say it, I think the potential defensive impact today has lessened, and that especially on good teams if you transport a guy like Mutombo to todays game, he would not be AS impactful, despite his in eta impact based off rapm and what not making him seem like a (non russell) GOAT defender candidate with how much he dwarfed everyone else

Like, when we talk about how KG is perfect defensively today, I agree, but I don’t think that means he’s more impactful today than he was in the 2000s, I think this means he has less of a dropoff than some others would. This isn’t to say the others wouldn’t be absolutely fantastic but I think defenders have less impact in general today. I feel if you take a Rudy Gobert, whose absurdly dominant as an interior defender he’s probably gonna be a perennial DPOY candidate

Like he’s probably about as good as a mutombo, but even if we say a bit worse, who by some RAPM data consistently dwarfed the competition, and some of his post prime years were competitive or even better than some prime TD years, so I think peak Gobert is probably in the running for DPOY and in that category, even if he probably didn’t peak as high on that end (thats a whole can of worms)

The likes of TD and KG do dominate their era in metrics like defensive RAPM far more than Gobert does, although bigs don’t tend to dominate that as much as they did back then.

I used bball ref for the stuff above, admittedly just because it is far easier and older data seems hard to find.

Luck adjusted RAPM vs regular RAPM is a can of worms imo, luck adjustments generally work better in testing but for multiple years apparently they’re worse so take that with a grain of salt. (They may be worse in individual testing)

Regular defensive RAPM
2019 Giannis ranked 2nd behind PG
2020 Giannis ranks 1st by a lot

Regular luck adjusted defensive RAPM
2019 Giannis ranked 1st by a lot
2020 Giannis ranks 1st by a lot

To be clear, ranking second isn’t a sort of death sentence, this is NPI rapm so it’s a bit more noisy and to my knowledge TD never ranked first in his career, although was really close a bunch, Garnett only did so in his Celtics run, and while he was a clear first in 3/5 years 08 was the only year with a large seperation between him and second

Just checking a user named shadows data on apbr who seems respected, giannis’s placements are the same although the gaps are different (he’s a clear second with PG as a crazy first in 2019, and he’s a clear first with a Decent amount of seperation but not a crazy amount over bron in 2020. It’s still roughly equal to most of they Boston KG years though, and it should be noted high end defensive values are higher in general).

To be blunt, I’m way too lazy to make a Google doc with the files from the shotcharts website, especially since it’s easily publically available and accessible. While comparing across seasons with standard deviations is important, for this I’ll only put the top 2 values each year with the name of first place if it seems significant.

While this seems dumb and might not tell enough, I think it’ll be clear what im trying to say when I put in the data. For giannis’s 2020 year I’ll add more incase there’s doubt for that year specifically

RAPM regular 2010
2.77 (Tim Duncan)
2.7
RAPM regular 2011
4.25 (Garnett)
3.19
RAPM regular 2012
4.21 (Taj Gibson)
3.46
RAPM regular 2013
4.06 (Garnett)
3.39
RAPM regular 2014
2.47 (Iggy)
2.21
RAPM regular 2015
2.57 (Tony Allen)
2.55
RAPM regular 2016
2.54 (Kawhi)
2.45 (Green)
RAPM regular 2017
2.32 (Gobert)
2.03
RAPM regular 2018
2.73(Covington)
2.56
RAPM regular 2019
2.03 (Wayoff P)
1.79 (Giannis)
RAPM regular 2020
3.49 (Giannis)
2.49 (Matthews)
2.28 (Schroder)
RAPM regular 2021
2.74 (Gobert)
2.25 (Conley)
2.1 (PJ Dozier)
RAPM regular 2022
2.41 (George Hill)
2.23 (Kenrich Williams)

The overall DRAPM declines as a whole I think after a certain point, Giannis’s is almost certainly the highest here in terms of seperation from second as a percentage and in terms of standard deviations from 0.

This site has luck adjustments too

LARAPM 2010
2.99 (Bogut)
2.87
LARAPM 2011
5.39 (Garnett)
4.65 (Dwight)
3.99 (Caron Butler)
3.89 (Asik)
LARAPM 2012
3.01 (Taj Gibson)
2.87
LARAPM 2013
3.93 (Garnett)
3.14 (Sanders)
2.61
2.59
LARAPM 2014
4.11 (Splitter)
4.09 (Kemba!?)
3.95 (Cp3)
LARAPM 2015
2.47 (Tony Allen)
2.21 (Bogut)
LARAPM 2016
2.33 (Jokic!?)
2.19 (Kawhi)
2.1 Tim Duncan)
LARAPM 2017
1.82 (Gilchrist)
1.81 (Covington)
1.76 (Dray)
LARAPM 2018
2.04 (Gobert)
1.8 (Dejountay)
LARAPM 2019
2.18 (Giannis)
1.71 (Bledsoe)
1.71 (Lopez)
1.69 (Turner)
1.61 (Gobert)
LARAPM 2020
3.19 (Giannis)
2.07 (Matthews)
2.04 (Middleton)
1.93 (Lopez)
1.8 (Marc)
LARAPM 2021
2.11 (BaldEagleOfTruthCaruso)
1.87 (Gobert)
1.66 (Conley)
LARAPM 2022
1.98 (Horford)
1.41 (Draymond)
1.38 (Lonzo)

Added more for giannis since I think a collinearnity issue is something talked about with RAPM stuff, so that’s something worth mentioning here with it being maybe similar to the Warriors RAPM stuff on offense being too dominant during the Curry era to properly assess impact

In any case, the only other high minutes guy in the 2020 squad with a def net rtg of more than -3 is Matthews at -6.2 (99.9 on court def rtg). Then it’s DiVincenzo at -2.7 (101.7) and lopez at -2.3 (102.1). Meanwhile the entire starting lineup outside of giannis is a near neutral or has a positive (bad) def net rtg, George hill has a -6.4 net rtg with an on court rtg of 101.6, but played less than a quarter of the minutes (and it was a trade). Others that ranked well basically played less than 509 minutes, and the starters were all essentially neutrals.

LEBRON data ranks 2020 Giannis as 6th and 2019 Giannis as 30th over the past 15 years, caveat that I don’t think it’s adjusted for standard deviations per season (I think it’s the raw values) and more importantly it tends to overrate bigs, and Giannis doesn’t block as many shots as some others do.

