The_Hater wrote:If you’re trying to win a championship, you still want KP over Randle imo. Ignoring injury risk.
Why? KP can't rebound or defend
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
The_Hater wrote:If you’re trying to win a championship, you still want KP over Randle imo. Ignoring injury risk.
jstudabaka wrote:The_Hater wrote:If you’re trying to win a championship, you still want KP over Randle imo. Ignoring injury risk.
Why? KP can't rebound or defend
AthensBucks wrote:Lowry is done.
Nurse is below average at best.
Masai is overrated.
I dont get how so many people believe in the raptors,they have zero to chance to win it all.
The_Hater wrote:jstudabaka wrote:The_Hater wrote:If you’re trying to win a championship, you still want KP over Randle imo. Ignoring injury risk.
Why? KP can't rebound or defend
Why do a few people keep claiming that KP can’t defend? Which is completely false. He’s one of the top rim protectors in the league for God’s sake which is considerably more important for a big man then guarding players 20 feet from the rim.
And you can get back to me with proof on why individual RPG is an important stat in regards to winning? Andre Drummond and Hassan Whiteside are anxiously waiting for confirmation on this as their playing time gradually slips to zero.

AthensBucks wrote:Lowry is done.
Nurse is below average at best.
Masai is overrated.
I dont get how so many people believe in the raptors,they have zero to chance to win it all.
The_Hater wrote:That’s the current season. 18 games where he hasn’t been fully healthy. But we have 5 full seasons and 243 games prior to this year which tell a much different story. Sample size matters.
https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/kristaps-porzingis-defensive-rating-year-by-year
And this is just from last season.
https://www.mavs.com/back-to-basketball-kp-is-worthy/


3toheadmelo wrote:The_Hater wrote:That’s the current season. 18 games where he hasn’t been fully healthy. But we have 5 full seasons and 243 games prior to this year which tell a much different story. Sample size matters.
https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/kristaps-porzingis-defensive-rating-year-by-year
And this is just from last season.
https://www.mavs.com/back-to-basketball-kp-is-worthy/
Last season is pretty irrelevant
AthensBucks wrote:Lowry is done.
Nurse is below average at best.
Masai is overrated.
I dont get how so many people believe in the raptors,they have zero to chance to win it all.

matt6715 wrote:Knicks fans have been down bad so long they forget how to act being a fanbase whose team is winning. It's wild
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
The_Hater wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:The_Hater wrote:That’s the current season. 18 games where he hasn’t been fully healthy. But we have 5 full seasons and 243 games prior to this year which tell a much different story. Sample size matters.
https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/kristaps-porzingis-defensive-rating-year-by-year
And this is just from last season.
https://www.mavs.com/back-to-basketball-kp-is-worthy/
Last season is pretty irrelevant
So 18 games are relevant in your world but the previous 243 games are irrelevant? Learn the meaning of sample size my friend.
Sometimes remaining biased and ignoring the facts that don’t fit your narrative is just easier for some.
Flush.

3toheadmelo wrote:The_Hater wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Last season is pretty irrelevant
So 18 games are relevant in your world but the previous 243 games are irrelevant? Learn the meaning of sample size my friend.
Sometimes remaining biased and ignoring the facts that don’t fit your narrative is just easier for some.
Flush.
Nah you’re ignoring the facts. Porzingis has been complete trash on defense this season. What he did last year or 3 years ago is completely irrelevant. Pretty odd that you’re using that as your argument. But I guess that’s your way of justifying you’re wrong once again. Carry on with your Anti Knicks agenda like you always do.
NY2k1 wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:The_Hater wrote:
So 18 games are relevant in your world but the previous 243 games are irrelevant? Learn the meaning of sample size my friend.
Sometimes remaining biased and ignoring the facts that don’t fit your narrative is just easier for some.
Flush.
Nah you’re ignoring the facts. Porzingis has been complete trash on defense this season. What he did last year or 3 years ago is completely irrelevant. Pretty odd that you’re using that as your argument. But I guess that’s your way of justifying you’re wrong once again. Carry on with your Anti Knicks agenda like you always do.
I'm a Knicks fan, but let's be fair. KP was always a good defensive player. Not sure what is going on with his defense this season (maybe injuries, not content with the Mavs, etc.), but 243 past games do still matter more as a whole than 18 games this season when it comes to his defense. Granted, it could be that his defense has fallen off a cliff permanently, but not sure you can make that determination after only 18 games.

Statlanta wrote:You take KP. He looked like the Mavs defensive anchor at times last season
The_Hater wrote:That’s the current season. 18 games where he hasn’t been fully healthy. But we have 5 full seasons and 243 games prior to this year which tell a much different story. Sample size matters.
https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/kristaps-porzingis-defensive-rating-year-by-year
And this is just from last season.
https://www.mavs.com/back-to-basketball-kp-is-worthy/
gorz wrote:Give me current randle over healthy porzingis. Better scorer rebounder playmaker tougher physically. Randle is a better version of ben simmons and we know how much rgm loves Ben simmons.

h4rrison wrote:Right now Randle but he looks to have peaked. KP still has room to improve imo. He just needs to stay healthy.