BeiBeau wrote:ozwizard8 wrote:BeiBeau wrote:
There are many really bad takes on the internet but the worst one for today is that Cam Thomas can replace Kyrie Irving’s production.
Cam Thomas is scoring a lot right now. And he had some stretches last season where he scored in bunches. But he is a career 45% and 30% shooter compared to Kyrie who puts up nearly a 40-50-90 every season. Plus Kyrie creates for others and Thomas does not.
Cam Thomas is significantly closer to THJ then he is to Kyrie Irving.
Also Kyrie doesn’t guard LaVine or Derozen. He guards Coby White.
I really wish that you could learn to read.
'Derozan switching on Luka is fine. But I dont want to watch Derozan or Banes switching on Kyrie.'
Derozan switched on Halliburton against Indiana all of the 4th quarter and Bulls scored very easy points. Same abusement would occur on Kyrie if he played.
No one said Cam Thomas has a career that is as good as Kyrie. We'll see how his career develops. Cam Thomas is getting paid $2m whereas Kyrie getting $40m per year.
As of now, Nets not missing Kyrie's absence because Cam Thomas gave them the scoring that Kyrie was supposed to provide. Kyrie is usually injured, or mentally unavailable to play. So Nets are fine without him.
We watch Kyrie against Nets. Him making an open 3 in the 4th qt is replaced with Hardy making an open 3pt shot in Bulls game. Mavs really did not needed Kyrie last night. It would be nice to have a max player like Kawhi or PG along Luka for yesterdays game rather than Kyrie giving up tons of points and Mavs become too small.
I really wish you would learn about basketball. Yeah Dallas has to protect the switch but if it were that easy to “just target Kyrie” teams would permanently do it. And they do it some to be sure as he is a weak defender but he is not the complete liability to make him out to be. Dallas is always a better team when Kyrie plays. They are never better off without him. I shouldn’t have to say that but with you, you never know what’s going on.
People like you always flip the **** out over the smallest sample sizes. It’s been 4 games. He’s Kyrie Irving. He’s a 27-5-5 and constantly flirts with 40-50-90.
Sure while they’re rebuilding the nets like Cam Thomas because he has a chance to develop into something special. With out anything locked up long term. But for right now he’s a low efficiency chucker who started the season hot. It’s not like we’ve never seen this before he had a hot streak for 40+ point games last season too, and still averaged 10ppg. I think we will see improvement there but let’s not be stupid, any team who wants to win in the playoffs would rather give the ball to Kyrie for 40m then to cam Thomas for 2m. And it’s really not close. Good scores are a dime a dozen. Great scorers are a different breed.
You with all of your BS to just be a Kyrie apologist.
- Every team Kyrie went to in the last 6 years became worse.
- Mavs dropped to 11th from 4th seed.
So Kyrie is not always a positive. As a MAX contract player, having him on instead of being injured is a plus for average game. However this does not apply to all games. It should be a plus for the Denver game but we do not know.
Kyrie being a defensive liability is an issue. Indiana tried to avoid Derozan switching on Halliburton too. It just opened other opportunities. Kyrie's marginal offensive improvement over Luka does not worth it for his defensive liabilities for some games. Grizzlies, Bulls, they choked in the 4th against a good defense. Mavs team had height and size to bother them and rebound. With Kyrie we would watch Derozan, Banes cooking.