Beyond that, the bucks defense despite Giannis playing limited minutes was genuinely ATG, both first place defence a, 2020 in particular in the games Giannis played was a -8.1 rel DRTG defense, which I think might be the best non Celtics mark ever (slightly worse than 08) although I might be mistake I think it outdoes any of the Spurs marks

(Caveat that a -8 defense wi a 110 avg off rtg isn’t a higher percentage drop relative to the league than a -7 vs a 70 average or something which makes more sense to use honestly, at the same time the current era is one where players rest guys and Bud REALLY rests giannis a lot to be safe so maybe it evens out in terms of pure level of play)

Now if Giannis had a problem defending in the playoffs I get it, but their playoff defense in 2019, 2021, and 2022 was the best in the nba

2019 -7.1 playoff league avg def rtg
2020 -2.8 playoff league avg def rtg
2021 -6.7 playoff league avg def rtg
2022 -7.4 playoff league avg def rtg

They had a problem with dropping too much esp in 2020 iirc (I think they adjusted after giannis got hurt lol) I don’t really blame giannis for coaching incompetence tho, they actually varied their pick and roll coverage more


More importantly to me though, this does make it seem like they were coasting in the RS, I mean at the end of the day 2021 and 2022 bucks were far from a decent defense despite their RS numbers

(From here onward I’m using NBA.com data, just because it didn’t have league averages before but that’s not that important here)

As for his RS defense vs playoff defense

2021 RS
Giannis def net rtg -3.4 (107.4 on court)

2021 playoffs
Giannis def net rtg -5.6 (103.7 on court)

(Second best high minutes guy is Lopez, -0.4 and 105.4, I don’t know if I’m tripping but EVERY rotation player outside of that is a negative in defense in raw impact lol).

Checking it more so, it looks like some of it comes from the heat series, which they just blew them tf out and munched on them in garbage time, altho even taking that out, giannis is now has a def net rtg of -7.5 and an on court def rtg of 105.6, and PJ is next best at -3.2 with an on court of 105.8. Unless I’m tripping everyone other rotation guy is still a negative in defense though

Looking at the teams results they played against a first ranked offense in the nets (before someone says they Kyrie got hurt or harden missed the first part of the series, they were the first ranked offense witth harden and Durant missing more than half the season and Kyrie missing a third), the 18th offense in the heat, the 9th ranked offense in the hawks and the 7th ranked offense in the Suns).

2021

Vs the heat (110.6)
95.4 def rtg
Giannis 95.4 def rtg on-court (+5.4)

Vs the nets (117.3)
107.3 def rtg
Giannis 103.2 def rtg on-court (-11.7)

Vs hawks (114.3)
109.1 def rtg
(107.7 in the games giannis played)
(111.7 in the games giannis missed)
Giannis 106.2 def rtg on-court (-3.6)

Vs Suns (116.3)
112.1 def rtg
Giannis 108.0 def rtg on court (-12.4)

2022
Vs bulls (112.7)
94.4 def rtg
Giannis 91.3 def rtg on court (-4.3)

Vs Celtics (113.6)
108.8 def rtg
Giannis 104.2 def rtg on court (-15.1)

Some of this is mildly misleading, the Suns finished the season strong on offense as did the heat, and the hawks. The nets actually stayed like that consistently, the Celtics had the best offense over the second half of the year while the bulls were pretty poor as the season ended, but let’s just take it at face value

But viewing it as where teams were in terms of their level of play going into the playoffs would make the defense look even more favorable

Nevertheless, the bucks defense over these 6 series was very consistently elite, and as a whole on average probably on the ATG scale, so with giannis impact data looking like it’s the one that looks different I do think it’s fair to say the change was at least partially from him. His tracking data doesn’t change all too much but it’s still similar to his 2019 data if not better I think, although I’d have to check again but it definately wasn’t substantially worse

It’s hard to get definitive proof that he’s a better playoff defender than RS defender. I DONT think he’s quite as good as he was in the 2020 RS at least on a per minute basis (other than the finals lol) but at the same time by all metrics relative to era on a per minute basis that might’ve been one of the most dominant defensive regular seasons since play by play data has been announced, in fact impact stuff it does probably come out to first relative to his peers from the 1999-2021 span, so that’s not saying much

Otoh, I do think that the bucks being a decent RS defense while pretty obviously being a super elite defense in the playoffs, with the main person whose impact data gets better both years is giannis, is pretty significant.

Even this year, only the Warriors did better against the Celtics, and that’s with Tatum forgetting how to play basketball (and this is pretty much entirely due to their defense in the non-giannis minutes, they were a 104.2 offense with giannis in the court which should coincide with their starters, a 119.3 offense with him off the court. For comparison the offense with dray or Wiggins was 103.2 and 103.4).

As a whole, the bucks with giannis on the floor have been a hyper elite defense in 6 series in a row now, and taking the series as a whole (also keep in mind the Celtics and Suns had great second halves of the year and were the best offenses in the league those years from the midway point onwards after a sluggish start, although the Celtics playoff offense was a bit weird to me with Tatum being so inconsistent)

I don’t think it’s outlandish to say Giannis is as good as his 2020 RS in the playoffs, although maybe I wouldn’t go that far, tracking data isn’t full proof at all but it was utterly absurd in 2020 (and as a small note it was suuuper similar to 2016 playoff bron! :D )

In terms of like, his defensive attributes I don’t understand why this would be an outlandish take either

Giannis is a high IQ defender, rarely makes mistakes, has an absurd motor, and is a guy that can legitimately guard 1-5, 6ft11 with a freakishly long wingspan (that 7ft3 was measured when he was 6ft8.5, hes now at the point that he can casually grab the rim tiptoing now, 7ft6 is probably a safe bet)

Can cover stupid ground, like his max vert might not be absurd but I’ve never seen someone jump as far as he does, which might be more important for his defensive role in 2020 and 2021 where he was breaking up actions as a helpside defender (he’s probably the only guy ever other than wilt that dunks from the ft line because it’s comfortable that way lmao)

We tend to either underestimate the defensive IQ of current defenders or overestimate past defenders, sure Garnett and Duncan have a higher defensive Iq than giannis and guys like AD or Embiid but it’s not as if it’s comparing Magnus Carlson to like a kid playing chess for the first time lol, and draymonds smarter than all of them anyway.

