Best Option #3

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Best Option #3

Austin Reaves
19
15%
Normal Powell
5
4%
Porzinis with injury risk
11
9%
Derrick White
27
21%
Bridges
3
2%
Anunoby
1
1%
Garland
25
20%
Holmgren
28
22%
Bane
5
4%
Castle
3
2%
 
Total votes: 127

LakersSoul
Head Coach
Posts: 7,100
And1: 4,968
Joined: Jul 03, 2016

Re: Best Option #3 

Post#21 » by LakersSoul » Wed Mar 19, 2025 5:38 pm

cupcakesnake wrote:Whoever the Cavs 3rd option is. Whether it's Garland or Mobley, that's my pick.

Healthy Chet is a good pick as well.
Whoever is the 3rd option on Boston or New York.

Austin Reaves has low key been amazing this year. Bane belongs on this list.

I don't see why Stephon Castle is on this list though... he's one of my fave rookies but he's nowhere near the level of the other guys yet.


Just saw Castle play again and his quickness and strength is undeniable. Too early for #3 option but upside is so high, I wanted to include him as the third option behind Wemby and Fox.

Not Yo Ham Lakers!

The Don and The King!
Yoshun
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,924
And1: 5,559
Joined: Dec 24, 2012
       

Re: Best Option #3 

Post#22 » by Yoshun » Wed Mar 19, 2025 5:41 pm

I'd say Chet or White.

I don't consider Garland a 3rd option.
User avatar
Lalouie
RealGM
Posts: 23,331
And1: 12,448
Joined: May 12, 2017

Re: Best Option #3 

Post#23 » by Lalouie » Wed Mar 19, 2025 5:42 pm

i think kp and white split the vote

or at least it shouldn't be as lopsided as it appears right now
SK21209
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,650
And1: 6,348
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
     

Re: Best Option #3 

Post#24 » by SK21209 » Wed Mar 19, 2025 5:43 pm

toooskies wrote:Yeah, confusion between "third best player" and "third option on offense". Voting Garland as a vote for whichever one the OP intended.


Yeah, if it's "third option on offense" meaning which 3rd best guy is best able to create offense I actually do think its Reaves. But if its just "who's the best 3rd best player on a team", I'm still taking most of the guys on that list over Reaves tbh. They're going to revoke my Laker fan card.
JustBuzzin
RealGM
Posts: 16,108
And1: 13,671
Joined: Jun 10, 2023
 

Re: Best Option #3 

Post#25 » by JustBuzzin » Wed Mar 19, 2025 5:46 pm

cupcakesnake wrote:
JustBuzzin wrote:Give me Castle he has the highest upside of anyone on the list.


OP said best, not most upside.

Do you really think Castle has higher upside than Chet?

I don't view Chet as the 3rd option. He's the 2nd best player on OKC. Putting him as a 3rd option doesn't seem right.

But if he's a 3rd option on this list then yeah give me Chet.
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,440
And1: 8,660
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Best Option #3 

Post#26 » by AFM » Wed Mar 19, 2025 5:48 pm

KYLE KUZMA
User avatar
Flash4thewin
RealGM
Posts: 13,424
And1: 9,714
Joined: Jan 27, 2006

Re: Best Option #3 

Post#27 » by Flash4thewin » Wed Mar 19, 2025 5:57 pm

Bankai wrote:Anunoby. Hear me out. If I had 2 stud offensive players as my #1 and 2, I need a low use defensive anchor. OG is perfect for #3.


Wouldn't Bam be better in that role?
nomansland
Head Coach
Posts: 6,964
And1: 5,362
Joined: Mar 02, 2013
   

Re: Best Option #3 

Post#28 » by nomansland » Wed Mar 19, 2025 6:18 pm

LakersSoul wrote:Lot of talk of best Option #3 in a team.

If you were building a team, who would you choose as your option #3?
For fairness, lets assume all players are paid the same:

Austin Reaves
Normal Powell
Porzinis with injury risk
Derrick White
Bridges
Anunoby
Garland
Holmgren
Bane
Castle


I vote for Abnormal Powell.
LakersSoul
Head Coach
Posts: 7,100
And1: 4,968
Joined: Jul 03, 2016

Re: Best Option #3 

Post#29 » by LakersSoul » Wed Mar 19, 2025 6:24 pm

nomansland wrote:
LakersSoul wrote:Lot of talk of best Option #3 in a team.

