The Comedian wrote:SLCceltic wrote:Shak_Celts wrote:
No, it's too early for Tatum to be taking things like that out of his game. He has so much more room to grow, he should try to hone a lot of different things so he can get better at having things to do when people take away a couple of his things he's really good at. Don't want him to do those things to excess but every now and then he should be trying it, the every now and then has to be a couple of times a game if he's going to figure it out, plus a hell of a lot of practice time.
Agreed, why on earth would we want to cut out JTs bread and butter (midrange-game) ?? Makes zero sense
Lets tell Gordon to cut his midR game too while we're at it.
Difference is Hayward is awesome in the midrange. Tatum is in the 82nd percentile in taking midrange jumpers, so he takes a lot, and he shoots 38% on them, which is bad. So that's certainly not his bread and butter lol. I agree with Shak that Tatum shouldn't completely take it out of his game, but maybe just keep it to fadeaways in the post against smaller defenders.
There's certainly room for the midrange game. More often than not, it's the one area other teams are willing to give up defensively. The more players you have that are efficient in it, the more options you have in your offensive attack. You just don't want to overdo it. Like I would rather Tatum do his dribble iso pullup thing from beyond the arc than in the midrange. Or I'd rather he pass it out and not force it against the a tough defender in the midrange/post early in the clock.
If it's late clock or he gets a mismatch in the post, I don't mind it that much. Maybe not a good idea for it to be his primary weapon. Layups, threes, and trying to get to the line are still the priority.
