Like generally the elite defenders are elite mentally as well, guys like giannis despite being freakishly athletic aren’t an exception to that, even if he’s not as cerebral as let’s say a draymond green is


https://www.reddit.com/r/MkeBucks/comments/9pq5vv/giannis_casually_grabbing_the_rim_with_his_feet/)

Overall, I think he’s an elite DPOY type defender. He’s shown the ability as a very deserved DPOY and especially 2020 he’s shown ATG defensive ability. His physical profile and motor and overall defensive IQ are in line with that as are his results, and I believe his playoff defense shows that

Like the Gap between him and garnett to me for example is probably mainly that Garnett is better at pick and roll coverages

I can fully understand not being as high on him defensively as I am but him being top 2 in player of the year voting only once and falling out of the top 3 is wild to me. At the very least he’s an ATG defender

I feel offensively there’s not really much to say, his impact data looks a bit worse because of the Miami series (the offense wasn’t bad or anything, but they killed them in garbage time and it’s hard to take much negative in a series that was such an utter sweep like that)

Beyond that if we’re evaluating him as a player by virtue of being a Greek Freak Giannis is kind of an amazing off ball big, from the virtue of setting good screens being stupidly athletic and being an incredible finisher, so he’s highly portable in an off ball role, although jrue isn’t the type that maximizes him in that role so it’s hard even though jrue is great.

Beyond that, imagining Giannis’s defensive impact in a role where he doesn’t have to do as much offensively would be insane considering his defensive impact already is where it’s at when he puts his mind to it, and he’s a good passer off the short roll too

Giannis honestly works REALLY well as a pick and roll partner, and it would probably give him the energy to be a historic level defender as well

On a side note: holding 2021 giannis’s injury against him when he then had potentially one of the absolute greatest finals performances ever on one leg on an injury that took him out of the first few days of training camp 3 months later is MAD corny lmao, that made it 10x more legendary and the fact that they might not win if someone hit the reset button doesn’t matter much to me since 1. He came back stupidly early and killed the city of Phoenix 2. In real life they actually won which really is all that matters vs whatever hypothetical scenario we draw up where him getting hurt leads to them losing.

I’m not 100% on him here, but I do think that his defense seems to be viewed as “oh it’s quite good” sometimes, he’s a legitimate DPOY type player that has shown the ability at least to match absolutely top of the line ATG defensive peaks, and may do so in the playoffs.

Giannis had one of the absolute best two way playoff performances ever

Admittedly, it’s a bit lame that I don’t have like much video watching for this cuz I just don’t have any time, so that’s a bit annoying, either way though giannis for me on defense is a guy that doesn’t play a role that impacts every shot or anything but his motor makes him impact the shots he can to the point that the defense actively does things so he can’t help because he’s such an absurd deterrent


04 KG

- extremely portable, absurd impact data, would be utterly dominant today, but his playoff scoring is an issue for me



Giannis here would be nasty lol
One_and_Done
General Manager
Posts: 9,361
And1: 5,639
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #9 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 7/27/28 

Post#23 » by One_and_Done » Tue Jul 25, 2023 10:21 pm

Mikan getting in soon would be the most depressing vote of the project by far. We'd be voting in a guy who would likely not make the league today.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,650
And1: 8,294
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #9 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 7/27/28 

Post#24 » by trex_8063 » Tue Jul 25, 2023 10:36 pm

One_and_Done wrote:Mikan getting in soon would be the most depressing vote of the project by far. We'd be voting in a guy who would likely not make the league today.


Spoiler:
Image


I've barely had the time to read any of the posts/discussion in this project so far, and yet even I've come across this same [exact] sentiment from you like three times already.
So I'd wager it's unlikely anyone one else in the project has failed to catch it, too. Perhaps you could give it a rest unless you come up with a new angle (something that's not conjecture, preferably).
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
lessthanjake
Analyst
Posts: 3,348
And1: 3,008
Joined: Apr 13, 2013

Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #9 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 7/27/28 

Post#25 » by lessthanjake » Tue Jul 25, 2023 10:50 pm

homecourtloss wrote:
ShaqAttac wrote:I'm confused. why are you ignoring the average for kg and then using averages for steph? if i was readin right jokic peaked higher by the impact stuff. seems like it depends on what stats you use. also why do u keep using github. doesnt it have no source?

im not gonna say much more since im on thin ice but i dont think why you should be saying bottom line for things that people put good args against. It also seems like you’re putting in a bunch of stuff with slashlines in it so idk how much it got to do with steph being the impact king or whatever.
:D


We currently have two RS+PS RAPM sources: JE’s sets and Cheema’s; if someone knows of other RAPM sources that are both regular season and post season, please link them as they would be interesting to look at.

Englemann’s 1997-2022 PI RS+PS RAPM with confidence levels

Englemann’s 1997-2019 PI RS+PS RAPM single seasons

1. LeBron, +9.1, lower bound +7.9, upper bound +10.3 [absurd lower bound here that’s higher than most upper bounds]
2. KG, +8.4, lower bound +7.0, upper bound +9.9 [also absurd lower bound that speaks to the inelasticity of his impact]
7. Jordan, +6.9, lower bound +4.9, upper bound +9.4 [strong signals from small sample]
10. Draymond, +6.6, lower bound +4.5, upper bound 8.6
11. Curry, +6.4, lower bound +4.7, upper bound 8.2

If you took out Currys rookie year, this would look a little bit better for him, but it wouldn’t make up the entire gap. Every year after his rookie season, curry shows up as a highly Impactful player.:

Rookie year 2009-2010: -.37, 2,896 minutes
2010-2011: +2.07, 2,489 minutes
2011-2012: +3.59, 732 minutes
2012-2013: +4.41, 3,390 minutes


I don’t think we have any precise idea what JE’s 25-year RAPM would spit out for just Curry’s prime or how much his first few years hurt him. What we do know is that JE’s single-season RAPM data has prime Curry placing as well or better in the league on average than he has prime Garnett placing. Looking at anything else than that is just either (1) comparing career-wide data where Steph started much slower in terms of impact, so it doesn’t necessarily tell us anything about prime vs. prime; or (2) comparing exact values for different time intervals, which you yourself have said is meaningless.

I certainly agree that Garnett has a longevity advantage at this point over Curry. He had several years surrounding his prime where he was still a very impactful player, in a way that Curry doesn’t have (at least so far). But prime vs. prime, Curry’s impact numbers look superior (with the caveat that it’s very difficult to truly compare impact metrics across different time intervals). Again, if one wants to basically say “Okay, but it’s close and KG had better longevity, so he goes ahead of Curry” then that’s fine, but I’d counter that Steph’s vastly greater team achievement in the league needs to count for something (quite a lot actually) and IMO it *at least* counteracts the longevity gap.