If you were building a team, who would you choose as your option #3?
For fairness, lets assume all players are paid the same:

Austin Reaves
Normal Powell
Porzinis with injury risk
Derrick White
Bridges
Anunoby
Garland
Holmgren
Bane
Castle


I vote for Abnormal Powell.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Love it!

GoGo Abnormal Powell! Not yo average Clipper!

Not Yo Ham Lakers!

The Don and The King!
shi-woo
Veteran
Posts: 2,568
And1: 4,106
Joined: Jun 17, 2018
     

Re: Best Option #3 

Post#30 » by shi-woo » Wed Mar 19, 2025 6:26 pm

This list isn't truthful as others are pointing out. Garland and White aren't the #3 options, and Chet and OG have just as bad of an injury history as KP, so I don't understand where the Kristaps hate is coming from...

Chet, Mobley, and Porzingus are all the best 3rd options in the league because they can be defensive anchors that protect the rim AND space the floor, score at all 3 levels, and put the ball on the floor if need be.

No injuries, and i'm taking Kristaps here given he's the only one with multiple years of #1 experience, is the best offensive option at this point, and has already proven to be an elite #3 on a championship team. This is preference towards veterans though, and being a Celtic fan.

Mobley is going to be the better player, and might prove to be the better player this playoffs, as he's the superior defender already. I just need to see if his offense can hold up against good teams over a 7 game series. It didn't last year, but this year he's taken a step, and can solidify his place. No arguments for people saying him, his passing has also improved.

After those guys I actually like Draymond Green, assuming we aren't just talking about scoring. He's just the perfect glue guy, has proven it, and his impact on winning can't be overshadowed. Warriors have consistently been a Top 10 defense, and it's solely because of Dray. His passing, screening, and ability to hit 3's makes him more valuable than other guys on this list that only play one side of the ball, and his overall versatility is an asset. I would much rather have Dray on my team than someone like Reaves is I already have 2 offensive guys.

Finally, I think we need to determine who the 3rd option is in MEM, because if it's JJJ, you would have to add him to the aformentioned group of KP and the gang. Ja, Bane, and JJJ have all been the lead guys over the year, and imo Bane and JJJ are better players than JA given he only plays one side of the ball, and isn't a good shooter. He takes the most shots though when he's there, so I think we all assume he's the #1. Bane on the other hand, is clearly the 2nd option offensively. He was the 1 when Ja was out, and even though he takes less shots than JJJ, he still runs and handles way more of the offense given his playmaking and near 6 asts a game. So JJJ, while the best player, is clearly what we would define typically as the 3rd option, and would put him over Chet, but behind KP and Mobley.

If it's Bane, I take him over Reaves, but after all the 3rd option bigs are gone.
ejftw
RealGM
Posts: 11,609
And1: 5,664
Joined: Nov 30, 2008
Contact:
         

Re: Best Option #3 

Post#31 » by ejftw » Wed Mar 19, 2025 6:27 pm

Zubac.
User avatar
oversteerdawg
Senior
Posts: 714
And1: 1,090
Joined: Sep 21, 2008
Location: That's a heated tray.

Re: Best Option #3 

Post#32 » by oversteerdawg » Wed Mar 19, 2025 6:41 pm

It's a cop out answer, but it depends. In a vacuum, it's hard to ignore the raw talent of Porzingis, Bridges and Holmgren. However, what makes a "best" 3rd option has a lot of situational variables. Replacing someone like Derrick White for Boston does not improve them. Similarly to how the Lakers need a 3rd creator to keep the offense running when LeBron/Luka rest or get blitzed.
Hon-essim wrote:LOL @John Starks, Charles Oakley, Harper and Davis = average team but Smush, Kwame and Luke = not.
nomansland
Head Coach
Posts: 6,964
And1: 5,362
Joined: Mar 02, 2013
   

Re: Best Option #3 

Post#33 » by nomansland » Wed Mar 19, 2025 6:41 pm

Yes I'm a homer but looking at this list I have to think Aaron Gordon could be in the mix.
LakersSoul
Head Coach
Posts: 7,100
And1: 4,968
Joined: Jul 03, 2016

Re: Best Option #3 

Post#34 » by LakersSoul » Wed Mar 19, 2025 6:51 pm

nomansland wrote:Yes I'm a homer but looking at this list I have to think Aaron Gordon could be in the mix.


Right on! Solid option.

Not sure how I missed him.

Not Yo Ham Lakers!