Then we have Cheema’s 1997-2022 PI RS+PS RAPM Five Year Intervals

Here we see that KG’s best five year intervals are stronger than Curry’s best 5 year intervals.

1. LeBron, 2012-2016, +6.46
2. LeBron, 2013-2017, +6.27
3. KG, 2003-2007, +6.17
4. LeBron, 2006-2010, +6.10
5. KG, 2000-2004, +6.01
6. Duncan, 2001-2005, +6.00
7. Duncan, 1993-2004, +6.00
8. KG, 2002-2006, +5.98
9. Curry, 2014-2018, +5.81
10. KG, 2001-2005, +5.76
11. Lebron, 2016-2020, +5.76
12. Wade, 2006-10, +5.73 2
13. LeBron, 2005-09, +5.73
14. LeBron, 2008-12, +5.71
15. Duncan, 2000-04, +5.68
16. KG, 2004-08, +5.64
17. Chris Paul, 2012-16, +5.64
18. Chris Paul, 2013-17, +5.61
19. Curry, 2013-17, +5.60
20. Duncan, 2003-07, +5.58

In the two sources that we have for both postseason and regular season, Kevin Garnett has higher single season, higher career by a significant margin, and has the highest five year intervals. But they are close. Two outsized impact makers, delivering the impact in different ways.


But of course here you are just using a method you yourself have very strongly condemned as completely invalid. As you’ve said, we cannot directly compare specific impact numbers accrued in different time intervals. Garnett’s and Curry’s primes did not overlap, so we do not have any 5-year Cheema data where we can compare their primes within the same 5-year time interval. This makes the above exercise meaningless by your own prior arguments.

And to the extent you’ve pulled back on that and now no longer think it is meaningless, then we’d have to also contend with things like Steph’s RPM, AuPM/g, and GitHub RAPM values being higher than Garnett’s (see my prior post on that), such that the specific impact values prime Curry has would tend to be better overall than prime Garnett’s. And while you might say those measures don’t include playoff data, we actually do have playoff RAPM from the GitHub set through 2018-2019, and Steph had put in five top-10-in-the-league playoff RAPMs by then, while Garnett only even had four top-50-in-the-league playoff RAPMs in his entire career! If you took Steph’s average placement in those 6 prime playoffs in that data set, his average league placement (13.33) is substantially better than Garnett’s average league placement if you cherry picked out the six highest-placing playoffs of his career (21.0). And that’s not missing any great playoffs from Garnett—as his 7th best placing playoffs in the set was 84th in the league—while the data set is missing an entire title run from Curry and I’m not even counting an out-of-prime year where he was 12th in the league in playoff RAPM (i.e. the 2012-2013 playoffs). If we decided we wanted to compare the actual playoff RAPM values themselves, we’d also find that Steph’s average playoff RAPM from 2013-2014 to 2018-2019 in that set is higher than Garnett’s average even if we cherry-picked Garnett’s highest-rated six playoffs (2.132 vs. 1.880). Meanwhile, beyond the GitHub stuff, other playoff-specific impact data is actually quite high on Steph too (for instance, I’ve posted his average league placement in playoff AuPM/g—which is actually even higher than the GitHub placement: an average league placement of 3.17 over the same time period. And his average playoff RAPTOR placement is higher than GitHub too), so we don’t have any reason to believe the GitHub data is overly high on playoff Steph’s impact. Thus, since there’s little reason to believe Garnett has the advantage in playoff impact (and in fact there’s good reason to believe the opposite), the fact that RPM and AuPM/g don’t have playoff data in them (for AuPM/g, it has playoff data for prime Steph but not far enough back for Garnett) is unlikely to be biasing things in Curry’s favor in those measures.

In other words, the bottom line is that either (1) the Cheema set’s specific values for Garnett and Curry cannot be validly compared (which would be consistent with your prior arguments), in which case all we can look at to compare is their league placements, in which prime Curry is superior to prime Garnett across the measures we have; or (2) comparing specific values across different time intervals *is* actually meaningful but then there’s a boatload of other meaningful data that goes in Curry’s favor, such that prime Curry still looks better than prime Garnett across the totality of the data. The only way you can get around this is to talk yourself into only trusting certain metrics that look better for Garnett and finding reasons to discount anything else.
OhayoKD wrote:Lebron contributes more to all the phases of play than Messi does. And he is of course a defensive anchor unlike messi.
One_and_Done
General Manager
Posts: 9,361
And1: 5,639
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #9 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 7/27/28 

Post#26 » by One_and_Done » Tue Jul 25, 2023 11:19 pm

How would people feel about nominating Bob Kurland soon.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,410
And1: 9,937
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #9 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 7/27/28 

Post#27 » by penbeast0 » Tue Jul 25, 2023 11:24 pm

I believe the OP was NBA/ABA/NBL, Kurland didn't turn pro. Same goes for Oscar Schmidt, etc.

I am curious when Giannis and Jokic start getting mentions despite the relative brevity of their careers.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
User avatar
eminence
RealGM
Posts: 17,053
And1: 11,866
Joined: Mar 07, 2015

Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #9 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 7/27/28 

Post#28 » by eminence » Tue Jul 25, 2023 11:25 pm

One_and_Done wrote:How would people feel about nominating Bob Kurland soon.


If we were doing all pro basketball I'd be considering Kurland probably somewhere in the 30s. Great, but not as great as Mikan and didn't play as much.

But he's not eligible for the project in the same vein as Goose Tatum and Oscar Schmidt. Didn't play in the NBA or its merged leagues.
I bought a boat.
User avatar
homecourtloss
RealGM
Posts: 11,476
And1: 18,873
Joined: Dec 29, 2012

Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #9 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 7/27/28 

Post#29 » by homecourtloss » Tue Jul 25, 2023 11:26 pm

lessthanjake wrote:
But of course here you are just using a method you yourself have very strongly condemned as completely invalid.

No, what I said you couldn’t do is average RPM/RAPM numbers like you tried to do. Cheema isn’t averaging numbers—this is the RAPM numbers for these 5 year intervals taking into account ALL possessions played in the RS/PS during these intervals. It’s a much different thing than taking the average that you incorrectly tried to do (easy mistake to make when first learning about these numbers). It might be that the numbers could look similar, but the process is completely different, i.e., one is valid and the other one meaningless.

homecourtloss wrote:
lessthanjake wrote:Following on with some more information, this time from the GitHub RAPM data (which ends at 2018-2019, which is why I don’t include years beyond that in the timeframes):

Average Regular Season GitHub RAPM in Prime Years

- Stephen Curry (2013-2014 to 2018-2019): 5.482
- Michael Jordan (1996-1997 to 1997-1998): 4.335
- Kevin Garnett (1999-2000 to 2007-2008): 4.096
- LeBron James (2008-2009 to 2018-2019): 3.881
- Tim Duncan (1998-1999 to 2006-2007): 3.530
- Shaquille O’Neal (1997-1998 to 2004-2005): 2.365

There’s also playoff RAPM data. The playoff RAPM appears to be on a different scale for whatever reason, so the numbers are all lower:

Average Playoff GitHub RAPM in Prime Years

- Michael Jordan (1996-1997 to 1997-1998): 2.527
- Stephen Curry (2013-2014 to 2018-2019): 2.132
- LeBron James (2008-2009 to 2017-2018): 1.713
- Tim Duncan (1998-1999 to 2006-2007): 0.925
- Shaquille O’Neal (1997-1998 to 2004-2005): 0.621
- Kevin Garnett (1999-2000 to 2007-2008): 0.612

This version of RAPM is a bit wonky and I know some don’t like it, but it’s one of the RAPM measures we have and it seems worth posting how the above players come out in their primes. As with the AuPM/g and RPM measures I posted earlier, Steph Curry comes off looking extremely good.

(Note: Again, I didn’t include Hakeem here, since he wasn’t really in his prime by the 1996-1997 season, which is when the data starts. But in case there’s any curiosity, Hakeem had a regular season average of 2.395 in 1996-1997 to 1997-1998, and an average playoff RAPM of 0.170 in that timeframe).


Even though we might get some similar numbers if we calculated the real RAPM over these prime spans, I wanted to point out that you can’t average out or RAPM numbers because the different amount of possessions, the different priors used in each season, and so on. I’m assuming you didn’t calculate out the true RAPM over these years as that is a massive undertaking and requires a lot of data not readily available unless one is running some sort of script and scrubbing that data.

Regardless, Steph Curry has been an incredible impact engine, and that type of impact is very difficult to ignore, and I am looking at him near the top after the top 12 or so players. I also see his game aging well over the next few years, at which point, it might be impossible to keep them out of the top 10. But I have a question here – whether you look at the GitHub RAPM or shotcharts RAPM (the two you seem to use), Draymond Green comes out looking extraordinarily well. How do you reconcile that with Curry’s impact? I know there has been previous discussion about collinearity and other factors, but Draymond Green‘s primary impact has been on defense, different than Curry’s primary impact on offense. The only other duo that comes close to this type of overall impact over such a long stretch of time it’s probably Kareem and Magic Johnson but we really don’t have data for them. We can look at 2020 and say that Draymond falls off but in many ways that seems like a throwaway season

If we look at Engelmann’s 1997–2022 PI RAPM (RS+PS), Draymond is 12th, most of his monstrous impact coming on defense (basically only Kevin Garnett, Dikembe, Mutombo, and Ben Wallace above him with a few others close by), but being a sizable positive on offense as well. do have some issues with how Draymond would fare without curry, his positive value towards winning margins is generally coming on defense.

If we look at Engelmann’s Single Season 1997–2019 PI RAPM (RS+PS), you have Draymond’s 2016 at number 8, 2015 at 78, 2017 at 195.

If we look at Cheema’s 1997-2022 RAPM 5 year peaks (RS+PS), you have Draymond with seven 5-year stretches in the top 320, one of them at 60, and four from 107 to 118 out of 16,000+, ahead of several Kobe, Steve Nash, Nikola Jokić, Dirk, Kawhi, Leonard, Chris, Paul, Tim Duncan, etc., stretches.

If we want to use the wonky GitLab data, we have Draymond at 22nd/30th in the RS/PS in 2014, 5th/1st in 2015, 1st/1st in 2016, 6th/2nd in 2017, 40th/2nd in 2018, 32nd/6th in 2019.

If we want to use NBA ShotCharts RAPM, we have Dray at 48th in 2014, 3rd in 2015, 1st in 2016, 4th in 2017, 49th in 2018, 23rd in 2019.

Will end this message from LukaTheGOAT that involves some of his AuPM numbers and overall PS rise:

LukaTheGOAT wrote:Too little credit on defense-Draymond Green

From 2015-2020, Draymond Green is 2nd in the NBA in Playoffs PIPM
https://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/j9xodj/from_20152020_playoffs_the_highest_rated_players/

This is significant because PIPM is too box-score dependent, yet someone like Draymond comes out looking so good in the metric, despite so much of what he does not showing up in the box-score.

It is not just PIPM of box-hybrid models that that are high on Draymond. From 2014-2019, Draymond lead the NBA in PS RAPTOR WAR.

From 15-17, Draymond is 2nd in PS AuPM/G.

And when you consider that Golden State's defense improves from the RS to PS more than almost any dynasty ever, I think it makes sense to look towards Draymond for a lot of Golden State's success.



As a matter of fact, RAPTOR projections considered Draymond to be the NBA player who improved most from the RS to PS in the NBA during that time frame at a whopping 1.4 points per 100 possessions. The next most improved player was Lebron who was at 0.9 pts per 100 possessions. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-our-raptor-metric-works/

According to AuPM/G, which has data going back to 96-97, no player has improved more in from the RS to PS in their career than Draymond Green. As mentioned in the article, "among players with at least five qualifying runs, Green has the largest improvement in AuPM history. And this isn’t from slow-rolling the regular season either. In the seven seasons he’s played in the postseason, Green’s posted a hefty +3.5 AuPM per game in the regular season and then a whopping +4.7 in the playoffs. That’s like going from the sixth-best player in the league to the second." https://backpicks.com/page/6/

Kevin Pelton also wrote an article about how Draymond was statistically the 2nd biggest playoff riser during some specific time period, but I cannot find it :(

If you want numbers that look at the pure plus-minus side of things (and does not include anything pertaining to the box-score), I should note, Draymond looks arguably better...

Draymond is #1 in 14-18 PS RAPM, and #1 in 15-19 PS RAPM.