The Don and The King!
User avatar
GeorgeMarcus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,788
And1: 23,938
Joined: Jun 17, 2006
     

Re: Best Option #3 

Post#35 » by GeorgeMarcus » Wed Mar 19, 2025 7:02 pm

If we're purely talking about as an offensive option, I'd say Garland. As an overall player I'll take Holmgren.
The Legend of George Marcus

"Where I'm from, bullies get bullied." - Zach Randolph
User avatar
GeorgeMarcus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,788
And1: 23,938
Joined: Jun 17, 2006
     

Re: Best Option #3 

Post#36 » by GeorgeMarcus » Wed Mar 19, 2025 7:15 pm

Very roughly I'd say...

Overall:
Holmgren
Garland
White
Reaves
Bane
Bridges/OG
Porzingis
Powell
Castle (doesn't belong on this list just yet)

Strictly offense:
Garland
Reaves
Bane
Powell
White
Chet
Porzingis
Bridges/OG
Castle (ditto what I said above)


I'm realizing how hard it is to separate OG and Bridges on either side of the ball :dontknow:
The Legend of George Marcus

"Where I'm from, bullies get bullied." - Zach Randolph
Profound23
RealGM
Posts: 20,613
And1: 8,325
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
     

Re: Best Option #3 

Post#37 » by Profound23 » Wed Mar 19, 2025 7:17 pm

I want my #3 to play defense so I would say it's pretty close between Derrick White and Chet. Probably go Chet.

How crazy is it that Celtics have White, Porzingis, or Jrue Holiday who are all really good #3 options.
facothomas22
Analyst
Posts: 3,709
And1: 2,179
Joined: Jul 02, 2018
   

Re: Best Option #3 

Post#38 » by facothomas22 » Wed Mar 19, 2025 8:06 pm

To me it comes down to ether OG Anunoby,Chet Holmgren or Derrick White. These are guys who are both very good on both sides of the ball.Both can easily score 17-20 points per game, while also being elite defenders.

Darius Garland, Desmond Bane, Chet Holgremn are great 3rd options as well.

I like Norman Powell as a 3rd option this year. Not enough of sample size in terms of years to suggest he's better than most of the guys on this list, but he's been quite impressive. He's simply a 3 layer scorer who add a major scoring punch to any team to needs it. I think he would be a great on a team like the Magic who don't have a lot of guys who can create their shot or offense.

Far as Stephen Castle, he doesn't belong on this list. I think the upside is him being a elite 3rd option on a Championship team or maybe even a 2nd option. However we haven't seen that from him yet and it may a few years before we do.

Far as Austin Reaves, I just don't see it. He's fine role player to have that's currently on tradeable contract. That's basically it. He's simply not a starting level player, let alone a legit 3rd option on a good team.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,536
And1: 22,531
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Best Option #3 

Post#39 » by Doctor MJ » Wed Mar 19, 2025 8:15 pm

Iwasawitness wrote:Garland is not the cavaliers third option. That would be Mobley.


Yeah Bill Simmons was doing this on his pod and it's weird to me when people conflate the offensive option with the overall player.

Mobley's probably the Cavs best overall player, but he's the 3rd offensive option.

Similarly, a healthy Chet is the Thunder's 2nd best player, but the third offensive option.

Then you have White who is the 3rd option for the Celtics, but who is generally a more effective player than 2nd option Brown which why was why he was getting his Gold Medal while Brown imagined conspiracies.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,536
And1: 22,531
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Best Option #3 

Post#40 » by Doctor MJ » Wed Mar 19, 2025 8:18 pm

LakersSoul wrote:Lot of talk of best Option #3 in a team.

If you were building a team, who would you choose as your option #3?
For fairness, lets assume all players are paid the same:

Austin Reaves
Normal Powell
Porzinis with injury risk
Derrick White
Bridges
Anunoby
Garland
Holmgren
Bane
Castle


So the best offensive player here by far is Garland, who is also the best offensive player on his own team, so it makes it hard not to choose him. The question is whether his defensive weaknesses will prevent him from scaling to a champion in the playoffs. We're about to find out more.

Holmgren is the guy on the list who I see as capable of being the best overall player when healthy, but we haven't quite seen that yet.

If I take Holmgren off the table and look for an answer other than Garland, I'd side with White who is your absolutely classic 3rd banana guy, and good enough in that role to be more valuable than most guys slotted in as 2nd banana guys.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!

Return to The General Board