If we know GSW's offense declines in the PS, but their defense makes one of the biggest improvements ever, and we know that Draymond has been the captain of those GSW offenses, and all the data we have suggests he is among the biggest improvers in performance come PS time, I will put my money on him


https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2307873&p=107654568&hilit=Average#p107653674
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.

lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…
lessthanjake
Analyst
Posts: 3,348
And1: 3,008
Joined: Apr 13, 2013

Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #9 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 7/27/28 

Post#30 » by lessthanjake » Tue Jul 25, 2023 11:26 pm

I’m curious if anyone can articulate to me an argument in favor of nominating someone else over Moses Malone. Only one other guy on the table was the best player in the league over significant timespan (Mikan), and Moses Malone had way better longevity than Mikan and faced much stiffer competition for being best in the world (i.e. prime Kareem). And no one else being considered on the table at this point actually won more than Moses. He led one of the greatest teams of all time and also took a team to the finals (past the 1980s Lakers) that would proceed to win 14 games on -11.12 SRS when he left a couple years later.
OhayoKD wrote:Lebron contributes more to all the phases of play than Messi does. And he is of course a defensive anchor unlike messi.
One_and_Done
General Manager
Posts: 9,361
And1: 5,639
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #9 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 7/27/28 

Post#31 » by One_and_Done » Tue Jul 25, 2023 11:29 pm

penbeast0 wrote:I believe the OP was NBA/ABA/NBL, Kurland didn't turn pro. Same goes for Oscar Schmidt, etc.

For those wondering 'who tf is Bob Kurland?', he was considered Mikan's equal as a big man in college. What happened to him? He never joined the league and became a salesman because in Mikan's day the league was so amatuerish that you could make more money as a salesman than a basketball star (and by all accounts his decision to not go pro was probably right, and he did make more money as a salesman).
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
lessthanjake
Analyst
Posts: 3,348
And1: 3,008
Joined: Apr 13, 2013

Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #9 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 7/27/28 

Post#32 » by lessthanjake » Tue Jul 25, 2023 11:36 pm

homecourtloss wrote:
lessthanjake wrote:
But of course here you are just using a method you yourself have very strongly condemned as completely invalid.


No, what I said you couldn’t do is average RPM/RAPM numbers like you tried to do. Cheema isn’t averaging numbers—this is the RAPM numbers for these 5 year intervals taking into account ALL possessions played in the RS/PS dueing these intervals. It’s a much different thing than taking the average that you try to do. It might be that the numbers could look similar, but the process is completely different, i.e., one is valid and the other one meaningless.


The reason it’s invalid clearly applies here too, though. Which is that there’s different priors and different scaling and whatnot used in different time intervals of the same impact metric. The reason you objected to “averaging” numbers across different years in the same impact metric is that values in different time intervals are calculated differently so you can’t meaningfully compare the precise values in different years. But of course the exact same thing is true about comparing values in different time intervals (i.e. here, different 5-year intervals) in something like Cheema’s 5-year data. There is zero way to logically argue that comparing values in different time intervals with one metric is invalid and doing so with another metric is valid, and honestly I’d urge you to really step back and think about this instead of instinctively coming back again with distinctions that don’t get to the actual point. You are being objectively inconsistent in your argumentation.

EDIT: To be clear, I think you think I’m making a different point than I am. I am not saying that Cheema’s actual 5-year data itself is invalid. I understand that each 5-year data set itself is not averaging values from those 5 years, but instead doing a full five-year calculation. But I’m not objecting to comparing peoples’ five-year RAPM in the same 5-year time interval. I’m objecting to comparing peoples’ five-year RAPM in different five-year time intervals (i.e. let’s say Player A’s five-year RAPM in 1997-2002 vs. Player B’s five-year RAPM in 2012-2016). That’s inherently what you’re doing when listing the highest five-year RAPM values. And that objectively has the same issues that you identified with comparing values across different years in the same impact metric. When you compare values in the same metric across different time intervals, you’re comparing things that were calculated differently. You cannot argue that that’s not valid sometimes and other times it is.
OhayoKD wrote:Lebron contributes more to all the phases of play than Messi does. And he is of course a defensive anchor unlike messi.
One_and_Done
General Manager
Posts: 9,361
And1: 5,639
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #9 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 7/27/28 

Post#33 » by One_and_Done » Tue Jul 25, 2023 11:48 pm

lessthanjake wrote:I’m curious if anyone can articulate to me an argument in favor of nominating someone else over Moses Malone. Only one other guy on the table was the best player in the league over significant timespan (Mikan), and Moses Malone had way better longevity than Mikan and faced much stiffer competition for being best in the world (i.e. prime Kareem). And no one else being considered on the table at this point actually won more than Moses. He led one of the greatest teams of all time and also took a team to the finals (past the 1980s Lakers) that would proceed to win 14 games on -11.12 SRS when he left a couple years later.

1) He wouldn't win an MVP today
2) Others who were comparably good like K.Malone have more longevity
3) Others with less longevity like Giannis, KD, Dirk and D.Rob were better players
4) His game is very era specific and factors like stats and narrative probably led to him being ar least a little overrated
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
User avatar
eminence
RealGM
Posts: 17,053
And1: 11,866
Joined: Mar 07, 2015

Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #9 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 7/27/28 

Post#34 » by eminence » Wed Jul 26, 2023 12:03 am

lessthanjake wrote:I’m curious if anyone can articulate to me an argument in favor of nominating someone else over Moses Malone. Only one other guy on the table was the best player in the league over significant timespan (Mikan), and Moses Malone had way better longevity than Mikan and faced much stiffer competition for being best in the world (i.e. prime Kareem). And no one else being considered on the table at this point actually won more than Moses. He led one of the greatest teams of all time and also took a team to the finals (past the 1980s Lakers) that would proceed to win 14 games on -11.12 SRS when he left a couple years later.


I appreciate the Moses push here, he's not someone I traditionally consider quite this high and it's nice to re-evaluate.

First thoughts:
I think I agree that he has the best (non-Mikan) claim to the crown among players who aren't already nominated (current prime guys like Giannis/Jokic probably the biggest challengers). I do feel it has a bit of the Mikan problem of it being a somewhat weak window, with the competition namely being late-prime Kareem and DrJ. Walton abdicating by having bad feet. Overall I tend to prefer measuring distance from the pack to measuring distance from the top, and I don't see Moses having an edge there over a guy like Oscar/Dirk even though he was more arguably on top. But there's some value in both approaches, so I think re-appreciating that does push me up on Moses some.

His overall longevity is good, but I need to re-look at some of those later years. I'm generally underwhelmed by his +/- numbers in his time with the Sixers, though they aren't terrible either. Notable highs and lows.

I might argue his running mate DrJ did more winning than he did (not necessarily relative to expectations, but just more generally). I don't think he's well clear of West/Dirk off the top of my head. More guys can of course be added depending on how one feels about 2nd fiddles (Hondo/Pippen/Manu/Dray/KD/etc). Mel Daniels if one is feeling frisky.

Good things to think on, though I seriously doubt I push him over Mikan.
I bought a boat.
lessthanjake
Analyst
Posts: 3,348
And1: 3,008
Joined: Apr 13, 2013

Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #9 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 7/27/28 

Post#35 » by lessthanjake » Wed Jul 26, 2023 12:12 am

One_and_Done wrote:
lessthanjake wrote:I’m curious if anyone can articulate to me an argument in favor of nominating someone else over Moses Malone. Only one other guy on the table was the best player in the league over significant timespan (Mikan), and Moses Malone had way better longevity than Mikan and faced much stiffer competition for being best in the world (i.e. prime Kareem). And no one else being considered on the table at this point actually won more than Moses. He led one of the greatest teams of all time and also took a team to the finals (past the 1980s Lakers) that would proceed to win 14 games on -11.12 SRS when he left a couple years later.

1) He wouldn't win an MVP today
2) Others who were comparably good like K.Malone have more longevity
3) Others with less longevity like Giannis, KD, Dirk and D.Rob were better players
4) His game is very era specific and factors like stats and narrative probably led to him being ar least a little overrated


1. He won three MVPs in an era where the #2 player in this project was in his prime. So I don’t really see why he couldn’t win them today. Unless your point is basically just that past players are all bad and couldn’t win MVPs today, which is not a logic I think most people here would find convincing, for various reasons.

2. Karl Malone was never the best player in the world for any meaningful time period. And not just because Jordan was around. He wasn’t the best in the world either time Jordan retired, despite Karl being in his prime. Karl Malone also never won a title, and Moses Malone did—in dominant fashion. Karl Malone never outplayed his era’s best player (Jordan) in a playoff series, while Moses Malone outplayed his era’s best player (Kareem) both times he faced him in the playoffs.

3. How were they better players? None of those players ever were the best player in the world for any meaningful length of time. Moses Malone was the best player in the world in a five-year span (1978-1979 to 1982-1983). None of those guys were the best player in the world for more than maybe a one-year span at most.

4. Why was his game era-specific? Being dominant on the boards and getting massive amounts of offensive rebounds has been extremely effective in every single era in the history of basketball. As has having a physically dominant post game that results in getting to the line a ton.
OhayoKD wrote:Lebron contributes more to all the phases of play than Messi does. And he is of course a defensive anchor unlike messi.
One_and_Done
General Manager
Posts: 9,361
And1: 5,639
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #9 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 7/27/28 

Post#36 » by One_and_Done » Wed Jul 26, 2023 12:27 am

1. Wes Unseld and Cowens beat out Kareem for MVP too. MVPs were awarded even more poorly in the 70s than today. I don't put too much stock in that. How many of those MVPs would you say Moses actually deserved in hindsight? Moses game just doesn't translate to MVP play today either. As I alluded to, his skill set is overrated in most eras, but especially today. A big without any real offensive depth, who doesn't protect the rim, and makes his living grabbing offensive rebounds in the paint. He'd probably be torched in pick and roll too. Sounds like a tough fit.

2. Karl Malone wasn't even the best player, but I'm not sure Moses was; he was just wrongly perceived to be. He was also perceived to be in worse leagues. I'm not going to base a vote on anything as arbitrary as "won a title", and Moses won his ring by joining an existing contender anyway.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
lessthanjake
Analyst
Posts: 3,348
And1: 3,008
Joined: Apr 13, 2013

Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #9 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 7/27/28 

Post#37 » by lessthanjake » Wed Jul 26, 2023 12:32 am

eminence wrote:
lessthanjake wrote:I’m curious if anyone can articulate to me an argument in favor of nominating someone else over Moses Malone. Only one other guy on the table was the best player in the league over significant timespan (Mikan), and Moses Malone had way better longevity than Mikan and faced much stiffer competition for being best in the world (i.e. prime Kareem). And no one else being considered on the table at this point actually won more than Moses. He led one of the greatest teams of all time and also took a team to the finals (past the 1980s Lakers) that would proceed to win 14 games on -11.12 SRS when he left a couple years later.


I appreciate the Moses push here, he's not someone I traditionally consider quite this high and it's nice to re-evaluate.

First thoughts:
I think I agree that he has the best (non-Mikan) claim to the crown among players who aren't already nominated (current prime guys like Giannis/Jokic probably the biggest challengers). I do feel it has a bit of the Mikan problem of it being a somewhat weak window, with the competition namely being late-prime Kareem and DrJ. Walton abdicating by having bad feet. Overall I tend to prefer measuring distance from the pack to measuring distance from the top, and I don't see Moses having an edge there over a guy like Oscar/Dirk even though he was more arguably on top. But there's some value in both approaches, so I think re-appreciating that does push me up on Moses some.

His overall longevity is good, but I need to re-look at some of those later years. I'm generally underwhelmed by his +/- numbers in his time with the Sixers, though they aren't terrible either. Notable highs and lows.

I might argue his running mate DrJ did more winning than he did (not necessarily relative to expectations, but just more generally). I don't think he's well clear of West/Dirk off the top of my head. More guys can of course be added depending on how one feels about 2nd fiddles (Hondo/Pippen/Manu/Dray/KD/etc). Mel Daniels if one is feeling frisky.

Good things to think on, though I seriously doubt I push him over Mikan.


Are you able to point me to where plus-minus data for Moses Malone is? I know Pollack did it for the 76ers back way further than we otherwise have, but I can’t actually find it online.

What I can find on this is second-hand—for instance here: viewtopic.php?p=99258529#p99258529

That suggests Moses Malone had a +15.6 On/Off in 1982-1983. Which doing some quick basic math suggests to me that the 1982-1983 76ers—one of the best teams of all time—actually probably had a net rating of about -4 in minutes Moses was off the floor!
OhayoKD wrote:Lebron contributes more to all the phases of play than Messi does. And he is of course a defensive anchor unlike messi.
rk2023
Starter
Posts: 2,266
And1: 2,273
Joined: Jul 01, 2022
   

Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #9 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 7/27/28 

Post#38 » by rk2023 » Wed Jul 26, 2023 12:33 am

homecourtloss wrote:Alternate: Magic Johnson

An offensive savant with a natural feel for the game whose impact signals look as strong as anyone’s in the ‘80s and early ‘90s (WOWYR, Squared2020’s partial RAPM samples). @rk2023 sums up his impact signals well (and makes a good case for why his longevity or relative lack thereof is not a function of his game not holding up but rather through forces outside of his control

rk2023 wrote:- 9 seasons and PS campaigns in the 100th percentile in Thinking Basketball's Passer Rating
- Monster grades in Jacobs' historical RAPM for 1985 & 88 (Am aware this is a very small sample and only a 1 year RAPM sample)
- Pretty solid on-court track record (atl at glance) from Jacobs' career tracking of Magic's +/-. Checks out given the Lakers' impressive team data in the Magic era. https://squared2020.com/2022/07/22/some-magic-johnson-plus-minus-numbers/
- Consistently high WOWY scores, regardless of statistical method, in Moonbeam's modeling
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=107785464#p107785464
- Furthermore, Lakers PS rORTG(s) in 3 year increments from when Magic "took the reigns" in 1984 (so starting with 1984-86):
8.0, 9.1, 8.3, 9.0, 8.2, 7.2


One of my favorite things to watch is Johnson dribbling the ball up to the left side of the court turn his back, dribble from the post, make a move into the lane, naturally bump off body, contact, and work his way into a little skyhook or a little finger roll. He also had that hard dribble to his left, starting from the right side of the key, and then finishing in the lane to be honest with you, he probably should have taken more shots given how highly efficient he was in his half court offense, but then again he was a creator par excellence. How many times have you watched him at the top of the key and throw a pass onto the right side of the lane by the basket seemingly into the middle of nowhere, but somehow those seemingly nowhere passes would find his teammates coming off of the double picks set on the left side…he was brilliant.


Thanks for the citation :D Great choices and rationale across the board in this ballot as well!

Re: Magic (for anyone interested &/or considering him at this point in time).

It's pretty cool to see many on here acknowledge and lay out very well put together arguments for his statistical and impact footprint. Almost all avenues / frameworks lead to him being portrayed as a GOAT level offensive player, whether this superlative spans peak or a more consistent prime.
70sFan wrote:.


70sFan posted a tremendous compilation of Magic's offensive excellence with various macro areas highlighted.


I agree fully with your premise of Magic being a very entertaining watch due to his offensive wizardry and mastery. The video focuses on the 1989-90 campaign (and his game certainly aged well due to adding new tricks to his arsenal and being able to completely shift pace and 'control the chessboard' on-court with a different distribution of team possessions), but assuming a lot of his best tendencies could be extrapolated through his primes' high-end makes perfect sense.

What stands out to me:
- Tremendous handle and ball control for his size and frame. As a driver, such discipline with the ball in his hands (coupled with the size) made him a nightmare to guard driving from the perimeter. Not too disadvantaged from a burst / agility standpoint compared to point guards where he can eviscerate them off the dribble while being too quick for wings / forwards to contain him in this aspect.

- Proficiency operating and orchestrating from various 'higher' areas within the post. Sort of the same logic here as to what's enabling stellar scoring efficiency - where he's too athletic to stonewall and too big for certain matchups. In this regard, who could forget about the ability to move horizontally and fire up a hook shot (I'm sure having Kareem as a teammate helped with this :lol: ). Through both of these scoring components, he was able to garner very gaudy, not quite forced, free throw rates due to defenders' inabilities to stymy him.

- The ability to ramp up scoring volume and comfort scoring from the outside & more frequently in the half-court enabled his biggest value proposition. With his court vision, there were various angles Magic could and did pass to from the perimeter & post (stationary) as well as on a drive. He's sort of like Patrick Mahomes where the TOV%/ rate of completion or execution won't be the biggest data-point that stands out. It's rather the more granular, advanced proxies of playmaking/passing effectiveness which grade Magic as a one-of-one player from a career & consistency standpoint.

- Off-the-ball, he certainly isn't covering a Curry or Jokic level mileage per game for example, but for how good his teams' offenses fared with him making the decisions with the ball in his hands - I do find his off-ball movement across the perimeter and/or into the post area quite impressive. That very well could be seen as a 'cherry on top' of his ridiculously potent on-ball acumen.

Not the flashiest or quickest twitch offensive attack seen, but wow.. was it fundamentally sound and able to get the job done.
Mogspan wrote:I think they see the super rare combo of high IQ with freakish athleticism and overrate the former a bit, kind of like a hot girl who is rather articulate being thought of as “super smart.” I don’t know kind of a weird analogy, but you catch my drift.
OhayoKD
Head Coach
Posts: 6,042
And1: 3,933
Joined: Jun 22, 2022

Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #9 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 7/27/28 

Post#39 » by OhayoKD » Wed Jul 26, 2023 12:48 am

One_and_Done wrote:1. Wes Unseld and Cowens beat out Kareem for MVP too. MVPs were awarded even more poorly in the 70s than today. I don't put too much stock in that. How many of those MVPs would you say Moses actually deserved in hindsight? Moses game just doesn't translate to MVP play today either. As I alluded to, his skill set is overrated in most eras, but especially today. A big without any real offensive depth, who doesn't protect the rim, and makes his living grabbing offensive rebounds in the paint. He'd probably be torched in pick and roll too. Sounds like a tough fit.

2. Karl Malone wasn't even the best player, but I'm not sure Moses was; he was just wrongly perceived to be. He was also perceived to be in worse leagues. I'm not going to base a vote on anything as arbitrary as "won a title", and Moses won his ring by joining an existing contender anyway.

Okay, does mvp voting matter to your or not?

What extraordinary proof do you have for Moses being overrated to the extent he was actually comparable to the lesser-rated Malone?
User avatar
eminence
RealGM
Posts: 17,053
And1: 11,866
Joined: Mar 07, 2015

Re: RealGM 2023 Top 100 Project - #9 (Deadline 11:59 PM EST on 7/27/28 

Post#40 » by eminence » Wed Jul 26, 2023 12:50 am

lessthanjake wrote:Are you able to point me to where plus-minus data for Moses Malone is? I know Pollack did it for the 76ers back way further than we otherwise have, but I can’t actually find it online.

What I can find on this is second-hand—for instance here: viewtopic.php?p=99258529#p99258529

That suggests Moses Malone had a +15.6 On/Off in 1982-1983. Which doing some quick basic math suggests to me that the 1982-1983 76ers—one of the best teams of all time—actually probably had a net rating of about -4 in minutes Moses was off the floor!


Yep, that's about accurate: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ZxRM9p2dFil5w6s21VEB4HnQZJymEY8_2vej-jREuUo/edit#gid=631667261

He had spectacular numbers in '83/'85, okay in '86, and pretty poor in '84. I guess overall a bit better than I remembered.
I bought a boat.

Return to Player Comparisons